Loading…
Ecliptic North‐South Symmetry of Hydrogen Geocorona
The hydrogen exosphere constitutes the uppermost atmospheric layer of the Earth, and its shape may reflect the last stage of the atmospheric escape process. The distribution of hydrogen in the outer exosphere remains unobserved because outer geocoronal emissions are difficult to observe from within...
Saved in:
Published in: | Geophysical research letters 2017-12, Vol.44 (23), p.11,706-11,712 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4544-4059e7d9d39bcaa68f52b78fb49dfb7097e6f3a07849ddf0cea59d30f0550d423 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4544-4059e7d9d39bcaa68f52b78fb49dfb7097e6f3a07849ddf0cea59d30f0550d423 |
container_end_page | 11,712 |
container_issue | 23 |
container_start_page | 11,706 |
container_title | Geophysical research letters |
container_volume | 44 |
creator | Kameda, S. Ikezawa, S. Sato, M. Kuwabara, M. Osada, N. Murakami, G. Yoshioka, K. Yoshikawa, I. Taguchi, M. Funase, R. Sugita, S. Miyoshi, Y. Fujimoto, M. |
description | The hydrogen exosphere constitutes the uppermost atmospheric layer of the Earth, and its shape may reflect the last stage of the atmospheric escape process. The distribution of hydrogen in the outer exosphere remains unobserved because outer geocoronal emissions are difficult to observe from within the exosphere. In this study, we used the Lyman Alpha Imaging Camera on board the Proximate Object Close Flyby with Optical Navigation spacecraft, located outside the exosphere, to obtain the first image of the entire geocorona that extends to more than 38 Earth radii. The observed emission intensity distribution can be reproduced using our analytical model that has three parameters: exobase temperature, exobase density, and solar radiation pressure, which implies that hot hydrogen production in the magnetized plasmasphere is not the dominant process shaping the outer hydrogen exosphere. However, the role of the magnetic effect in determining the total escape flux cannot be ruled out.
Plain Language Summary
In this report, we show the first high‐quality, and wide‐field‐of‐view (FOV) image of Earth's hydrogen corona of 100 Earth radii (RE) obtained by the first interplanetary microspacecraft. Because hydrogen geocorona has not been observed since Apollo 16 in 1972, which observed only up to 10 RE of FOV. The field of view of our observation is ~10 times wider than that in past. Furthermore, since the advancement in deep UV detection technology in the last four decades is very large, the improvement in data quality is very large. In fact, our newly obtained data strongly support a different picture for geocorona distribution. More specifically, we found that the observed ecliptic north‐south symmetrical distribution can be reproduced by a simple analytic model and is not consistent with past results. Our result strongly suggests a combination between a compact science instrument and a flexible interplanetary microspacecraft allows us to measure important scientific observables not readily accessible with conventional large‐scale spacecraft missions.
Key Points
The first image of the outer hydrogen geocorona at |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/2017GL075915 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1983635457</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1983635457</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4544-4059e7d9d39bcaa68f52b78fb49dfb7097e6f3a07849ddf0cea59d30f0550d423</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90MFKAzEQBuAgCtbqzQdY8Gp1sslsNkcpdSssClbPIZtN7Ja2qdldZG99BJ_RJzFSD548zTB8zA8_IZcUbihAepsCFUUJAiXFIzKikvNJDiCOyQhAxj0V2Sk5a9sVADBgdERwZtbNrmtM8uhDt_zafy583y2TxbDZ2C4MiXfJfKiDf7PbpLDe-OC3-pycOL1u7cXvHJPX-9nLdD4pn4qH6V05MRxjNgeUVtSyZrIyWme5w7QSuau4rF0lQAqbOaZB5PFQOzBWY8TgABFqnrIxuTr83QX_3tu2Uyvfh22MVFTmLGPIUUR1fVAm-LYN1qldaDY6DIqC-ilG_S0m8vTAP5q1Hf61qnguMcuQs2_WY2PX</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1983635457</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ecliptic North‐South Symmetry of Hydrogen Geocorona</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Archive</source><creator>Kameda, S. ; Ikezawa, S. ; Sato, M. ; Kuwabara, M. ; Osada, N. ; Murakami, G. ; Yoshioka, K. ; Yoshikawa, I. ; Taguchi, M. ; Funase, R. ; Sugita, S. ; Miyoshi, Y. ; Fujimoto, M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kameda, S. ; Ikezawa, S. ; Sato, M. ; Kuwabara, M. ; Osada, N. ; Murakami, G. ; Yoshioka, K. ; Yoshikawa, I. ; Taguchi, M. ; Funase, R. ; Sugita, S. ; Miyoshi, Y. ; Fujimoto, M.</creatorcontrib><description>The hydrogen exosphere constitutes the uppermost atmospheric layer of the Earth, and its shape may reflect the last stage of the atmospheric escape process. The distribution of hydrogen in the outer exosphere remains unobserved because outer geocoronal emissions are difficult to observe from within the exosphere. In this study, we used the Lyman Alpha Imaging Camera on board the Proximate Object Close Flyby with Optical Navigation spacecraft, located outside the exosphere, to obtain the first image of the entire geocorona that extends to more than 38 Earth radii. The observed emission intensity distribution can be reproduced using our analytical model that has three parameters: exobase temperature, exobase density, and solar radiation pressure, which implies that hot hydrogen production in the magnetized plasmasphere is not the dominant process shaping the outer hydrogen exosphere. However, the role of the magnetic effect in determining the total escape flux cannot be ruled out.
