Loading…

Human movement, cooperation and the effectiveness of coordinated vector control strategies

Vector-borne disease transmission is often typified by highly focal transmission and influenced by movement of hosts and vectors across different scales. The ecological and environmental conditions (including those created by humans through vector control programmes) that result in metapopulation dy...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of the Royal Society interface 2017-08, Vol.14 (133), p.20170336-20170336
Main Authors: Stone, Chris M., Schwab, Samantha R., Fonseca, Dina M., Fefferman, Nina H.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-f4578dc1da249fbb466b1552902e822f23e3393e8e824c1a3fe06a426328fa73
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-f4578dc1da249fbb466b1552902e822f23e3393e8e824c1a3fe06a426328fa73
container_end_page 20170336
container_issue 133
container_start_page 20170336
container_title Journal of the Royal Society interface
container_volume 14
creator Stone, Chris M.
Schwab, Samantha R.
Fonseca, Dina M.
Fefferman, Nina H.
description Vector-borne disease transmission is often typified by highly focal transmission and influenced by movement of hosts and vectors across different scales. The ecological and environmental conditions (including those created by humans through vector control programmes) that result in metapopulation dynamics remain poorly understood. The development of control strategies that would most effectively limit outbreaks given such dynamics is particularly urgent given the recent epidemics of dengue, chikungunya and Zika viruses. We developed a stochastic, spatial model of vector-borne disease transmission, allowing for movement of hosts between patches. Our model is applicable to arbovirus transmission by Aedes aegypti in urban settings and was parametrized to capture Zika virus transmission in particular. Using simulations, we investigated the extent to which two aspects of vector control strategies are affected by human commuting patterns: the extent of coordination and cooperation between neighbouring communities. We find that transmission intensity is highest at intermediate levels of host movement. The extent to which coordination of control activities among neighbouring patches decreases the prevalence of infection is affected by both how frequently humans commute and the proportion of neighbouring patches that commits to vector surveillance and control activities. At high levels of host movement, patches that do not contribute to vector control may act as sources of infection in the landscape, yet have comparable levels of prevalence as patches that do cooperate. This result suggests that real cooperation among neighbours will be critical to the development of effective pro-active strategies for vector-borne disease control in today's commuter-linked communities.
doi_str_mv 10.1098/rsif.2017.0336
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1984080669</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1984080669</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-f4578dc1da249fbb466b1552902e822f23e3393e8e824c1a3fe06a426328fa73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkUtLAzEUhYMotj62LmXAra15TDKZjSDFFwhuunIT0pkbTekkNUkL_fdmaC0VXOVxv3vOTQ5CVwSPCa7lXYjWjCkm1RgzJo7QkFQlHXEh6PF-L-sBOotxjjGrGOenaECl5JxJMUQfL6tOu6Lza-jApdui8X4JQSfrXaFdW6QvKMAYaJJdg4MYC296KLTW6QRtsc4lH_KVS8EviphyM3xaiBfoxOhFhMvdeo6mT4_Tycvo7f35dfLwNmpKQdPIlLySbUNaTcvazGalEDPCOa0xBUmpoQwYqxnIfCobopkBLHRJBaPS6Iqdo_ut7HI166Bt8iuCXqhlsJ0OG-W1VX8rzn6pT79WnEtKqMwCNzuB4L9XEJOa-1VweWRFalliiYWoMzXeUk3wMQYweweCVR-F6qNQfRSqjyI3XB_Otcd__z4DbAsEv8lmvrGQNgfe_8v-AKhwmME</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1984080669</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Human movement, cooperation and the effectiveness of coordinated vector control strategies</title><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Royal Society Publishing Jisc Collections Royal Society Journals Read &amp; Publish Transitional Agreement 2025 (reading list)</source><creator>Stone, Chris M. ; Schwab, Samantha R. ; Fonseca, Dina M. ; Fefferman, Nina H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Stone, Chris M. ; Schwab, Samantha R. ; Fonseca, Dina M. ; Fefferman, Nina H.</creatorcontrib><description>Vector-borne disease transmission is often typified by highly focal transmission and influenced by movement of hosts and vectors across different scales. The ecological and environmental conditions (including those created by humans through vector control programmes) that result in metapopulation dynamics remain poorly understood. The development of control strategies that would most effectively limit outbreaks given such dynamics is particularly urgent given the recent epidemics of dengue, chikungunya and Zika viruses. We developed a stochastic, spatial model of vector-borne disease transmission, allowing for movement of hosts between patches. Our model is applicable to arbovirus transmission by Aedes aegypti in urban settings and was parametrized to capture Zika virus transmission in particular. Using simulations, we investigated the extent to which two aspects of vector control strategies are affected by human commuting patterns: the extent of coordination and cooperation between neighbouring communities. We find that transmission intensity is highest at intermediate levels of host movement. The extent to which coordination of control activities among neighbouring patches decreases the prevalence of infection is affected by both how frequently humans commute and the proportion of neighbouring patches that commits to vector surveillance and control activities. At high levels of host movement, patches that do not contribute to vector control may act as sources of infection in the landscape, yet have comparable levels of prevalence as patches that do cooperate. This result suggests that real cooperation among neighbours will be critical to the development of effective pro-active strategies for vector-borne disease control in today's commuter-linked communities.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1742-5689</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1742-5662</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2017.0336</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28855386</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: The Royal Society</publisher><subject>Active control ; Aedes aegypti ; Animals ; Aquatic insects ; Communities ; Commuting ; Commuting Patterns ; Computer simulation ; Cooperation ; Dengue fever ; Disease control ; Disease Outbreaks ; Disease transmission ; Ecosystem ; Environmental conditions ; Environmental Monitoring ; Epidemics ; Human motion ; Humans ; Infections ; Landscape ; Larval Control ; Life Sciences–Mathematics interface ; Metapopulation ; Metapopulations ; Models, Biological ; Mosquito Vectors ; Mosquitoes ; Outbreaks ; Patches (structures) ; Stochasticity ; Urban environments ; Vector-borne diseases ; Vectors ; Vectors (Biology) ; Viral diseases ; Viruses ; Zika Virus ; Zika Virus Infection - epidemiology ; Zika Virus Infection - prevention &amp; control ; Zika Virus Infection - transmission</subject><ispartof>Journal of the Royal Society interface, 2017-08, Vol.14 (133), p.20170336-20170336</ispartof><rights>2017 The Author(s)</rights><rights>2017 The Author(s).</rights><rights>Copyright The Royal Society Publishing Aug 2017</rights><rights>2017 The Author(s) 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-f4578dc1da249fbb466b1552902e822f23e3393e8e824c1a3fe06a426328fa73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-f4578dc1da249fbb466b1552902e822f23e3393e8e824c1a3fe06a426328fa73</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9535-2583</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5582128/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5582128/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28855386$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stone, Chris M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwab, Samantha R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fonseca, Dina M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fefferman, Nina H.</creatorcontrib><title>Human movement, cooperation and the effectiveness of coordinated vector control strategies</title><title>Journal of the Royal Society interface</title><addtitle>J. R. Soc. Interface</addtitle><addtitle>J R Soc Interface</addtitle><description>Vector-borne disease transmission is often typified by highly focal transmission and influenced by movement of hosts and vectors across different scales. The ecological and environmental conditions (including those created by humans through vector control programmes) that result in metapopulation dynamics remain poorly understood. The development of control strategies that would most effectively limit outbreaks given such dynamics is particularly urgent given the recent epidemics of dengue, chikungunya and Zika viruses. We developed a stochastic, spatial model of vector-borne disease transmission, allowing for movement of hosts between patches. Our model is applicable to arbovirus transmission by Aedes aegypti in urban settings and was parametrized to capture Zika virus transmission in particular. Using simulations, we investigated the extent to which two aspects of vector control strategies are affected by human commuting patterns: the extent of coordination and cooperation between neighbouring communities. We find that transmission intensity is highest at intermediate levels of host movement. The extent to which coordination of control activities among neighbouring patches decreases the prevalence of infection is affected by both how frequently humans commute and the proportion of neighbouring patches that commits to vector surveillance and control activities. At high levels of host movement, patches that do not contribute to vector control may act as sources of infection in the landscape, yet have comparable levels of prevalence as patches that do cooperate. This result suggests that real cooperation among neighbours will be critical to the development of effective pro-active strategies for vector-borne disease control in today's commuter-linked communities.</description><subject>Active control</subject><subject>Aedes aegypti</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Aquatic insects</subject><subject>Communities</subject><subject>Commuting</subject><subject>Commuting Patterns</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Cooperation</subject><subject>Dengue fever</subject><subject>Disease control</subject><subject>Disease Outbreaks</subject><subject>Disease transmission</subject><subject>Ecosystem</subject><subject>Environmental conditions</subject><subject>Environmental Monitoring</subject><subject>Epidemics</subject><subject>Human motion</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infections</subject><subject>Landscape</subject><subject>Larval Control</subject><subject>Life Sciences–Mathematics interface</subject><subject>Metapopulation</subject><subject>Metapopulations</subject><subject>Models, Biological</subject><subject>Mosquito Vectors</subject><subject>Mosquitoes</subject><subject>Outbreaks</subject><subject>Patches (structures)</subject><subject>Stochasticity</subject><subject>Urban environments</subject><subject>Vector-borne diseases</subject><subject>Vectors</subject><subject>Vectors (Biology)</subject><subject>Viral diseases</subject><subject>Viruses</subject><subject>Zika Virus</subject><subject>Zika Virus Infection - epidemiology</subject><subject>Zika Virus Infection - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Zika Virus Infection - transmission</subject><issn>1742-5689</issn><issn>1742-5662</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNptkUtLAzEUhYMotj62LmXAra15TDKZjSDFFwhuunIT0pkbTekkNUkL_fdmaC0VXOVxv3vOTQ5CVwSPCa7lXYjWjCkm1RgzJo7QkFQlHXEh6PF-L-sBOotxjjGrGOenaECl5JxJMUQfL6tOu6Lza-jApdui8X4JQSfrXaFdW6QvKMAYaJJdg4MYC296KLTW6QRtsc4lH_KVS8EviphyM3xaiBfoxOhFhMvdeo6mT4_Tycvo7f35dfLwNmpKQdPIlLySbUNaTcvazGalEDPCOa0xBUmpoQwYqxnIfCobopkBLHRJBaPS6Iqdo_ut7HI166Bt8iuCXqhlsJ0OG-W1VX8rzn6pT79WnEtKqMwCNzuB4L9XEJOa-1VweWRFalliiYWoMzXeUk3wMQYweweCVR-F6qNQfRSqjyI3XB_Otcd__z4DbAsEv8lmvrGQNgfe_8v-AKhwmME</recordid><startdate>20170801</startdate><enddate>20170801</enddate><creator>Stone, Chris M.</creator><creator>Schwab, Samantha R.</creator><creator>Fonseca, Dina M.</creator><creator>Fefferman, Nina H.</creator><general>The Royal Society</general><general>The Royal Society Publishing</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9535-2583</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20170801</creationdate><title>Human movement, cooperation and the effectiveness of coordinated vector control strategies</title><author>Stone, Chris M. ; Schwab, Samantha R. ; Fonseca, Dina M. ; Fefferman, Nina H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-f4578dc1da249fbb466b1552902e822f23e3393e8e824c1a3fe06a426328fa73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Active control</topic><topic>Aedes aegypti</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Aquatic insects</topic><topic>Communities</topic><topic>Commuting</topic><topic>Commuting Patterns</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Cooperation</topic><topic>Dengue fever</topic><topic>Disease control</topic><topic>Disease Outbreaks</topic><topic>Disease transmission</topic><topic>Ecosystem</topic><topic>Environmental conditions</topic><topic>Environmental Monitoring</topic><topic>Epidemics</topic><topic>Human motion</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infections</topic><topic>Landscape</topic><topic>Larval Control</topic><topic>Life Sciences–Mathematics interface</topic><topic>Metapopulation</topic><topic>Metapopulations</topic><topic>Models, Biological</topic><topic>Mosquito Vectors</topic><topic>Mosquitoes</topic><topic>Outbreaks</topic><topic>Patches (structures)</topic><topic>Stochasticity</topic><topic>Urban environments</topic><topic>Vector-borne diseases</topic><topic>Vectors</topic><topic>Vectors (Biology)</topic><topic>Viral diseases</topic><topic>Viruses</topic><topic>Zika Virus</topic><topic>Zika Virus Infection - epidemiology</topic><topic>Zika Virus Infection - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Zika Virus Infection - transmission</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stone, Chris M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwab, Samantha R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fonseca, Dina M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fefferman, Nina H.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of the Royal Society interface</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stone, Chris M.</au><au>Schwab, Samantha R.</au><au>Fonseca, Dina M.</au><au>Fefferman, Nina H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Human movement, cooperation and the effectiveness of coordinated vector control strategies</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the Royal Society interface</jtitle><stitle>J. R. Soc. Interface</stitle><addtitle>J R Soc Interface</addtitle><date>2017-08-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>133</issue><spage>20170336</spage><epage>20170336</epage><pages>20170336-20170336</pages><issn>1742-5689</issn><eissn>1742-5662</eissn><abstract>Vector-borne disease transmission is often typified by highly focal transmission and influenced by movement of hosts and vectors across different scales. The ecological and environmental conditions (including those created by humans through vector control programmes) that result in metapopulation dynamics remain poorly understood. The development of control strategies that would most effectively limit outbreaks given such dynamics is particularly urgent given the recent epidemics of dengue, chikungunya and Zika viruses. We developed a stochastic, spatial model of vector-borne disease transmission, allowing for movement of hosts between patches. Our model is applicable to arbovirus transmission by Aedes aegypti in urban settings and was parametrized to capture Zika virus transmission in particular. Using simulations, we investigated the extent to which two aspects of vector control strategies are affected by human commuting patterns: the extent of coordination and cooperation between neighbouring communities. We find that transmission intensity is highest at intermediate levels of host movement. The extent to which coordination of control activities among neighbouring patches decreases the prevalence of infection is affected by both how frequently humans commute and the proportion of neighbouring patches that commits to vector surveillance and control activities. At high levels of host movement, patches that do not contribute to vector control may act as sources of infection in the landscape, yet have comparable levels of prevalence as patches that do cooperate. This result suggests that real cooperation among neighbours will be critical to the development of effective pro-active strategies for vector-borne disease control in today's commuter-linked communities.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>The Royal Society</pub><pmid>28855386</pmid><doi>10.1098/rsif.2017.0336</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9535-2583</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1742-5689
ispartof Journal of the Royal Society interface, 2017-08, Vol.14 (133), p.20170336-20170336
issn 1742-5689
1742-5662
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1984080669
source PubMed Central; Royal Society Publishing Jisc Collections Royal Society Journals Read & Publish Transitional Agreement 2025 (reading list)
subjects Active control
Aedes aegypti
Animals
Aquatic insects
Communities
Commuting
Commuting Patterns
Computer simulation
Cooperation
Dengue fever
Disease control
Disease Outbreaks
Disease transmission
Ecosystem
Environmental conditions
Environmental Monitoring
Epidemics
Human motion
Humans
Infections
Landscape
Larval Control
Life Sciences–Mathematics interface
Metapopulation
Metapopulations
Models, Biological
Mosquito Vectors
Mosquitoes
Outbreaks
Patches (structures)
Stochasticity
Urban environments
Vector-borne diseases
Vectors
Vectors (Biology)
Viral diseases
Viruses
Zika Virus
Zika Virus Infection - epidemiology
Zika Virus Infection - prevention & control
Zika Virus Infection - transmission
title Human movement, cooperation and the effectiveness of coordinated vector control strategies
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T01%3A10%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Human%20movement,%20cooperation%20and%20the%20effectiveness%20of%20coordinated%20vector%20control%20strategies&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20Royal%20Society%20interface&rft.au=Stone,%20Chris%20M.&rft.date=2017-08-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=133&rft.spage=20170336&rft.epage=20170336&rft.pages=20170336-20170336&rft.issn=1742-5689&rft.eissn=1742-5662&rft_id=info:doi/10.1098/rsif.2017.0336&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1984080669%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-f4578dc1da249fbb466b1552902e822f23e3393e8e824c1a3fe06a426328fa73%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1984080669&rft_id=info:pmid/28855386&rfr_iscdi=true