Loading…
The Measurement of Subjective Wellbeing: Item-Order Effects in the Personal Wellbeing Index—Adult
When multi-item questionnaires are included in psychological research, many factors can influence the response given. One such factor that has traditionally been overlooked is the potential impact of item-order effects. This paper extends upon the work of Kaplan et al. (J Happiness Stud 14:1443–1458...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of happiness studies 2018, Vol.19 (1), p.315-332 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-dbc3707a5706e31e0858b64b5de95fea671b1488b63ebae3a7d414f50d9582823 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-dbc3707a5706e31e0858b64b5de95fea671b1488b63ebae3a7d414f50d9582823 |
container_end_page | 332 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 315 |
container_title | Journal of happiness studies |
container_volume | 19 |
creator | Weinberg, Melissa K. Seton, Catherine Cameron, Nikki |
description | When multi-item questionnaires are included in psychological research, many factors can influence the response given. One such factor that has traditionally been overlooked is the potential impact of item-order effects. This paper extends upon the work of Kaplan et al. (J Happiness Stud 14:1443–1458,
2013
. doi:
10.1007/s10902-012-9388-5
) who explored item-order effects in measures of job satisfaction, and applies similar principles to the measurement of life satisfaction, or subjective wellbeing, by exploring item-order effects within the Personal Wellbeing Index (PWI; IWBG in Personal Wellbeing Index, 5th edn. Australian Centre on Quality of Life, Deakin University, Melbourne,
2013
.
http://www.deakin.edu.au/research/acqol/intruments/wellbeing-index/index.php
). In a preliminary study, participants completed the PWI in its standard format (general-specific) and psychometric properties were compared to those who completed the PWI in an alternate format (specific-general). Analyses revealed that the PWI performed adequately for both groups, though there were subtle indications of item-order effects. In a second study, the order of the PWI domains was randomised (random-order) and compared to the standard format (fixed-order). Results revealed lower mean scores and more variation in scores when items were randomised. Overall, the PWI performed as expected for most interrogative analyses. It achieved a single factor solution, no matter the order of items, and the same domains emerged as significant unique predictors of general life satisfaction. The study highlights the importance of exploring item-order effects as part of the psychometric validation procedure, and it is recommended that all new scales be subject to this investigation to reduce measurement error and improve accuracy in psychological assessment. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10902-016-9822-1 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1999916799</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1999916799</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-dbc3707a5706e31e0858b64b5de95fea671b1488b63ebae3a7d414f50d9582823</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM9Kw0AQxhdRsFYfwNuC59WdbLJ_vJVStVBRsOJxyZ9JTUmTupuI3nwIn9AncUsEvTiXGWZ-38fwEXIK_Bw4VxceuOER4yCZ0VHEYI-MIFGCKaX5fpiFNiw2Sh-SI-_XnHMjpRyRfPmM9BZT3zvcYNPRtqQPfbbGvKtekT5hXWdYNatLOu9ww-5cgY7OyjLcPa0a2gX5PTrfNmn9S9N5U-Db18fnpOjr7pgclGnt8eSnj8nj1Ww5vWGLu-v5dLJguQDZsSLLheIqTRSXKAC5TnQm4ywp0CQlplJBBrEOO4FZiiJVRQxxmfDCJDrSkRiTs8F369qXHn1n123vwmPeggkFUhkTKBio3LXeOyzt1lWb1L1b4HaXpR2ytCFLu8vSQtBEg8YHtlmh--P8r-gbMeB3ig</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1999916799</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Measurement of Subjective Wellbeing: Item-Order Effects in the Personal Wellbeing Index—Adult</title><source>EconLit s plnými texty</source><source>ABI/INFORM Global</source><source>Springer Nature</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>Sociology Collection</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Weinberg, Melissa K. ; Seton, Catherine ; Cameron, Nikki</creator><creatorcontrib>Weinberg, Melissa K. ; Seton, Catherine ; Cameron, Nikki</creatorcontrib><description>When multi-item questionnaires are included in psychological research, many factors can influence the response given. One such factor that has traditionally been overlooked is the potential impact of item-order effects. This paper extends upon the work of Kaplan et al. (J Happiness Stud 14:1443–1458,
2013
. doi:
10.1007/s10902-012-9388-5
) who explored item-order effects in measures of job satisfaction, and applies similar principles to the measurement of life satisfaction, or subjective wellbeing, by exploring item-order effects within the Personal Wellbeing Index (PWI; IWBG in Personal Wellbeing Index, 5th edn. Australian Centre on Quality of Life, Deakin University, Melbourne,
2013
.
http://www.deakin.edu.au/research/acqol/intruments/wellbeing-index/index.php
). In a preliminary study, participants completed the PWI in its standard format (general-specific) and psychometric properties were compared to those who completed the PWI in an alternate format (specific-general). Analyses revealed that the PWI performed adequately for both groups, though there were subtle indications of item-order effects. In a second study, the order of the PWI domains was randomised (random-order) and compared to the standard format (fixed-order). Results revealed lower mean scores and more variation in scores when items were randomised. Overall, the PWI performed as expected for most interrogative analyses. It achieved a single factor solution, no matter the order of items, and the same domains emerged as significant unique predictors of general life satisfaction. The study highlights the importance of exploring item-order effects as part of the psychometric validation procedure, and it is recommended that all new scales be subject to this investigation to reduce measurement error and improve accuracy in psychological assessment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1389-4978</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-7780</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10902-016-9822-1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Economics ; Happiness ; Job satisfaction ; Life satisfaction ; Measurement errors ; Personality and Social Psychology ; Philosophy ; Positive Psychology ; Psychological aspects ; Psychological research ; Quality of life ; Quality of Life Research ; Quantitative psychology ; Research Paper ; Social Sciences ; Well being</subject><ispartof>Journal of happiness studies, 2018, Vol.19 (1), p.315-332</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016</rights><rights>Journal of Happiness Studies is a copyright of Springer, (2016). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-dbc3707a5706e31e0858b64b5de95fea671b1488b63ebae3a7d414f50d9582823</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-dbc3707a5706e31e0858b64b5de95fea671b1488b63ebae3a7d414f50d9582823</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1999916799/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1999916799?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,11668,21374,21375,27323,27903,27904,33590,33753,34509,36039,43712,44094,44342,73967,74385,74641</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Weinberg, Melissa K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seton, Catherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cameron, Nikki</creatorcontrib><title>The Measurement of Subjective Wellbeing: Item-Order Effects in the Personal Wellbeing Index—Adult</title><title>Journal of happiness studies</title><addtitle>J Happiness Stud</addtitle><description>When multi-item questionnaires are included in psychological research, many factors can influence the response given. One such factor that has traditionally been overlooked is the potential impact of item-order effects. This paper extends upon the work of Kaplan et al. (J Happiness Stud 14:1443–1458,
2013
. doi:
10.1007/s10902-012-9388-5
) who explored item-order effects in measures of job satisfaction, and applies similar principles to the measurement of life satisfaction, or subjective wellbeing, by exploring item-order effects within the Personal Wellbeing Index (PWI; IWBG in Personal Wellbeing Index, 5th edn. Australian Centre on Quality of Life, Deakin University, Melbourne,
2013
.
http://www.deakin.edu.au/research/acqol/intruments/wellbeing-index/index.php
). In a preliminary study, participants completed the PWI in its standard format (general-specific) and psychometric properties were compared to those who completed the PWI in an alternate format (specific-general). Analyses revealed that the PWI performed adequately for both groups, though there were subtle indications of item-order effects. In a second study, the order of the PWI domains was randomised (random-order) and compared to the standard format (fixed-order). Results revealed lower mean scores and more variation in scores when items were randomised. Overall, the PWI performed as expected for most interrogative analyses. It achieved a single factor solution, no matter the order of items, and the same domains emerged as significant unique predictors of general life satisfaction. The study highlights the importance of exploring item-order effects as part of the psychometric validation procedure, and it is recommended that all new scales be subject to this investigation to reduce measurement error and improve accuracy in psychological assessment.</description><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Happiness</subject><subject>Job satisfaction</subject><subject>Life satisfaction</subject><subject>Measurement errors</subject><subject>Personality and Social Psychology</subject><subject>Philosophy</subject><subject>Positive Psychology</subject><subject>Psychological aspects</subject><subject>Psychological research</subject><subject>Quality of life</subject><subject>Quality of Life Research</subject><subject>Quantitative psychology</subject><subject>Research Paper</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Well being</subject><issn>1389-4978</issn><issn>1573-7780</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>HEHIP</sourceid><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><sourceid>M2R</sourceid><sourceid>M2S</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kM9Kw0AQxhdRsFYfwNuC59WdbLJ_vJVStVBRsOJxyZ9JTUmTupuI3nwIn9AncUsEvTiXGWZ-38fwEXIK_Bw4VxceuOER4yCZ0VHEYI-MIFGCKaX5fpiFNiw2Sh-SI-_XnHMjpRyRfPmM9BZT3zvcYNPRtqQPfbbGvKtekT5hXWdYNatLOu9ww-5cgY7OyjLcPa0a2gX5PTrfNmn9S9N5U-Db18fnpOjr7pgclGnt8eSnj8nj1Ww5vWGLu-v5dLJguQDZsSLLheIqTRSXKAC5TnQm4ywp0CQlplJBBrEOO4FZiiJVRQxxmfDCJDrSkRiTs8F369qXHn1n123vwmPeggkFUhkTKBio3LXeOyzt1lWb1L1b4HaXpR2ytCFLu8vSQtBEg8YHtlmh--P8r-gbMeB3ig</recordid><startdate>2018</startdate><enddate>2018</enddate><creator>Weinberg, Melissa K.</creator><creator>Seton, Catherine</creator><creator>Cameron, Nikki</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2018</creationdate><title>The Measurement of Subjective Wellbeing: Item-Order Effects in the Personal Wellbeing Index—Adult</title><author>Weinberg, Melissa K. ; Seton, Catherine ; Cameron, Nikki</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-dbc3707a5706e31e0858b64b5de95fea671b1488b63ebae3a7d414f50d9582823</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Happiness</topic><topic>Job satisfaction</topic><topic>Life satisfaction</topic><topic>Measurement errors</topic><topic>Personality and Social Psychology</topic><topic>Philosophy</topic><topic>Positive Psychology</topic><topic>Psychological aspects</topic><topic>Psychological research</topic><topic>Quality of life</topic><topic>Quality of Life Research</topic><topic>Quantitative psychology</topic><topic>Research Paper</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Well being</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Weinberg, Melissa K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seton, Catherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cameron, Nikki</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Databases</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Journal of happiness studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Weinberg, Melissa K.</au><au>Seton, Catherine</au><au>Cameron, Nikki</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Measurement of Subjective Wellbeing: Item-Order Effects in the Personal Wellbeing Index—Adult</atitle><jtitle>Journal of happiness studies</jtitle><stitle>J Happiness Stud</stitle><date>2018</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>315</spage><epage>332</epage><pages>315-332</pages><issn>1389-4978</issn><eissn>1573-7780</eissn><abstract>When multi-item questionnaires are included in psychological research, many factors can influence the response given. One such factor that has traditionally been overlooked is the potential impact of item-order effects. This paper extends upon the work of Kaplan et al. (J Happiness Stud 14:1443–1458,
2013
. doi:
10.1007/s10902-012-9388-5
) who explored item-order effects in measures of job satisfaction, and applies similar principles to the measurement of life satisfaction, or subjective wellbeing, by exploring item-order effects within the Personal Wellbeing Index (PWI; IWBG in Personal Wellbeing Index, 5th edn. Australian Centre on Quality of Life, Deakin University, Melbourne,
2013
.
http://www.deakin.edu.au/research/acqol/intruments/wellbeing-index/index.php
). In a preliminary study, participants completed the PWI in its standard format (general-specific) and psychometric properties were compared to those who completed the PWI in an alternate format (specific-general). Analyses revealed that the PWI performed adequately for both groups, though there were subtle indications of item-order effects. In a second study, the order of the PWI domains was randomised (random-order) and compared to the standard format (fixed-order). Results revealed lower mean scores and more variation in scores when items were randomised. Overall, the PWI performed as expected for most interrogative analyses. It achieved a single factor solution, no matter the order of items, and the same domains emerged as significant unique predictors of general life satisfaction. The study highlights the importance of exploring item-order effects as part of the psychometric validation procedure, and it is recommended that all new scales be subject to this investigation to reduce measurement error and improve accuracy in psychological assessment.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s10902-016-9822-1</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1389-4978 |
ispartof | Journal of happiness studies, 2018, Vol.19 (1), p.315-332 |
issn | 1389-4978 1573-7780 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1999916799 |
source | EconLit s plnými texty; ABI/INFORM Global; Springer Nature; Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); Sociology Collection; Sociological Abstracts |
subjects | Economics Happiness Job satisfaction Life satisfaction Measurement errors Personality and Social Psychology Philosophy Positive Psychology Psychological aspects Psychological research Quality of life Quality of Life Research Quantitative psychology Research Paper Social Sciences Well being |
title | The Measurement of Subjective Wellbeing: Item-Order Effects in the Personal Wellbeing Index—Adult |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T19%3A38%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Measurement%20of%20Subjective%20Wellbeing:%20Item-Order%20Effects%20in%20the%20Personal%20Wellbeing%20Index%E2%80%94Adult&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20happiness%20studies&rft.au=Weinberg,%20Melissa%20K.&rft.date=2018&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=315&rft.epage=332&rft.pages=315-332&rft.issn=1389-4978&rft.eissn=1573-7780&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10902-016-9822-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1999916799%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-dbc3707a5706e31e0858b64b5de95fea671b1488b63ebae3a7d414f50d9582823%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1999916799&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |