Loading…
Do Local Property Taxes Affect New Building Development? Results from a Quasi-Natural Experiment in New Zealand
We utilise a quasi-natural experiment in local property tax reform arising from a compulsory amalgamation of several local councils in 2010 in Auckland, New Zealand, to form a unitary local authority. The reform involved changes in property taxes (known as ‘Rates’ in New Zealand) including a shift i...
Saved in:
Published in: | The journal of real estate finance and economics 2019-02, Vol.58 (2), p.310-333 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-d3d8f0e7d93406066b4482711bc02cc9de72872791772c3031dadf1c75b19d5b3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-d3d8f0e7d93406066b4482711bc02cc9de72872791772c3031dadf1c75b19d5b3 |
container_end_page | 333 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 310 |
container_title | The journal of real estate finance and economics |
container_volume | 58 |
creator | Gemmell, Norman Grimes, Arthur Skidmore, Mark |
description | We utilise a quasi-natural experiment in local property tax reform arising from a compulsory amalgamation of several local councils in 2010 in Auckland, New Zealand, to form a unitary local authority. The reform involved changes in property taxes (known as ‘Rates’ in New Zealand) including a
shift
in the local tax base from land-value to capital-value in some of the former councils; changes in
relative levels
of Rates across former councils; and changes in levels of a separate tax (Development Contributions) levied on new building. These exogenously imposed reforms enable us to test several hypotheses related to the effects on property development of these tax switches using a difference-in-difference approach, controlling for other influences. We find support for tax effects on building
alterations
but no evidence of effects on
new
building development after amalgamation. Our dataset covers only two post-amalgamation years, and we speculate that this apparent difference may arise from greater flexibility of building alterations to respond quickly compared with new developments. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11146-017-9651-y |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1982529980</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1982529980</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-d3d8f0e7d93406066b4482711bc02cc9de72872791772c3031dadf1c75b19d5b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtLAzEURoMoWKs_wF3AdfTeeWWyktrWB5T6oIK4CWmSKVOmk5rMaPvvnVoXblxlc75zwyHkHOESAfhVQMQkY4CciSxFtj0gPUx5zCBJ3w5JD3KRsjSL82NyEsISADKeQ4-4kaMTp1VFn7xbW99s6UxtbKCDorC6oVP7RW_asjJlvaAj-2krt17ZurmmLza0VRNo4d2KKvrcqlCyqWpa38nGm85V7kBa1j-Sd6sqVZtTclSoKtiz37dPXm_Hs-E9mzzePQwHE6aThDfMxCYvwHIj4gQyyLJ5kuQRR5xriLQWxvIo5xEXyHmkY4jRKFOg5ukchUnncZ9c7L1r7z5aGxq5dK2vu5MSRR6lkRA5dBTuKe1dCN4Wct39WvmtRJC7rnLfVXZd5a6r3HabaL8JHVsvrP9j_nf0DcldezE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1982529980</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Do Local Property Taxes Affect New Building Development? Results from a Quasi-Natural Experiment in New Zealand</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>EBSCOhost Econlit with Full Text</source><source>ABI/INFORM Global</source><source>Springer Nature</source><source>BSC - Ebsco (Business Source Ultimate)</source><creator>Gemmell, Norman ; Grimes, Arthur ; Skidmore, Mark</creator><creatorcontrib>Gemmell, Norman ; Grimes, Arthur ; Skidmore, Mark</creatorcontrib><description>We utilise a quasi-natural experiment in local property tax reform arising from a compulsory amalgamation of several local councils in 2010 in Auckland, New Zealand, to form a unitary local authority. The reform involved changes in property taxes (known as ‘Rates’ in New Zealand) including a
shift
in the local tax base from land-value to capital-value in some of the former councils; changes in
relative levels
of Rates across former councils; and changes in levels of a separate tax (Development Contributions) levied on new building. These exogenously imposed reforms enable us to test several hypotheses related to the effects on property development of these tax switches using a difference-in-difference approach, controlling for other influences. We find support for tax effects on building
alterations
but no evidence of effects on
new
building development after amalgamation. Our dataset covers only two post-amalgamation years, and we speculate that this apparent difference may arise from greater flexibility of building alterations to respond quickly compared with new developments.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0895-5638</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-045X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11146-017-9651-y</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Amalgamation ; Councils ; Economics ; Economics and Finance ; Financial Services ; Flexibility ; Property development ; Property taxes ; Regional/Spatial Science ; Tax reform ; Taxation</subject><ispartof>The journal of real estate finance and economics, 2019-02, Vol.58 (2), p.310-333</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2017</rights><rights>The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics is a copyright of Springer, (2017). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-d3d8f0e7d93406066b4482711bc02cc9de72872791772c3031dadf1c75b19d5b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-d3d8f0e7d93406066b4482711bc02cc9de72872791772c3031dadf1c75b19d5b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9152-8051</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1982529980/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1982529980?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,11688,12847,27924,27925,33223,36060,44363,74895</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gemmell, Norman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grimes, Arthur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skidmore, Mark</creatorcontrib><title>Do Local Property Taxes Affect New Building Development? Results from a Quasi-Natural Experiment in New Zealand</title><title>The journal of real estate finance and economics</title><addtitle>J Real Estate Finan Econ</addtitle><description>We utilise a quasi-natural experiment in local property tax reform arising from a compulsory amalgamation of several local councils in 2010 in Auckland, New Zealand, to form a unitary local authority. The reform involved changes in property taxes (known as ‘Rates’ in New Zealand) including a
shift
in the local tax base from land-value to capital-value in some of the former councils; changes in
relative levels
