AN ASSESSMENT AND REFINEMENT OF JEHN'S INTRAGROUP CONFLICT SCALE

Jehn (1992, 1994) developed the Intragroup Conflict Scale (ICS) to measure two theoretically distinct dimensions of conflict: relationship and task conflict. In the years since, the ICS has been widely adopted by researchers as a measurement tool for group conflict. However, limited evidence of the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The International journal of conflict management 2002-02, Vol.13 (2), p.110-126
Main Authors: Pearson, Allison W, Ensley, Michael D, Amason, Allen C
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Best practice
Conflict
Decision making
Discriminant analysis
Groups
International
Management theory
Quantitative psychology
Studies
Teams
Validation studies
Validity
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-bb5c9f7f5297f07a50afb41e9ca39baf2b8e942e52c98d6e9acc6a5d47942fb73
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-bb5c9f7f5297f07a50afb41e9ca39baf2b8e942e52c98d6e9acc6a5d47942fb73
container_end_page 126
container_issue 2
container_start_page 110
container_title The International journal of conflict management
container_volume 13
creator Pearson, Allison W
Ensley, Michael D
Amason, Allen C
description Jehn (1992, 1994) developed the Intragroup Conflict Scale (ICS) to measure two theoretically distinct dimensions of conflict: relationship and task conflict. In the years since, the ICS has been widely adopted by researchers as a measurement tool for group conflict. However, limited evidence of the scale's psychometric properties has been published. Following guidelines provided by Schwab (1980) and Hinkin (1995), we assess the construct validity of the scale, using both individual level and group level techniques, and test proposed nomological relationships, using six diverse samples. We conclude that a 6-item version of the original 9-item scale best captures relationship and task conflict.
doi_str_mv 10.1108/eb022870
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_istex</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_199043245</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>36085591</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-bb5c9f7f5297f07a50afb41e9ca39baf2b8e942e52c98d6e9acc6a5d47942fb73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpt0E9PwjAUAPDFaCKiiR9h0US8TNuuXdubC24wg5uyEY9NN9oEBIYrJPrtrU44qKe-vvzenzzHOYfgBkLAblUJEGIUHDgdSAnzGMHk0MYAYw-DgB07J8bMAQCBD2DHuQtTN8zzKM8fo7Rww_TeHUdxkkbf3yx2H6Jh2svdJC3G4WCcTZ7cfpbGo6RfuHk_HEWnzpGWC6POft6uM4mjoj_0RtkgscCrfAY3XlmSimuqCeJUAyoJkLrEUPFK-ryUGpVMcYwUQRVn00BxWVWBJFNMbVaX1O86V23fdVO_bZXZiOXMVGqxkCtVb43wA8AI4dDCi19wXm-bld1NQM4B9hEmFl23qGpqYxqlxbqZLWXzISAQX3cUuzta6rV0Zjbqfe9k8yoC6lMi8AsSz_4QUQSpGFh_2Xq1VI1cTPcVu45iPdVW9f5Xf-Z_ArumhV0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>199043245</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>AN ASSESSMENT AND REFINEMENT OF JEHN'S INTRAGROUP CONFLICT SCALE</title><source>Emerald eJournals Backfiles</source><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Business Source Ultimate【Trial: -2024/12/31】【Remote access available】</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>ABI/INFORM Global</source><creator>Pearson, Allison W ; Ensley, Michael D ; Amason, Allen C</creator><creatorcontrib>Pearson, Allison W ; Ensley, Michael D ; Amason, Allen C</creatorcontrib><description>Jehn (1992, 1994) developed the Intragroup Conflict Scale (ICS) to measure two theoretically distinct dimensions of conflict: relationship and task conflict. In the years since, the ICS has been widely adopted by researchers as a measurement tool for group conflict. However, limited evidence of the scale's psychometric properties has been published. Following guidelines provided by Schwab (1980) and Hinkin (1995), we assess the construct validity of the scale, using both individual level and group level techniques, and test proposed nomological relationships, using six diverse samples. We conclude that a 6-item version of the original 9-item scale best captures relationship and task conflict.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1044-4068</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-8545</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/eb022870</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bowling Green: MCB UP Ltd</publisher><subject>Best practice ; Conflict ; Decision making ; Discriminant analysis ; Groups ; International ; Management theory ; Quantitative psychology ; Studies ; Teams ; Validation studies ; Validity</subject><ispartof>The International journal of conflict management, 2002-02, Vol.13 (2), p.110-126</ispartof><rights>MCB UP Limited</rights><rights>Copyright Center for Advanced Studies in Management 2002</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-bb5c9f7f5297f07a50afb41e9ca39baf2b8e942e52c98d6e9acc6a5d47942fb73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-bb5c9f7f5297f07a50afb41e9ca39baf2b8e942e52c98d6e9acc6a5d47942fb73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/199043245/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/199043245?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,2365,11688,12847,21394,27924,27925,33223,33611,33612,36060,36061,43733,44363,53210,53338,74221,74895</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pearson, Allison W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ensley, Michael D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amason, Allen C</creatorcontrib><title>AN ASSESSMENT AND REFINEMENT OF JEHN'S INTRAGROUP CONFLICT SCALE</title><title>The International journal of conflict management</title><description>Jehn (1992, 1994) developed the Intragroup Conflict Scale (ICS) to measure two theoretically distinct dimensions of conflict: relationship and task conflict. In the years since, the ICS has been widely adopted by researchers as a measurement tool for group conflict. However, limited evidence of the scale's psychometric properties has been published. Following guidelines provided by Schwab (1980) and Hinkin (1995), we assess the construct validity of the scale, using both individual level and group level techniques, and test proposed nomological relationships, using six diverse samples. We conclude that a 6-item version of the original 9-item scale best captures relationship and task conflict.</description><subject>Best practice</subject><subject>Conflict</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Discriminant analysis</subject><subject>Groups</subject><subject>International</subject><subject>Management theory</subject><subject>Quantitative psychology</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Teams</subject><subject>Validation studies</subject><subject>Validity</subject><issn>1044-4068</issn><issn>1758-8545</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><sourceid>M2R</sourceid><recordid>eNpt0E9PwjAUAPDFaCKiiR9h0US8TNuuXdubC24wg5uyEY9NN9oEBIYrJPrtrU44qKe-vvzenzzHOYfgBkLAblUJEGIUHDgdSAnzGMHk0MYAYw-DgB07J8bMAQCBD2DHuQtTN8zzKM8fo7Rww_TeHUdxkkbf3yx2H6Jh2svdJC3G4WCcTZ7cfpbGo6RfuHk_HEWnzpGWC6POft6uM4mjoj_0RtkgscCrfAY3XlmSimuqCeJUAyoJkLrEUPFK-ryUGpVMcYwUQRVn00BxWVWBJFNMbVaX1O86V23fdVO_bZXZiOXMVGqxkCtVb43wA8AI4dDCi19wXm-bld1NQM4B9hEmFl23qGpqYxqlxbqZLWXzISAQX3cUuzta6rV0Zjbqfe9k8yoC6lMi8AsSz_4QUQSpGFh_2Xq1VI1cTPcVu45iPdVW9f5Xf-Z_ArumhV0</recordid><startdate>20020201</startdate><enddate>20020201</enddate><creator>Pearson, Allison W</creator><creator>Ensley, Michael D</creator><creator>Amason, Allen C</creator><general>MCB UP Ltd</general><general>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1Q</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JG9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20020201</creationdate><title>AN ASSESSMENT AND REFINEMENT OF JEHN'S INTRAGROUP CONFLICT SCALE</title><author>Pearson, Allison W ; Ensley, Michael D ; Amason, Allen C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-bb5c9f7f5297f07a50afb41e9ca39baf2b8e942e52c98d6e9acc6a5d47942fb73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Best practice</topic><topic>Conflict</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Discriminant analysis</topic><topic>Groups</topic><topic>International</topic><topic>Management theory</topic><topic>Quantitative psychology</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Teams</topic><topic>Validation studies</topic><topic>Validity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pearson, Allison W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ensley, Michael D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amason, Allen C</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>ProQuest Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Military Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><jtitle>The International journal of conflict management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pearson, Allison W</au><au>Ensley, Michael D</au><au>Amason, Allen C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>AN ASSESSMENT AND REFINEMENT OF JEHN'S INTRAGROUP CONFLICT SCALE</atitle><jtitle>The International journal of conflict management</jtitle><date>2002-02-01</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>110</spage><epage>126</epage><pages>110-126</pages><issn>1044-4068</issn><eissn>1758-8545</eissn><abstract>Jehn (1992, 1994) developed the Intragroup Conflict Scale (ICS) to measure two theoretically distinct dimensions of conflict: relationship and task conflict. In the years since, the ICS has been widely adopted by researchers as a measurement tool for group conflict. However, limited evidence of the scale's psychometric properties has been published. Following guidelines provided by Schwab (1980) and Hinkin (1995), we assess the construct validity of the scale, using both individual level and group level techniques, and test proposed nomological relationships, using six diverse samples. We conclude that a 6-item version of the original 9-item scale best captures relationship and task conflict.</abstract><cop>Bowling Green</cop><pub>MCB UP Ltd</pub><doi>10.1108/eb022870</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1044-4068
ispartof The International journal of conflict management, 2002-02, Vol.13 (2), p.110-126
issn 1044-4068
1758-8545
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_199043245
source Emerald eJournals Backfiles; International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Business Source Ultimate【Trial: -2024/12/31】【Remote access available】; Social Science Premium Collection; ABI/INFORM Global
subjects Best practice
Conflict
Decision making
Discriminant analysis
Groups
International
Management theory
Quantitative psychology
Studies
Teams
Validation studies
Validity
title AN ASSESSMENT AND REFINEMENT OF JEHN'S INTRAGROUP CONFLICT SCALE
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T01%3A20%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_istex&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=AN%20ASSESSMENT%20AND%20REFINEMENT%20OF%20JEHN'S%20INTRAGROUP%20CONFLICT%20SCALE&rft.jtitle=The%20International%20journal%20of%20conflict%20management&rft.au=Pearson,%20Allison%20W&rft.date=2002-02-01&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=110&rft.epage=126&rft.pages=110-126&rft.issn=1044-4068&rft.eissn=1758-8545&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/eb022870&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_istex%3E36085591%3C/proquest_istex%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-bb5c9f7f5297f07a50afb41e9ca39baf2b8e942e52c98d6e9acc6a5d47942fb73%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=199043245&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true