Loading…

Do Local Property Taxes Affect New Building Development? Results from a Quasi-Natural Experiment in New Zealand

We utilise a quasi-natural experiment in local property tax reform arising from a compulsory amalgamation of several local councils in 2010 in Auckland, New Zealand, to form a unitary local authority. The reform involved changes in property taxes (known as ‘Rates’ in New Zealand) including a shift i...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The journal of real estate finance and economics 2019-02, Vol.58 (2), p.310-333
Main Authors: Gemmell, Norman, Grimes, Arthur, Skidmore, Mark
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-d3d8f0e7d93406066b4482711bc02cc9de72872791772c3031dadf1c75b19d5b3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-d3d8f0e7d93406066b4482711bc02cc9de72872791772c3031dadf1c75b19d5b3
container_end_page 333
container_issue 2
container_start_page 310
container_title The journal of real estate finance and economics
container_volume 58
creator Gemmell, Norman
Grimes, Arthur
Skidmore, Mark
description We utilise a quasi-natural experiment in local property tax reform arising from a compulsory amalgamation of several local councils in 2010 in Auckland, New Zealand, to form a unitary local authority. The reform involved changes in property taxes (known as ‘Rates’ in New Zealand) including a shift in the local tax base from land-value to capital-value in some of the former councils; changes in relative levels of Rates across former councils; and changes in levels of a separate tax (Development Contributions) levied on new building. These exogenously imposed reforms enable us to test several hypotheses related to the effects on property development of these tax switches using a difference-in-difference approach, controlling for other influences. We find support for tax effects on building alterations but no evidence of effects on new building development after amalgamation. Our dataset covers only two post-amalgamation years, and we speculate that this apparent difference may arise from greater flexibility of building alterations to respond quickly compared with new developments.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11146-017-9651-y
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1982529980</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1982529980</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-d3d8f0e7d93406066b4482711bc02cc9de72872791772c3031dadf1c75b19d5b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtLAzEURoMoWKs_wF3AdfTeeWWyktrWB5T6oIK4CWmSKVOmk5rMaPvvnVoXblxlc75zwyHkHOESAfhVQMQkY4CciSxFtj0gPUx5zCBJ3w5JD3KRsjSL82NyEsISADKeQ4-4kaMTp1VFn7xbW99s6UxtbKCDorC6oVP7RW_asjJlvaAj-2krt17ZurmmLza0VRNo4d2KKvrcqlCyqWpa38nGm85V7kBa1j-Sd6sqVZtTclSoKtiz37dPXm_Hs-E9mzzePQwHE6aThDfMxCYvwHIj4gQyyLJ5kuQRR5xriLQWxvIo5xEXyHmkY4jRKFOg5ukchUnncZ9c7L1r7z5aGxq5dK2vu5MSRR6lkRA5dBTuKe1dCN4Wct39WvmtRJC7rnLfVXZd5a6r3HabaL8JHVsvrP9j_nf0DcldezE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1982529980</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Do Local Property Taxes Affect New Building Development? Results from a Quasi-Natural Experiment in New Zealand</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>EBSCOhost Econlit with Full Text</source><source>ABI/INFORM Global</source><source>Springer Nature</source><source>BSC - Ebsco (Business Source Ultimate)</source><creator>Gemmell, Norman ; Grimes, Arthur ; Skidmore, Mark</creator><creatorcontrib>Gemmell, Norman ; Grimes, Arthur ; Skidmore, Mark</creatorcontrib><description>We utilise a quasi-natural experiment in local property tax reform arising from a compulsory amalgamation of several local councils in 2010 in Auckland, New Zealand, to form a unitary local authority. The reform involved changes in property taxes (known as ‘Rates’ in New Zealand) including a shift in the local tax base from land-value to capital-value in some of the former councils; changes in relative levels of Rates across former councils; and changes in levels of a separate tax (Development Contributions) levied on new building. These exogenously imposed reforms enable us to test several hypotheses related to the effects on property development of these tax switches using a difference-in-difference approach, controlling for other influences. We find support for tax effects on building alterations but no evidence of effects on new building development after amalgamation. Our dataset covers only two post-amalgamation years, and we speculate that this apparent difference may arise from greater flexibility of building alterations to respond quickly compared with new developments.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0895-5638</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-045X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11146-017-9651-y</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Amalgamation ; Councils ; Economics ; Economics and Finance ; Financial Services ; Flexibility ; Property development ; Property taxes ; Regional/Spatial Science ; Tax reform ; Taxation</subject><ispartof>The journal of real estate finance and economics, 2019-02, Vol.58 (2), p.310-333</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2017</rights><rights>The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics is a copyright of Springer, (2017). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-d3d8f0e7d93406066b4482711bc02cc9de72872791772c3031dadf1c75b19d5b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-d3d8f0e7d93406066b4482711bc02cc9de72872791772c3031dadf1c75b19d5b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9152-8051</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1982529980/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1982529980?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,11688,12847,27924,27925,33223,36060,44363,74895</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gemmell, Norman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grimes, Arthur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skidmore, Mark</creatorcontrib><title>Do Local Property Taxes Affect New Building Development? Results from a Quasi-Natural Experiment in New Zealand</title><title>The journal of real estate finance and economics</title><addtitle>J Real Estate Finan Econ</addtitle><description>We utilise a quasi-natural experiment in local property tax reform arising from a compulsory amalgamation of several local councils in 2010 in Auckland, New Zealand, to form a unitary local authority. The reform involved changes in property taxes (known as ‘Rates’ in New Zealand) including a shift in the local tax base from land-value to capital-value in some of the former councils; changes in relative levels of Rates across former councils; and changes in levels of a separate tax (Development Contributions) levied on new building. These exogenously imposed reforms enable us to test several hypotheses related to the effects on property development of these tax switches using a difference-in-difference approach, controlling for other influences. We find support for tax effects on building alterations but no evidence of effects on new building development after amalgamation. Our dataset covers only two post-amalgamation years, and we speculate that this apparent difference may arise from greater flexibility of building alterations to respond quickly compared with new developments.</description><subject>Amalgamation</subject><subject>Councils</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Economics and Finance</subject><subject>Financial Services</subject><subject>Flexibility</subject><subject>Property development</subject><subject>Property taxes</subject><subject>Regional/Spatial Science</subject><subject>Tax reform</subject><subject>Taxation</subject><issn>0895-5638</issn><issn>1573-045X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kEtLAzEURoMoWKs_wF3AdfTeeWWyktrWB5T6oIK4CWmSKVOmk5rMaPvvnVoXblxlc75zwyHkHOESAfhVQMQkY4CciSxFtj0gPUx5zCBJ3w5JD3KRsjSL82NyEsISADKeQ4-4kaMTp1VFn7xbW99s6UxtbKCDorC6oVP7RW_asjJlvaAj-2krt17ZurmmLza0VRNo4d2KKvrcqlCyqWpa38nGm85V7kBa1j-Sd6sqVZtTclSoKtiz37dPXm_Hs-E9mzzePQwHE6aThDfMxCYvwHIj4gQyyLJ5kuQRR5xriLQWxvIo5xEXyHmkY4jRKFOg5ukchUnncZ9c7L1r7z5aGxq5dK2vu5MSRR6lkRA5dBTuKe1dCN4Wct39WvmtRJC7rnLfVXZd5a6r3HabaL8JHVsvrP9j_nf0DcldezE</recordid><startdate>20190201</startdate><enddate>20190201</enddate><creator>Gemmell, Norman</creator><creator>Grimes, Arthur</creator><creator>Skidmore, Mark</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>885</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ANIOZ</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRAZJ</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M1F</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9152-8051</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190201</creationdate><title>Do Local Property Taxes Affect New Building Development? Results from a Quasi-Natural Experiment in New Zealand</title><author>Gemmell, Norman ; Grimes, Arthur ; Skidmore, Mark</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-d3d8f0e7d93406066b4482711bc02cc9de72872791772c3031dadf1c75b19d5b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Amalgamation</topic><topic>Councils</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Economics and Finance</topic><topic>Financial Services</topic><topic>Flexibility</topic><topic>Property development</topic><topic>Property taxes</topic><topic>Regional/Spatial Science</topic><topic>Tax reform</topic><topic>Taxation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gemmell, Norman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grimes, Arthur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skidmore, Mark</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Banking Information Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Accounting, Tax &amp; Banking Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Accounting, Tax &amp; Banking Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Banking Information Database</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>The journal of real estate finance and economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gemmell, Norman</au><au>Grimes, Arthur</au><au>Skidmore, Mark</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Do Local Property Taxes Affect New Building Development? Results from a Quasi-Natural Experiment in New Zealand</atitle><jtitle>The journal of real estate finance and economics</jtitle><stitle>J Real Estate Finan Econ</stitle><date>2019-02-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>58</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>310</spage><epage>333</epage><pages>310-333</pages><issn>0895-5638</issn><eissn>1573-045X</eissn><abstract>We utilise a quasi-natural experiment in local property tax reform arising from a compulsory amalgamation of several local councils in 2010 in Auckland, New Zealand, to form a unitary local authority. The reform involved changes in property taxes (known as ‘Rates’ in New Zealand) including a shift in the local tax base from land-value to capital-value in some of the former councils; changes in relative levels of Rates across former councils; and changes in levels of a separate tax (Development Contributions) levied on new building. These exogenously imposed reforms enable us to test several hypotheses related to the effects on property development of these tax switches using a difference-in-difference approach, controlling for other influences. We find support for tax effects on building alterations but no evidence of effects on new building development after amalgamation. Our dataset covers only two post-amalgamation years, and we speculate that this apparent difference may arise from greater flexibility of building alterations to respond quickly compared with new developments.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s11146-017-9651-y</doi><tpages>24</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9152-8051</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0895-5638
ispartof The journal of real estate finance and economics, 2019-02, Vol.58 (2), p.310-333
issn 0895-5638
1573-045X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1982529980
source International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); EBSCOhost Econlit with Full Text; ABI/INFORM Global; Springer Nature; BSC - Ebsco (Business Source Ultimate)
subjects Amalgamation
Councils
Economics
Economics and Finance
Financial Services
Flexibility
Property development
Property taxes
Regional/Spatial Science
Tax reform
Taxation
title Do Local Property Taxes Affect New Building Development? Results from a Quasi-Natural Experiment in New Zealand
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T22%3A26%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Do%20Local%20Property%20Taxes%20Affect%20New%20Building%20Development?%20Results%20from%20a%20Quasi-Natural%20Experiment%20in%20New%20Zealand&rft.jtitle=The%20journal%20of%20real%20estate%20finance%20and%20economics&rft.au=Gemmell,%20Norman&rft.date=2019-02-01&rft.volume=58&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=310&rft.epage=333&rft.pages=310-333&rft.issn=0895-5638&rft.eissn=1573-045X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11146-017-9651-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1982529980%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-d3d8f0e7d93406066b4482711bc02cc9de72872791772c3031dadf1c75b19d5b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1982529980&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true