A comparative study on the dislocation rate of the Mirena® and the Multiload 375® intrauterine device

An abstract of an article entitled A comparative study on the Dislocation of the Mirena and the Multiload 375 intrauterine device by G. S. Merki-Feld et al is presented. Researchers conclude that the rate of partial and complete expulsions is significantly lower for the LNG-IUD compared to the ML-IU...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The European journal of contraception & reproductive health care 2004-06, Vol.9, p.82
Main Authors: Merki-Feld, G S, Schwarz, D, Keller, P J
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Birth control
Comparative studies
Intrauterine devices
IUD
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 82
container_title The European journal of contraception & reproductive health care
container_volume 9
creator Merki-Feld, G S
Schwarz, D
Keller, P J
description An abstract of an article entitled A comparative study on the Dislocation of the Mirena and the Multiload 375 intrauterine device by G. S. Merki-Feld et al is presented. Researchers conclude that the rate of partial and complete expulsions is significantly lower for the LNG-IUD compared to the ML-IUD. The low rate of dislocations might contribute to the high safety of the LNG-IUD.
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_200623871</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>665075011</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_2006238713</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjEsKwjAURYMoWD97CM4LSdM2nYooTpw5L6F91ZSY1HwKbspFuDKDugBH795zLm-CEppzlhJeZdOYWZmlBa34HC2c6wmhLGdlgi5b3JjbIKzwcgTsfGgf2Gjsr4Bb6ZRpoog9esCm-_CTtKDF64mFbr8gKC-VES1mvIhcam9F8GCljl9glA2s0KwTysH6d5doc9ifd8d0sOYewPm6N8HqqOqMkDJjFafsr9Eb64ZI-A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>200623871</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A comparative study on the dislocation rate of the Mirena® and the Multiload 375® intrauterine device</title><source>Taylor and Francis:Jisc Collections:Taylor and Francis Read and Publish Agreement 2024-2025:Medical Collection (Reading list)</source><creator>Merki-Feld, G S ; Schwarz, D ; Keller, P J</creator><creatorcontrib>Merki-Feld, G S ; Schwarz, D ; Keller, P J</creatorcontrib><description>An abstract of an article entitled A comparative study on the Dislocation of the Mirena and the Multiload 375 intrauterine device by G. S. Merki-Feld et al is presented. Researchers conclude that the rate of partial and complete expulsions is significantly lower for the LNG-IUD compared to the ML-IUD. The low rate of dislocations might contribute to the high safety of the LNG-IUD.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1362-5187</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1473-0782</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ECRCFK</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Carnforth: Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</publisher><subject>Birth control ; Comparative studies ; Intrauterine devices ; IUD</subject><ispartof>The European journal of contraception &amp; reproductive health care, 2004-06, Vol.9, p.82</ispartof><rights>Copyright CRC Press Jun 2004</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Merki-Feld, G S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwarz, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keller, P J</creatorcontrib><title>A comparative study on the dislocation rate of the Mirena® and the Multiload 375® intrauterine device</title><title>The European journal of contraception &amp; reproductive health care</title><description>An abstract of an article entitled A comparative study on the Dislocation of the Mirena and the Multiload 375 intrauterine device by G. S. Merki-Feld et al is presented. Researchers conclude that the rate of partial and complete expulsions is significantly lower for the LNG-IUD compared to the ML-IUD. The low rate of dislocations might contribute to the high safety of the LNG-IUD.</description><subject>Birth control</subject><subject>Comparative studies</subject><subject>Intrauterine devices</subject><subject>IUD</subject><issn>1362-5187</issn><issn>1473-0782</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNjEsKwjAURYMoWD97CM4LSdM2nYooTpw5L6F91ZSY1HwKbspFuDKDugBH795zLm-CEppzlhJeZdOYWZmlBa34HC2c6wmhLGdlgi5b3JjbIKzwcgTsfGgf2Gjsr4Bb6ZRpoog9esCm-_CTtKDF64mFbr8gKC-VES1mvIhcam9F8GCljl9glA2s0KwTysH6d5doc9ifd8d0sOYewPm6N8HqqOqMkDJjFafsr9Eb64ZI-A</recordid><startdate>20040602</startdate><enddate>20040602</enddate><creator>Merki-Feld, G S</creator><creator>Schwarz, D</creator><creator>Keller, P J</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040602</creationdate><title>A comparative study on the dislocation rate of the Mirena® and the Multiload 375® intrauterine device</title><author>Merki-Feld, G S ; Schwarz, D ; Keller, P J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_2006238713</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Birth control</topic><topic>Comparative studies</topic><topic>Intrauterine devices</topic><topic>IUD</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Merki-Feld, G S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwarz, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keller, P J</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>The European journal of contraception &amp; reproductive health care</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Merki-Feld, G S</au><au>Schwarz, D</au><au>Keller, P J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A comparative study on the dislocation rate of the Mirena® and the Multiload 375® intrauterine device</atitle><jtitle>The European journal of contraception &amp; reproductive health care</jtitle><date>2004-06-02</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>9</volume><spage>82</spage><pages>82-</pages><issn>1362-5187</issn><eissn>1473-0782</eissn><coden>ECRCFK</coden><abstract>An abstract of an article entitled A comparative study on the Dislocation of the Mirena and the Multiload 375 intrauterine device by G. S. Merki-Feld et al is presented. Researchers conclude that the rate of partial and complete expulsions is significantly lower for the LNG-IUD compared to the ML-IUD. The low rate of dislocations might contribute to the high safety of the LNG-IUD.</abstract><cop>Carnforth</cop><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1362-5187
ispartof The European journal of contraception & reproductive health care, 2004-06, Vol.9, p.82
issn 1362-5187
1473-0782
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_200623871
source Taylor and Francis:Jisc Collections:Taylor and Francis Read and Publish Agreement 2024-2025:Medical Collection (Reading list)
subjects Birth control
Comparative studies
Intrauterine devices
IUD
title A comparative study on the dislocation rate of the Mirena® and the Multiload 375® intrauterine device
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T18%3A13%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20comparative%20study%20on%20the%20dislocation%20rate%20of%20the%20Mirena%C2%AE%20and%20the%20Multiload%20375%C2%AE%20intrauterine%20device&rft.jtitle=The%20European%20journal%20of%20contraception%20&%20reproductive%20health%20care&rft.au=Merki-Feld,%20G%20S&rft.date=2004-06-02&rft.volume=9&rft.spage=82&rft.pages=82-&rft.issn=1362-5187&rft.eissn=1473-0782&rft.coden=ECRCFK&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E665075011%3C/proquest%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_2006238713%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=200623871&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true