Loading…

Randomised trial of surgery alone versus radiotherapy followed by surgery for potentially operable locally advanced rectal cancer

Survival rates after surgery for rectal cancer remain at about 40% at 5 years from diagnosis. The aim of this study was to find out whether local recurrence rate could be reduced and survival increased by a moderately high dose of preoperative radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced, but othe...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Lancet (British edition) 1996-12, Vol.348 (9042), p.1605-1610
Main Authors: Oates, G D, Stenning, S P
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-e77ccf3d47b4f2708390c3d0ea655e775dd4aa0621800665e087dd54ca85ff653
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-e77ccf3d47b4f2708390c3d0ea655e775dd4aa0621800665e087dd54ca85ff653
container_end_page 1610
container_issue 9042
container_start_page 1605
container_title The Lancet (British edition)
container_volume 348
creator Oates, G D
Stenning, S P
description Survival rates after surgery for rectal cancer remain at about 40% at 5 years from diagnosis. The aim of this study was to find out whether local recurrence rate could be reduced and survival increased by a moderately high dose of preoperative radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced, but otherwise operable, carcinoma of the rectum. We carried out a prospective randomised trial of surgery alone (n=140) versus surgery preceded by 40 Gy radiotherapy (n=139) given in 20 fractions of 2 Gy over 4 weeks. The patients, from 20 regional centres throughout the UK, were enrolled between 1981 and 1989, and followed up for a minimum of 5 years or to death. 217 patients died, 114 of 140 allocated surgery alone and 103 of 139 allocated preoperative radiotherapy: median survival times were 24 months and 31 months, respectively. The hazard ratio for overall survival was 0·79 (95% CI 0·60–1·04, p=0·10). At 5 years' follow-up 65 patients allocated surgery alone and 50 who received preoperative radiotherapy had local recurrence (hazard ratio 0·68 [0·47–0·98], p=0·04); the corresponding numbers of patients with distant recurrence were 67 and 49 (hazard ratio 0·66 [0·46–0·95], p=0·02). There was a significant benefit of radiotherapy on disease-free survival (hazard ratio 0·76 [0·58–1·0], p=0·05). There was no increase in postoperative or late complications in the radiotherapy group. Our results provide further evidence that preoperative radiotherapy can reduce the rate of local recurrence of rectal cancer in patients with locally advanced disease. However, survival results are still equivocal, and so we must await the results of a meta-analysis of all radiotherapy trials from which precise and definitive results, particularly for survival, may be obtained.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0140-6736(96)05348-2
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_199029875</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0140673696053482</els_id><sourcerecordid>10553793</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-e77ccf3d47b4f2708390c3d0ea655e775dd4aa0621800665e087dd54ca85ff653</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1r3DAYhEVpoNs0P6EgSg_twe1r68s-hRLapBAItAn0JrT6SBQcy3nl3eBj_nnl3bDXnISkZ2aYIeRjDd9qqOX3v1BzqKRi8ksnv4JgvK2aN2RVc8UrwdW_t2R1QN6R9znfAwCXIFbk-Y8ZXHqI2Ts6YTQ9TYHmDd56nKnp0-Dp1mPeZIrGxTTdeTTjTEPq-_RUNOv5QIeEdEyTH6Zi0880jYVd9572ye4ejNuawRYRejuVJLvc8AM5CqbP_uTlPCY3v35en11Ul1fnv89-XFaWSTZVXilrA3NcrXloFLSsA8sceCOFKJ_COW4MyKZuAaQUHlrlnODWtCIEKdgx-bT3HTE9bnye9H3a4FAidd110HStWiCxhyymnNEHPWJ8MDjrGvQytt6NrZcldSf1bmzdFN3nF3OTS9mApVrMB3EjgCnOCna6x3wpuo0edbbRL5vEZRPtUnwl6D8GipY3</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>199029875</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Randomised trial of surgery alone versus radiotherapy followed by surgery for potentially operable locally advanced rectal cancer</title><source>Elsevier</source><source>Access via Business Source (EBSCOhost)</source><creator>Oates, G D ; Stenning, S P</creator><creatorcontrib>Oates, G D ; Stenning, S P ; Medical Research Council Rectal Cancer Working Party</creatorcontrib><description>Survival rates after surgery for rectal cancer remain at about 40% at 5 years from diagnosis. The aim of this study was to find out whether local recurrence rate could be reduced and survival increased by a moderately high dose of preoperative radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced, but otherwise operable, carcinoma of the rectum. We carried out a prospective randomised trial of surgery alone (n=140) versus surgery preceded by 40 Gy radiotherapy (n=139) given in 20 fractions of 2 Gy over 4 weeks. The patients, from 20 regional centres throughout the UK, were enrolled between 1981 and 1989, and followed up for a minimum of 5 years or to death. 217 patients died, 114 of 140 allocated surgery alone and 103 of 139 allocated preoperative radiotherapy: median survival times were 24 months and 31 months, respectively. The hazard ratio for overall survival was 0·79 (95% CI 0·60–1·04, p=0·10). At 5 years' follow-up 65 patients allocated surgery alone and 50 who received preoperative radiotherapy had local recurrence (hazard ratio 0·68 [0·47–0·98], p=0·04); the corresponding numbers of patients with distant recurrence were 67 and 49 (hazard ratio 0·66 [0·46–0·95], p=0·02). There was a significant benefit of radiotherapy on disease-free survival (hazard ratio 0·76 [0·58–1·0], p=0·05). There was no increase in postoperative or late complications in the radiotherapy group. Our results provide further evidence that preoperative radiotherapy can reduce the rate of local recurrence of rectal cancer in patients with locally advanced disease. However, survival results are still equivocal, and so we must await the results of a meta-analysis of all radiotherapy trials from which precise and definitive results, particularly for survival, may be obtained.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0140-6736</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1474-547X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(96)05348-2</identifier><identifier>CODEN: LANCAO</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Colorectal cancer ; Disease ; Medical research ; Medical sciences ; Radiation therapy ; Rectum ; Stomach, duodenum, intestine, rectum, anus ; Surgery ; Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases ; Surgery of the digestive system ; Tumors</subject><ispartof>The Lancet (British edition), 1996-12, Vol.348 (9042), p.1605-1610</ispartof><rights>1996 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>1997 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Lancet Ltd. Dec 14, 1996</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-e77ccf3d47b4f2708390c3d0ea655e775dd4aa0621800665e087dd54ca85ff653</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-e77ccf3d47b4f2708390c3d0ea655e775dd4aa0621800665e087dd54ca85ff653</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=2503743$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Oates, G D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stenning, S P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Medical Research Council Rectal Cancer Working Party</creatorcontrib><title>Randomised trial of surgery alone versus radiotherapy followed by surgery for potentially operable locally advanced rectal cancer</title><title>The Lancet (British edition)</title><description>Survival rates after surgery for rectal cancer remain at about 40% at 5 years from diagnosis. The aim of this study was to find out whether local recurrence rate could be reduced and survival increased by a moderately high dose of preoperative radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced, but otherwise operable, carcinoma of the rectum. We carried out a prospective randomised trial of surgery alone (n=140) versus surgery preceded by 40 Gy radiotherapy (n=139) given in 20 fractions of 2 Gy over 4 weeks. The patients, from 20 regional centres throughout the UK, were enrolled between 1981 and 1989, and followed up for a minimum of 5 years or to death. 217 patients died, 114 of 140 allocated surgery alone and 103 of 139 allocated preoperative radiotherapy: median survival times were 24 months and 31 months, respectively. The hazard ratio for overall survival was 0·79 (95% CI 0·60–1·04, p=0·10). At 5 years' follow-up 65 patients allocated surgery alone and 50 who received preoperative radiotherapy had local recurrence (hazard ratio 0·68 [0·47–0·98], p=0·04); the corresponding numbers of patients with distant recurrence were 67 and 49 (hazard ratio 0·66 [0·46–0·95], p=0·02). There was a significant benefit of radiotherapy on disease-free survival (hazard ratio 0·76 [0·58–1·0], p=0·05). There was no increase in postoperative or late complications in the radiotherapy group. Our results provide further evidence that preoperative radiotherapy can reduce the rate of local recurrence of rectal cancer in patients with locally advanced disease. However, survival results are still equivocal, and so we must await the results of a meta-analysis of all radiotherapy trials from which precise and definitive results, particularly for survival, may be obtained.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Colorectal cancer</subject><subject>Disease</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Radiation therapy</subject><subject>Rectum</subject><subject>Stomach, duodenum, intestine, rectum, anus</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</subject><subject>Surgery of the digestive system</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><issn>0140-6736</issn><issn>1474-547X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkE1r3DAYhEVpoNs0P6EgSg_twe1r68s-hRLapBAItAn0JrT6SBQcy3nl3eBj_nnl3bDXnISkZ2aYIeRjDd9qqOX3v1BzqKRi8ksnv4JgvK2aN2RVc8UrwdW_t2R1QN6R9znfAwCXIFbk-Y8ZXHqI2Ts6YTQ9TYHmDd56nKnp0-Dp1mPeZIrGxTTdeTTjTEPq-_RUNOv5QIeEdEyTH6Zi0880jYVd9572ye4ejNuawRYRejuVJLvc8AM5CqbP_uTlPCY3v35en11Ul1fnv89-XFaWSTZVXilrA3NcrXloFLSsA8sceCOFKJ_COW4MyKZuAaQUHlrlnODWtCIEKdgx-bT3HTE9bnye9H3a4FAidd110HStWiCxhyymnNEHPWJ8MDjrGvQytt6NrZcldSf1bmzdFN3nF3OTS9mApVrMB3EjgCnOCna6x3wpuo0edbbRL5vEZRPtUnwl6D8GipY3</recordid><startdate>19961214</startdate><enddate>19961214</enddate><creator>Oates, G D</creator><creator>Stenning, S P</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Lancet</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0TT</scope><scope>0TZ</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8C2</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KB~</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19961214</creationdate><title>Randomised trial of surgery alone versus radiotherapy followed by surgery for potentially operable locally advanced rectal cancer</title><author>Oates, G D ; Stenning, S P</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-e77ccf3d47b4f2708390c3d0ea655e775dd4aa0621800665e087dd54ca85ff653</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Colorectal cancer</topic><topic>Disease</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Radiation therapy</topic><topic>Rectum</topic><topic>Stomach, duodenum, intestine, rectum, anus</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</topic><topic>Surgery of the digestive system</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Oates, G D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stenning, S P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Medical Research Council Rectal Cancer Working Party</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>News PRO</collection><collection>Pharma and Biotech Premium PRO</collection><collection>Global News &amp; ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database (Proquest)</collection><collection>Lancet Titles</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Newsstand Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Family Health Database (Proquest)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>The Lancet (British edition)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Oates, G D</au><au>Stenning, S P</au><aucorp>Medical Research Council Rectal Cancer Working Party</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Randomised trial of surgery alone versus radiotherapy followed by surgery for potentially operable locally advanced rectal cancer</atitle><jtitle>The Lancet (British edition)</jtitle><date>1996-12-14</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>348</volume><issue>9042</issue><spage>1605</spage><epage>1610</epage><pages>1605-1610</pages><issn>0140-6736</issn><eissn>1474-547X</eissn><coden>LANCAO</coden><abstract>Survival rates after surgery for rectal cancer remain at about 40% at 5 years from diagnosis. The aim of this study was to find out whether local recurrence rate could be reduced and survival increased by a moderately high dose of preoperative radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced, but otherwise operable, carcinoma of the rectum. We carried out a prospective randomised trial of surgery alone (n=140) versus surgery preceded by 40 Gy radiotherapy (n=139) given in 20 fractions of 2 Gy over 4 weeks. The patients, from 20 regional centres throughout the UK, were enrolled between 1981 and 1989, and followed up for a minimum of 5 years or to death. 217 patients died, 114 of 140 allocated surgery alone and 103 of 139 allocated preoperative radiotherapy: median survival times were 24 months and 31 months, respectively. The hazard ratio for overall survival was 0·79 (95% CI 0·60–1·04, p=0·10). At 5 years' follow-up 65 patients allocated surgery alone and 50 who received preoperative radiotherapy had local recurrence (hazard ratio 0·68 [0·47–0·98], p=0·04); the corresponding numbers of patients with distant recurrence were 67 and 49 (hazard ratio 0·66 [0·46–0·95], p=0·02). There was a significant benefit of radiotherapy on disease-free survival (hazard ratio 0·76 [0·58–1·0], p=0·05). There was no increase in postoperative or late complications in the radiotherapy group. Our results provide further evidence that preoperative radiotherapy can reduce the rate of local recurrence of rectal cancer in patients with locally advanced disease. However, survival results are still equivocal, and so we must await the results of a meta-analysis of all radiotherapy trials from which precise and definitive results, particularly for survival, may be obtained.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/S0140-6736(96)05348-2</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0140-6736
ispartof The Lancet (British edition), 1996-12, Vol.348 (9042), p.1605-1610
issn 0140-6736
1474-547X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_199029875
source Elsevier; Access via Business Source (EBSCOhost)
subjects Biological and medical sciences
Colorectal cancer
Disease
Medical research
Medical sciences
Radiation therapy
Rectum
Stomach, duodenum, intestine, rectum, anus
Surgery
Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases
Surgery of the digestive system
Tumors
title Randomised trial of surgery alone versus radiotherapy followed by surgery for potentially operable locally advanced rectal cancer
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T20%3A37%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Randomised%20trial%20of%20surgery%20alone%20versus%20radiotherapy%20followed%20by%20surgery%20for%20potentially%20operable%20locally%20advanced%20rectal%20cancer&rft.jtitle=The%20Lancet%20(British%20edition)&rft.au=Oates,%20G%20D&rft.aucorp=Medical%20Research%20Council%20Rectal%20Cancer%20Working%20Party&rft.date=1996-12-14&rft.volume=348&rft.issue=9042&rft.spage=1605&rft.epage=1610&rft.pages=1605-1610&rft.issn=0140-6736&rft.eissn=1474-547X&rft.coden=LANCAO&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0140-6736(96)05348-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E10553793%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-e77ccf3d47b4f2708390c3d0ea655e775dd4aa0621800665e087dd54ca85ff653%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=199029875&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true