Loading…

The Measurement of Subjective Wellbeing: Item-Order Effects in the Personal Wellbeing Index—Adult

When multi-item questionnaires are included in psychological research, many factors can influence the response given. One such factor that has traditionally been overlooked is the potential impact of item-order effects. This paper extends upon the work of Kaplan et al. (J Happiness Stud 14:1443–1458...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of happiness studies 2018, Vol.19 (1), p.315-332
Main Authors: Weinberg, Melissa K., Seton, Catherine, Cameron, Nikki
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-dbc3707a5706e31e0858b64b5de95fea671b1488b63ebae3a7d414f50d9582823
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-dbc3707a5706e31e0858b64b5de95fea671b1488b63ebae3a7d414f50d9582823
container_end_page 332
container_issue 1
container_start_page 315
container_title Journal of happiness studies
container_volume 19
creator Weinberg, Melissa K.
Seton, Catherine
Cameron, Nikki
description When multi-item questionnaires are included in psychological research, many factors can influence the response given. One such factor that has traditionally been overlooked is the potential impact of item-order effects. This paper extends upon the work of Kaplan et al. (J Happiness Stud 14:1443–1458, 2013 . doi: 10.1007/s10902-012-9388-5 ) who explored item-order effects in measures of job satisfaction, and applies similar principles to the measurement of life satisfaction, or subjective wellbeing, by exploring item-order effects within the Personal Wellbeing Index (PWI; IWBG in Personal Wellbeing Index, 5th edn. Australian Centre on Quality of Life, Deakin University, Melbourne, 2013 . http://www.deakin.edu.au/research/acqol/intruments/wellbeing-index/index.php ). In a preliminary study, participants completed the PWI in its standard format (general-specific) and psychometric properties were compared to those who completed the PWI in an alternate format (specific-general). Analyses revealed that the PWI performed adequately for both groups, though there were subtle indications of item-order effects. In a second study, the order of the PWI domains was randomised (random-order) and compared to the standard format (fixed-order). Results revealed lower mean scores and more variation in scores when items were randomised. Overall, the PWI performed as expected for most interrogative analyses. It achieved a single factor solution, no matter the order of items, and the same domains emerged as significant unique predictors of general life satisfaction. The study highlights the importance of exploring item-order effects as part of the psychometric validation procedure, and it is recommended that all new scales be subject to this investigation to reduce measurement error and improve accuracy in psychological assessment.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10902-016-9822-1
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1999916799</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1999916799</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-dbc3707a5706e31e0858b64b5de95fea671b1488b63ebae3a7d414f50d9582823</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM9Kw0AQxhdRsFYfwNuC59WdbLJ_vJVStVBRsOJxyZ9JTUmTupuI3nwIn9AncUsEvTiXGWZ-38fwEXIK_Bw4VxceuOER4yCZ0VHEYI-MIFGCKaX5fpiFNiw2Sh-SI-_XnHMjpRyRfPmM9BZT3zvcYNPRtqQPfbbGvKtekT5hXWdYNatLOu9ww-5cgY7OyjLcPa0a2gX5PTrfNmn9S9N5U-Db18fnpOjr7pgclGnt8eSnj8nj1Ww5vWGLu-v5dLJguQDZsSLLheIqTRSXKAC5TnQm4ywp0CQlplJBBrEOO4FZiiJVRQxxmfDCJDrSkRiTs8F369qXHn1n123vwmPeggkFUhkTKBio3LXeOyzt1lWb1L1b4HaXpR2ytCFLu8vSQtBEg8YHtlmh--P8r-gbMeB3ig</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1999916799</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Measurement of Subjective Wellbeing: Item-Order Effects in the Personal Wellbeing Index—Adult</title><source>EconLit s plnými texty</source><source>ABI/INFORM Global</source><source>Springer Nature</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>Sociology Collection</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Weinberg, Melissa K. ; Seton, Catherine ; Cameron, Nikki</creator><creatorcontrib>Weinberg, Melissa K. ; Seton, Catherine ; Cameron, Nikki</creatorcontrib><description>When multi-item questionnaires are included in psychological research, many factors can influence the response given. One such factor that has traditionally been overlooked is the potential impact of item-order effects. This paper extends upon the work of Kaplan et al. (J Happiness Stud 14:1443–1458, 2013 . doi: 10.1007/s10902-012-9388-5 ) who explored item-order effects in measures of job satisfaction, and applies similar principles to the measurement of life satisfaction, or subjective wellbeing, by exploring item-order effects within the Personal Wellbeing Index (PWI; IWBG in Personal Wellbeing Index, 5th edn. Australian Centre on Quality of Life, Deakin University, Melbourne, 2013 . http://www.deakin.edu.au/research/acqol/intruments/wellbeing-index/index.php ). In a preliminary study, participants completed the PWI in its standard format (general-specific) and psychometric properties were compared to those who completed the PWI in an alternate format (specific-general). Analyses revealed that the PWI performed adequately for both groups, though there were subtle indications of item-order effects. In a second study, the order of the PWI domains was randomised (random-order) and compared to the standard format (fixed-order). Results revealed lower mean scores and more variation in scores when items were randomised. Overall, the PWI performed as expected for most interrogative analyses. It achieved a single factor solution, no matter the order of items, and the same domains emerged as significant unique predictors of general life satisfaction. The study highlights the importance of exploring item-order effects as part of the psychometric validation procedure, and it is recommended that all new scales be subject to this investigation to reduce measurement error and improve accuracy in psychological assessment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1389-4978</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-7780</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10902-016-9822-1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Economics ; Happiness ; Job satisfaction ; Life satisfaction ; Measurement errors ; Personality and Social Psychology ; Philosophy ; Positive Psychology ; Psychological aspects ; Psychological research ; Quality of life ; Quality of Life Research ; Quantitative psychology ; Research Paper ; Social Sciences ; Well being</subject><ispartof>Journal of happiness studies, 2018, Vol.19 (1), p.315-332</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016</rights><rights>Journal of Happiness Studies is a copyright of Springer, (2016). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-dbc3707a5706e31e0858b64b5de95fea671b1488b63ebae3a7d414f50d9582823</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-dbc3707a5706e31e0858b64b5de95fea671b1488b63ebae3a7d414f50d9582823</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1999916799/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1999916799?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,11668,21374,21375,27323,27903,27904,33590,33753,34509,36039,43712,44094,44342,73967,74385,74641</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Weinberg, Melissa K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seton, Catherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cameron, Nikki</creatorcontrib><title>The Measurement of Subjective Wellbeing: Item-Order Effects in the Personal Wellbeing Index—Adult</title><title>Journal of happiness studies</title><addtitle>J Happiness Stud</addtitle><description>When multi-item questionnaires are included in psychological research, many factors can influence the response given. One such factor that has traditionally been overlooked is the potential impact of item-order effects. This paper extends upon the work of Kaplan et al. (J Happiness Stud 14:1443–1458, 2013 . doi: 10.1007/s10902-012-9388-5 ) who explored item-order effects in measures of job satisfaction, and applies similar principles to the measurement of life satisfaction, or subjective wellbeing, by exploring item-order effects within the Personal Wellbeing Index (PWI; IWBG in Personal Wellbeing Index, 5th edn. Australian Centre on Quality of Life, Deakin University, Melbourne, 2013 . http://www.deakin.edu.au/research/acqol/intruments/wellbeing-index/index.php ). In a preliminary study, participants completed the PWI in its standard format (general-specific) and psychometric properties were compared to those who completed the PWI in an alternate format (specific-general). Analyses revealed that the PWI performed adequately for both groups, though there were subtle indications of item-order effects. In a second study, the order of the PWI domains was randomised (random-order) and compared to the standard format (fixed-order). Results revealed lower mean scores and more variation in scores when items were randomised. Overall, the PWI performed as expected for most interrogative analyses. It achieved a single factor solution, no matter the order of items, and the same domains emerged as significant unique predictors of general life satisfaction. The study highlights the importance of exploring item-order effects as part of the psychometric validation procedure, and it is recommended that all new scales be subject to this investigation to reduce measurement error and improve accuracy in psychological assessment.</description><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Happiness</subject><subject>Job satisfaction</subject><subject>Life satisfaction</subject><subject>Measurement errors</subject><subject>Personality and Social Psychology</subject><subject>Philosophy</subject><subject>Positive Psychology</subject><subject>Psychological aspects</subject><subject>Psychological research</subject><subject>Quality of life</subject><subject>Quality of Life Research</subject><subject>Quantitative psychology</subject><subject>Research Paper</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Well being</subject><issn>1389-4978</issn><issn>1573-7780</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>HEHIP</sourceid><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><sourceid>M2R</sourceid><sourceid>M2S</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kM9Kw0AQxhdRsFYfwNuC59WdbLJ_vJVStVBRsOJxyZ9JTUmTupuI3nwIn9AncUsEvTiXGWZ-38fwEXIK_Bw4VxceuOER4yCZ0VHEYI-MIFGCKaX5fpiFNiw2Sh-SI-_XnHMjpRyRfPmM9BZT3zvcYNPRtqQPfbbGvKtekT5hXWdYNatLOu9ww-5cgY7OyjLcPa0a2gX5PTrfNmn9S9N5U-Db18fnpOjr7pgclGnt8eSnj8nj1Ww5vWGLu-v5dLJguQDZsSLLheIqTRSXKAC5TnQm4ywp0CQlplJBBrEOO4FZiiJVRQxxmfDCJDrSkRiTs8F369qXHn1n123vwmPeggkFUhkTKBio3LXeOyzt1lWb1L1b4HaXpR2ytCFLu8vSQtBEg8YHtlmh--P8r-gbMeB3ig</recordid><startdate>2018</startdate><enddate>2018</enddate><creator>Weinberg, Melissa K.</creator><creator>Seton, Catherine</creator><creator>Cameron, Nikki</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2018</creationdate><title>The Measurement of Subjective Wellbeing: Item-Order Effects in the Personal Wellbeing Index—Adult</title><author>Weinberg, Melissa K. ; Seton, Catherine ; Cameron, Nikki</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-dbc3707a5706e31e0858b64b5de95fea671b1488b63ebae3a7d414f50d9582823</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Happiness</topic><topic>Job satisfaction</topic><topic>Life satisfaction</topic><topic>Measurement errors</topic><topic>Personality and Social Psychology</topic><topic>Philosophy</topic><topic>Positive Psychology</topic><topic>Psychological aspects</topic><topic>Psychological research</topic><topic>Quality of life</topic><topic>Quality of Life Research</topic><topic>Quantitative psychology</topic><topic>Research Paper</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Well being</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Weinberg, Melissa K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seton, Catherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cameron, Nikki</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Databases</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Journal of happiness studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Weinberg, Melissa K.</au><au>Seton, Catherine</au><au>Cameron, Nikki</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Measurement of Subjective Wellbeing: Item-Order Effects in the Personal Wellbeing Index—Adult</atitle><jtitle>Journal of happiness studies</jtitle><stitle>J Happiness Stud</stitle><date>2018</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>315</spage><epage>332</epage><pages>315-332</pages><issn>1389-4978</issn><eissn>1573-7780</eissn><abstract>When multi-item questionnaires are included in psychological research, many factors can influence the response given. One such factor that has traditionally been overlooked is the potential impact of item-order effects. This paper extends upon the work of Kaplan et al. (J Happiness Stud 14:1443–1458, 2013 . doi: 10.1007/s10902-012-9388-5 ) who explored item-order effects in measures of job satisfaction, and applies similar principles to the measurement of life satisfaction, or subjective wellbeing, by exploring item-order effects within the Personal Wellbeing Index (PWI; IWBG in Personal Wellbeing Index, 5th edn. Australian Centre on Quality of Life, Deakin University, Melbourne, 2013 . http://www.deakin.edu.au/research/acqol/intruments/wellbeing-index/index.php ). In a preliminary study, participants completed the PWI in its standard format (general-specific) and psychometric properties were compared to those who completed the PWI in an alternate format (specific-general). Analyses revealed that the PWI performed adequately for both groups, though there were subtle indications of item-order effects. In a second study, the order of the PWI domains was randomised (random-order) and compared to the standard format (fixed-order). Results revealed lower mean scores and more variation in scores when items were randomised. Overall, the PWI performed as expected for most interrogative analyses. It achieved a single factor solution, no matter the order of items, and the same domains emerged as significant unique predictors of general life satisfaction. The study highlights the importance of exploring item-order effects as part of the psychometric validation procedure, and it is recommended that all new scales be subject to this investigation to reduce measurement error and improve accuracy in psychological assessment.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s10902-016-9822-1</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1389-4978
ispartof Journal of happiness studies, 2018, Vol.19 (1), p.315-332
issn 1389-4978
1573-7780
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1999916799
source EconLit s plnými texty; ABI/INFORM Global; Springer Nature; Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); Sociology Collection; Sociological Abstracts
subjects Economics
Happiness
Job satisfaction
Life satisfaction
Measurement errors
Personality and Social Psychology
Philosophy
Positive Psychology
Psychological aspects
Psychological research
Quality of life
Quality of Life Research
Quantitative psychology
Research Paper
Social Sciences
Well being
title The Measurement of Subjective Wellbeing: Item-Order Effects in the Personal Wellbeing Index—Adult
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T19%3A38%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Measurement%20of%20Subjective%20Wellbeing:%20Item-Order%20Effects%20in%20the%20Personal%20Wellbeing%20Index%E2%80%94Adult&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20happiness%20studies&rft.au=Weinberg,%20Melissa%20K.&rft.date=2018&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=315&rft.epage=332&rft.pages=315-332&rft.issn=1389-4978&rft.eissn=1573-7780&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10902-016-9822-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1999916799%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-dbc3707a5706e31e0858b64b5de95fea671b1488b63ebae3a7d414f50d9582823%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1999916799&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true