Plain Language Summary
In this report, we show the first high‐quality, and wide‐field‐of‐view (FOV) image of Earth's hydrogen corona of 100 Earth radii (RE) obtained by the first interplanetary microspacecraft. Because hydrogen geocorona has not been observed since Apollo 16 in 1972, which observed only up to 10 RE of FOV. The field of view of our observation is ~10 times wider than that in past. Furthermore, since the advancement in deep UV detection technology in the last four decades is very large, the improvement in data quality is very large. In fact, our newly obtained data strongly support a different picture for geocorona distribution. More specifically, we found that the observed ecliptic north‐south symmetrical distribution can be reproduced by a simple analytic model and is not consistent with past results. Our result strongly suggests a combination between a compact science instrument and a flexible interplanetary microspacecraft allows us to measure important scientific observables not readily accessible with conventional large‐scale spacecraft missions.
Key Points
The first image of the outer hydrogen geocorona at <16 RE shows ecliptic north‐south symmetry
We reproduced the observed spatial distribution using a model with neither a magnetic effect nor a satellite component
Substantial contribution of the magnetic effect to the escape flux cannot be ruled out</description><identifier>ISSN: 0094-8276</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1944-8007</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/2017GL075915</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Corona ; Detection ; Distribution ; Earth ; Ecliptic ; Emission analysis ; Emissions ; Exosphere ; Field of view ; Flyby missions ; geocorona ; Geocoronal emissions ; Hydrogen ; Hydrogen production ; Image quality ; Imaging techniques ; Lyman alpha ; Mathematical models ; Microspacecraft ; Navigation ; Plasmasphere ; Radiation pressure ; Solar radiation ; Spacecraft ; Symmetry ; Ultraviolet radiation</subject><ispartof>Geophysical research letters, 2017-12, Vol.44 (23), p.11,706-11,712</ispartof><rights>2017. The Authors.</rights><rights>2018. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4544-4059e7d9d39bcaa68f52b78fb49dfb7097e6f3a07849ddf0cea59d30f0550d423</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4544-4059e7d9d39bcaa68f52b78fb49dfb7097e6f3a07849ddf0cea59d30f0550d423</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2759-7682 ; 0000-0002-8324-9404 ; 0000-0001-5451-9367 ; 0000-0002-2907-2265 ; 0000-0002-4601-8164 ; 0000-0001-9084-2858 ; 0000-0001-7998-1240</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2F2017GL075915$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2F2017GL075915$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,11514,27924,27925,46468,46892</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kameda, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ikezawa, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sato, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuwabara, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Osada, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murakami, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoshioka, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoshikawa, I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taguchi, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Funase, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sugita, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miyoshi, Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fujimoto, M.</creatorcontrib><title>Ecliptic North‐South Symmetry of Hydrogen Geocorona</title><title>Geophysical research letters</title><description>The hydrogen exosphere constitutes the uppermost atmospheric layer of the Earth, and its shape may reflect the last stage of the atmospheric escape process. The distribution of hydrogen in the outer exosphere remains unobserved because outer geocoronal emissions are difficult to observe from within the exosphere. In this study, we used the Lyman Alpha Imaging Camera on board the Proximate Object Close Flyby with Optical Navigation spacecraft, located outside the exosphere, to obtain the first image of the entire geocorona that extends to more than 38 Earth radii. The observed emission intensity distribution can be reproduced using our analytical model that has three parameters: exobase temperature, exobase density, and solar radiation pressure, which implies that hot hydrogen production in the magnetized plasmasphere is not the dominant process shaping the outer hydrogen exosphere. However, the role of the magnetic effect in determining the total escape flux cannot be ruled out.
Plain Language Summary
In this report, we show the first high‐quality, and wide‐field‐of‐view (FOV) image of Earth's hydrogen corona of 100 Earth radii (RE) obtained by the first interplanetary microspacecraft. Because hydrogen geocorona has not been observed since Apollo 16 in 1972, which observed only up to 10 RE of FOV. The field of view of our observation is ~10 times wider than that in past. Furthermore, since the advancement in deep UV detection technology in the last four decades is very large, the improvement in data quality is very large. In fact, our newly obtained data strongly support a different picture for geocorona distribution. More specifically, we found that the observed ecliptic north‐south symmetrical distribution can be reproduced by a simple analytic model and is not consistent with past results. Our result strongly suggests a combination between a compact science instrument and a flexible interplanetary microspacecraft allows us to measure important scientific observables not readily accessible with conventional large‐scale spacecraft missions.
Key Points
The first image of the outer hydrogen geocorona at <16 RE shows ecliptic north‐south symmetry
We reproduced the observed spatial distribution using a model with neither a magnetic effect nor a satellite component
Substantial contribution of the magnetic effect to the escape flux cannot be ruled out</description><subject>Corona</subject><subject>Detection</subject><subject>Distribution</subject><subject>Earth</subject><subject>Ecliptic</subject><subject>Emission analysis</subject><subject>Emissions</subject><subject>Exosphere</subject><subject>Field of view</subject><subject>Flyby missions</subject><subject>geocorona</subject><subject>Geocoronal emissions</subject><subject>Hydrogen</subject><subject>Hydrogen production</subject><subject>Image quality</subject><subject>Imaging techniques</subject><subject>Lyman alpha</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Microspacecraft</subject><subject>Navigation</subject><subject>Plasmasphere</subject><subject>Radiation pressure</subject><subject>Solar radiation</subject><subject>Spacecraft</subject><subject>Symmetry</subject><subject>Ultraviolet radiation</subject><issn>0094-8276</issn><issn>1944-8007</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><recordid>eNp90MFKAzEQBuAgCtbqzQdY8Gp1sslsNkcpdSssClbPIZtN7Ja2qdldZG99BJ_RJzFSD548zTB8zA8_IZcUbihAepsCFUUJAiXFIzKikvNJDiCOyQhAxj0V2Sk5a9sVADBgdERwZtbNrmtM8uhDt_zafy583y2TxbDZ2C4MiXfJfKiDf7PbpLDe-OC3-pycOL1u7cXvHJPX-9nLdD4pn4qH6V05MRxjNgeUVtSyZrIyWme5w7QSuau4rF0lQAqbOaZB5PFQOzBWY8TgABFqnrIxuTr83QX_3tu2Uyvfh22MVFTmLGPIUUR1fVAm-LYN1qldaDY6DIqC-ilG_S0m8vTAP5q1Hf61qnguMcuQs2_WY2PX</recordid><startdate>20171216</startdate><enddate>20171216</enddate><creator>Kameda, S.</creator><creator>Ikezawa, S.</creator><creator>Sato, M.</creator><creator>Kuwabara, M.</creator><creator>Osada, N.</creator><creator>Murakami, G.</creator><creator>Yoshioka, K.</creator><creator>Yoshikawa, I.</creator><creator>Taguchi, M.</creator><creator>Funase, R.</creator><creator>Sugita, S.</creator><creator>Miyoshi, Y.</creator><creator>Fujimoto, M.</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L7M</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2759-7682</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8324-9404</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5451-9367</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2907-2265</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4601-8164</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9084-2858</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7998-1240</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20171216</creationdate><title>Ecliptic North‐South Symmetry of Hydrogen Geocorona</title><author>Kameda, S. ; Ikezawa, S. ; Sato, M. ; Kuwabara, M. ; Osada, N. ; Murakami, G. ; Yoshioka, K. ; Yoshikawa, I. ; Taguchi, M. ; Funase, R. ; Sugita, S. ; Miyoshi, Y. ; Fujimoto, M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4544-4059e7d9d39bcaa68f52b78fb49dfb7097e6f3a07849ddf0cea59d30f0550d423</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Corona</topic><topic>Detection</topic><topic>Distribution</topic><topic>Earth</topic><topic>Ecliptic</topic><topic>Emission analysis</topic><topic>Emissions</topic><topic>Exosphere</topic><topic>Field of view</topic><topic>Flyby missions</topic><topic>geocorona</topic><topic>Geocoronal emissions</topic><topic>Hydrogen</topic><topic>Hydrogen production</topic><topic>Image quality</topic><topic>Imaging techniques</topic><topic>Lyman alpha</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Microspacecraft</topic><topic>Navigation</topic><topic>Plasmasphere</topic><topic>Radiation pressure</topic><topic>Solar radiation</topic><topic>Spacecraft</topic><topic>Symmetry</topic><topic>Ultraviolet radiation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kameda, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ikezawa, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sato, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuwabara, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Osada, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murakami, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoshioka, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoshikawa, I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taguchi, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Funase, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sugita, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miyoshi, Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fujimoto, M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Geophysical research letters</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kameda, S.</au><au>Ikezawa, S.</au><au>Sato, M.</au><au>Kuwabara, M.</au><au>Osada, N.</au><au>Murakami, G.</au><au>Yoshioka, K.</au><au>Yoshikawa, I.</au><au>Taguchi, M.</au><au>Funase, R.</au><au>Sugita, S.</au><au>Miyoshi, Y.</au><au>Fujimoto, M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ecliptic North‐South Symmetry of Hydrogen Geocorona</atitle><jtitle>Geophysical research letters</jtitle><date>2017-12-16</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>23</issue><spage>11,706</spage><epage>11,712</epage><pages>11,706-11,712</pages><issn>0094-8276</issn><eissn>1944-8007</eissn><abstract>The hydrogen exosphere constitutes the uppermost atmospheric layer of the Earth, and its shape may reflect the last stage of the atmospheric escape process. The distribution of hydrogen in the outer exosphere remains unobserved because outer geocoronal emissions are difficult to observe from within the exosphere. In this study, we used the Lyman Alpha Imaging Camera on board the Proximate Object Close Flyby with Optical Navigation spacecraft, located outside the exosphere, to obtain the first image of the entire geocorona that extends to more than 38 Earth radii. The observed emission intensity distribution can be reproduced using our analytical model that has three parameters: exobase temperature, exobase density, and solar radiation pressure, which implies that hot hydrogen production in the magnetized plasmasphere is not the dominant process shaping the outer hydrogen exosphere. However, the role of the magnetic effect in determining the total escape flux cannot be ruled out.
Plain Language Summary
In this report, we show the first high‐quality, and wide‐field‐of‐view (FOV) image of Earth's hydrogen corona of 100 Earth radii (RE) obtained by the first interplanetary microspacecraft. Because hydrogen geocorona has not been observed since Apollo 16 in 1972, which observed only up to 10 RE of FOV. The field of view of our observation is ~10 times wider than that in past. Furthermore, since the advancement in deep UV detection technology in the last four decades is very large, the improvement in data quality is very large. In fact, our newly obtained data strongly support a different picture for geocorona distribution. More specifically, we found that the observed ecliptic north‐south symmetrical distribution can be reproduced by a simple analytic model and is not consistent with past results. Our result strongly suggests a combination between a compact science instrument and a flexible interplanetary microspacecraft allows us to measure important scientific observables not readily accessible with conventional large‐scale spacecraft missions.
Key Points
The first image of the outer hydrogen geocorona at <16 RE shows ecliptic north‐south symmetry
We reproduced the observed spatial distribution using a model with neither a magnetic effect nor a satellite component
Substantial contribution of the magnetic effect to the escape flux cannot be ruled out</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/2017GL075915</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2759-7682</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8324-9404</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5451-9367</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2907-2265</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4601-8164</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9084-2858</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7998-1240</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0094-8276 |
ispartof | Geophysical research letters, 2017-12, Vol.44 (23), p.11,706-11,712 |
issn | 0094-8276 1944-8007 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1983635457 |
source | Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Archive |
subjects | Corona Detection Distribution Earth Ecliptic Emission analysis Emissions Exosphere Field of view Flyby missions geocorona Geocoronal emissions Hydrogen Hydrogen production Image quality Imaging techniques Lyman alpha Mathematical models Microspacecraft Navigation Plasmasphere Radiation pressure Solar radiation Spacecraft Symmetry Ultraviolet radiation |
title | Ecliptic North‐South Symmetry of Hydrogen Geocorona |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T05%3A10%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ecliptic%20North%E2%80%90South%20Symmetry%20of%20Hydrogen%20Geocorona&rft.jtitle=Geophysical%20research%20letters&rft.au=Kameda,%20S.&rft.date=2017-12-16&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=23&rft.spage=11,706&rft.epage=11,712&rft.pages=11,706-11,712&rft.issn=0094-8276&rft.eissn=1944-8007&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/2017GL075915&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1983635457%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4544-4059e7d9d39bcaa68f52b78fb49dfb7097e6f3a07849ddf0cea59d30f0550d423%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1983635457&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |