Loading…
Oral amoxicillin versus injectable penicillin for severe pneumonia in children aged 3 to 59 months: a randomised multicentre equivalency study
Injectable penicillin is the recommended treatment for WHO-defined severe pneumonia (lower chest indrawing). If oral amoxicillin proves equally effective, it could reduce referral, admission, and treatment costs. We aimed to determine whether oral amoxicillin and parenteral penicillin were equivalen...
Saved in:
Published in: | The Lancet (British edition) 2004-09, Vol.364 (9440), p.1141-1148 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-9d4bd1ce7f876da77d1a381c23d490e7b23f5b8a15824d7ea83de3f95a9868a73 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-9d4bd1ce7f876da77d1a381c23d490e7b23f5b8a15824d7ea83de3f95a9868a73 |
container_end_page | 1148 |
container_issue | 9440 |
container_start_page | 1141 |
container_title | The Lancet (British edition) |
container_volume | 364 |
creator | Addo-Yobo, Emmanuel Chisaka, Noel Hassan, Mumtaz Hibberd, Patricia Lozano, Juan M Jeena, Prakash MacLeod, William B Maulen, Irene Patel, Archana Qazi, Shamim Thea, Donald M |
description | Injectable penicillin is the recommended treatment for WHO-defined severe pneumonia (lower chest indrawing). If oral amoxicillin proves equally effective, it could reduce referral, admission, and treatment costs. We aimed to determine whether oral amoxicillin and parenteral penicillin were equivalent in the treatment of severe pneumonia in children aged 3–59 months.
This multicentre, randomised, open-label equivalency study was undertaken at tertiary-care centres in eight developing countries in Africa, Asia, and South America. Children aged 3–59 months with severe pneumonia were admitted for 48 h and, if symptoms improved, were discharged with a 5-day course of oral amoxicillin. 1702 children were randomly allocated to receive either oral amoxicillin (n=857) or parenteral penicillin (n=845) for 48 h. Follow-up assessments were done at 5 and 14 days after enrolment. Primary outcome was treatment failure (persistence of lower chest indrawing or new danger signs) at 48 h. Analyses were by intention-to-treat and per protocol.
Treatment failure was 19% in each group (161 patients, pencillin; 167 amoxillin; risk difference –0·4%; 95% CI –4·2 to 3·3) at 48 h. Infancy (age 3–11 months; odds ratio 2·72, 95% CI 1·95 to 3·79), very fast breathing (1·94, 1·42 to 2·65), and hypoxia (1·95, 1·34 to 2·82) at baseline predicted treatment failure by multivariate analysis.
Injectable penicillin and oral amoxicillin are equivalent for severe pneumonia treatment in controlled settings. Potential benefits of oral treatment include decreases in (1) risk of needle-borne infections; (2) need for referral or admission; (3) administration costs; and (4) costs to the family. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17100-6 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_199012610</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0140673604171006</els_id><sourcerecordid>706554231</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-9d4bd1ce7f876da77d1a381c23d490e7b23f5b8a15824d7ea83de3f95a9868a73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc2OFCEUhYnROO3oI2iIK12UcgsoKDfGTPxLJpmFmrgjFNxy6FRBD1R17JfwmWWmW126InC-e244h5CnwF4Bg-71FwaCNZ3i3QsmXoICVm_3yAaEEo0U6vt9svmLnJFHpWwZY6Jj8iE5AykktC1syK-rbCdq5_QzuDBNIdI95rIWGuIW3WKHCekO4x9xTJkWrEh9jbjOKQZbUequw-QzRmp_oKecLonKnlZ5uS5vqKXZRp_mUKo4r9MSHMaleuDNGvZ2wugOtCyrPzwmD0Y7FXxyOs_Jtw_vv158ai6vPn6-eHfZOK710vReDB4cqlGrzlulPFiuwbXci56hGlo-ykFbkLoVXqHV3CMfe2l73Wmr-Dl5fvTd5XSzYlnMNq051pUG-p5B2wGrkDxCLqdSMo5ml8Ns88EAM7clmLsSzG3ChglzV4Lp6tyzk_k6zOj_TZ1Sr8DbI4D1i_uA2RQXagjoQ66hG5_Cf1b8Bi_gmRg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>199012610</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Oral amoxicillin versus injectable penicillin for severe pneumonia in children aged 3 to 59 months: a randomised multicentre equivalency study</title><source>Business Source Ultimate</source><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><creator>Addo-Yobo, Emmanuel ; Chisaka, Noel ; Hassan, Mumtaz ; Hibberd, Patricia ; Lozano, Juan M ; Jeena, Prakash ; MacLeod, William B ; Maulen, Irene ; Patel, Archana ; Qazi, Shamim ; Thea, Donald M</creator><creatorcontrib>Addo-Yobo, Emmanuel ; Chisaka, Noel ; Hassan, Mumtaz ; Hibberd, Patricia ; Lozano, Juan M ; Jeena, Prakash ; MacLeod, William B ; Maulen, Irene ; Patel, Archana ; Qazi, Shamim ; Thea, Donald M ; Ngoc Tuong Vy Nguyen for the Amoxicillin Penicillin Pneumonia International Study (APPIS) group</creatorcontrib><description>Injectable penicillin is the recommended treatment for WHO-defined severe pneumonia (lower chest indrawing). If oral amoxicillin proves equally effective, it could reduce referral, admission, and treatment costs. We aimed to determine whether oral amoxicillin and parenteral penicillin were equivalent in the treatment of severe pneumonia in children aged 3–59 months.
This multicentre, randomised, open-label equivalency study was undertaken at tertiary-care centres in eight developing countries in Africa, Asia, and South America. Children aged 3–59 months with severe pneumonia were admitted for 48 h and, if symptoms improved, were discharged with a 5-day course of oral amoxicillin. 1702 children were randomly allocated to receive either oral amoxicillin (n=857) or parenteral penicillin (n=845) for 48 h. Follow-up assessments were done at 5 and 14 days after enrolment. Primary outcome was treatment failure (persistence of lower chest indrawing or new danger signs) at 48 h. Analyses were by intention-to-treat and per protocol.
Treatment failure was 19% in each group (161 patients, pencillin; 167 amoxillin; risk difference –0·4%; 95% CI –4·2 to 3·3) at 48 h. Infancy (age 3–11 months; odds ratio 2·72, 95% CI 1·95 to 3·79), very fast breathing (1·94, 1·42 to 2·65), and hypoxia (1·95, 1·34 to 2·82) at baseline predicted treatment failure by multivariate analysis.
Injectable penicillin and oral amoxicillin are equivalent for severe pneumonia treatment in controlled settings. Potential benefits of oral treatment include decreases in (1) risk of needle-borne infections; (2) need for referral or admission; (3) administration costs; and (4) costs to the family.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0140-6736</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1474-547X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17100-6</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15451221</identifier><identifier>CODEN: LANCAO</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Administration, Oral ; Algorithms ; Amoxicillin - administration & dosage ; Anti-Bacterial Agents - administration & dosage ; Antimicrobial agents ; Child, Preschool ; Children & youth ; Developing Countries ; Female ; Haemophilus Infections - diagnosis ; Haemophilus Infections - drug therapy ; Haemophilus Infections - mortality ; Haemophilus influenzae ; Health risk assessment ; Hospitalization ; Humans ; Hypoxia ; Infant ; Injections, Intravenous - adverse effects ; LDCs ; Male ; Medical treatment ; Mortality ; Multivariate analysis ; Penicillin ; Penicillins - administration & dosage ; Pharmacology ; Pneumonia ; Pneumonia, Bacterial - diagnosis ; Pneumonia, Bacterial - drug therapy ; Pneumonia, Bacterial - mortality ; Pneumonia, Pneumococcal - diagnosis ; Pneumonia, Pneumococcal - drug therapy ; Pneumonia, Pneumococcal - mortality ; Survival Rate ; Treatment Failure</subject><ispartof>The Lancet (British edition), 2004-09, Vol.364 (9440), p.1141-1148</ispartof><rights>2004 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Lancet Ltd. Sep 25-Oct 1, 2004</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-9d4bd1ce7f876da77d1a381c23d490e7b23f5b8a15824d7ea83de3f95a9868a73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-9d4bd1ce7f876da77d1a381c23d490e7b23f5b8a15824d7ea83de3f95a9868a73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15451221$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Addo-Yobo, Emmanuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chisaka, Noel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hassan, Mumtaz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hibberd, Patricia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lozano, Juan M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jeena, Prakash</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MacLeod, William B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maulen, Irene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patel, Archana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qazi, Shamim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thea, Donald M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ngoc Tuong Vy Nguyen for the Amoxicillin Penicillin Pneumonia International Study (APPIS) group</creatorcontrib><title>Oral amoxicillin versus injectable penicillin for severe pneumonia in children aged 3 to 59 months: a randomised multicentre equivalency study</title><title>The Lancet (British edition)</title><addtitle>Lancet</addtitle><description>Injectable penicillin is the recommended treatment for WHO-defined severe pneumonia (lower chest indrawing). If oral amoxicillin proves equally effective, it could reduce referral, admission, and treatment costs. We aimed to determine whether oral amoxicillin and parenteral penicillin were equivalent in the treatment of severe pneumonia in children aged 3–59 months.
This multicentre, randomised, open-label equivalency study was undertaken at tertiary-care centres in eight developing countries in Africa, Asia, and South America. Children aged 3–59 months with severe pneumonia were admitted for 48 h and, if symptoms improved, were discharged with a 5-day course of oral amoxicillin. 1702 children were randomly allocated to receive either oral amoxicillin (n=857) or parenteral penicillin (n=845) for 48 h. Follow-up assessments were done at 5 and 14 days after enrolment. Primary outcome was treatment failure (persistence of lower chest indrawing or new danger signs) at 48 h. Analyses were by intention-to-treat and per protocol.
Treatment failure was 19% in each group (161 patients, pencillin; 167 amoxillin; risk difference –0·4%; 95% CI –4·2 to 3·3) at 48 h. Infancy (age 3–11 months; odds ratio 2·72, 95% CI 1·95 to 3·79), very fast breathing (1·94, 1·42 to 2·65), and hypoxia (1·95, 1·34 to 2·82) at baseline predicted treatment failure by multivariate analysis.
Injectable penicillin and oral amoxicillin are equivalent for severe pneumonia treatment in controlled settings. Potential benefits of oral treatment include decreases in (1) risk of needle-borne infections; (2) need for referral or admission; (3) administration costs; and (4) costs to the family.</description><subject>Administration, Oral</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Amoxicillin - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Anti-Bacterial Agents - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Antimicrobial agents</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Children & youth</subject><subject>Developing Countries</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Haemophilus Infections - diagnosis</subject><subject>Haemophilus Infections - drug therapy</subject><subject>Haemophilus Infections - mortality</subject><subject>Haemophilus influenzae</subject><subject>Health risk assessment</subject><subject>Hospitalization</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hypoxia</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Injections, Intravenous - adverse effects</subject><subject>LDCs</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical treatment</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Multivariate analysis</subject><subject>Penicillin</subject><subject>Penicillins - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Pharmacology</subject><subject>Pneumonia</subject><subject>Pneumonia, Bacterial - diagnosis</subject><subject>Pneumonia, Bacterial - drug therapy</subject><subject>Pneumonia, Bacterial - mortality</subject><subject>Pneumonia, Pneumococcal - diagnosis</subject><subject>Pneumonia, Pneumococcal - drug therapy</subject><subject>Pneumonia, Pneumococcal - mortality</subject><subject>Survival Rate</subject><subject>Treatment Failure</subject><issn>0140-6736</issn><issn>1474-547X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkc2OFCEUhYnROO3oI2iIK12UcgsoKDfGTPxLJpmFmrgjFNxy6FRBD1R17JfwmWWmW126InC-e244h5CnwF4Bg-71FwaCNZ3i3QsmXoICVm_3yAaEEo0U6vt9svmLnJFHpWwZY6Jj8iE5AykktC1syK-rbCdq5_QzuDBNIdI95rIWGuIW3WKHCekO4x9xTJkWrEh9jbjOKQZbUequw-QzRmp_oKecLonKnlZ5uS5vqKXZRp_mUKo4r9MSHMaleuDNGvZ2wugOtCyrPzwmD0Y7FXxyOs_Jtw_vv158ai6vPn6-eHfZOK710vReDB4cqlGrzlulPFiuwbXci56hGlo-ykFbkLoVXqHV3CMfe2l73Wmr-Dl5fvTd5XSzYlnMNq051pUG-p5B2wGrkDxCLqdSMo5ml8Ns88EAM7clmLsSzG3ChglzV4Lp6tyzk_k6zOj_TZ1Sr8DbI4D1i_uA2RQXagjoQ66hG5_Cf1b8Bi_gmRg</recordid><startdate>20040925</startdate><enddate>20040925</enddate><creator>Addo-Yobo, Emmanuel</creator><creator>Chisaka, Noel</creator><creator>Hassan, Mumtaz</creator><creator>Hibberd, Patricia</creator><creator>Lozano, Juan M</creator><creator>Jeena, Prakash</creator><creator>MacLeod, William B</creator><creator>Maulen, Irene</creator><creator>Patel, Archana</creator><creator>Qazi, Shamim</creator><creator>Thea, Donald M</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0TT</scope><scope>0TZ</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8C2</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KB~</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040925</creationdate><title>Oral amoxicillin versus injectable penicillin for severe pneumonia in children aged 3 to 59 months: a randomised multicentre equivalency study</title><author>Addo-Yobo, Emmanuel ; Chisaka, Noel ; Hassan, Mumtaz ; Hibberd, Patricia ; Lozano, Juan M ; Jeena, Prakash ; MacLeod, William B ; Maulen, Irene ; Patel, Archana ; Qazi, Shamim ; Thea, Donald M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-9d4bd1ce7f876da77d1a381c23d490e7b23f5b8a15824d7ea83de3f95a9868a73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Administration, Oral</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Amoxicillin - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Anti-Bacterial Agents - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Antimicrobial agents</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Children & youth</topic><topic>Developing Countries</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Haemophilus Infections - diagnosis</topic><topic>Haemophilus Infections - drug therapy</topic><topic>Haemophilus Infections - mortality</topic><topic>Haemophilus influenzae</topic><topic>Health risk assessment</topic><topic>Hospitalization</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hypoxia</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Injections, Intravenous - adverse effects</topic><topic>LDCs</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical treatment</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Multivariate analysis</topic><topic>Penicillin</topic><topic>Penicillins - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Pharmacology</topic><topic>Pneumonia</topic><topic>Pneumonia, Bacterial - diagnosis</topic><topic>Pneumonia, Bacterial - drug therapy</topic><topic>Pneumonia, Bacterial - mortality</topic><topic>Pneumonia, Pneumococcal - diagnosis</topic><topic>Pneumonia, Pneumococcal - drug therapy</topic><topic>Pneumonia, Pneumococcal - mortality</topic><topic>Survival Rate</topic><topic>Treatment Failure</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Addo-Yobo, Emmanuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chisaka, Noel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hassan, Mumtaz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hibberd, Patricia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lozano, Juan M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jeena, Prakash</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MacLeod, William B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maulen, Irene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patel, Archana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qazi, Shamim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thea, Donald M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ngoc Tuong Vy Nguyen for the Amoxicillin Penicillin Pneumonia International Study (APPIS) group</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>News PRO</collection><collection>Pharma and Biotech Premium PRO</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Journals</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Public Health Database</collection><collection>Lancet Titles</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Newsstand Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Family Health Database (Proquest)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>The Lancet (British edition)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Addo-Yobo, Emmanuel</au><au>Chisaka, Noel</au><au>Hassan, Mumtaz</au><au>Hibberd, Patricia</au><au>Lozano, Juan M</au><au>Jeena, Prakash</au><au>MacLeod, William B</au><au>Maulen, Irene</au><au>Patel, Archana</au><au>Qazi, Shamim</au><au>Thea, Donald M</au><aucorp>Ngoc Tuong Vy Nguyen for the Amoxicillin Penicillin Pneumonia International Study (APPIS) group</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Oral amoxicillin versus injectable penicillin for severe pneumonia in children aged 3 to 59 months: a randomised multicentre equivalency study</atitle><jtitle>The Lancet (British edition)</jtitle><addtitle>Lancet</addtitle><date>2004-09-25</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>364</volume><issue>9440</issue><spage>1141</spage><epage>1148</epage><pages>1141-1148</pages><issn>0140-6736</issn><eissn>1474-547X</eissn><coden>LANCAO</coden><abstract>Injectable penicillin is the recommended treatment for WHO-defined severe pneumonia (lower chest indrawing). If oral amoxicillin proves equally effective, it could reduce referral, admission, and treatment costs. We aimed to determine whether oral amoxicillin and parenteral penicillin were equivalent in the treatment of severe pneumonia in children aged 3–59 months.
