Loading…
Spread of Antarctic vegetation by the kelp gull: comparison of two maritime Antarctic regions
In the present paper, we compare how the kelp gull, Larus dominicanus , utilizes various nest building materials, particularly vascular plants, bryophytes, lichens and other components, in the Fildes Peninsula area (King George Island) and on the Argentine Islands area. In both areas, nest material...
Saved in:
Published in: | Polar biology 2018-06, Vol.41 (6), p.1143-1155 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-5fd2edcab4caaecc4510c83afbc79f425d73f9f7e3f8b0f4bc6b9655ca00e7803 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-5fd2edcab4caaecc4510c83afbc79f425d73f9f7e3f8b0f4bc6b9655ca00e7803 |
container_end_page | 1155 |
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 1143 |
container_title | Polar biology |
container_volume | 41 |
creator | Parnikoza, I. Rozhok, A. Convey, P. Veselski, M. Esefeld, J. Ochyra, R. Mustafa, O. Braun, C. Peter, H.-U. Smykla, J. Kunakh, V. Kozeretska, I. |
description | In the present paper, we compare how the kelp gull,
Larus dominicanus
, utilizes various nest building materials, particularly vascular plants, bryophytes, lichens and other components, in the Fildes Peninsula area (King George Island) and on the Argentine Islands area. In both areas, nest material primarily consisted of the Antarctic hairgrass (
Deschampsia antarctica
), bryophytes, lichens, feathers, limpets, and algae. Our study reveals area-specific differences in the utilization of plants for nest building related to local conditions during the nesting season. In the Fildes area, vegetation emerges from under the winter snow cover earlier in the spring, giving the gulls greater choice locally, meaning that the gulls need not resort to long distance material transfer. Here, mosses and lichens dominate in the nest material, likely collected from the nearby vegetation formations. The Antarctic hairgrass in these conditions is mostly found in nests located directly within hairgrass formations. However, on the more southern Argentine Islands, kelp gulls routinely use
D. antarctica
and some mosses, transferring them from coastal hill tops where snow generally disappears earlier. Here, the gulls appear to be selective still, as they rarely use some mosses, such as
Polytrichum strictum
, that are abundant near the nesting locations. In the Argentine Islands area, we documented long-range transfer of the Antarctic hairgrass and some other vegetation materials from places of abundance to bare rocks of low islands lacking developed vegetation. This demonstrates the potential of the gulls to serve as dispersal and gene pool exchange agents for the local terrestrial biota in the maritime Antarctic, especially between highly isolated populations from small islands and ice-free areas. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00300-018-2274-9 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2002115819</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A715540695</galeid><sourcerecordid>A715540695</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-5fd2edcab4caaecc4510c83afbc79f425d73f9f7e3f8b0f4bc6b9655ca00e7803</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMFu3CAQhlGVSt1s-wC9IeXsdMBg7NxWqySttFIOSY8VwnhwvfUaB9hU-_Zl5UrJJeKAGP5vBj5CvjK4ZgDqWwQoAQpgdcG5EkXzgayYKHnBQVYXZAWK80JABZ_IZYx7AKYq0azIr8c5oOmod3QzJRNsGix9wR6TSYOfaHui6TfSPzjOtD-O4w21_jCbMMR8maH019NDPqbhgG86BOwzHT-Tj86MEb_839fk593t0_Z7sXu4_7Hd7AorOEuFdB3HzppWWGPQWiEZ2Lo0rrWqcYLLTpWucQpLV7fgRGurtqmktAYAVQ3lmlwtfefgn48Yk977Y5jySM0BOGOyZk1OXS-p3oyoh8n5FIzNq8PDYP2Ebsj1jWJSZlONzABbABt8jAGdnsOQf3vSDPRZu16066xdn7Xr8xC-MDFnpx7D61Peh_4Ba5qGLQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2002115819</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Spread of Antarctic vegetation by the kelp gull: comparison of two maritime Antarctic regions</title><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Parnikoza, I. ; Rozhok, A. ; Convey, P. ; Veselski, M. ; Esefeld, J. ; Ochyra, R. ; Mustafa, O. ; Braun, C. ; Peter, H.-U. ; Smykla, J. ; Kunakh, V. ; Kozeretska, I.</creator><creatorcontrib>Parnikoza, I. ; Rozhok, A. ; Convey, P. ; Veselski, M. ; Esefeld, J. ; Ochyra, R. ; Mustafa, O. ; Braun, C. ; Peter, H.-U. ; Smykla, J. ; Kunakh, V. ; Kozeretska, I.</creatorcontrib><description>In the present paper, we compare how the kelp gull,
Larus dominicanus
, utilizes various nest building materials, particularly vascular plants, bryophytes, lichens and other components, in the Fildes Peninsula area (King George Island) and on the Argentine Islands area. In both areas, nest material primarily consisted of the Antarctic hairgrass (
Deschampsia antarctica
), bryophytes, lichens, feathers, limpets, and algae. Our study reveals area-specific differences in the utilization of plants for nest building related to local conditions during the nesting season. In the Fildes area, vegetation emerges from under the winter snow cover earlier in the spring, giving the gulls greater choice locally, meaning that the gulls need not resort to long distance material transfer. Here, mosses and lichens dominate in the nest material, likely collected from the nearby vegetation formations. The Antarctic hairgrass in these conditions is mostly found in nests located directly within hairgrass formations. However, on the more southern Argentine Islands, kelp gulls routinely use
D. antarctica
and some mosses, transferring them from coastal hill tops where snow generally disappears earlier. Here, the gulls appear to be selective still, as they rarely use some mosses, such as
Polytrichum strictum
, that are abundant near the nesting locations. In the Argentine Islands area, we documented long-range transfer of the Antarctic hairgrass and some other vegetation materials from places of abundance to bare rocks of low islands lacking developed vegetation. This demonstrates the potential of the gulls to serve as dispersal and gene pool exchange agents for the local terrestrial biota in the maritime Antarctic, especially between highly isolated populations from small islands and ice-free areas.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0722-4060</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-2056</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00300-018-2274-9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Algae ; Analysis ; Antarctic zone ; Aquatic plants ; Area ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Biota ; Bryophyta ; Bryophytes ; Building materials ; Building materials industry ; Construction materials ; Deschampsia antarctica ; Dispersal ; Ecology ; Feathers ; Gene pool ; Gene pools ; Gulls ; Ice environments ; Islands ; Kelp ; Larus dominicanus ; Lichens ; Life Sciences ; Marine molluscs ; Materials selection ; Microbiology ; Mosses ; Nest building ; Nesting ; Nests ; Oceanography ; Original Paper ; Plant Sciences ; Plants ; Polytrichum strictum ; Seabirds ; Snow ; Snow cover ; Vegetation ; Zoology</subject><ispartof>Polar biology, 2018-06, Vol.41 (6), p.1143-1155</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2018 Springer</rights><rights>Polar Biology is a copyright of Springer, (2018). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-5fd2edcab4caaecc4510c83afbc79f425d73f9f7e3f8b0f4bc6b9655ca00e7803</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-5fd2edcab4caaecc4510c83afbc79f425d73f9f7e3f8b0f4bc6b9655ca00e7803</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0490-8134</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Parnikoza, I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rozhok, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Convey, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Veselski, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Esefeld, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ochyra, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mustafa, O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Braun, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peter, H.-U.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smykla, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kunakh, V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kozeretska, I.</creatorcontrib><title>Spread of Antarctic vegetation by the kelp gull: comparison of two maritime Antarctic regions</title><title>Polar biology</title><addtitle>Polar Biol</addtitle><description>In the present paper, we compare how the kelp gull,
Larus dominicanus
, utilizes various nest building materials, particularly vascular plants, bryophytes, lichens and other components, in the Fildes Peninsula area (King George Island) and on the Argentine Islands area. In both areas, nest material primarily consisted of the Antarctic hairgrass (
Deschampsia antarctica
), bryophytes, lichens, feathers, limpets, and algae. Our study reveals area-specific differences in the utilization of plants for nest building related to local conditions during the nesting season. In the Fildes area, vegetation emerges from under the winter snow cover earlier in the spring, giving the gulls greater choice locally, meaning that the gulls need not resort to long distance material transfer. Here, mosses and lichens dominate in the nest material, likely collected from the nearby vegetation formations. The Antarctic hairgrass in these conditions is mostly found in nests located directly within hairgrass formations. However, on the more southern Argentine Islands, kelp gulls routinely use
D. antarctica
and some mosses, transferring them from coastal hill tops where snow generally disappears earlier. Here, the gulls appear to be selective still, as they rarely use some mosses, such as
Polytrichum strictum
, that are abundant near the nesting locations. In the Argentine Islands area, we documented long-range transfer of the Antarctic hairgrass and some other vegetation materials from places of abundance to bare rocks of low islands lacking developed vegetation. This demonstrates the potential of the gulls to serve as dispersal and gene pool exchange agents for the local terrestrial biota in the maritime Antarctic, especially between highly isolated populations from small islands and ice-free areas.</description><subject>Algae</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Antarctic zone</subject><subject>Aquatic plants</subject><subject>Area</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Biota</subject><subject>Bryophyta</subject><subject>Bryophytes</subject><subject>Building materials</subject><subject>Building materials industry</subject><subject>Construction materials</subject><subject>Deschampsia antarctica</subject><subject>Dispersal</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Feathers</subject><subject>Gene pool</subject><subject>Gene pools</subject><subject>Gulls</subject><subject>Ice environments</subject><subject>Islands</subject><subject>Kelp</subject><subject>Larus dominicanus</subject><subject>Lichens</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Marine molluscs</subject><subject>Materials selection</subject><subject>Microbiology</subject><subject>Mosses</subject><subject>Nest building</subject><subject>Nesting</subject><subject>Nests</subject><subject>Oceanography</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Plant Sciences</subject><subject>Plants</subject><subject>Polytrichum strictum</subject><subject>Seabirds</subject><subject>Snow</subject><subject>Snow cover</subject><subject>Vegetation</subject><subject>Zoology</subject><issn>0722-4060</issn><issn>1432-2056</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kMFu3CAQhlGVSt1s-wC9IeXsdMBg7NxWqySttFIOSY8VwnhwvfUaB9hU-_Zl5UrJJeKAGP5vBj5CvjK4ZgDqWwQoAQpgdcG5EkXzgayYKHnBQVYXZAWK80JABZ_IZYx7AKYq0azIr8c5oOmod3QzJRNsGix9wR6TSYOfaHui6TfSPzjOtD-O4w21_jCbMMR8maH019NDPqbhgG86BOwzHT-Tj86MEb_839fk593t0_Z7sXu4_7Hd7AorOEuFdB3HzppWWGPQWiEZ2Lo0rrWqcYLLTpWucQpLV7fgRGurtqmktAYAVQ3lmlwtfefgn48Yk977Y5jySM0BOGOyZk1OXS-p3oyoh8n5FIzNq8PDYP2Ebsj1jWJSZlONzABbABt8jAGdnsOQf3vSDPRZu16066xdn7Xr8xC-MDFnpx7D61Peh_4Ba5qGLQ</recordid><startdate>20180601</startdate><enddate>20180601</enddate><creator>Parnikoza, I.</creator><creator>Rozhok, A.</creator><creator>Convey, P.</creator><creator>Veselski, M.</creator><creator>Esefeld, J.</creator><creator>Ochyra, R.</creator><creator>Mustafa, O.</creator><creator>Braun, C.</creator><creator>Peter, H.-U.</creator><creator>Smykla, J.</creator><creator>Kunakh, V.</creator><creator>Kozeretska, I.</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0490-8134</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180601</creationdate><title>Spread of Antarctic vegetation by the kelp gull: comparison of two maritime Antarctic regions</title><author>Parnikoza, I. ; Rozhok, A. ; Convey, P. ; Veselski, M. ; Esefeld, J. ; Ochyra, R. ; Mustafa, O. ; Braun, C. ; Peter, H.-U. ; Smykla, J. ; Kunakh, V. ; Kozeretska, I.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-5fd2edcab4caaecc4510c83afbc79f425d73f9f7e3f8b0f4bc6b9655ca00e7803</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Algae</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Antarctic zone</topic><topic>Aquatic plants</topic><topic>Area</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Biota</topic><topic>Bryophyta</topic><topic>Bryophytes</topic><topic>Building materials</topic><topic>Building materials industry</topic><topic>Construction materials</topic><topic>Deschampsia antarctica</topic><topic>Dispersal</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Feathers</topic><topic>Gene pool</topic><topic>Gene pools</topic><topic>Gulls</topic><topic>Ice environments</topic><topic>Islands</topic><topic>Kelp</topic><topic>Larus dominicanus</topic><topic>Lichens</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Marine molluscs</topic><topic>Materials selection</topic><topic>Microbiology</topic><topic>Mosses</topic><topic>Nest building</topic><topic>Nesting</topic><topic>Nests</topic><topic>Oceanography</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Plant Sciences</topic><topic>Plants</topic><topic>Polytrichum strictum</topic><topic>Seabirds</topic><topic>Snow</topic><topic>Snow cover</topic><topic>Vegetation</topic><topic>Zoology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Parnikoza, I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rozhok, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Convey, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Veselski, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Esefeld, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ochyra, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mustafa, O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Braun, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peter, H.-U.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smykla, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kunakh, V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kozeretska, I.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><jtitle>Polar biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Parnikoza, I.</au><au>Rozhok, A.</au><au>Convey, P.</au><au>Veselski, M.</au><au>Esefeld, J.</au><au>Ochyra, R.</au><au>Mustafa, O.</au><au>Braun, C.</au><au>Peter, H.-U.</au><au>Smykla, J.</au><au>Kunakh, V.</au><au>Kozeretska, I.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Spread of Antarctic vegetation by the kelp gull: comparison of two maritime Antarctic regions</atitle><jtitle>Polar biology</jtitle><stitle>Polar Biol</stitle><date>2018-06-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1143</spage><epage>1155</epage><pages>1143-1155</pages><issn>0722-4060</issn><eissn>1432-2056</eissn><abstract>In the present paper, we compare how the kelp gull,
Larus dominicanus
, utilizes various nest building materials, particularly vascular plants, bryophytes, lichens and other components, in the Fildes Peninsula area (King George Island) and on the Argentine Islands area. In both areas, nest material primarily consisted of the Antarctic hairgrass (
Deschampsia antarctica
), bryophytes, lichens, feathers, limpets, and algae. Our study reveals area-specific differences in the utilization of plants for nest building related to local conditions during the nesting season. In the Fildes area, vegetation emerges from under the winter snow cover earlier in the spring, giving the gulls greater choice locally, meaning that the gulls need not resort to long distance material transfer. Here, mosses and lichens dominate in the nest material, likely collected from the nearby vegetation formations. The Antarctic hairgrass in these conditions is mostly found in nests located directly within hairgrass formations. However, on the more southern Argentine Islands, kelp gulls routinely use
D. antarctica
and some mosses, transferring them from coastal hill tops where snow generally disappears earlier. Here, the gulls appear to be selective still, as they rarely use some mosses, such as
Polytrichum strictum
, that are abundant near the nesting locations. In the Argentine Islands area, we documented long-range transfer of the Antarctic hairgrass and some other vegetation materials from places of abundance to bare rocks of low islands lacking developed vegetation. This demonstrates the potential of the gulls to serve as dispersal and gene pool exchange agents for the local terrestrial biota in the maritime Antarctic, especially between highly isolated populations from small islands and ice-free areas.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s00300-018-2274-9</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0490-8134</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0722-4060 |
ispartof | Polar biology, 2018-06, Vol.41 (6), p.1143-1155 |
issn | 0722-4060 1432-2056 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2002115819 |
source | Springer Link |
subjects | Algae Analysis Antarctic zone Aquatic plants Area Biomedical and Life Sciences Biota Bryophyta Bryophytes Building materials Building materials industry Construction materials Deschampsia antarctica Dispersal Ecology Feathers Gene pool Gene pools Gulls Ice environments Islands Kelp Larus dominicanus Lichens Life Sciences Marine molluscs Materials selection Microbiology Mosses Nest building Nesting Nests Oceanography Original Paper Plant Sciences Plants Polytrichum strictum Seabirds Snow Snow cover Vegetation Zoology |
title | Spread of Antarctic vegetation by the kelp gull: comparison of two maritime Antarctic regions |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T23%3A56%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Spread%20of%20Antarctic%20vegetation%20by%20the%20kelp%20gull:%20comparison%20of%20two%20maritime%20Antarctic%20regions&rft.jtitle=Polar%20biology&rft.au=Parnikoza,%20I.&rft.date=2018-06-01&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1143&rft.epage=1155&rft.pages=1143-1155&rft.issn=0722-4060&rft.eissn=1432-2056&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00300-018-2274-9&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA715540695%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-5fd2edcab4caaecc4510c83afbc79f425d73f9f7e3f8b0f4bc6b9655ca00e7803%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2002115819&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A715540695&rfr_iscdi=true |