Coercive control in intimate partner violence

• Published in: Aggression and violent behavior 2017-11, Vol.37, p.1-11
• Main Authors: Hamberger, L. Kevin, Larsen, Sadie E., Lehrner, Amy
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Abusers; Behavior; Coercion; Coercive control; Deployment; Domestic violence; Inconsistency; Intention; Intentionality; Intimate partner violence; Literature reviews; Measurement; Motivation; Operational definitions; Opportunity; Power and control
• ISSN: 1359-1789; 1873-6335
• DOI: 10.1016/j.avb.2017.08.003

The construct of coercive control has been central to many conceptualizations of intimate partner violence (IPV), yet there is widespread inconsistency in the literature regarding how this construct is defined and measured. This article provides a comprehensive literature review on coercive control in regards to conceptualizations, definitions, operationalization, and measurement; and attempts to provide a synthesis and recommendations for future research. A summary and critique of measures used to assess coercive control in IPV is provided. At least three facets of coercive control are identified: 1) intentionality or goal orientation in the abuser (versus motivation), 2) a negative perception of the controlling behavior by the victim, and 3) the ability of the abuser to obtain control through the deployment of a credible threat. Measurement challenges and opportunities posed by such a multifaceted definition are discussed. •Coercive control has been defined and measured in varied ways (at least 22 measures).•The first facet of coercive control is intentionality of the abuser.•The second facet of coercive control is a victim's negative perception of control.•The third facet of coercive control is an abuser's credible threat to gain control.