Loading…
The Relational Structure of Belief Networks
This paper demonstrates the relational structure of belief networks by establishing an extended relational data model which can be applied to both belief networks and relational applications. It is demonstrated that a Markov network can be represented as a generalized acyclic join dependency (GAJD)...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of intelligent information systems 2001-03, Vol.16 (2), p.117 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c226t-5e56ef013360d7e186bd3f7ca3ca3dc0a4e3e4137d96fb9f87d1d04fa69b633e3 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 117 |
container_title | Journal of intelligent information systems |
container_volume | 16 |
creator | S.K.M. Wong |
description | This paper demonstrates the relational structure of belief networks by establishing an extended relational data model which can be applied to both belief networks and relational applications. It is demonstrated that a Markov network can be represented as a generalized acyclic join dependency (GAJD) which is equivalent to a set of conflict-free generalized multivalued dependencies (GMVDs). A Markov network can also be characterized by an entropy function, which greatly facilitates the manipulation of GMVDs. These results are extensions of results established in relational theory. It is shown that there exists a complete set of inference rules for the GMVDs. This result is important from a probabilistic perspective. All the above results explicitly demonstrate that there is a unified model for relational database and probabilistic reasoning systems. This is not only important from a theoretical point of view in that one model has been developed for a number of domains, but also from a practical point of view in that one system can be implemented for both domains. This implemented system can take advantage of the performance enhancing techniques developed in both fields. Thereby, this paper serves as a theoretical foundation for harmonizing these two important information domains. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT] |
doi_str_mv | 10.1023/A:1011237717300 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_200182070</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>352547621</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c226t-5e56ef013360d7e186bd3f7ca3ca3dc0a4e3e4137d96fb9f87d1d04fa69b633e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotjk1LxDAQQIMoWFfPXotXqc5k2kzjbV3WD1gUdD0vaTPBXYvVJMW_74LCg3d7PKXOEa4QNF3PbxAQNTEjE8CBKrBhqthwc6gKsLqprAV9rE5S2gGAbQ0U6nL9LuWLDC5vx083lK85Tn2eopRjKG9l2EoonyT_jPEjnaqj4IYkZ_-eqbe75XrxUK2e7x8X81XVa21y1UhjJAASGfAs2JrOU-De0R7fg6uFpEZib03obGjZo4c6OGM7QyQ0Uxd_3a84fk-S8mY3TnF_lzYaAFsNDPQLbzhDJA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>200182070</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Relational Structure of Belief Networks</title><source>ABI/INFORM Global (ProQuest)</source><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>S.K.M. Wong</creator><creatorcontrib>S.K.M. Wong</creatorcontrib><description>This paper demonstrates the relational structure of belief networks by establishing an extended relational data model which can be applied to both belief networks and relational applications. It is demonstrated that a Markov network can be represented as a generalized acyclic join dependency (GAJD) which is equivalent to a set of conflict-free generalized multivalued dependencies (GMVDs). A Markov network can also be characterized by an entropy function, which greatly facilitates the manipulation of GMVDs. These results are extensions of results established in relational theory. It is shown that there exists a complete set of inference rules for the GMVDs. This result is important from a probabilistic perspective. All the above results explicitly demonstrate that there is a unified model for relational database and probabilistic reasoning systems. This is not only important from a theoretical point of view in that one model has been developed for a number of domains, but also from a practical point of view in that one system can be implemented for both domains. This implemented system can take advantage of the performance enhancing techniques developed in both fields. Thereby, this paper serves as a theoretical foundation for harmonizing these two important information domains. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><identifier>ISSN: 0925-9902</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-7675</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1023/A:1011237717300</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer Nature B.V</publisher><subject>Data models ; Decomposition ; Information systems ; Product testing ; Relational data bases ; Studies ; Values ; Variables</subject><ispartof>Journal of intelligent information systems, 2001-03, Vol.16 (2), p.117</ispartof><rights>Copyright Kluwer Academic Publishers Mar/Apr 2001</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c226t-5e56ef013360d7e186bd3f7ca3ca3dc0a4e3e4137d96fb9f87d1d04fa69b633e3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/200182070/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/200182070?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,11666,27900,27901,36036,44338,74864</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>S.K.M. Wong</creatorcontrib><title>The Relational Structure of Belief Networks</title><title>Journal of intelligent information systems</title><description>This paper demonstrates the relational structure of belief networks by establishing an extended relational data model which can be applied to both belief networks and relational applications. It is demonstrated that a Markov network can be represented as a generalized acyclic join dependency (GAJD) which is equivalent to a set of conflict-free generalized multivalued dependencies (GMVDs). A Markov network can also be characterized by an entropy function, which greatly facilitates the manipulation of GMVDs. These results are extensions of results established in relational theory. It is shown that there exists a complete set of inference rules for the GMVDs. This result is important from a probabilistic perspective. All the above results explicitly demonstrate that there is a unified model for relational database and probabilistic reasoning systems. This is not only important from a theoretical point of view in that one model has been developed for a number of domains, but also from a practical point of view in that one system can be implemented for both domains. This implemented system can take advantage of the performance enhancing techniques developed in both fields. Thereby, this paper serves as a theoretical foundation for harmonizing these two important information domains. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><subject>Data models</subject><subject>Decomposition</subject><subject>Information systems</subject><subject>Product testing</subject><subject>Relational data bases</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Values</subject><subject>Variables</subject><issn>0925-9902</issn><issn>1573-7675</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><recordid>eNotjk1LxDAQQIMoWFfPXotXqc5k2kzjbV3WD1gUdD0vaTPBXYvVJMW_74LCg3d7PKXOEa4QNF3PbxAQNTEjE8CBKrBhqthwc6gKsLqprAV9rE5S2gGAbQ0U6nL9LuWLDC5vx083lK85Tn2eopRjKG9l2EoonyT_jPEjnaqj4IYkZ_-eqbe75XrxUK2e7x8X81XVa21y1UhjJAASGfAs2JrOU-De0R7fg6uFpEZib03obGjZo4c6OGM7QyQ0Uxd_3a84fk-S8mY3TnF_lzYaAFsNDPQLbzhDJA</recordid><startdate>200103</startdate><enddate>200103</enddate><creator>S.K.M. Wong</creator><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8AL</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0N</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQGLB</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200103</creationdate><title>The Relational Structure of Belief Networks</title><author>S.K.M. Wong</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c226t-5e56ef013360d7e186bd3f7ca3ca3dc0a4e3e4137d96fb9f87d1d04fa69b633e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Data models</topic><topic>Decomposition</topic><topic>Information systems</topic><topic>Product testing</topic><topic>Relational data bases</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Values</topic><topic>Variables</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>S.K.M. Wong</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>Computing Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database (1962 - current)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Computing Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Journal of intelligent information systems</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>S.K.M. Wong</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Relational Structure of Belief Networks</atitle><jtitle>Journal of intelligent information systems</jtitle><date>2001-03</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>117</spage><pages>117-</pages><issn>0925-9902</issn><eissn>1573-7675</eissn><abstract>This paper demonstrates the relational structure of belief networks by establishing an extended relational data model which can be applied to both belief networks and relational applications. It is demonstrated that a Markov network can be represented as a generalized acyclic join dependency (GAJD) which is equivalent to a set of conflict-free generalized multivalued dependencies (GMVDs). A Markov network can also be characterized by an entropy function, which greatly facilitates the manipulation of GMVDs. These results are extensions of results established in relational theory. It is shown that there exists a complete set of inference rules for the GMVDs. This result is important from a probabilistic perspective. All the above results explicitly demonstrate that there is a unified model for relational database and probabilistic reasoning systems. This is not only important from a theoretical point of view in that one model has been developed for a number of domains, but also from a practical point of view in that one system can be implemented for both domains. This implemented system can take advantage of the performance enhancing techniques developed in both fields. Thereby, this paper serves as a theoretical foundation for harmonizing these two important information domains. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer Nature B.V</pub><doi>10.1023/A:1011237717300</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0925-9902 |
ispartof | Journal of intelligent information systems, 2001-03, Vol.16 (2), p.117 |
issn | 0925-9902 1573-7675 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_200182070 |
source | ABI/INFORM Global (ProQuest); Springer Nature |
subjects | Data models Decomposition Information systems Product testing Relational data bases Studies Values Variables |
title | The Relational Structure of Belief Networks |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-24T17%3A24%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Relational%20Structure%20of%20Belief%20Networks&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20intelligent%20information%20systems&rft.au=S.K.M.%20Wong&rft.date=2001-03&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=117&rft.pages=117-&rft.issn=0925-9902&rft.eissn=1573-7675&rft_id=info:doi/10.1023/A:1011237717300&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E352547621%3C/proquest%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c226t-5e56ef013360d7e186bd3f7ca3ca3dc0a4e3e4137d96fb9f87d1d04fa69b633e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=200182070&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |