Loading…

Personalisation as vision and toolkit. A case study

With the objective to eradicate disability related discrimination and promote choice, control, independence and inclusion for all individuals, the personalisation agenda paved the way for a transformation of social care and disability services in the UK. This paper explores personalisation both as a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International review of sociology 2018-01, Vol.28 (1), p.62-85
Main Author: Pozzoli, Francesca
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-bb353aa97068e196e7715c65f364360c2791f81d7022c5e71e321516ed239c953
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-bb353aa97068e196e7715c65f364360c2791f81d7022c5e71e321516ed239c953
container_end_page 85
container_issue 1
container_start_page 62
container_title International review of sociology
container_volume 28
creator Pozzoli, Francesca
description With the objective to eradicate disability related discrimination and promote choice, control, independence and inclusion for all individuals, the personalisation agenda paved the way for a transformation of social care and disability services in the UK. This paper explores personalisation both as a vision of care and support services and as a toolkit promoted by government policies in order to allow for such vision to translate into practice - the use of direct payments and personal budgets being an example. A qualitative case study analysis has been conducted in the context of care services for disabled young people and by means of in-depth interviews with professionals, parents and the young people themselves. Such analysis reconstructs the implementation of personalisation showing how the toolkit offered by government policies has been used and interpreted differently by the different actors in the field and how this has brought to a wide range of opportunities but also risks. What seems to emerge from the study is that the vision of personalisation risks being hampered by its toolkit and that alternatives might be needed in order to safeguard the potential of personalisation as a vision.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/03906701.2017.1422885
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_infor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2006846497</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2006846497</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-bb353aa97068e196e7715c65f364360c2791f81d7022c5e71e321516ed239c953</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLAzEUhYMoOFZ_gjDgesabZPLaWYovKOhC1yHNZCB1OqlJqvTfO2Pr1tU9i-8cLh9C1xhqDBJugSrgAnBNAIsaN4RIyU5QgRuuKkUEPUXFxFQTdI4uUloDAJWcF4i-upjCYHqfTPZhKE0qv3z6TUNb5hD6D5_rcl5ak1yZ8q7dX6KzzvTJXR3vDL0_3L8tnqrly-PzYr6sLKUyV6sVZdQYJYBLhxV3QmBmOesobygHS4TCncStAEIscwI7SjDD3LWEKqsYnaGbw-42hs-dS1mvwy6OvyZNYBxteKPESLEDZWNIKbpOb6PfmLjXGPTkR__50ZMfffQz9u4OPT90IW7Md4h9q7PZ9yF20QzWJ03_n_gBWdppcA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2006846497</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Personalisation as vision and toolkit. A case study</title><source>Taylor &amp; Francis</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Pozzoli, Francesca</creator><creatorcontrib>Pozzoli, Francesca</creatorcontrib><description>With the objective to eradicate disability related discrimination and promote choice, control, independence and inclusion for all individuals, the personalisation agenda paved the way for a transformation of social care and disability services in the UK. This paper explores personalisation both as a vision of care and support services and as a toolkit promoted by government policies in order to allow for such vision to translate into practice - the use of direct payments and personal budgets being an example. A qualitative case study analysis has been conducted in the context of care services for disabled young people and by means of in-depth interviews with professionals, parents and the young people themselves. Such analysis reconstructs the implementation of personalisation showing how the toolkit offered by government policies has been used and interpreted differently by the different actors in the field and how this has brought to a wide range of opportunities but also risks. What seems to emerge from the study is that the vision of personalisation risks being hampered by its toolkit and that alternatives might be needed in order to safeguard the potential of personalisation as a vision.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0390-6701</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-9273</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/03906701.2017.1422885</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Paris: Routledge</publisher><subject>Case studies ; Disability ; Discrimination ; Parents &amp; parenting ; Payments ; People with disabilities ; personal budgets ; Personalisation ; Physical disabilities ; Public policy ; social care policies ; Social services ; Support services ; Youth</subject><ispartof>International review of sociology, 2018-01, Vol.28 (1), p.62-85</ispartof><rights>2018 University of Rome 'La Sapienza' 2018</rights><rights>2018 University of Rome 'La Sapienza'</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-bb353aa97068e196e7715c65f364360c2791f81d7022c5e71e321516ed239c953</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-bb353aa97068e196e7715c65f364360c2791f81d7022c5e71e321516ed239c953</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,33751</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pozzoli, Francesca</creatorcontrib><title>Personalisation as vision and toolkit. A case study</title><title>International review of sociology</title><description>With the objective to eradicate disability related discrimination and promote choice, control, independence and inclusion for all individuals, the personalisation agenda paved the way for a transformation of social care and disability services in the UK. This paper explores personalisation both as a vision of care and support services and as a toolkit promoted by government policies in order to allow for such vision to translate into practice - the use of direct payments and personal budgets being an example. A qualitative case study analysis has been conducted in the context of care services for disabled young people and by means of in-depth interviews with professionals, parents and the young people themselves. Such analysis reconstructs the implementation of personalisation showing how the toolkit offered by government policies has been used and interpreted differently by the different actors in the field and how this has brought to a wide range of opportunities but also risks. What seems to emerge from the study is that the vision of personalisation risks being hampered by its toolkit and that alternatives might be needed in order to safeguard the potential of personalisation as a vision.</description><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Disability</subject><subject>Discrimination</subject><subject>Parents &amp; parenting</subject><subject>Payments</subject><subject>People with disabilities</subject><subject>personal budgets</subject><subject>Personalisation</subject><subject>Physical disabilities</subject><subject>Public policy</subject><subject>social care policies</subject><subject>Social services</subject><subject>Support services</subject><subject>Youth</subject><issn>0390-6701</issn><issn>1469-9273</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEtLAzEUhYMoOFZ_gjDgesabZPLaWYovKOhC1yHNZCB1OqlJqvTfO2Pr1tU9i-8cLh9C1xhqDBJugSrgAnBNAIsaN4RIyU5QgRuuKkUEPUXFxFQTdI4uUloDAJWcF4i-upjCYHqfTPZhKE0qv3z6TUNb5hD6D5_rcl5ak1yZ8q7dX6KzzvTJXR3vDL0_3L8tnqrly-PzYr6sLKUyV6sVZdQYJYBLhxV3QmBmOesobygHS4TCncStAEIscwI7SjDD3LWEKqsYnaGbw-42hs-dS1mvwy6OvyZNYBxteKPESLEDZWNIKbpOb6PfmLjXGPTkR__50ZMfffQz9u4OPT90IW7Md4h9q7PZ9yF20QzWJ03_n_gBWdppcA</recordid><startdate>20180102</startdate><enddate>20180102</enddate><creator>Pozzoli, Francesca</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180102</creationdate><title>Personalisation as vision and toolkit. A case study</title><author>Pozzoli, Francesca</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-bb353aa97068e196e7715c65f364360c2791f81d7022c5e71e321516ed239c953</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Disability</topic><topic>Discrimination</topic><topic>Parents &amp; parenting</topic><topic>Payments</topic><topic>People with disabilities</topic><topic>personal budgets</topic><topic>Personalisation</topic><topic>Physical disabilities</topic><topic>Public policy</topic><topic>social care policies</topic><topic>Social services</topic><topic>Support services</topic><topic>Youth</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pozzoli, Francesca</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>International review of sociology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pozzoli, Francesca</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Personalisation as vision and toolkit. A case study</atitle><jtitle>International review of sociology</jtitle><date>2018-01-02</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>62</spage><epage>85</epage><pages>62-85</pages><issn>0390-6701</issn><eissn>1469-9273</eissn><abstract>With the objective to eradicate disability related discrimination and promote choice, control, independence and inclusion for all individuals, the personalisation agenda paved the way for a transformation of social care and disability services in the UK. This paper explores personalisation both as a vision of care and support services and as a toolkit promoted by government policies in order to allow for such vision to translate into practice - the use of direct payments and personal budgets being an example. A qualitative case study analysis has been conducted in the context of care services for disabled young people and by means of in-depth interviews with professionals, parents and the young people themselves. Such analysis reconstructs the implementation of personalisation showing how the toolkit offered by government policies has been used and interpreted differently by the different actors in the field and how this has brought to a wide range of opportunities but also risks. What seems to emerge from the study is that the vision of personalisation risks being hampered by its toolkit and that alternatives might be needed in order to safeguard the potential of personalisation as a vision.</abstract><cop>Paris</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/03906701.2017.1422885</doi><tpages>24</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0390-6701
ispartof International review of sociology, 2018-01, Vol.28 (1), p.62-85
issn 0390-6701
1469-9273
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2006846497
source Taylor & Francis; Sociological Abstracts
subjects Case studies
Disability
Discrimination
Parents & parenting
Payments
People with disabilities
personal budgets
Personalisation
Physical disabilities
Public policy
social care policies
Social services
Support services
Youth
title Personalisation as vision and toolkit. A case study
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-23T16%3A08%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_infor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Personalisation%20as%20vision%20and%20toolkit.%20A%20case%20study&rft.jtitle=International%20review%20of%20sociology&rft.au=Pozzoli,%20Francesca&rft.date=2018-01-02&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=62&rft.epage=85&rft.pages=62-85&rft.issn=0390-6701&rft.eissn=1469-9273&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/03906701.2017.1422885&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_infor%3E2006846497%3C/proquest_infor%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-bb353aa97068e196e7715c65f364360c2791f81d7022c5e71e321516ed239c953%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2006846497&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true