Loading…
Early surgery versus initial conservative treatment in patients with spontaneous supratentorial intracerebral haematomas in the International Surgical Trial in Intracerebral Haemorrhage (STICH): a randomised trial
Spontaneous supratentorial intracerebral haemorrhage accounts for 20% of all stroke-related sudden neurological deficits, has the highest morbidity and mortality of all stroke, and the role of surgery remains controversial. We undertook a prospective randomised trial to compare early surgery with in...
Saved in:
Published in: | The Lancet (British edition) 2005-01, Vol.365 (9457), p.387-397 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1353-2aa84c9798b10c9262fda7ec6f88e1285ecf6fb263eb1e9a690e5df4dacb33563 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 397 |
container_issue | 9457 |
container_start_page | 387 |
container_title | The Lancet (British edition) |
container_volume | 365 |
creator | Mendelow, A David Gregson, Barbara A Fernandes, Helen M Murray, Gordon D Teasdale, Graham M Hope, D Terence Karimi, Abbas Shaw, M Donald M Barer, David H |
description | Spontaneous supratentorial intracerebral haemorrhage accounts for 20% of all stroke-related sudden neurological deficits, has the highest morbidity and mortality of all stroke, and the role of surgery remains controversial. We undertook a prospective randomised trial to compare early surgery with initial conservative treatment for patients with intracerebral haemorrhage.
A parallel-group trial design was used. Early surgery combined haematoma evacuation (within 24 h of randomisation) with medical treatment. Initial conservative treatment used medical treatment, although later evacuation was allowed if necessary. We used the eight-point Glasgow outcome scale obtained by postal questionnaires sent directly to patients at 6 months follow-up as the primary outcome measure. We divided the patients into good and poor prognosis groups on the basis of their clinical status at randomisation. For the good prognosis group, a favourable outcome was defined as good recovery or moderate disability on the Glasgow outcome scale. For the poor prognosis group, a favourable outcome also included the upper level of severe disability. Analysis was by intention to treat.
1033 patients from 83 centres in 27 countries were randomised to early surgery (503) or initial conservative treatment (530). At 6 months, 51 patients were lost to follow-up, and 17 were alive with unknown status. Of 468 patients randomised to early surgery, 122 (26%) had a favourable outcome compared with 118 (24%) of 496 randomised to initial conservative treatment (odds ratio 0·89 [95% CI 0·66–1·19], p=0·414); absolute benefit 2·3% (–3·2 to 7·7), relative benefit 10% (–13 to 33).
Patients with spontaneous supratentorial intracerebral haemorrhage in neurosurgical units show no overall benefit from early surgery when compared with initial conservative treatment. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)17826-X |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_elsev</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_198997243</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S014067360517826X</els_id><sourcerecordid>787995621</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1353-2aa84c9798b10c9262fda7ec6f88e1285ecf6fb263eb1e9a690e5df4dacb33563</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNUV1v0zAUtRBIlMFPQLJ42h4Cdpw4CS8IVYNWmsRDi9Q368a5WT21drl2ivZD939wtgntydc-Hz72YeyjFJ-lkPrLRshKFLpR-lLUV7JpS13sXrGFrJqqqKtm95ot_lPesncx3gkhKi3qBXu4Bjrc8zjRLdI9PyPFKXLnXXJw4Db4iHSG5M7IEyGkI_qUYX7KZ3mM_K9Lex5PwSfwGLI2TieClLFAs4XzicAiYU95twc8QgpHmO_gaY987ROSz27BZ3yTczibh-2zeMZf6FdZH4j2cIv8crNdL1dXXzlwAj-Eo4s45JRZ-J69GeEQ8cPzesF-_7jeLlfFza-f6-X3m8JKVauiBGgr2zVd20thu1KX4wANWj22LcqyrdGOeuxLrbCX2IHuBNbDWA1ge6VqrS7YpyffE4U_E8Zk7sKUX3OIRnZt1zVlpTLp2xMJc5KzQzLR5r-zODhCm8wQnJHCzFWaxyrN3JMRtXms0uzUPwbumf8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>198997243</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Early surgery versus initial conservative treatment in patients with spontaneous supratentorial intracerebral haematomas in the International Surgical Trial in Intracerebral Haemorrhage (STICH): a randomised trial</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate</source><source>Elsevier</source><creator>Mendelow, A David ; Gregson, Barbara A ; Fernandes, Helen M ; Murray, Gordon D ; Teasdale, Graham M ; Hope, D Terence ; Karimi, Abbas ; Shaw, M Donald M ; Barer, David H</creator><creatorcontrib>Mendelow, A David ; Gregson, Barbara A ; Fernandes, Helen M ; Murray, Gordon D ; Teasdale, Graham M ; Hope, D Terence ; Karimi, Abbas ; Shaw, M Donald M ; Barer, David H ; for the STICH investigators</creatorcontrib><description>Spontaneous supratentorial intracerebral haemorrhage accounts for 20% of all stroke-related sudden neurological deficits, has the highest morbidity and mortality of all stroke, and the role of surgery remains controversial. We undertook a prospective randomised trial to compare early surgery with initial conservative treatment for patients with intracerebral haemorrhage.
A parallel-group trial design was used. Early surgery combined haematoma evacuation (within 24 h of randomisation) with medical treatment. Initial conservative treatment used medical treatment, although later evacuation was allowed if necessary. We used the eight-point Glasgow outcome scale obtained by postal questionnaires sent directly to patients at 6 months follow-up as the primary outcome measure. We divided the patients into good and poor prognosis groups on the basis of their clinical status at randomisation. For the good prognosis group, a favourable outcome was defined as good recovery or moderate disability on the Glasgow outcome scale. For the poor prognosis group, a favourable outcome also included the upper level of severe disability. Analysis was by intention to treat.
1033 patients from 83 centres in 27 countries were randomised to early surgery (503) or initial conservative treatment (530). At 6 months, 51 patients were lost to follow-up, and 17 were alive with unknown status. Of 468 patients randomised to early surgery, 122 (26%) had a favourable outcome compared with 118 (24%) of 496 randomised to initial conservative treatment (odds ratio 0·89 [95% CI 0·66–1·19], p=0·414); absolute benefit 2·3% (–3·2 to 7·7), relative benefit 10% (–13 to 33).
Patients with spontaneous supratentorial intracerebral haemorrhage in neurosurgical units show no overall benefit from early surgery when compared with initial conservative treatment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0140-6736</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1474-547X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)17826-X</identifier><identifier>CODEN: LANCAO</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Clinical trials ; Hemorrhage ; Medical research ; Medical treatment ; Stroke ; Surgery</subject><ispartof>The Lancet (British edition), 2005-01, Vol.365 (9457), p.387-397</ispartof><rights>2005 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Lancet Ltd. Jan 29-Feb 4, 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1353-2aa84c9798b10c9262fda7ec6f88e1285ecf6fb263eb1e9a690e5df4dacb33563</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mendelow, A David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gregson, Barbara A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernandes, Helen M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murray, Gordon D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teasdale, Graham M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hope, D Terence</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karimi, Abbas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shaw, M Donald M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barer, David H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>for the STICH investigators</creatorcontrib><title>Early surgery versus initial conservative treatment in patients with spontaneous supratentorial intracerebral haematomas in the International Surgical Trial in Intracerebral Haemorrhage (STICH): a randomised trial</title><title>The Lancet (British edition)</title><description>Spontaneous supratentorial intracerebral haemorrhage accounts for 20% of all stroke-related sudden neurological deficits, has the highest morbidity and mortality of all stroke, and the role of surgery remains controversial. We undertook a prospective randomised trial to compare early surgery with initial conservative treatment for patients with intracerebral haemorrhage.
A parallel-group trial design was used. Early surgery combined haematoma evacuation (within 24 h of randomisation) with medical treatment. Initial conservative treatment used medical treatment, although later evacuation was allowed if necessary. We used the eight-point Glasgow outcome scale obtained by postal questionnaires sent directly to patients at 6 months follow-up as the primary outcome measure. We divided the patients into good and poor prognosis groups on the basis of their clinical status at randomisation. For the good prognosis group, a favourable outcome was defined as good recovery or moderate disability on the Glasgow outcome scale. For the poor prognosis group, a favourable outcome also included the upper level of severe disability. Analysis was by intention to treat.
1033 patients from 83 centres in 27 countries were randomised to early surgery (503) or initial conservative treatment (530). At 6 months, 51 patients were lost to follow-up, and 17 were alive with unknown status. Of 468 patients randomised to early surgery, 122 (26%) had a favourable outcome compared with 118 (24%) of 496 randomised to initial conservative treatment (odds ratio 0·89 [95% CI 0·66–1·19], p=0·414); absolute benefit 2·3% (–3·2 to 7·7), relative benefit 10% (–13 to 33).
Patients with spontaneous supratentorial intracerebral haemorrhage in neurosurgical units show no overall benefit from early surgery when compared with initial conservative treatment.</description><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Hemorrhage</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Medical treatment</subject><subject>Stroke</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><issn>0140-6736</issn><issn>1474-547X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpNUV1v0zAUtRBIlMFPQLJ42h4Cdpw4CS8IVYNWmsRDi9Q368a5WT21drl2ivZD939wtgntydc-Hz72YeyjFJ-lkPrLRshKFLpR-lLUV7JpS13sXrGFrJqqqKtm95ot_lPesncx3gkhKi3qBXu4Bjrc8zjRLdI9PyPFKXLnXXJw4Db4iHSG5M7IEyGkI_qUYX7KZ3mM_K9Lex5PwSfwGLI2TieClLFAs4XzicAiYU95twc8QgpHmO_gaY987ROSz27BZ3yTczibh-2zeMZf6FdZH4j2cIv8crNdL1dXXzlwAj-Eo4s45JRZ-J69GeEQ8cPzesF-_7jeLlfFza-f6-X3m8JKVauiBGgr2zVd20thu1KX4wANWj22LcqyrdGOeuxLrbCX2IHuBNbDWA1ge6VqrS7YpyffE4U_E8Zk7sKUX3OIRnZt1zVlpTLp2xMJc5KzQzLR5r-zODhCm8wQnJHCzFWaxyrN3JMRtXms0uzUPwbumf8</recordid><startdate>20050129</startdate><enddate>20050129</enddate><creator>Mendelow, A David</creator><creator>Gregson, Barbara A</creator><creator>Fernandes, Helen M</creator><creator>Murray, Gordon D</creator><creator>Teasdale, Graham M</creator><creator>Hope, D Terence</creator><creator>Karimi, Abbas</creator><creator>Shaw, M Donald M</creator><creator>Barer, David H</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>0TT</scope><scope>0TZ</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8C2</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KB~</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050129</creationdate><title>Early surgery versus initial conservative treatment in patients with spontaneous supratentorial intracerebral haematomas in the International Surgical Trial in Intracerebral Haemorrhage (STICH): a randomised trial</title><author>Mendelow, A David ; Gregson, Barbara A ; Fernandes, Helen M ; Murray, Gordon D ; Teasdale, Graham M ; Hope, D Terence ; Karimi, Abbas ; Shaw, M Donald M ; Barer, David H</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1353-2aa84c9798b10c9262fda7ec6f88e1285ecf6fb263eb1e9a690e5df4dacb33563</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Hemorrhage</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Medical treatment</topic><topic>Stroke</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mendelow, A David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gregson, Barbara A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernandes, Helen M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murray, Gordon D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teasdale, Graham M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hope, D Terence</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karimi, Abbas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shaw, M Donald M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barer, David H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>for the STICH investigators</creatorcontrib><collection>News PRO</collection><collection>Pharma and Biotech Premium PRO</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Lancet Titles</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Newsstand Professional</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>The Lancet (British edition)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mendelow, A David</au><au>Gregson, Barbara A</au><au>Fernandes, Helen M</au><au>Murray, Gordon D</au><au>Teasdale, Graham M</au><au>Hope, D Terence</au><au>Karimi, Abbas</au><au>Shaw, M Donald M</au><au>Barer, David H</au><aucorp>for the STICH investigators</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Early surgery versus initial conservative treatment in patients with spontaneous supratentorial intracerebral haematomas in the International Surgical Trial in Intracerebral Haemorrhage (STICH): a randomised trial</atitle><jtitle>The Lancet (British edition)</jtitle><date>2005-01-29</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>365</volume><issue>9457</issue><spage>387</spage><epage>397</epage><pages>387-397</pages><issn>0140-6736</issn><eissn>1474-547X</eissn><coden>LANCAO</coden><abstract>Spontaneous supratentorial intracerebral haemorrhage accounts for 20% of all stroke-related sudden neurological deficits, has the highest morbidity and mortality of all stroke, and the role of surgery remains controversial. We undertook a prospective randomised trial to compare early surgery with initial conservative treatment for patients with intracerebral haemorrhage.
A parallel-group trial design was used. Early surgery combined haematoma evacuation (within 24 h of randomisation) with medical treatment. Initial conservative treatment used medical treatment, although later evacuation was allowed if necessary. We used the eight-point Glasgow outcome scale obtained by postal questionnaires sent directly to patients at 6 months follow-up as the primary outcome measure. We divided the patients into good and poor prognosis groups on the basis of their clinical status at randomisation. For the good prognosis group, a favourable outcome was defined as good recovery or moderate disability on the Glasgow outcome scale. For the poor prognosis group, a favourable outcome also included the upper level of severe disability. Analysis was by intention to treat.
1033 patients from 83 centres in 27 countries were randomised to early surgery (503) or initial conservative treatment (530). At 6 months, 51 patients were lost to follow-up, and 17 were alive with unknown status. Of 468 patients randomised to early surgery, 122 (26%) had a favourable outcome compared with 118 (24%) of 496 randomised to initial conservative treatment (odds ratio 0·89 [95% CI 0·66–1·19], p=0·414); absolute benefit 2·3% (–3·2 to 7·7), relative benefit 10% (–13 to 33).
Patients with spontaneous supratentorial intracerebral haemorrhage in neurosurgical units show no overall benefit from early surgery when compared with initial conservative treatment.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/S0140-6736(05)17826-X</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0140-6736 |
ispartof | The Lancet (British edition), 2005-01, Vol.365 (9457), p.387-397 |
issn | 0140-6736 1474-547X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_198997243 |
source | EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate; Elsevier |
subjects | Clinical trials Hemorrhage Medical research Medical treatment Stroke Surgery |
title | Early surgery versus initial conservative treatment in patients with spontaneous supratentorial intracerebral haematomas in the International Surgical Trial in Intracerebral Haemorrhage (STICH): a randomised trial |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T21%3A39%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_elsev&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Early%20surgery%20versus%20initial%20conservative%20treatment%20in%20patients%20with%20spontaneous%20supratentorial%20intracerebral%20haematomas%20in%20the%20International%20Surgical%20Trial%20in%20Intracerebral%20Haemorrhage%20(STICH):%20a%20randomised%20trial&rft.jtitle=The%20Lancet%20(British%20edition)&rft.au=Mendelow,%20A%20David&rft.aucorp=for%20the%20STICH%20investigators&rft.date=2005-01-29&rft.volume=365&rft.issue=9457&rft.spage=387&rft.epage=397&rft.pages=387-397&rft.issn=0140-6736&rft.eissn=1474-547X&rft.coden=LANCAO&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0140-6736(05)17826-X&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_elsev%3E787995621%3C/proquest_elsev%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1353-2aa84c9798b10c9262fda7ec6f88e1285ecf6fb263eb1e9a690e5df4dacb33563%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=198997243&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |