Loading…

Elaborating the construct of transformational leadership: The role of affect

Despite being the most widely used and popular measure of transformational leadership, the MLQ has not received much attention in terms of possible method biases, either at the item or structural level. Based on a priori theory and empirical work, we examined the influence of affect on the measureme...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Leadership quarterly 2005-04, Vol.16 (2), p.245-272
Main Authors: Brown, Douglas J., Keeping, Lisa M.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-ff76e833e9d65f2e232a1f3a31b433514633753e411c7e0a7ebf8d7d44a08c563
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-ff76e833e9d65f2e232a1f3a31b433514633753e411c7e0a7ebf8d7d44a08c563
container_end_page 272
container_issue 2
container_start_page 245
container_title The Leadership quarterly
container_volume 16
creator Brown, Douglas J.
Keeping, Lisa M.
description Despite being the most widely used and popular measure of transformational leadership, the MLQ has not received much attention in terms of possible method biases, either at the item or structural level. Based on a priori theory and empirical work, we examined the influence of affect on the measurement of transformational leadership, as assessed by the MLQ, and its structural relationships with important organizational outcomes in two separate studies. Results of the first study ( N=307) indicated that while temporary mood states have little impact either on measurement or structural relationships, target-specific affect (i.e., liking) influenced both. The effect of target-specific affect was fully replicated in a second study ( N=120) using an independent sample and a more conservative estimate of the liking effect. Overall, the results of this research suggest that transformational leadership, at least when assessed with the MLQ, is highly influenced by the interpersonal affect raters feel towards the target being rated (i.e., liking). These results are discussed in terms of their implications for future work on transformational leadership and affect.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.01.003
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_200773487</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1048984305000044</els_id><sourcerecordid>817205121</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-ff76e833e9d65f2e232a1f3a31b433514633753e411c7e0a7ebf8d7d44a08c563</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9PwzAMxSMEEmPwDThU3FucOm06Dkho4p80ics4R1nqsFZdsyUpEt-eTOPMyZb8nu33Y-yWQ8GB1_d9MZA-TLooAaoCeAGAZ2zGG4k5Clicpx5Eky8agZfsKoQeAHiFzYytnge9cV7HbvzK4pYy48YQ_WRi5mwWvR6DdX6X5m7UQ5butOTDtts_ZOuk9m6go1BbSyZeswurh0A3f3XOPl-e18u3fPXx-r58WuUGEWNuraypQaRFW1e2pBJLzS1q5BuBWHFRI8oKSXBuJIGWtLFNK1shNDSmqnHO7k57994dJgpR9W7y6b-gEgEpUaTkcyZOIuNdCJ6s2vtup_2P4qCO2FSvTtiOpkoBVwlbsj2ebJQCfHfkVTAdjYbazqeIqnXd_wt-AWf6d5k</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>200773487</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Elaborating the construct of transformational leadership: The role of affect</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><creator>Brown, Douglas J. ; Keeping, Lisa M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Brown, Douglas J. ; Keeping, Lisa M.</creatorcontrib><description>Despite being the most widely used and popular measure of transformational leadership, the MLQ has not received much attention in terms of possible method biases, either at the item or structural level. Based on a priori theory and empirical work, we examined the influence of affect on the measurement of transformational leadership, as assessed by the MLQ, and its structural relationships with important organizational outcomes in two separate studies. Results of the first study ( N=307) indicated that while temporary mood states have little impact either on measurement or structural relationships, target-specific affect (i.e., liking) influenced both. The effect of target-specific affect was fully replicated in a second study ( N=120) using an independent sample and a more conservative estimate of the liking effect. Overall, the results of this research suggest that transformational leadership, at least when assessed with the MLQ, is highly influenced by the interpersonal affect raters feel towards the target being rated (i.e., liking). These results are discussed in terms of their implications for future work on transformational leadership and affect.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1048-9843</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-3409</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.01.003</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Affect ; Leadership ; Liking ; Multi-factor leadership questionnaire ; Organizational behavior ; Organizational change ; Studies ; Transformational leadership</subject><ispartof>The Leadership quarterly, 2005-04, Vol.16 (2), p.245-272</ispartof><rights>2005 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Apr 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-ff76e833e9d65f2e232a1f3a31b433514633753e411c7e0a7ebf8d7d44a08c563</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-ff76e833e9d65f2e232a1f3a31b433514633753e411c7e0a7ebf8d7d44a08c563</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Brown, Douglas J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keeping, Lisa M.</creatorcontrib><title>Elaborating the construct of transformational leadership: The role of affect</title><title>The Leadership quarterly</title><description>Despite being the most widely used and popular measure of transformational leadership, the MLQ has not received much attention in terms of possible method biases, either at the item or structural level. Based on a priori theory and empirical work, we examined the influence of affect on the measurement of transformational leadership, as assessed by the MLQ, and its structural relationships with important organizational outcomes in two separate studies. Results of the first study ( N=307) indicated that while temporary mood states have little impact either on measurement or structural relationships, target-specific affect (i.e., liking) influenced both. The effect of target-specific affect was fully replicated in a second study ( N=120) using an independent sample and a more conservative estimate of the liking effect. Overall, the results of this research suggest that transformational leadership, at least when assessed with the MLQ, is highly influenced by the interpersonal affect raters feel towards the target being rated (i.e., liking). These results are discussed in terms of their implications for future work on transformational leadership and affect.</description><subject>Affect</subject><subject>Leadership</subject><subject>Liking</subject><subject>Multi-factor leadership questionnaire</subject><subject>Organizational behavior</subject><subject>Organizational change</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Transformational leadership</subject><issn>1048-9843</issn><issn>1873-3409</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE9PwzAMxSMEEmPwDThU3FucOm06Dkho4p80ics4R1nqsFZdsyUpEt-eTOPMyZb8nu33Y-yWQ8GB1_d9MZA-TLooAaoCeAGAZ2zGG4k5Clicpx5Eky8agZfsKoQeAHiFzYytnge9cV7HbvzK4pYy48YQ_WRi5mwWvR6DdX6X5m7UQ5butOTDtts_ZOuk9m6go1BbSyZeswurh0A3f3XOPl-e18u3fPXx-r58WuUGEWNuraypQaRFW1e2pBJLzS1q5BuBWHFRI8oKSXBuJIGWtLFNK1shNDSmqnHO7k57994dJgpR9W7y6b-gEgEpUaTkcyZOIuNdCJ6s2vtup_2P4qCO2FSvTtiOpkoBVwlbsj2ebJQCfHfkVTAdjYbazqeIqnXd_wt-AWf6d5k</recordid><startdate>20050401</startdate><enddate>20050401</enddate><creator>Brown, Douglas J.</creator><creator>Keeping, Lisa M.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050401</creationdate><title>Elaborating the construct of transformational leadership: The role of affect</title><author>Brown, Douglas J. ; Keeping, Lisa M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-ff76e833e9d65f2e232a1f3a31b433514633753e411c7e0a7ebf8d7d44a08c563</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Affect</topic><topic>Leadership</topic><topic>Liking</topic><topic>Multi-factor leadership questionnaire</topic><topic>Organizational behavior</topic><topic>Organizational change</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Transformational leadership</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Brown, Douglas J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keeping, Lisa M.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>The Leadership quarterly</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Brown, Douglas J.</au><au>Keeping, Lisa M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Elaborating the construct of transformational leadership: The role of affect</atitle><jtitle>The Leadership quarterly</jtitle><date>2005-04-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>245</spage><epage>272</epage><pages>245-272</pages><issn>1048-9843</issn><eissn>1873-3409</eissn><abstract>Despite being the most widely used and popular measure of transformational leadership, the MLQ has not received much attention in terms of possible method biases, either at the item or structural level. Based on a priori theory and empirical work, we examined the influence of affect on the measurement of transformational leadership, as assessed by the MLQ, and its structural relationships with important organizational outcomes in two separate studies. Results of the first study ( N=307) indicated that while temporary mood states have little impact either on measurement or structural relationships, target-specific affect (i.e., liking) influenced both. The effect of target-specific affect was fully replicated in a second study ( N=120) using an independent sample and a more conservative estimate of the liking effect. Overall, the results of this research suggest that transformational leadership, at least when assessed with the MLQ, is highly influenced by the interpersonal affect raters feel towards the target being rated (i.e., liking). These results are discussed in terms of their implications for future work on transformational leadership and affect.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.01.003</doi><tpages>28</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1048-9843
ispartof The Leadership quarterly, 2005-04, Vol.16 (2), p.245-272
issn 1048-9843
1873-3409
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_200773487
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024
subjects Affect
Leadership
Liking
Multi-factor leadership questionnaire
Organizational behavior
Organizational change
Studies
Transformational leadership
title Elaborating the construct of transformational leadership: The role of affect
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T07%3A01%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Elaborating%20the%20construct%20of%20transformational%20leadership:%20The%20role%20of%20affect&rft.jtitle=The%20Leadership%20quarterly&rft.au=Brown,%20Douglas%20J.&rft.date=2005-04-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=245&rft.epage=272&rft.pages=245-272&rft.issn=1048-9843&rft.eissn=1873-3409&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.01.003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E817205121%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-ff76e833e9d65f2e232a1f3a31b433514633753e411c7e0a7ebf8d7d44a08c563%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=200773487&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true