Loading…
Miniaturization and morphological evolution in Paleozoic relatives of living amphibians: a quantitative approach
Miniaturization has been defined as the evolution of extremely small adult size in a lineage. It does not simply imply the decrease of the body size but also involves structural modifications to maintain functional efficiency at a strongly reduced size. Miniaturization has been proposed as a key fac...
Saved in:
Published in: | Paleobiology 2018-02, Vol.44 (1), p.58-75 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a414t-6476b03281198229ff40a499c0d35f935f999571c875121724d4af4f4c9b39dd3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a414t-6476b03281198229ff40a499c0d35f935f999571c875121724d4af4f4c9b39dd3 |
container_end_page | 75 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 58 |
container_title | Paleobiology |
container_volume | 44 |
creator | Pérez-Ben, Celeste M Schoch, Rainer R Báez, Ana M |
description | Miniaturization has been defined as the evolution of extremely small adult size in a lineage. It does not simply imply the decrease of the body size but also involves structural modifications to maintain functional efficiency at a strongly reduced size. Miniaturization has been proposed as a key factor in the origin of several major tetrapod clades. Current hypotheses propose that the living amphibians (lissamphibians) originated within a clade of Paleozoic dwarfed dissorophoid temnospondyls. Morphological traits shared by these small dissorophoids have been interpreted as resulting from constraints imposed by the extreme size reduction, but these statements were based only on qualitative observations. Herein, we assess quantitatively morphological changes in the skull previously associated with miniaturization in the lissamphibian stem lineage by comparing evolutionary and ontogenetic allometries in dissorophoids. Our results show that these features are not comparable to the morphological consequences of extreme size reduction as documented in extant miniature amphibians, but instead they resemble immature conditions of larger temnospondyls. We conclude that the truncation of the ancestral ontogeny, and not constraints related to miniaturization, might have been the factor that played a major role in the morphological evolution of small dissorophoids. Based on our results, we discuss the putative role of miniaturization in the origin of lissamphibians within Dissorophoidea. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/pab.2017.22 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2007446983</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_pab_2017_22</cupid><jstor_id>48574114</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>48574114</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a414t-6476b03281198229ff40a499c0d35f935f999571c875121724d4af4f4c9b39dd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLxDAURoMoOD5WroWAK5GOeXXSuBPxBYoudB1u03QmQyepSTuiv96OI-pCXITkkpPvhA-hA0rGlFB52kI5ZsNhzNgGGlHFiyznnG6iESFKZAWXfBvtpDQnw5xP5Ai198476Pro3qFzwWPwFV6E2M5CE6bOQIPtMjT9553z-BEaG96DMzjaZnixtAmHGjdu6fwUw6KdudKBT2cY8EsPvnPdJ4WhbWMAM9tDWzU0ye5_7bvo-ery6eImu3u4vr04v8tAUNFlEyEnJeGsoFQVjKm6FgSEUoZUPK_VaimVS2oKmVNGJROVgFrUwqiSq6riu-honTtoX3qbOj0PffSDUjNCpBATVfCBOllTJoaUoq11G90C4pumRK8q1UOlelWpZmygD9f0PHUhfqOiyKWgVPykTW1Ixllv7GuITfVbTQtNcsnzVVr25YZFGV01tT_c3_bjNV-6ELz996cfvdWfNw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2007446983</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Miniaturization and morphological evolution in Paleozoic relatives of living amphibians: a quantitative approach</title><source>Cambridge Journals Online</source><creator>Pérez-Ben, Celeste M ; Schoch, Rainer R ; Báez, Ana M</creator><creatorcontrib>Pérez-Ben, Celeste M ; Schoch, Rainer R ; Báez, Ana M</creatorcontrib><description>Miniaturization has been defined as the evolution of extremely small adult size in a lineage. It does not simply imply the decrease of the body size but also involves structural modifications to maintain functional efficiency at a strongly reduced size. Miniaturization has been proposed as a key factor in the origin of several major tetrapod clades. Current hypotheses propose that the living amphibians (lissamphibians) originated within a clade of Paleozoic dwarfed dissorophoid temnospondyls. Morphological traits shared by these small dissorophoids have been interpreted as resulting from constraints imposed by the extreme size reduction, but these statements were based only on qualitative observations. Herein, we assess quantitatively morphological changes in the skull previously associated with miniaturization in the lissamphibian stem lineage by comparing evolutionary and ontogenetic allometries in dissorophoids. Our results show that these features are not comparable to the morphological consequences of extreme size reduction as documented in extant miniature amphibians, but instead they resemble immature conditions of larger temnospondyls. We conclude that the truncation of the ancestral ontogeny, and not constraints related to miniaturization, might have been the factor that played a major role in the morphological evolution of small dissorophoids. Based on our results, we discuss the putative role of miniaturization in the origin of lissamphibians within Dissorophoidea.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0094-8373</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-5331</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/pab.2017.22</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: The Paleontological Society</publisher><subject>allometry ; Amphibia ; Amphibians ; Animal morphology ; Aquatic reptiles ; biologic evolution ; biometry ; Body size ; Chordata ; Evolution ; Frogs ; Genomes ; Labyrinthodontia ; Miniaturization ; Morphology ; Museums ; Ontogeny ; Paleontology ; Paleozoic ; Phylogenetics ; phylogeny ; regression analysis ; Reptiles & amphibians ; size ; Size reduction ; skull ; statistical analysis ; Temnospondyli ; Tetrapoda ; Vertebrata ; vertebrate ; Vertebrates</subject><ispartof>Paleobiology, 2018-02, Vol.44 (1), p.58-75</ispartof><rights>2018 The Paleontological Society. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 The Paleontological Society. All rights reserved</rights><rights>GeoRef, Copyright 2020, American Geosciences Institute. Reference includes data from GeoScienceWorld @Alexandria, VA @USA @United States. Abstract, Copyright, The Paleontological Society</rights><rights>2018 The Paleontological Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a414t-6476b03281198229ff40a499c0d35f935f999571c875121724d4af4f4c9b39dd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a414t-6476b03281198229ff40a499c0d35f935f999571c875121724d4af4f4c9b39dd3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0094837317000227/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,72960</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pérez-Ben, Celeste M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schoch, Rainer R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Báez, Ana M</creatorcontrib><title>Miniaturization and morphological evolution in Paleozoic relatives of living amphibians: a quantitative approach</title><title>Paleobiology</title><addtitle>Paleobiology</addtitle><description>Miniaturization has been defined as the evolution of extremely small adult size in a lineage. It does not simply imply the decrease of the body size but also involves structural modifications to maintain functional efficiency at a strongly reduced size. Miniaturization has been proposed as a key factor in the origin of several major tetrapod clades. Current hypotheses propose that the living amphibians (lissamphibians) originated within a clade of Paleozoic dwarfed dissorophoid temnospondyls. Morphological traits shared by these small dissorophoids have been interpreted as resulting from constraints imposed by the extreme size reduction, but these statements were based only on qualitative observations. Herein, we assess quantitatively morphological changes in the skull previously associated with miniaturization in the lissamphibian stem lineage by comparing evolutionary and ontogenetic allometries in dissorophoids. Our results show that these features are not comparable to the morphological consequences of extreme size reduction as documented in extant miniature amphibians, but instead they resemble immature conditions of larger temnospondyls. We conclude that the truncation of the ancestral ontogeny, and not constraints related to miniaturization, might have been the factor that played a major role in the morphological evolution of small dissorophoids. Based on our results, we discuss the putative role of miniaturization in the origin of lissamphibians within Dissorophoidea.</description><subject>allometry</subject><subject>Amphibia</subject><subject>Amphibians</subject><subject>Animal morphology</subject><subject>Aquatic reptiles</subject><subject>biologic evolution</subject><subject>biometry</subject><subject>Body size</subject><subject>Chordata</subject><subject>Evolution</subject><subject>Frogs</subject><subject>Genomes</subject><subject>Labyrinthodontia</subject><subject>Miniaturization</subject><subject>Morphology</subject><subject>Museums</subject><subject>Ontogeny</subject><subject>Paleontology</subject><subject>Paleozoic</subject><subject>Phylogenetics</subject><subject>phylogeny</subject><subject>regression analysis</subject><subject>Reptiles & amphibians</subject><subject>size</subject><subject>Size reduction</subject><subject>skull</subject><subject>statistical analysis</subject><subject>Temnospondyli</subject><subject>Tetrapoda</subject><subject>Vertebrata</subject><subject>vertebrate</subject><subject>Vertebrates</subject><issn>0094-8373</issn><issn>1938-5331</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEtLxDAURoMoOD5WroWAK5GOeXXSuBPxBYoudB1u03QmQyepSTuiv96OI-pCXITkkpPvhA-hA0rGlFB52kI5ZsNhzNgGGlHFiyznnG6iESFKZAWXfBvtpDQnw5xP5Ai198476Pro3qFzwWPwFV6E2M5CE6bOQIPtMjT9553z-BEaG96DMzjaZnixtAmHGjdu6fwUw6KdudKBT2cY8EsPvnPdJ4WhbWMAM9tDWzU0ye5_7bvo-ery6eImu3u4vr04v8tAUNFlEyEnJeGsoFQVjKm6FgSEUoZUPK_VaimVS2oKmVNGJROVgFrUwqiSq6riu-honTtoX3qbOj0PffSDUjNCpBATVfCBOllTJoaUoq11G90C4pumRK8q1UOlelWpZmygD9f0PHUhfqOiyKWgVPykTW1Ixllv7GuITfVbTQtNcsnzVVr25YZFGV01tT_c3_bjNV-6ELz996cfvdWfNw</recordid><startdate>20180201</startdate><enddate>20180201</enddate><creator>Pérez-Ben, Celeste M</creator><creator>Schoch, Rainer R</creator><creator>Báez, Ana M</creator><general>The Paleontological Society</general><general>Cambridge University Press</general><general>Paleontological Society</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180201</creationdate><title>Miniaturization and morphological evolution in Paleozoic relatives of living amphibians: a quantitative approach</title><author>Pérez-Ben, Celeste M ; Schoch, Rainer R ; Báez, Ana M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a414t-6476b03281198229ff40a499c0d35f935f999571c875121724d4af4f4c9b39dd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>allometry</topic><topic>Amphibia</topic><topic>Amphibians</topic><topic>Animal morphology</topic><topic>Aquatic reptiles</topic><topic>biologic evolution</topic><topic>biometry</topic><topic>Body size</topic><topic>Chordata</topic><topic>Evolution</topic><topic>Frogs</topic><topic>Genomes</topic><topic>Labyrinthodontia</topic><topic>Miniaturization</topic><topic>Morphology</topic><topic>Museums</topic><topic>Ontogeny</topic><topic>Paleontology</topic><topic>Paleozoic</topic><topic>Phylogenetics</topic><topic>phylogeny</topic><topic>regression analysis</topic><topic>Reptiles & amphibians</topic><topic>size</topic><topic>Size reduction</topic><topic>skull</topic><topic>statistical analysis</topic><topic>Temnospondyli</topic><topic>Tetrapoda</topic><topic>Vertebrata</topic><topic>vertebrate</topic><topic>Vertebrates</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pérez-Ben, Celeste M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schoch, Rainer R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Báez, Ana M</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Paleobiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pérez-Ben, Celeste M</au><au>Schoch, Rainer R</au><au>Báez, Ana M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Miniaturization and morphological evolution in Paleozoic relatives of living amphibians: a quantitative approach</atitle><jtitle>Paleobiology</jtitle><addtitle>Paleobiology</addtitle><date>2018-02-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>58</spage><epage>75</epage><pages>58-75</pages><issn>0094-8373</issn><eissn>1938-5331</eissn><abstract>Miniaturization has been defined as the evolution of extremely small adult size in a lineage. It does not simply imply the decrease of the body size but also involves structural modifications to maintain functional efficiency at a strongly reduced size. Miniaturization has been proposed as a key factor in the origin of several major tetrapod clades. Current hypotheses propose that the living amphibians (lissamphibians) originated within a clade of Paleozoic dwarfed dissorophoid temnospondyls. Morphological traits shared by these small dissorophoids have been interpreted as resulting from constraints imposed by the extreme size reduction, but these statements were based only on qualitative observations. Herein, we assess quantitatively morphological changes in the skull previously associated with miniaturization in the lissamphibian stem lineage by comparing evolutionary and ontogenetic allometries in dissorophoids. Our results show that these features are not comparable to the morphological consequences of extreme size reduction as documented in extant miniature amphibians, but instead they resemble immature conditions of larger temnospondyls. We conclude that the truncation of the ancestral ontogeny, and not constraints related to miniaturization, might have been the factor that played a major role in the morphological evolution of small dissorophoids. Based on our results, we discuss the putative role of miniaturization in the origin of lissamphibians within Dissorophoidea.</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>The Paleontological Society</pub><doi>10.1017/pab.2017.22</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0094-8373 |
ispartof | Paleobiology, 2018-02, Vol.44 (1), p.58-75 |
issn | 0094-8373 1938-5331 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2007446983 |
source | Cambridge Journals Online |
subjects | allometry Amphibia Amphibians Animal morphology Aquatic reptiles biologic evolution biometry Body size Chordata Evolution Frogs Genomes Labyrinthodontia Miniaturization Morphology Museums Ontogeny Paleontology Paleozoic Phylogenetics phylogeny regression analysis Reptiles & amphibians size Size reduction skull statistical analysis Temnospondyli Tetrapoda Vertebrata vertebrate Vertebrates |
title | Miniaturization and morphological evolution in Paleozoic relatives of living amphibians: a quantitative approach |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T03%3A18%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Miniaturization%20and%20morphological%20evolution%20in%20Paleozoic%20relatives%20of%20living%20amphibians:%20a%20quantitative%20approach&rft.jtitle=Paleobiology&rft.au=P%C3%A9rez-Ben,%20Celeste%20M&rft.date=2018-02-01&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=58&rft.epage=75&rft.pages=58-75&rft.issn=0094-8373&rft.eissn=1938-5331&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/pab.2017.22&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E48574114%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a414t-6476b03281198229ff40a499c0d35f935f999571c875121724d4af4f4c9b39dd3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2007446983&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_pab_2017_22&rft_jstor_id=48574114&rfr_iscdi=true |