Loading…
Elaborating the construct of transformational leadership: The role of affect
Despite being the most widely used and popular measure of transformational leadership, the MLQ has not received much attention in terms of possible method biases, either at the item or structural level. Based on a priori theory and empirical work, we examined the influence of affect on the measureme...
Saved in:
Published in: | The Leadership quarterly 2005-04, Vol.16 (2), p.245-272 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-ff76e833e9d65f2e232a1f3a31b433514633753e411c7e0a7ebf8d7d44a08c563 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-ff76e833e9d65f2e232a1f3a31b433514633753e411c7e0a7ebf8d7d44a08c563 |
container_end_page | 272 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 245 |
container_title | The Leadership quarterly |
container_volume | 16 |
creator | Brown, Douglas J. Keeping, Lisa M. |
description | Despite being the most widely used and popular measure of transformational leadership, the MLQ has not received much attention in terms of possible method biases, either at the item or structural level. Based on a priori theory and empirical work, we examined the influence of affect on the measurement of transformational leadership, as assessed by the MLQ, and its structural relationships with important organizational outcomes in two separate studies. Results of the first study (
N=307) indicated that while temporary mood states have little impact either on measurement or structural relationships, target-specific affect (i.e., liking) influenced both. The effect of target-specific affect was fully replicated in a second study (
N=120) using an independent sample and a more conservative estimate of the liking effect. Overall, the results of this research suggest that transformational leadership, at least when assessed with the MLQ, is highly influenced by the interpersonal affect raters feel towards the target being rated (i.e., liking). These results are discussed in terms of their implications for future work on transformational leadership and affect. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.01.003 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_200773487</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1048984305000044</els_id><sourcerecordid>817205121</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-ff76e833e9d65f2e232a1f3a31b433514633753e411c7e0a7ebf8d7d44a08c563</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9PwzAMxSMEEmPwDThU3FucOm06Dkho4p80ics4R1nqsFZdsyUpEt-eTOPMyZb8nu33Y-yWQ8GB1_d9MZA-TLooAaoCeAGAZ2zGG4k5Clicpx5Eky8agZfsKoQeAHiFzYytnge9cV7HbvzK4pYy48YQ_WRi5mwWvR6DdX6X5m7UQ5butOTDtts_ZOuk9m6go1BbSyZeswurh0A3f3XOPl-e18u3fPXx-r58WuUGEWNuraypQaRFW1e2pBJLzS1q5BuBWHFRI8oKSXBuJIGWtLFNK1shNDSmqnHO7k57994dJgpR9W7y6b-gEgEpUaTkcyZOIuNdCJ6s2vtup_2P4qCO2FSvTtiOpkoBVwlbsj2ebJQCfHfkVTAdjYbazqeIqnXd_wt-AWf6d5k</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>200773487</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Elaborating the construct of transformational leadership: The role of affect</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><creator>Brown, Douglas J. ; Keeping, Lisa M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Brown, Douglas J. ; Keeping, Lisa M.</creatorcontrib><description>Despite being the most widely used and popular measure of transformational leadership, the MLQ has not received much attention in terms of possible method biases, either at the item or structural level. Based on a priori theory and empirical work, we examined the influence of affect on the measurement of transformational leadership, as assessed by the MLQ, and its structural relationships with important organizational outcomes in two separate studies. Results of the first study (
N=307) indicated that while temporary mood states have little impact either on measurement or structural relationships, target-specific affect (i.e., liking) influenced both. The effect of target-specific affect was fully replicated in a second study (
N=120) using an independent sample and a more conservative estimate of the liking effect. Overall, the results of this research suggest that transformational leadership, at least when assessed with the MLQ, is highly influenced by the interpersonal affect raters feel towards the target being rated (i.e., liking). These results are discussed in terms of their implications for future work on transformational leadership and affect.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1048-9843</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-3409</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.01.003</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Affect ; Leadership ; Liking ; Multi-factor leadership questionnaire ; Organizational behavior ; Organizational change ; Studies ; Transformational leadership</subject><ispartof>The Leadership quarterly, 2005-04, Vol.16 (2), p.245-272</ispartof><rights>2005 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Apr 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-ff76e833e9d65f2e232a1f3a31b433514633753e411c7e0a7ebf8d7d44a08c563</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-ff76e833e9d65f2e232a1f3a31b433514633753e411c7e0a7ebf8d7d44a08c563</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Brown, Douglas J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keeping, Lisa M.</creatorcontrib><title>Elaborating the construct of transformational leadership: The role of affect</title><title>The Leadership quarterly</title><description>Despite being the most widely used and popular measure of transformational leadership, the MLQ has not received much attention in terms of possible method biases, either at the item or structural level. Based on a priori theory and empirical work, we examined the influence of affect on the measurement of transformational leadership, as assessed by the MLQ, and its structural relationships with important organizational outcomes in two separate studies. Results of the first study (
N=307) indicated that while temporary mood states have little impact either on measurement or structural relationships, target-specific affect (i.e., liking) influenced both. The effect of target-specific affect was fully replicated in a second study (
N=120) using an independent sample and a more conservative estimate of the liking effect. Overall, the results of this research suggest that transformational leadership, at least when assessed with the MLQ, is highly influenced by the interpersonal affect raters feel towards the target being rated (i.e., liking). These results are discussed in terms of their implications for future work on transformational leadership and affect.</description><subject>Affect</subject><subject>Leadership</subject><subject>Liking</subject><subject>Multi-factor leadership questionnaire</subject><subject>Organizational behavior</subject><subject>Organizational change</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Transformational leadership</subject><issn>1048-9843</issn><issn>1873-3409</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE9PwzAMxSMEEmPwDThU3FucOm06Dkho4p80ics4R1nqsFZdsyUpEt-eTOPMyZb8nu33Y-yWQ8GB1_d9MZA-TLooAaoCeAGAZ2zGG4k5Clicpx5Eky8agZfsKoQeAHiFzYytnge9cV7HbvzK4pYy48YQ_WRi5mwWvR6DdX6X5m7UQ5butOTDtts_ZOuk9m6go1BbSyZeswurh0A3f3XOPl-e18u3fPXx-r58WuUGEWNuraypQaRFW1e2pBJLzS1q5BuBWHFRI8oKSXBuJIGWtLFNK1shNDSmqnHO7k57994dJgpR9W7y6b-gEgEpUaTkcyZOIuNdCJ6s2vtup_2P4qCO2FSvTtiOpkoBVwlbsj2ebJQCfHfkVTAdjYbazqeIqnXd_wt-AWf6d5k</recordid><startdate>20050401</startdate><enddate>20050401</enddate><creator>Brown, Douglas J.</creator><creator>Keeping, Lisa M.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050401</creationdate><title>Elaborating the construct of transformational leadership: The role of affect</title><author>Brown, Douglas J. ; Keeping, Lisa M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-ff76e833e9d65f2e232a1f3a31b433514633753e411c7e0a7ebf8d7d44a08c563</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Affect</topic><topic>Leadership</topic><topic>Liking</topic><topic>Multi-factor leadership questionnaire</topic><topic>Organizational behavior</topic><topic>Organizational change</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Transformational leadership</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Brown, Douglas J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keeping, Lisa M.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>The Leadership quarterly</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Brown, Douglas J.</au><au>Keeping, Lisa M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Elaborating the construct of transformational leadership: The role of affect</atitle><jtitle>The Leadership quarterly</jtitle><date>2005-04-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>245</spage><epage>272</epage><pages>245-272</pages><issn>1048-9843</issn><eissn>1873-3409</eissn><abstract>Despite being the most widely used and popular measure of transformational leadership, the MLQ has not received much attention in terms of possible method biases, either at the item or structural level. Based on a priori theory and empirical work, we examined the influence of affect on the measurement of transformational leadership, as assessed by the MLQ, and its structural relationships with important organizational outcomes in two separate studies. Results of the first study (
N=307) indicated that while temporary mood states have little impact either on measurement or structural relationships, target-specific affect (i.e., liking) influenced both. The effect of target-specific affect was fully replicated in a second study (
N=120) using an independent sample and a more conservative estimate of the liking effect. Overall, the results of this research suggest that transformational leadership, at least when assessed with the MLQ, is highly influenced by the interpersonal affect raters feel towards the target being rated (i.e., liking). These results are discussed in terms of their implications for future work on transformational leadership and affect.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.01.003</doi><tpages>28</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1048-9843 |
ispartof | The Leadership quarterly, 2005-04, Vol.16 (2), p.245-272 |
issn | 1048-9843 1873-3409 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_200773487 |
source | ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024 |
subjects | Affect Leadership Liking Multi-factor leadership questionnaire Organizational behavior Organizational change Studies Transformational leadership |
title | Elaborating the construct of transformational leadership: The role of affect |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T07%3A01%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Elaborating%20the%20construct%20of%20transformational%20leadership:%20The%20role%20of%20affect&rft.jtitle=The%20Leadership%20quarterly&rft.au=Brown,%20Douglas%20J.&rft.date=2005-04-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=245&rft.epage=272&rft.pages=245-272&rft.issn=1048-9843&rft.eissn=1873-3409&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.01.003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E817205121%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-ff76e833e9d65f2e232a1f3a31b433514633753e411c7e0a7ebf8d7d44a08c563%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=200773487&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |