Argentinean state bonds - defense of necessity in relationship between state and private debtors - customary international law and general principles of law

Rudolf and Hufken explore the case of Joined Case Nos. 2 BvM 1-5/03 & BvM 1-2/06, in which the Federal Constitutional Court interpreted the question as being restricted to a defense of necessity toward private creditors. It began by recognizing that the doctrine of necessity is inherent in natio...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The American journal of international law 2007-10, Vol.101 (4), p.857
Main Authors: Rudolf, Beate, Hufken, Nina
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Court decisions
Debtors
Human rights
Immunities of foreign states
International law
Laws, regulations and rules
Necessity (International law)
Obligations
Responsibilities
State bonds
States
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page
container_issue 4
container_start_page 857
container_title The American journal of international law
container_volume 101
creator Rudolf, Beate
Hufken, Nina
description Rudolf and Hufken explore the case of Joined Case Nos. 2 BvM 1-5/03 & BvM 1-2/06, in which the Federal Constitutional Court interpreted the question as being restricted to a defense of necessity toward private creditors. It began by recognizing that the doctrine of necessity is inherent in national legal orders as well as public international law. The Court considered Article 25 of the International Law Commission's (ILC) Articles on State Responsibility--according to which, necessity is a circumstance precluding wrongfulness--as reflecting customary international law because the ILC had built on prior decisions of international judiciary bodies and the opinion of publicists. Moreover, he says that as the present decision shows--if only by its own, mistaken result--placing greater emphasis on general principles of public international law.
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_201099684</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A205988183</galeid><sourcerecordid>A205988183</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g1664-2bbff7825c434da89aaeee2a804be997a522ee3ad5373c973a66c8a372b8b93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptj81KAzEQgBdRsFbfIejJw0o22Z_kWIp_IPSgeF1ms7M1ZZvUJLX6Lj6s2baCQskhM5nvm5kcJSOWlVlayYIfJyNKKUslp_Q0OfN-QYc856Pke-LmaII2CIb4AAFJY03rSUpa7NB4JLYjBhV6r8MX0YY47CFoa_ybXpEGwwbxVwXTkpXTH0PcYhOsGxqptQ92CW6wAzqztaEnPWy2RlwAXcyjaZRe9eiHmbF6npx00Hu82N_j5Pnu9mX6kD7N7h-nk6d0npVlnrKm6bpKsELlPG9BSABEZCBo3qCUFRSMIXJoC15xJSsOZakE8Io1opF8nFzuuq6cfV-jD_XCruOWva8ZzaiUpcgjdLWD5tBjrU1ngwO11F7VE0YLKUQmeKTSA9T-f9Zgp-PzP_7mAB9Pi0utDgrX_4TIBPwMc1h7Xz_OXv-yPybqoOQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>201099684</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Argentinean state bonds - defense of necessity in relationship between state and private debtors - customary international law and general principles of law</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Nexis UK</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><creator>Rudolf, Beate ; Hufken, Nina</creator><creatorcontrib>Rudolf, Beate ; Hufken, Nina</creatorcontrib><description>Rudolf and Hufken explore the case of Joined Case Nos. 2 BvM 1-5/03 &amp; BvM 1-2/06, in which the Federal Constitutional Court interpreted the question as being restricted to a defense of necessity toward private creditors. It began by recognizing that the doctrine of necessity is inherent in national legal orders as well as public international law. The Court considered Article 25 of the International Law Commission's (ILC) Articles on State Responsibility--according to which, necessity is a circumstance precluding wrongfulness--as reflecting customary international law because the ILC had built on prior decisions of international judiciary bodies and the opinion of publicists. Moreover, he says that as the present decision shows--if only by its own, mistaken result--placing greater emphasis on general principles of public international law.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9300</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2161-7953</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AJINB9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Court decisions ; Debtors ; Human rights ; Immunities of foreign states ; International law ; Laws, regulations and rules ; Necessity (International law) ; Obligations ; Responsibilities ; State bonds ; States</subject><ispartof>The American journal of international law, 2007-10, Vol.101 (4), p.857</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2007 Cambridge University Press</rights><rights>Copyright American Society of International Law Oct 2007</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,12847,33223</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rudolf, Beate</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hufken, Nina</creatorcontrib><title>Argentinean state bonds - defense of necessity in relationship between state and private debtors - customary international law and general principles of law</title><title>The American journal of international law</title><description>Rudolf and Hufken explore the case of Joined Case Nos. 2 BvM 1-5/03 &amp; BvM 1-2/06, in which the Federal Constitutional Court interpreted the question as being restricted to a defense of necessity toward private creditors. It began by recognizing that the doctrine of necessity is inherent in national legal orders as well as public international law. The Court considered Article 25 of the International Law Commission's (ILC) Articles on State Responsibility--according to which, necessity is a circumstance precluding wrongfulness--as reflecting customary international law because the ILC had built on prior decisions of international judiciary bodies and the opinion of publicists. Moreover, he says that as the present decision shows--if only by its own, mistaken result--placing greater emphasis on general principles of public international law.</description><subject>Court decisions</subject><subject>Debtors</subject><subject>Human rights</subject><subject>Immunities of foreign states</subject><subject>International law</subject><subject>Laws, regulations and rules</subject><subject>Necessity (International law)</subject><subject>Obligations</subject><subject>Responsibilities</subject><subject>State bonds</subject><subject>States</subject><issn>0002-9300</issn><issn>2161-7953</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>M2R</sourceid><recordid>eNptj81KAzEQgBdRsFbfIejJw0o22Z_kWIp_IPSgeF1ms7M1ZZvUJLX6Lj6s2baCQskhM5nvm5kcJSOWlVlayYIfJyNKKUslp_Q0OfN-QYc856Pke-LmaII2CIb4AAFJY03rSUpa7NB4JLYjBhV6r8MX0YY47CFoa_ybXpEGwwbxVwXTkpXTH0PcYhOsGxqptQ92CW6wAzqztaEnPWy2RlwAXcyjaZRe9eiHmbF6npx00Hu82N_j5Pnu9mX6kD7N7h-nk6d0npVlnrKm6bpKsELlPG9BSABEZCBo3qCUFRSMIXJoC15xJSsOZakE8Io1opF8nFzuuq6cfV-jD_XCruOWva8ZzaiUpcgjdLWD5tBjrU1ngwO11F7VE0YLKUQmeKTSA9T-f9Zgp-PzP_7mAB9Pi0utDgrX_4TIBPwMc1h7Xz_OXv-yPybqoOQ</recordid><startdate>20071001</startdate><enddate>20071001</enddate><creator>Rudolf, Beate</creator><creator>Hufken, Nina</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ILT</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88F</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>M1Q</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20071001</creationdate><title>Argentinean state bonds - defense of necessity in relationship between state and private debtors - customary international law and general principles of law</title><author>Rudolf, Beate ; Hufken, Nina</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g1664-2bbff7825c434da89aaeee2a804be997a522ee3ad5373c973a66c8a372b8b93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Court decisions</topic><topic>Debtors</topic><topic>Human rights</topic><topic>Immunities of foreign states</topic><topic>International law</topic><topic>Laws, regulations and rules</topic><topic>Necessity (International law)</topic><topic>Obligations</topic><topic>Responsibilities</topic><topic>State bonds</topic><topic>States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rudolf, Beate</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hufken, Nina</creatorcontrib><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale OneFile: LegalTrac</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Military Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Military Database</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>The American journal of international law</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rudolf, Beate</au><au>Hufken, Nina</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Argentinean state bonds - defense of necessity in relationship between state and private debtors - customary international law and general principles of law</atitle><jtitle>The American journal of international law</jtitle><date>2007-10-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>101</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>857</spage><pages>857-</pages><issn>0002-9300</issn><eissn>2161-7953</eissn><coden>AJINB9</coden><abstract>Rudolf and Hufken explore the case of Joined Case Nos. 2 BvM 1-5/03 &amp; BvM 1-2/06, in which the Federal Constitutional Court interpreted the question as being restricted to a defense of necessity toward private creditors. It began by recognizing that the doctrine of necessity is inherent in national legal orders as well as public international law. The Court considered Article 25 of the International Law Commission's (ILC) Articles on State Responsibility--according to which, necessity is a circumstance precluding wrongfulness--as reflecting customary international law because the ILC had built on prior decisions of international judiciary bodies and the opinion of publicists. Moreover, he says that as the present decision shows--if only by its own, mistaken result--placing greater emphasis on general principles of public international law.</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-9300
ispartof The American journal of international law, 2007-10, Vol.101 (4), p.857
issn 0002-9300
2161-7953
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_201099684
source International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Nexis UK; JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection
subjects Court decisions
Debtors
Human rights
Immunities of foreign states
International law
Laws, regulations and rules
Necessity (International law)
Obligations
Responsibilities
State bonds
States
title Argentinean state bonds - defense of necessity in relationship between state and private debtors - customary international law and general principles of law
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T15%3A34%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Argentinean%20state%20bonds%20-%20defense%20of%20necessity%20in%20relationship%20between%20state%20and%20private%20debtors%20-%20customary%20international%20law%20and%20general%20principles%20of%20law&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20journal%20of%20international%20law&rft.au=Rudolf,%20Beate&rft.date=2007-10-01&rft.volume=101&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=857&rft.pages=857-&rft.issn=0002-9300&rft.eissn=2161-7953&rft.coden=AJINB9&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA205988183%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g1664-2bbff7825c434da89aaeee2a804be997a522ee3ad5373c973a66c8a372b8b93%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=201099684&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A205988183&rfr_iscdi=true