Loading…
How can financial incentives promote local ownership of onshore wind and solar projects? Case study evidence from Germany, Denmark, the UK and Ontario
Mobilising citizens as investors in local solar photovoltaic and onshore wind energy projects can help meet climate objectives, generate local development opportunities, and build social support for low carbon transition. This can be achieved through the introduction of financial incentives attracti...
Saved in:
Published in: | Local economy 2018-02, Vol.33 (1), p.40-62 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-d49a271dddd92d7e1a0ada2ac090428e8ccbc9cf00520bdd206f2d9536f6dc983 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-d49a271dddd92d7e1a0ada2ac090428e8ccbc9cf00520bdd206f2d9536f6dc983 |
container_end_page | 62 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 40 |
container_title | Local economy |
container_volume | 33 |
creator | Curtin, Joseph McInerney, Celine Johannsdottir, Lara |
description | Mobilising citizens as investors in local solar photovoltaic and onshore wind energy projects can help meet climate objectives, generate local development opportunities, and build social support for low carbon transition. This can be achieved through the introduction of financial incentives attractive to local actors. To investigate what types of financial incentives are effective at the feasibility, development, construction, and operation stages of project development, we undertake a comparative case study of their use in Denmark; Germany; the UK; and Ontario, Canada. We find that a requirement for incentives such as grants and soft loans at the feasibility and development stages is a distinguishing feature of projects with citizen involvement, reflecting their greater risk aversion, lack of technical experience and financial capacity, and their inability to balance risk across a portfolio of projects. At later project stages, market-independent supports (feed in tariffs, grants, and tax incentives) have been effective in mobilising investment, but market-based supports (feed in premiums and quota schemes) can also be tailored to the specific needs of local community actors. These findings add a new dimension to the growing academic and policy debate about how Governments can effectively mobilise investment from local communities and citizens in distributed renewable technologies. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/0269094217751868 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2002587507</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2002587507</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-d49a271dddd92d7e1a0ada2ac090428e8ccbc9cf00520bdd206f2d9536f6dc983</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdUE1LQzEQDKJgrd49Lnj16SbvMyeRqlUUvNjzI0320dQ2qclrS_-Iv9fUenJh2YWZnR2GsUuON5zX9S2KSqIsRNpL3lTNERvwosZM5qI8ZoM9nO3xU3YW4xwReS1xwL6f_Ra0ctBZp5y2agHWaXK93VCEVfBL3xMsvE6A3zoKcWZX4DvwLs58INhaZ0Cljn6hwv5iTrqPdzBSkSD2a7MD2lhDSRW6pAdjCkvldtfwQG6pwuc19DOCyeuvyrvrVbD-nJ10ahHp4m8O2eTp8WP0nL29j19G92-Zzouqz0whlai5SSWFqYkrVEYJpVFiIRpqtJ5qqTvEUuDUGIFVJ4ws86qrjJZNPmRXB93k-2tNsW_nfh1cetkKRFE2dYl1YuGBpYOPMVDXroJN1nctx3affvs__fwH_6N5og</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2002587507</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>How can financial incentives promote local ownership of onshore wind and solar projects? Case study evidence from Germany, Denmark, the UK and Ontario</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>SAGE</source><creator>Curtin, Joseph ; McInerney, Celine ; Johannsdottir, Lara</creator><creatorcontrib>Curtin, Joseph ; McInerney, Celine ; Johannsdottir, Lara</creatorcontrib><description>Mobilising citizens as investors in local solar photovoltaic and onshore wind energy projects can help meet climate objectives, generate local development opportunities, and build social support for low carbon transition. This can be achieved through the introduction of financial incentives attractive to local actors. To investigate what types of financial incentives are effective at the feasibility, development, construction, and operation stages of project development, we undertake a comparative case study of their use in Denmark; Germany; the UK; and Ontario, Canada. We find that a requirement for incentives such as grants and soft loans at the feasibility and development stages is a distinguishing feature of projects with citizen involvement, reflecting their greater risk aversion, lack of technical experience and financial capacity, and their inability to balance risk across a portfolio of projects. At later project stages, market-independent supports (feed in tariffs, grants, and tax incentives) have been effective in mobilising investment, but market-based supports (feed in premiums and quota schemes) can also be tailored to the specific needs of local community actors. These findings add a new dimension to the growing academic and policy debate about how Governments can effectively mobilise investment from local communities and citizens in distributed renewable technologies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0269-0942</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1470-9325</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0269094217751868</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Thousand Oaks: SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</publisher><subject>Case studies ; Citizen participation ; Citizens ; Community ; Comparative analysis ; Energy development ; Feasibility ; Financial incentives ; Grants ; Incentives ; Investments ; Investors ; Loans ; Monetary incentives ; Ownership ; Political participation ; Premiums ; Risk ; Social development ; Social support ; Solar energy ; Tariffs ; Tax incentives ; Taxation ; Wind power</subject><ispartof>Local economy, 2018-02, Vol.33 (1), p.40-62</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-d49a271dddd92d7e1a0ada2ac090428e8ccbc9cf00520bdd206f2d9536f6dc983</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-d49a271dddd92d7e1a0ada2ac090428e8ccbc9cf00520bdd206f2d9536f6dc983</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27845,27903,27904,33202</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Curtin, Joseph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McInerney, Celine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johannsdottir, Lara</creatorcontrib><title>How can financial incentives promote local ownership of onshore wind and solar projects? Case study evidence from Germany, Denmark, the UK and Ontario</title><title>Local economy</title><description>Mobilising citizens as investors in local solar photovoltaic and onshore wind energy projects can help meet climate objectives, generate local development opportunities, and build social support for low carbon transition. This can be achieved through the introduction of financial incentives attractive to local actors. To investigate what types of financial incentives are effective at the feasibility, development, construction, and operation stages of project development, we undertake a comparative case study of their use in Denmark; Germany; the UK; and Ontario, Canada. We find that a requirement for incentives such as grants and soft loans at the feasibility and development stages is a distinguishing feature of projects with citizen involvement, reflecting their greater risk aversion, lack of technical experience and financial capacity, and their inability to balance risk across a portfolio of projects. At later project stages, market-independent supports (feed in tariffs, grants, and tax incentives) have been effective in mobilising investment, but market-based supports (feed in premiums and quota schemes) can also be tailored to the specific needs of local community actors. These findings add a new dimension to the growing academic and policy debate about how Governments can effectively mobilise investment from local communities and citizens in distributed renewable technologies.</description><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Citizen participation</subject><subject>Citizens</subject><subject>Community</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Energy development</subject><subject>Feasibility</subject><subject>Financial incentives</subject><subject>Grants</subject><subject>Incentives</subject><subject>Investments</subject><subject>Investors</subject><subject>Loans</subject><subject>Monetary incentives</subject><subject>Ownership</subject><subject>Political participation</subject><subject>Premiums</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Social development</subject><subject>Social support</subject><subject>Solar energy</subject><subject>Tariffs</subject><subject>Tax incentives</subject><subject>Taxation</subject><subject>Wind power</subject><issn>0269-0942</issn><issn>1470-9325</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNpdUE1LQzEQDKJgrd49Lnj16SbvMyeRqlUUvNjzI0320dQ2qclrS_-Iv9fUenJh2YWZnR2GsUuON5zX9S2KSqIsRNpL3lTNERvwosZM5qI8ZoM9nO3xU3YW4xwReS1xwL6f_Ra0ctBZp5y2agHWaXK93VCEVfBL3xMsvE6A3zoKcWZX4DvwLs58INhaZ0Cljn6hwv5iTrqPdzBSkSD2a7MD2lhDSRW6pAdjCkvldtfwQG6pwuc19DOCyeuvyrvrVbD-nJ10ahHp4m8O2eTp8WP0nL29j19G92-Zzouqz0whlai5SSWFqYkrVEYJpVFiIRpqtJ5qqTvEUuDUGIFVJ4ws86qrjJZNPmRXB93k-2tNsW_nfh1cetkKRFE2dYl1YuGBpYOPMVDXroJN1nctx3affvs__fwH_6N5og</recordid><startdate>201802</startdate><enddate>201802</enddate><creator>Curtin, Joseph</creator><creator>McInerney, Celine</creator><creator>Johannsdottir, Lara</creator><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201802</creationdate><title>How can financial incentives promote local ownership of onshore wind and solar projects? Case study evidence from Germany, Denmark, the UK and Ontario</title><author>Curtin, Joseph ; McInerney, Celine ; Johannsdottir, Lara</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-d49a271dddd92d7e1a0ada2ac090428e8ccbc9cf00520bdd206f2d9536f6dc983</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Citizen participation</topic><topic>Citizens</topic><topic>Community</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Energy development</topic><topic>Feasibility</topic><topic>Financial incentives</topic><topic>Grants</topic><topic>Incentives</topic><topic>Investments</topic><topic>Investors</topic><topic>Loans</topic><topic>Monetary incentives</topic><topic>Ownership</topic><topic>Political participation</topic><topic>Premiums</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Social development</topic><topic>Social support</topic><topic>Solar energy</topic><topic>Tariffs</topic><topic>Tax incentives</topic><topic>Taxation</topic><topic>Wind power</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Curtin, Joseph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McInerney, Celine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johannsdottir, Lara</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Local economy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Curtin, Joseph</au><au>McInerney, Celine</au><au>Johannsdottir, Lara</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>How can financial incentives promote local ownership of onshore wind and solar projects? Case study evidence from Germany, Denmark, the UK and Ontario</atitle><jtitle>Local economy</jtitle><date>2018-02</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>40</spage><epage>62</epage><pages>40-62</pages><issn>0269-0942</issn><eissn>1470-9325</eissn><abstract>Mobilising citizens as investors in local solar photovoltaic and onshore wind energy projects can help meet climate objectives, generate local development opportunities, and build social support for low carbon transition. This can be achieved through the introduction of financial incentives attractive to local actors. To investigate what types of financial incentives are effective at the feasibility, development, construction, and operation stages of project development, we undertake a comparative case study of their use in Denmark; Germany; the UK; and Ontario, Canada. We find that a requirement for incentives such as grants and soft loans at the feasibility and development stages is a distinguishing feature of projects with citizen involvement, reflecting their greater risk aversion, lack of technical experience and financial capacity, and their inability to balance risk across a portfolio of projects. At later project stages, market-independent supports (feed in tariffs, grants, and tax incentives) have been effective in mobilising investment, but market-based supports (feed in premiums and quota schemes) can also be tailored to the specific needs of local community actors. These findings add a new dimension to the growing academic and policy debate about how Governments can effectively mobilise investment from local communities and citizens in distributed renewable technologies.</abstract><cop>Thousand Oaks</cop><pub>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</pub><doi>10.1177/0269094217751868</doi><tpages>23</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0269-0942 |
ispartof | Local economy, 2018-02, Vol.33 (1), p.40-62 |
issn | 0269-0942 1470-9325 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2002587507 |
source | International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); PAIS Index; SAGE |
subjects | Case studies Citizen participation Citizens Community Comparative analysis Energy development Feasibility Financial incentives Grants Incentives Investments Investors Loans Monetary incentives Ownership Political participation Premiums Risk Social development Social support Solar energy Tariffs Tax incentives Taxation Wind power |
title | How can financial incentives promote local ownership of onshore wind and solar projects? Case study evidence from Germany, Denmark, the UK and Ontario |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T00%3A34%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How%20can%20financial%20incentives%20promote%20local%20ownership%20of%20onshore%20wind%20and%20solar%20projects?%20Case%20study%20evidence%20from%20Germany,%20Denmark,%20the%20UK%20and%20Ontario&rft.jtitle=Local%20economy&rft.au=Curtin,%20Joseph&rft.date=2018-02&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=40&rft.epage=62&rft.pages=40-62&rft.issn=0269-0942&rft.eissn=1470-9325&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0269094217751868&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2002587507%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-d49a271dddd92d7e1a0ada2ac090428e8ccbc9cf00520bdd206f2d9536f6dc983%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2002587507&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |