Loading…

The Challenge of Developing New Educational Indicators

Proposals for national assessments of educational performance provide opportunities to develop valuable social indicators, but they also pose important problems of methodology and interpretation. Researchers in the U. S. have emphasized the importance of analyzing and reporting indicator data at the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Educational evaluation and policy analysis 1995-03, Vol.17 (1), p.113-131
Main Authors: Williams, J. Douglas, Kerckhoff, Alan C.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c242t-7ebc467c41d93e797e1b25e5eb375f40052ff237c99b4d88dc437304629243773
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c242t-7ebc467c41d93e797e1b25e5eb375f40052ff237c99b4d88dc437304629243773
container_end_page 131
container_issue 1
container_start_page 113
container_title Educational evaluation and policy analysis
container_volume 17
creator Williams, J. Douglas
Kerckhoff, Alan C.
description Proposals for national assessments of educational performance provide opportunities to develop valuable social indicators, but they also pose important problems of methodology and interpretation. Researchers in the U. S. have emphasized the importance of analyzing and reporting indicator data at the school level, mainly because much of the variation in schooling outcomes is at the school level, and because findings at this level are particularly relevant to policy and practice. We do not refute this, but contend that indicator data should be analyzed and reported also at state and district levels. We present an analysis of British data that shows there is important variation at higher levels of the system, and that it is possible to examine whether this variation is related to national or district-level policies. The article discusses the issues involved in conducting analyses at higher levels. We identify three kinds of indicators: gross productivity, net productivity, and inequality. Our analysis indicates the degree of interdistrict variation in Great Britain on all of these measures and the extent to which organizational features of the districts’ programs help explain that variation. Recommendations are made regarding the necessary features of any educational assessment if it is to produce useful social indicators.
doi_str_mv 10.3102/01623737017001113
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1987001098</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.3102_01623737017001113</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1987001098</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c242t-7ebc467c41d93e797e1b25e5eb375f40052ff237c99b4d88dc437304629243773</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UMFOwzAMjRBIjMEHcKvEucNO0qY5ojFg0gSXca7a1O06lWYkK4i_J1U5ICF8sS2_9_T8GLtGWAgEfguYcqGEAlQAiChO2Ay1SGKElJ-y2XiPR8A5u_B-D6GU4jOWbncULXdF11HfUGTr6J4-qLOHtm-iZ_qMVtVgimNr-6KL1n3VhsU6f8nO6qLzdPXT5-z1YbVdPsWbl8f18m4TGy75MVZUGpkqI7HSgpRWhCVPKKFSqKSWAAmv6-DbaF3KKssqI4NHkCnXPExKzNnNpHtw9n0gf8z3dnDBi89RZ-OroLOAwgllnPXeUZ0fXPtWuK8cIR_jyf_EEziLieOLhn6p_kv4BmrvYZU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1987001098</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Challenge of Developing New Educational Indicators</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>SAGE Deep Backfile Package</source><source>JSTOR</source><creator>Williams, J. Douglas ; Kerckhoff, Alan C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Williams, J. Douglas ; Kerckhoff, Alan C.</creatorcontrib><description>Proposals for national assessments of educational performance provide opportunities to develop valuable social indicators, but they also pose important problems of methodology and interpretation. Researchers in the U. S. have emphasized the importance of analyzing and reporting indicator data at the school level, mainly because much of the variation in schooling outcomes is at the school level, and because findings at this level are particularly relevant to policy and practice. We do not refute this, but contend that indicator data should be analyzed and reported also at state and district levels. We present an analysis of British data that shows there is important variation at higher levels of the system, and that it is possible to examine whether this variation is related to national or district-level policies. The article discusses the issues involved in conducting analyses at higher levels. We identify three kinds of indicators: gross productivity, net productivity, and inequality. Our analysis indicates the degree of interdistrict variation in Great Britain on all of these measures and the extent to which organizational features of the districts’ programs help explain that variation. Recommendations are made regarding the necessary features of any educational assessment if it is to produce useful social indicators.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0162-3737</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1935-1062</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3102/01623737017001113</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Districts ; Educational Assessment ; Educational evaluation ; Educational Indicators ; Productivity ; Social indicators</subject><ispartof>Educational evaluation and policy analysis, 1995-03, Vol.17 (1), p.113-131</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Educational Research Association Mar 1995</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c242t-7ebc467c41d93e797e1b25e5eb375f40052ff237c99b4d88dc437304629243773</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c242t-7ebc467c41d93e797e1b25e5eb375f40052ff237c99b4d88dc437304629243773</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.3102/01623737017001113$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.3102/01623737017001113$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21824,27843,27901,27902,45058,45446</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Williams, J. Douglas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kerckhoff, Alan C.</creatorcontrib><title>The Challenge of Developing New Educational Indicators</title><title>Educational evaluation and policy analysis</title><description>Proposals for national assessments of educational performance provide opportunities to develop valuable social indicators, but they also pose important problems of methodology and interpretation. Researchers in the U. S. have emphasized the importance of analyzing and reporting indicator data at the school level, mainly because much of the variation in schooling outcomes is at the school level, and because findings at this level are particularly relevant to policy and practice. We do not refute this, but contend that indicator data should be analyzed and reported also at state and district levels. We present an analysis of British data that shows there is important variation at higher levels of the system, and that it is possible to examine whether this variation is related to national or district-level policies. The article discusses the issues involved in conducting analyses at higher levels. We identify three kinds of indicators: gross productivity, net productivity, and inequality. Our analysis indicates the degree of interdistrict variation in Great Britain on all of these measures and the extent to which organizational features of the districts’ programs help explain that variation. Recommendations are made regarding the necessary features of any educational assessment if it is to produce useful social indicators.</description><subject>Districts</subject><subject>Educational Assessment</subject><subject>Educational evaluation</subject><subject>Educational Indicators</subject><subject>Productivity</subject><subject>Social indicators</subject><issn>0162-3737</issn><issn>1935-1062</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1995</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1UMFOwzAMjRBIjMEHcKvEucNO0qY5ojFg0gSXca7a1O06lWYkK4i_J1U5ICF8sS2_9_T8GLtGWAgEfguYcqGEAlQAiChO2Ay1SGKElJ-y2XiPR8A5u_B-D6GU4jOWbncULXdF11HfUGTr6J4-qLOHtm-iZ_qMVtVgimNr-6KL1n3VhsU6f8nO6qLzdPXT5-z1YbVdPsWbl8f18m4TGy75MVZUGpkqI7HSgpRWhCVPKKFSqKSWAAmv6-DbaF3KKssqI4NHkCnXPExKzNnNpHtw9n0gf8z3dnDBi89RZ-OroLOAwgllnPXeUZ0fXPtWuK8cIR_jyf_EEziLieOLhn6p_kv4BmrvYZU</recordid><startdate>199503</startdate><enddate>199503</enddate><creator>Williams, J. Douglas</creator><creator>Kerckhoff, Alan C.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>American Educational Research Association</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199503</creationdate><title>The Challenge of Developing New Educational Indicators</title><author>Williams, J. Douglas ; Kerckhoff, Alan C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c242t-7ebc467c41d93e797e1b25e5eb375f40052ff237c99b4d88dc437304629243773</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1995</creationdate><topic>Districts</topic><topic>Educational Assessment</topic><topic>Educational evaluation</topic><topic>Educational Indicators</topic><topic>Productivity</topic><topic>Social indicators</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Williams, J. Douglas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kerckhoff, Alan C.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Educational evaluation and policy analysis</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Williams, J. Douglas</au><au>Kerckhoff, Alan C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Challenge of Developing New Educational Indicators</atitle><jtitle>Educational evaluation and policy analysis</jtitle><date>1995-03</date><risdate>1995</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>113</spage><epage>131</epage><pages>113-131</pages><issn>0162-3737</issn><eissn>1935-1062</eissn><abstract>Proposals for national assessments of educational performance provide opportunities to develop valuable social indicators, but they also pose important problems of methodology and interpretation. Researchers in the U. S. have emphasized the importance of analyzing and reporting indicator data at the school level, mainly because much of the variation in schooling outcomes is at the school level, and because findings at this level are particularly relevant to policy and practice. We do not refute this, but contend that indicator data should be analyzed and reported also at state and district levels. We present an analysis of British data that shows there is important variation at higher levels of the system, and that it is possible to examine whether this variation is related to national or district-level policies. The article discusses the issues involved in conducting analyses at higher levels. We identify three kinds of indicators: gross productivity, net productivity, and inequality. Our analysis indicates the degree of interdistrict variation in Great Britain on all of these measures and the extent to which organizational features of the districts’ programs help explain that variation. Recommendations are made regarding the necessary features of any educational assessment if it is to produce useful social indicators.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.3102/01623737017001113</doi><tpages>19</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0162-3737
ispartof Educational evaluation and policy analysis, 1995-03, Vol.17 (1), p.113-131
issn 0162-3737
1935-1062
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1987001098
source PAIS Index; SAGE Deep Backfile Package; JSTOR
subjects Districts
Educational Assessment
Educational evaluation
Educational Indicators
Productivity
Social indicators
title The Challenge of Developing New Educational Indicators
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T06%3A55%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Challenge%20of%20Developing%20New%20Educational%20Indicators&rft.jtitle=Educational%20evaluation%20and%20policy%20analysis&rft.au=Williams,%20J.%20Douglas&rft.date=1995-03&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=113&rft.epage=131&rft.pages=113-131&rft.issn=0162-3737&rft.eissn=1935-1062&rft_id=info:doi/10.3102/01623737017001113&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1987001098%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c242t-7ebc467c41d93e797e1b25e5eb375f40052ff237c99b4d88dc437304629243773%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1987001098&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.3102_01623737017001113&rfr_iscdi=true