Loading…

Spread of Antarctic vegetation by the kelp gull: comparison of two maritime Antarctic regions

In the present paper, we compare how the kelp gull, Larus dominicanus , utilizes various nest building materials, particularly vascular plants, bryophytes, lichens and other components, in the Fildes Peninsula area (King George Island) and on the Argentine Islands area. In both areas, nest material...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Polar biology 2018-06, Vol.41 (6), p.1143-1155
Main Authors: Parnikoza, I., Rozhok, A., Convey, P., Veselski, M., Esefeld, J., Ochyra, R., Mustafa, O., Braun, C., Peter, H.-U., Smykla, J., Kunakh, V., Kozeretska, I.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-5fd2edcab4caaecc4510c83afbc79f425d73f9f7e3f8b0f4bc6b9655ca00e7803
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-5fd2edcab4caaecc4510c83afbc79f425d73f9f7e3f8b0f4bc6b9655ca00e7803
container_end_page 1155
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1143
container_title Polar biology
container_volume 41
creator Parnikoza, I.
Rozhok, A.
Convey, P.
Veselski, M.
Esefeld, J.
Ochyra, R.
Mustafa, O.
Braun, C.
Peter, H.-U.
Smykla, J.
Kunakh, V.
Kozeretska, I.
description In the present paper, we compare how the kelp gull, Larus dominicanus , utilizes various nest building materials, particularly vascular plants, bryophytes, lichens and other components, in the Fildes Peninsula area (King George Island) and on the Argentine Islands area. In both areas, nest material primarily consisted of the Antarctic hairgrass ( Deschampsia antarctica ), bryophytes, lichens, feathers, limpets, and algae. Our study reveals area-specific differences in the utilization of plants for nest building related to local conditions during the nesting season. In the Fildes area, vegetation emerges from under the winter snow cover earlier in the spring, giving the gulls greater choice locally, meaning that the gulls need not resort to long distance material transfer. Here, mosses and lichens dominate in the nest material, likely collected from the nearby vegetation formations. The Antarctic hairgrass in these conditions is mostly found in nests located directly within hairgrass formations. However, on the more southern Argentine Islands, kelp gulls routinely use D. antarctica and some mosses, transferring them from coastal hill tops where snow generally disappears earlier. Here, the gulls appear to be selective still, as they rarely use some mosses, such as Polytrichum strictum , that are abundant near the nesting locations. In the Argentine Islands area, we documented long-range transfer of the Antarctic hairgrass and some other vegetation materials from places of abundance to bare rocks of low islands lacking developed vegetation. This demonstrates the potential of the gulls to serve as dispersal and gene pool exchange agents for the local terrestrial biota in the maritime Antarctic, especially between highly isolated populations from small islands and ice-free areas.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00300-018-2274-9
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2002115819</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A715540695</galeid><sourcerecordid>A715540695</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-5fd2edcab4caaecc4510c83afbc79f425d73f9f7e3f8b0f4bc6b9655ca00e7803</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMFu3CAQhlGVSt1s-wC9IeXsdMBg7NxWqySttFIOSY8VwnhwvfUaB9hU-_Zl5UrJJeKAGP5vBj5CvjK4ZgDqWwQoAQpgdcG5EkXzgayYKHnBQVYXZAWK80JABZ_IZYx7AKYq0azIr8c5oOmod3QzJRNsGix9wR6TSYOfaHui6TfSPzjOtD-O4w21_jCbMMR8maH019NDPqbhgG86BOwzHT-Tj86MEb_839fk593t0_Z7sXu4_7Hd7AorOEuFdB3HzppWWGPQWiEZ2Lo0rrWqcYLLTpWucQpLV7fgRGurtqmktAYAVQ3lmlwtfefgn48Yk977Y5jySM0BOGOyZk1OXS-p3oyoh8n5FIzNq8PDYP2Ebsj1jWJSZlONzABbABt8jAGdnsOQf3vSDPRZu16066xdn7Xr8xC-MDFnpx7D61Peh_4Ba5qGLQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2002115819</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Spread of Antarctic vegetation by the kelp gull: comparison of two maritime Antarctic regions</title><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Parnikoza, I. ; Rozhok, A. ; Convey, P. ; Veselski, M. ; Esefeld, J. ; Ochyra, R. ; Mustafa, O. ; Braun, C. ; Peter, H.-U. ; Smykla, J. ; Kunakh, V. ; Kozeretska, I.</creator><creatorcontrib>Parnikoza, I. ; Rozhok, A. ; Convey, P. ; Veselski, M. ; Esefeld, J. ; Ochyra, R. ; Mustafa, O. ; Braun, C. ; Peter, H.-U. ; Smykla, J. ; Kunakh, V. ; Kozeretska, I.</creatorcontrib><description>In the present paper, we compare how the kelp gull, Larus dominicanus , utilizes various nest building materials, particularly vascular plants, bryophytes, lichens and other components, in the Fildes Peninsula area (King George Island) and on the Argentine Islands area. In both areas, nest material primarily consisted of the Antarctic hairgrass ( Deschampsia antarctica ), bryophytes, lichens, feathers, limpets, and algae. Our study reveals area-specific differences in the utilization of plants for nest building related to local conditions during the nesting season. In the Fildes area, vegetation emerges from under the winter snow cover earlier in the spring, giving the gulls greater choice locally, meaning that the gulls need not resort to long distance material transfer. Here, mosses and lichens dominate in the nest material, likely collected from the nearby vegetation formations. The Antarctic hairgrass in these conditions is mostly found in nests located directly within hairgrass formations. However, on the more southern Argentine Islands, kelp gulls routinely use D. antarctica and some mosses, transferring them from coastal hill tops where snow generally disappears earlier. Here, the gulls appear to be selective still, as they rarely use some mosses, such as Polytrichum strictum , that are abundant near the nesting locations. In the Argentine Islands area, we documented long-range transfer of the Antarctic hairgrass and some other vegetation materials from places of abundance to bare rocks of low islands lacking developed vegetation. This demonstrates the potential of the gulls to serve as dispersal and gene pool exchange agents for the local terrestrial biota in the maritime Antarctic, especially between highly isolated populations from small islands and ice-free areas.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0722-4060</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-2056</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00300-018-2274-9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Algae ; Analysis ; Antarctic zone ; Aquatic plants ; Area ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Biota ; Bryophyta ; Bryophytes ; Building materials ; Building materials industry ; Construction materials ; Deschampsia antarctica ; Dispersal ; Ecology ; Feathers ; Gene pool ; Gene pools ; Gulls ; Ice environments ; Islands ; Kelp ; Larus dominicanus ; Lichens ; Life Sciences ; Marine molluscs ; Materials selection ; Microbiology ; Mosses ; Nest building ; Nesting ; Nests ; Oceanography ; Original Paper ; Plant Sciences ; Plants ; Polytrichum strictum ; Seabirds ; Snow ; Snow cover ; Vegetation ; Zoology</subject><ispartof>Polar biology, 2018-06, Vol.41 (6), p.1143-1155</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2018 Springer</rights><rights>Polar Biology is a copyright of Springer, (2018). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-5fd2edcab4caaecc4510c83afbc79f425d73f9f7e3f8b0f4bc6b9655ca00e7803</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-5fd2edcab4caaecc4510c83afbc79f425d73f9f7e3f8b0f4bc6b9655ca00e7803</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0490-8134</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Parnikoza, I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rozhok, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Convey, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Veselski, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Esefeld, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ochyra, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mustafa, O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Braun, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peter, H.-U.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smykla, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kunakh, V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kozeretska, I.</creatorcontrib><title>Spread of Antarctic vegetation by the kelp gull: comparison of two maritime Antarctic regions</title><title>Polar biology</title><addtitle>Polar Biol</addtitle><description>In the present paper, we compare how the kelp gull, Larus dominicanus , utilizes various nest building materials, particularly vascular plants, bryophytes, lichens and other components, in the Fildes Peninsula area (King George Island) and on the Argentine Islands area. In both areas, nest material primarily consisted of the Antarctic hairgrass ( Deschampsia antarctica ), bryophytes, lichens, feathers, limpets, and algae. Our study reveals area-specific differences in the utilization of plants for nest building related to local conditions during the nesting season. In the Fildes area, vegetation emerges from under the winter snow cover earlier in the spring, giving the gulls greater choice locally, meaning that the gulls need not resort to long distance material transfer. Here, mosses and lichens dominate in the nest material, likely collected from the nearby vegetation formations. The Antarctic hairgrass in these conditions is mostly found in nests located directly within hairgrass formations. However, on the more southern Argentine Islands, kelp gulls routinely use D. antarctica and some mosses, transferring them from coastal hill tops where snow generally disappears earlier. Here, the gulls appear to be selective still, as they rarely use some mosses, such as Polytrichum strictum , that are abundant near the nesting locations. In the Argentine Islands area, we documented long-range transfer of the Antarctic hairgrass and some other vegetation materials from places of abundance to bare rocks of low islands lacking developed vegetation. This demonstrates the potential of the gulls to serve as dispersal and gene pool exchange agents for the local terrestrial biota in the maritime Antarctic, especially between highly isolated populations from small islands and ice-free areas.</description><subject>Algae</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Antarctic zone</subject><subject>Aquatic plants</subject><subject>Area</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Biota</subject><subject>Bryophyta</subject><subject>Bryophytes</subject><subject>Building materials</subject><subject>Building materials industry</subject><subject>Construction materials</subject><subject>Deschampsia antarctica</subject><subject>Dispersal</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Feathers</subject><subject>Gene pool</subject><subject>Gene pools</subject><subject>Gulls</subject><subject>Ice environments</subject><subject>Islands</subject><subject>Kelp</subject><subject>Larus dominicanus</subject><subject>Lichens</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Marine molluscs</subject><subject>Materials selection</subject><subject>Microbiology</subject><subject>Mosses</subject><subject>Nest building</subject><subject>Nesting</subject><subject>Nests</subject><subject>Oceanography</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Plant Sciences</subject><subject>Plants</subject><subject>Polytrichum strictum</subject><subject>Seabirds</subject><subject>Snow</subject><subject>Snow cover</subject><subject>Vegetation</subject><subject>Zoology</subject><issn>0722-4060</issn><issn>1432-2056</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kMFu3CAQhlGVSt1s-wC9IeXsdMBg7NxWqySttFIOSY8VwnhwvfUaB9hU-_Zl5UrJJeKAGP5vBj5CvjK4ZgDqWwQoAQpgdcG5EkXzgayYKHnBQVYXZAWK80JABZ_IZYx7AKYq0azIr8c5oOmod3QzJRNsGix9wR6TSYOfaHui6TfSPzjOtD-O4w21_jCbMMR8maH019NDPqbhgG86BOwzHT-Tj86MEb_839fk593t0_Z7sXu4_7Hd7AorOEuFdB3HzppWWGPQWiEZ2Lo0rrWqcYLLTpWucQpLV7fgRGurtqmktAYAVQ3lmlwtfefgn48Yk977Y5jySM0BOGOyZk1OXS-p3oyoh8n5FIzNq8PDYP2Ebsj1jWJSZlONzABbABt8jAGdnsOQf3vSDPRZu16066xdn7Xr8xC-MDFnpx7D61Peh_4Ba5qGLQ</recordid><startdate>20180601</startdate><enddate>20180601</enddate><creator>Parnikoza, I.</creator><creator>Rozhok, A.</creator><creator>Convey, P.</creator><creator>Veselski, M.</creator><creator>Esefeld, J.</creator><creator>Ochyra, R.</creator><creator>Mustafa, O.</creator><creator>Braun, C.</creator><creator>Peter, H.-U.</creator><creator>Smykla, J.</creator><creator>Kunakh, V.</creator><creator>Kozeretska, I.</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0490-8134</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180601</creationdate><title>Spread of Antarctic vegetation by the kelp gull: comparison of two maritime Antarctic regions</title><author>Parnikoza, I. ; Rozhok, A. ; Convey, P. ; Veselski, M. ; Esefeld, J. ; Ochyra, R. ; Mustafa, O. ; Braun, C. ; Peter, H.-U. ; Smykla, J. ; Kunakh, V. ; Kozeretska, I.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-5fd2edcab4caaecc4510c83afbc79f425d73f9f7e3f8b0f4bc6b9655ca00e7803</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Algae</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Antarctic zone</topic><topic>Aquatic plants</topic><topic>Area</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Biota</topic><topic>Bryophyta</topic><topic>Bryophytes</topic><topic>Building materials</topic><topic>Building materials industry</topic><topic>Construction materials</topic><topic>Deschampsia antarctica</topic><topic>Dispersal</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Feathers</topic><topic>Gene pool</topic><topic>Gene pools</topic><topic>Gulls</topic><topic>Ice environments</topic><topic>Islands</topic><topic>Kelp</topic><topic>Larus dominicanus</topic><topic>Lichens</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Marine molluscs</topic><topic>Materials selection</topic><topic>Microbiology</topic><topic>Mosses</topic><topic>Nest building</topic><topic>Nesting</topic><topic>Nests</topic><topic>Oceanography</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Plant Sciences</topic><topic>Plants</topic><topic>Polytrichum strictum</topic><topic>Seabirds</topic><topic>Snow</topic><topic>Snow cover</topic><topic>Vegetation</topic><topic>Zoology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Parnikoza, I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rozhok, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Convey, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Veselski, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Esefeld, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ochyra, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mustafa, O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Braun, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peter, H.-U.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smykla, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kunakh, V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kozeretska, I.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><jtitle>Polar biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Parnikoza, I.</au><au>Rozhok, A.</au><au>Convey, P.</au><au>Veselski, M.</au><au>Esefeld, J.</au><au>Ochyra, R.</au><au>Mustafa, O.</au><au>Braun, C.</au><au>Peter, H.-U.</au><au>Smykla, J.</au><au>Kunakh, V.</au><au>Kozeretska, I.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Spread of Antarctic vegetation by the kelp gull: comparison of two maritime Antarctic regions</atitle><jtitle>Polar biology</jtitle><stitle>Polar Biol</stitle><date>2018-06-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1143</spage><epage>1155</epage><pages>1143-1155</pages><issn>0722-4060</issn><eissn>1432-2056</eissn><abstract>In the present paper, we compare how the kelp gull, Larus dominicanus , utilizes various nest building materials, particularly vascular plants, bryophytes, lichens and other components, in the Fildes Peninsula area (King George Island) and on the Argentine Islands area. In both areas, nest material primarily consisted of the Antarctic hairgrass ( Deschampsia antarctica ), bryophytes, lichens, feathers, limpets, and algae. Our study reveals area-specific differences in the utilization of plants for nest building related to local conditions during the nesting season. In the Fildes area, vegetation emerges from under the winter snow cover earlier in the spring, giving the gulls greater choice locally, meaning that the gulls need not resort to long distance material transfer. Here, mosses and lichens dominate in the nest material, likely collected from the nearby vegetation formations. The Antarctic hairgrass in these conditions is mostly found in nests located directly within hairgrass formations. However, on the more southern Argentine Islands, kelp gulls routinely use D. antarctica and some mosses, transferring them from coastal hill tops where snow generally disappears earlier. Here, the gulls appear to be selective still, as they rarely use some mosses, such as Polytrichum strictum , that are abundant near the nesting locations. In the Argentine Islands area, we documented long-range transfer of the Antarctic hairgrass and some other vegetation materials from places of abundance to bare rocks of low islands lacking developed vegetation. This demonstrates the potential of the gulls to serve as dispersal and gene pool exchange agents for the local terrestrial biota in the maritime Antarctic, especially between highly isolated populations from small islands and ice-free areas.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s00300-018-2274-9</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0490-8134</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0722-4060
ispartof Polar biology, 2018-06, Vol.41 (6), p.1143-1155
issn 0722-4060
1432-2056
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2002115819
source Springer Link
subjects Algae
Analysis
Antarctic zone
Aquatic plants
Area
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Biota
Bryophyta
Bryophytes
Building materials
Building materials industry
Construction materials
Deschampsia antarctica
Dispersal
Ecology
Feathers
Gene pool
Gene pools
Gulls
Ice environments
Islands
Kelp
Larus dominicanus
Lichens
Life Sciences
Marine molluscs
Materials selection
Microbiology
Mosses
Nest building
Nesting
Nests
Oceanography
Original Paper
Plant Sciences
Plants
Polytrichum strictum
Seabirds
Snow
Snow cover
Vegetation
Zoology
title Spread of Antarctic vegetation by the kelp gull: comparison of two maritime Antarctic regions
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T23%3A56%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Spread%20of%20Antarctic%20vegetation%20by%20the%20kelp%20gull:%20comparison%20of%20two%20maritime%20Antarctic%20regions&rft.jtitle=Polar%20biology&rft.au=Parnikoza,%20I.&rft.date=2018-06-01&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1143&rft.epage=1155&rft.pages=1143-1155&rft.issn=0722-4060&rft.eissn=1432-2056&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00300-018-2274-9&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA715540695%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-5fd2edcab4caaecc4510c83afbc79f425d73f9f7e3f8b0f4bc6b9655ca00e7803%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2002115819&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A715540695&rfr_iscdi=true