Reevaluating Runoffs in Latin America

Since the 1960s, the most common rule used for electing presidents worldwide has shifted from plurality (first-past-the-post) to majority runoff (a requirement for a second round between the top two candidates if no candidate wins 50 percent of the vote). Between 1990 and 2016 in Latin America, leve...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of democracy 2018, Vol.29 (1), p.96-110
Main Author: McClintock, Cynthia
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Candidates
Constraints
Democracy
Innovations
Intellectuals
Local elections
Political campaigns
Political parties
Presidential candidates
Presidential elections
Presidents
Voting
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Since the 1960s, the most common rule used for electing presidents worldwide has shifted from plurality (first-past-the-post) to majority runoff (a requirement for a second round between the top two candidates if no candidate wins 50 percent of the vote). Between 1990 and 2016 in Latin America, levels of democracy improved in most countries under runoff but plummeted in most countries under plurality. Runoff lowered barriers to entry for new parties. It also ensured that the president had majority support and enticed candidates toward the political center. While the concerns many scholars have expressed about the proliferation of political parties under runoff is not unwarranted, this issue can be mitigated through additional institutional innovations.
ISSN:1045-5736
1086-3214
1086-3214
DOI:10.1353/jod.2018.0008