This multicentre, randomised, open-label equivalency study was undertaken at tertiary-care centres in eight developing countries in Africa, Asia, and South America. Children aged 3–59 months with severe pneumonia were admitted for 48 h and, if symptoms improved, were discharged with a 5-day course of oral amoxicillin. 1702 children were randomly allocated to receive either oral amoxicillin (n=857) or parenteral penicillin (n=845) for 48 h. Follow-up assessments were done at 5 and 14 days after enrolment. Primary outcome was treatment failure (persistence of lower chest indrawing or new danger signs) at 48 h. Analyses were by intention-to-treat and per protocol.
Treatment failure was 19% in each group (161 patients, pencillin; 167 amoxillin; risk difference –0·4%; 95% CI –4·2 to 3·3) at 48 h. Infancy (age 3–11 months; odds ratio 2·72, 95% CI 1·95 to 3·79), very fast breathing (1·94, 1·42 to 2·65), and hypoxia (1·95, 1·34 to 2·82) at baseline predicted treatment failure by multivariate analysis.
Injectable penicillin and oral amoxicillin are equivalent for severe pneumonia treatment in controlled settings. Potential benefits of oral treatment include decreases in (1) risk of needle-borne infections; (2) need for referral or admission; (3) administration costs; and (4) costs to the family.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>15451221</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17100-6</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0140-6736 |
ispartof | The Lancet (British edition), 2004-09, Vol.364 (9440), p.1141-1148 |
issn | 0140-6736 1474-547X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_199012610 |
source | Business Source Ultimate; ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024 |
subjects | Administration, Oral Algorithms Amoxicillin - administration & dosage Anti-Bacterial Agents - administration & dosage Antimicrobial agents Child, Preschool Children & youth Developing Countries Female Haemophilus Infections - diagnosis Haemophilus Infections - drug therapy Haemophilus Infections - mortality Haemophilus influenzae Health risk assessment Hospitalization Humans Hypoxia Infant Injections, Intravenous - adverse effects LDCs Male Medical treatment Mortality Multivariate analysis Penicillin Penicillins - administration & dosage Pharmacology Pneumonia Pneumonia, Bacterial - diagnosis Pneumonia, Bacterial - drug therapy Pneumonia, Bacterial - mortality Pneumonia, Pneumococcal - diagnosis Pneumonia, Pneumococcal - drug therapy Pneumonia, Pneumococcal - mortality Survival Rate Treatment Failure |
title | Oral amoxicillin versus injectable penicillin for severe pneumonia in children aged 3 to 59 months: a randomised multicentre equivalency study |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T16%3A01%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Oral%20amoxicillin%20versus%20injectable%20penicillin%20for%20severe%20pneumonia%20in%20children%20aged%203%20to%2059%20months:%20a%20randomised%20multicentre%20equivalency%20study&rft.jtitle=The%20Lancet%20(British%20edition)&rft.au=Addo-Yobo,%20Emmanuel&rft.aucorp=Ngoc%20Tuong%20Vy%20Nguyen%20for%20the%20Amoxicillin%20Penicillin%20Pneumonia%20International%20Study%20(APPIS)%20group&rft.date=2004-09-25&rft.volume=364&rft.issue=9440&rft.spage=1141&rft.epage=1148&rft.pages=1141-1148&rft.issn=0140-6736&rft.eissn=1474-547X&rft.coden=LANCAO&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17100-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E706554231%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c388t-9d4bd1ce7f876da77d1a381c23d490e7b23f5b8a15824d7ea83de3f95a9868a73%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=199012610&rft_id=info:pmid/15451221&rfr_iscdi=true |