of Rates across former councils; and changes in levels of a separate tax (Development Contributions) levied on new building. These exogenously imposed reforms enable us to test several hypotheses related to the effects on property development of these tax switches using a difference-in-difference approach, controlling for other influences. We find support for tax effects on building
alterations
but no evidence of effects on
new
building development after amalgamation. Our dataset covers only two post-amalgamation years, and we speculate that this apparent difference may arise from greater flexibility of building alterations to respond quickly compared with new developments.</description><subject>Amalgamation</subject><subject>Councils</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Economics and Finance</subject><subject>Financial Services</subject><subject>Flexibility</subject><subject>Property development</subject><subject>Property taxes</subject><subject>Regional/Spatial Science</subject><subject>Tax reform</subject><subject>Taxation</subject><issn>0895-5638</issn><issn>1573-045X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kEtLAzEURoMoWKs_wF3AdfTeeWWyktrWB5T6oIK4CWmSKVOmk5rMaPvvnVoXblxlc75zwyHkHOESAfhVQMQkY4CciSxFtj0gPUx5zCBJ3w5JD3KRsjSL82NyEsISADKeQ4-4kaMTp1VFn7xbW99s6UxtbKCDorC6oVP7RW_asjJlvaAj-2krt17ZurmmLza0VRNo4d2KKvrcqlCyqWpa38nGm85V7kBa1j-Sd6sqVZtTclSoKtiz37dPXm_Hs-E9mzzePQwHE6aThDfMxCYvwHIj4gQyyLJ5kuQRR5xriLQWxvIo5xEXyHmkY4jRKFOg5ukchUnncZ9c7L1r7z5aGxq5dK2vu5MSRR6lkRA5dBTuKe1dCN4Wct39WvmtRJC7rnLfVXZd5a6r3HabaL8JHVsvrP9j_nf0DcldezE</recordid><startdate>20190201</startdate><enddate>20190201</enddate><creator>Gemmell, Norman</creator><creator>Grimes, Arthur</creator><creator>Skidmore, Mark</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>885</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ANIOZ</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRAZJ</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M1F</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9152-8051</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190201</creationdate><title>Do Local Property Taxes Affect New Building Development? Results from a Quasi-Natural Experiment in New Zealand</title><author>Gemmell, Norman ; Grimes, Arthur ; Skidmore, Mark</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-d3d8f0e7d93406066b4482711bc02cc9de72872791772c3031dadf1c75b19d5b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Amalgamation</topic><topic>Councils</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Economics and Finance</topic><topic>Financial Services</topic><topic>Flexibility</topic><topic>Property development</topic><topic>Property taxes</topic><topic>Regional/Spatial Science</topic><topic>Tax reform</topic><topic>Taxation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gemmell, Norman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grimes, Arthur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skidmore, Mark</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Banking Information Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Accounting, Tax & Banking Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Accounting, Tax & Banking Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Banking Information Database</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>The journal of real estate finance and economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gemmell, Norman</au><au>Grimes, Arthur</au><au>Skidmore, Mark</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Do Local Property Taxes Affect New Building Development? Results from a Quasi-Natural Experiment in New Zealand</atitle><jtitle>The journal of real estate finance and economics</jtitle><stitle>J Real Estate Finan Econ</stitle><date>2019-02-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>58</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>310</spage><epage>333</epage><pages>310-333</pages><issn>0895-5638</issn><eissn>1573-045X</eissn><abstract>We utilise a quasi-natural experiment in local property tax reform arising from a compulsory amalgamation of several local councils in 2010 in Auckland, New Zealand, to form a unitary local authority. The reform involved changes in property taxes (known as ‘Rates’ in New Zealand) including a
shift
in the local tax base from land-value to capital-value in some of the former councils; changes in
relative levels
of Rates across former councils; and changes in levels of a separate tax (Development Contributions) levied on new building. These exogenously imposed reforms enable us to test several hypotheses related to the effects on property development of these tax switches using a difference-in-difference approach, controlling for other influences. We find support for tax effects on building
alterations
but no evidence of effects on
new
building development after amalgamation. Our dataset covers only two post-amalgamation years, and we speculate that this apparent difference may arise from greater flexibility of building alterations to respond quickly compared with new developments.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s11146-017-9651-y</doi><tpages>24</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9152-8051</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0895-5638 |
ispartof | The journal of real estate finance and economics, 2019-02, Vol.58 (2), p.310-333 |
issn | 0895-5638 1573-045X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1982529980 |
source | International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); EBSCOhost Econlit with Full Text; ABI/INFORM Global; Springer Nature; BSC - Ebsco (Business Source Ultimate) |
subjects | Amalgamation Councils Economics Economics and Finance Financial Services Flexibility Property development Property taxes Regional/Spatial Science Tax reform Taxation |
title | Do Local Property Taxes Affect New Building Development? Results from a Quasi-Natural Experiment in New Zealand |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T22%3A26%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Do%20Local%20Property%20Taxes%20Affect%20New%20Building%20Development?%20Results%20from%20a%20Quasi-Natural%20Experiment%20in%20New%20Zealand&rft.jtitle=The%20journal%20of%20real%20estate%20finance%20and%20economics&rft.au=Gemmell,%20Norman&rft.date=2019-02-01&rft.volume=58&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=310&rft.epage=333&rft.pages=310-333&rft.issn=0895-5638&rft.eissn=1573-045X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11146-017-9651-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1982529980%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-d3d8f0e7d93406066b4482711bc02cc9de72872791772c3031dadf1c75b19d5b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1982529980&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |