Root biomass distribution and soil properties of an open woodland on a duplex soil

• Published in: Plant and soil 2010-02, Vol.327 (1-2), p.377-388
• Main Authors: Macinnis-Ng, C. M. O, Fuentes, S, O'Grady, A. P, Palmer, A. R, Taylor, D, Whitley, R. J, Yunusa, I, Zeppel, M. J. B, Eamus, D
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Agricultural soils; Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions; Analysis; Animal, plant and microbial ecology; Biological and medical sciences; Biomass; Biomedical and Life Sciences; Ecology; Ecophysiology; Electric properties; Forests; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology; General agronomy. Plant production; Hydrogeology; Life Sciences; Plant biology; Plant Physiology; Plant roots; Plant Sciences; Regular Article; Root biomass; Roots; Sand soils; Soil horizons; Soil profiles; Soil properties; Soil science; Soil Science & Conservation; Soil sciences; Soil texture; Soil water; Soil water characteristics; Soil-plant relationships. Soil fertility; Soil-plant relationships. Soil fertility. Fertilization. Amendments; Stems; Subsoils; Topsoil; Trees; Vegetation; Water use; Woodlands
• ISSN: 0032-079X; 1573-5036
• DOI: 10.1007/s11104-009-0061-7

Data on the distribution of root biomass are critical to understanding the ecophysiology of vegetation communities. This is particularly true when models are applied to describe ecohydrology and vegetation function. However, there is a paucity of such information across continental Australia. We quantified vertical and horizontal root biomass distribution in a woodland dominated by Angophora bakeri and Eucalyptus sclerophylla on the Cumberland Plains near Richmond, New South Wales. The site was characterised by a duplex (texture contrast) soil with the A horizon (to 70 cm) consisting of loamy sand and the B horizon (to > 10 m) consisting of sandy clay. The topsoil had a smaller bulk density, a smaller water holding capacity but a larger organic component and a larger hydraulic conductivity in comparison to the subsoil. Root biomass was sampled to 1.5 m depth and declined through the soil profile. Whilst total biomass in the B horizon was relatively small, its contribution to the function of the trees was highly significant. Coarse roots accounted for approximately 82% of the root mass recovered. Lateral distribution of fine roots was generally even but coarse roots were more likely to occur closer to tree stems. Variation in tree diameter explained 75% of the variation in total below-ground biomass. The trench method suggested the belowground biomass was 6.03 ± 1.21 kg m⁻² but this method created bias towards sampling close to tree stems. We found that approximately 68% of root material was within a 2 m radius of tree stems and this made up 54% of the total number of samples but in reality, only approximately 5 to 10% of the site is within a 2 m radius of tree stems. Based on these proportions, our recalculated belowground biomass was 2.93 ± 0.59 kg m⁻². These measurements provide valuable data for modeling of ecosystem water use and productivity.