Loading…

Setting intelligent city tiling strategies for urban shading simulations

•Assessment of innovative computational strategies in an urban simulation platform.•Introduction of different tiling approaches for solar irradiance calculations.•Estimations of the Urban Shading Ratio for roofs and facades in large areas.•Analysis of two case studies with medium and high building d...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Solar energy 2017-11, Vol.157, p.880-894
Main Authors: Romero Rodríguez, Laura, Nouvel, Romain, Duminil, Eric, Eicker, Ursula
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c423t-527f686385d8c25de1464a9f51404bc10d1212e38b8d22b1b43953c5bf08b933
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c423t-527f686385d8c25de1464a9f51404bc10d1212e38b8d22b1b43953c5bf08b933
container_end_page 894
container_issue
container_start_page 880
container_title Solar energy
container_volume 157
creator Romero Rodríguez, Laura
Nouvel, Romain
Duminil, Eric
Eicker, Ursula
description •Assessment of innovative computational strategies in an urban simulation platform.•Introduction of different tiling approaches for solar irradiance calculations.•Estimations of the Urban Shading Ratio for roofs and facades in large areas.•Analysis of two case studies with medium and high building densities.•Irradiance reductions up to 60% for facades and 25% for roofs in dense urban areas. Assessing accurately the solar potential of all building surfaces in cities, including shading and multiple reflections between buildings, is essential for urban energy modelling. However, since the number of surface interactions and radiation exchanges increase exponentially with the scale of the district, innovative computational strategies are needed, some of which will be introduced in the present work. They should hold the best compromise between result accuracy and computational efficiency, i.e. computational time and memory requirements. In this study, different approaches that may be used for the computation of urban solar irradiance in large areas are presented. Two concrete urban case studies of different densities have been used to compare and evaluate three different methods: the Perez Sky model, the Simplified Radiosity Algorithm and a new scene tiling method implemented in our urban simulation platform SimStadt, used for feasible estimations on a large scale. To quantify the influence of shading, the new concept of Urban Shading Ratio has been introduced and used for this evaluation process. In high density urban areas, this index may reach 60% for facades and 25% for roofs. Tiles of 500m width and 200m overlap are a minimum requirement in this case to compute solar irradiance with an acceptable accuracy. In medium density areas, tiles of 300m width and 100m overlap meet perfectly the accuracy requirements. In addition, the solar potential for various solar energy thresholds as well as the monthly variation of the Urban Shading Ratio have been quantified for both case studies, distinguishing between roofs and facades of different orientations.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.solener.2017.09.017
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1984761173</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0038092X17307855</els_id><sourcerecordid>1984761173</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c423t-527f686385d8c25de1464a9f51404bc10d1212e38b8d22b1b43953c5bf08b933</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUMtKxDAUDaLgOPoJQsF1a24ebboSGdQRBlw4C3ehTW_HlE46Jqkwf2_ruHd14J7H5RxCboFmQCG_77Iw9OjQZ4xCkdEym-CMLEAUkAKTxTlZUMpVSkv2cUmuQujopABVLMj6HWO0bpdYF7Hv7Q5dTIyNxyTafr6H6KuIO4shaQefjL6uXBI-q-aXtPuxr6IdXLgmF23VB7z5wyXZPj9tV-t08_byunrcpEYwHlPJijZXOVeyUYbJBkHkoipbCYKK2gBtgAFDrmrVMFZDLXgpuZF1S1Vdcr4kd6fYgx--RgxRd8Po3fRRQ6lEkQMUs0qeVMYPIXhs9cHbfeWPGqieN9Od_ttMz5tpWuoJJt_DyYdTg287scFYdAYb69FE3Qz2n4Qfjgl4Bw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1984761173</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Setting intelligent city tiling strategies for urban shading simulations</title><source>Elsevier</source><creator>Romero Rodríguez, Laura ; Nouvel, Romain ; Duminil, Eric ; Eicker, Ursula</creator><creatorcontrib>Romero Rodríguez, Laura ; Nouvel, Romain ; Duminil, Eric ; Eicker, Ursula</creatorcontrib><description>•Assessment of innovative computational strategies in an urban simulation platform.•Introduction of different tiling approaches for solar irradiance calculations.•Estimations of the Urban Shading Ratio for roofs and facades in large areas.•Analysis of two case studies with medium and high building densities.•Irradiance reductions up to 60% for facades and 25% for roofs in dense urban areas. Assessing accurately the solar potential of all building surfaces in cities, including shading and multiple reflections between buildings, is essential for urban energy modelling. However, since the number of surface interactions and radiation exchanges increase exponentially with the scale of the district, innovative computational strategies are needed, some of which will be introduced in the present work. They should hold the best compromise between result accuracy and computational efficiency, i.e. computational time and memory requirements. In this study, different approaches that may be used for the computation of urban solar irradiance in large areas are presented. Two concrete urban case studies of different densities have been used to compare and evaluate three different methods: the Perez Sky model, the Simplified Radiosity Algorithm and a new scene tiling method implemented in our urban simulation platform SimStadt, used for feasible estimations on a large scale. To quantify the influence of shading, the new concept of Urban Shading Ratio has been introduced and used for this evaluation process. In high density urban areas, this index may reach 60% for facades and 25% for roofs. Tiles of 500m width and 200m overlap are a minimum requirement in this case to compute solar irradiance with an acceptable accuracy. In medium density areas, tiles of 300m width and 100m overlap meet perfectly the accuracy requirements. In addition, the solar potential for various solar energy thresholds as well as the monthly variation of the Urban Shading Ratio have been quantified for both case studies, distinguishing between roofs and facades of different orientations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0038-092X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-1257</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.solener.2017.09.017</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Case studies ; Cities ; Computer applications ; Computer memory ; Computer simulation ; Computing time ; Concrete ; Energy modeling ; Facades ; Irradiance ; Radiation ; Radiation models ; Radiosity ; Roofs ; Shading ; Solar energy ; Solar potential ; Tiles ; Tiling ; Tiling strategies ; Urban areas ; Urban shading ratio</subject><ispartof>Solar energy, 2017-11, Vol.157, p.880-894</ispartof><rights>2017 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Pergamon Press Inc. Nov 15, 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c423t-527f686385d8c25de1464a9f51404bc10d1212e38b8d22b1b43953c5bf08b933</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c423t-527f686385d8c25de1464a9f51404bc10d1212e38b8d22b1b43953c5bf08b933</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Romero Rodríguez, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nouvel, Romain</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duminil, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eicker, Ursula</creatorcontrib><title>Setting intelligent city tiling strategies for urban shading simulations</title><title>Solar energy</title><description>•Assessment of innovative computational strategies in an urban simulation platform.•Introduction of different tiling approaches for solar irradiance calculations.•Estimations of the Urban Shading Ratio for roofs and facades in large areas.•Analysis of two case studies with medium and high building densities.•Irradiance reductions up to 60% for facades and 25% for roofs in dense urban areas. Assessing accurately the solar potential of all building surfaces in cities, including shading and multiple reflections between buildings, is essential for urban energy modelling. However, since the number of surface interactions and radiation exchanges increase exponentially with the scale of the district, innovative computational strategies are needed, some of which will be introduced in the present work. They should hold the best compromise between result accuracy and computational efficiency, i.e. computational time and memory requirements. In this study, different approaches that may be used for the computation of urban solar irradiance in large areas are presented. Two concrete urban case studies of different densities have been used to compare and evaluate three different methods: the Perez Sky model, the Simplified Radiosity Algorithm and a new scene tiling method implemented in our urban simulation platform SimStadt, used for feasible estimations on a large scale. To quantify the influence of shading, the new concept of Urban Shading Ratio has been introduced and used for this evaluation process. In high density urban areas, this index may reach 60% for facades and 25% for roofs. Tiles of 500m width and 200m overlap are a minimum requirement in this case to compute solar irradiance with an acceptable accuracy. In medium density areas, tiles of 300m width and 100m overlap meet perfectly the accuracy requirements. In addition, the solar potential for various solar energy thresholds as well as the monthly variation of the Urban Shading Ratio have been quantified for both case studies, distinguishing between roofs and facades of different orientations.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Cities</subject><subject>Computer applications</subject><subject>Computer memory</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Computing time</subject><subject>Concrete</subject><subject>Energy modeling</subject><subject>Facades</subject><subject>Irradiance</subject><subject>Radiation</subject><subject>Radiation models</subject><subject>Radiosity</subject><subject>Roofs</subject><subject>Shading</subject><subject>Solar energy</subject><subject>Solar potential</subject><subject>Tiles</subject><subject>Tiling</subject><subject>Tiling strategies</subject><subject>Urban areas</subject><subject>Urban shading ratio</subject><issn>0038-092X</issn><issn>1471-1257</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFUMtKxDAUDaLgOPoJQsF1a24ebboSGdQRBlw4C3ehTW_HlE46Jqkwf2_ruHd14J7H5RxCboFmQCG_77Iw9OjQZ4xCkdEym-CMLEAUkAKTxTlZUMpVSkv2cUmuQujopABVLMj6HWO0bpdYF7Hv7Q5dTIyNxyTafr6H6KuIO4shaQefjL6uXBI-q-aXtPuxr6IdXLgmF23VB7z5wyXZPj9tV-t08_byunrcpEYwHlPJijZXOVeyUYbJBkHkoipbCYKK2gBtgAFDrmrVMFZDLXgpuZF1S1Vdcr4kd6fYgx--RgxRd8Po3fRRQ6lEkQMUs0qeVMYPIXhs9cHbfeWPGqieN9Od_ttMz5tpWuoJJt_DyYdTg287scFYdAYb69FE3Qz2n4Qfjgl4Bw</recordid><startdate>20171115</startdate><enddate>20171115</enddate><creator>Romero Rodríguez, Laura</creator><creator>Nouvel, Romain</creator><creator>Duminil, Eric</creator><creator>Eicker, Ursula</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Pergamon Press Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20171115</creationdate><title>Setting intelligent city tiling strategies for urban shading simulations</title><author>Romero Rodríguez, Laura ; Nouvel, Romain ; Duminil, Eric ; Eicker, Ursula</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c423t-527f686385d8c25de1464a9f51404bc10d1212e38b8d22b1b43953c5bf08b933</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Cities</topic><topic>Computer applications</topic><topic>Computer memory</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Computing time</topic><topic>Concrete</topic><topic>Energy modeling</topic><topic>Facades</topic><topic>Irradiance</topic><topic>Radiation</topic><topic>Radiation models</topic><topic>Radiosity</topic><topic>Roofs</topic><topic>Shading</topic><topic>Solar energy</topic><topic>Solar potential</topic><topic>Tiles</topic><topic>Tiling</topic><topic>Tiling strategies</topic><topic>Urban areas</topic><topic>Urban shading ratio</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Romero Rodríguez, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nouvel, Romain</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duminil, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eicker, Ursula</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Solar energy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Romero Rodríguez, Laura</au><au>Nouvel, Romain</au><au>Duminil, Eric</au><au>Eicker, Ursula</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Setting intelligent city tiling strategies for urban shading simulations</atitle><jtitle>Solar energy</jtitle><date>2017-11-15</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>157</volume><spage>880</spage><epage>894</epage><pages>880-894</pages><issn>0038-092X</issn><eissn>1471-1257</eissn><abstract>•Assessment of innovative computational strategies in an urban simulation platform.•Introduction of different tiling approaches for solar irradiance calculations.•Estimations of the Urban Shading Ratio for roofs and facades in large areas.•Analysis of two case studies with medium and high building densities.•Irradiance reductions up to 60% for facades and 25% for roofs in dense urban areas. Assessing accurately the solar potential of all building surfaces in cities, including shading and multiple reflections between buildings, is essential for urban energy modelling. However, since the number of surface interactions and radiation exchanges increase exponentially with the scale of the district, innovative computational strategies are needed, some of which will be introduced in the present work. They should hold the best compromise between result accuracy and computational efficiency, i.e. computational time and memory requirements. In this study, different approaches that may be used for the computation of urban solar irradiance in large areas are presented. Two concrete urban case studies of different densities have been used to compare and evaluate three different methods: the Perez Sky model, the Simplified Radiosity Algorithm and a new scene tiling method implemented in our urban simulation platform SimStadt, used for feasible estimations on a large scale. To quantify the influence of shading, the new concept of Urban Shading Ratio has been introduced and used for this evaluation process. In high density urban areas, this index may reach 60% for facades and 25% for roofs. Tiles of 500m width and 200m overlap are a minimum requirement in this case to compute solar irradiance with an acceptable accuracy. In medium density areas, tiles of 300m width and 100m overlap meet perfectly the accuracy requirements. In addition, the solar potential for various solar energy thresholds as well as the monthly variation of the Urban Shading Ratio have been quantified for both case studies, distinguishing between roofs and facades of different orientations.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.solener.2017.09.017</doi><tpages>15</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0038-092X
ispartof Solar energy, 2017-11, Vol.157, p.880-894
issn 0038-092X
1471-1257
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1984761173
source Elsevier
subjects Accuracy
Case studies
Cities
Computer applications
Computer memory
Computer simulation
Computing time
Concrete
Energy modeling
Facades
Irradiance
Radiation
Radiation models
Radiosity
Roofs
Shading
Solar energy
Solar potential
Tiles
Tiling
Tiling strategies
Urban areas
Urban shading ratio
title Setting intelligent city tiling strategies for urban shading simulations
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T21%3A01%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Setting%20intelligent%20city%20tiling%20strategies%20for%20urban%20shading%20simulations&rft.jtitle=Solar%20energy&rft.au=Romero%20Rodr%C3%ADguez,%20Laura&rft.date=2017-11-15&rft.volume=157&rft.spage=880&rft.epage=894&rft.pages=880-894&rft.issn=0038-092X&rft.eissn=1471-1257&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.solener.2017.09.017&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1984761173%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c423t-527f686385d8c25de1464a9f51404bc10d1212e38b8d22b1b43953c5bf08b933%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1984761173&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true