Loading…

Quality Evaluation Tests for Tensile Strength of Reactive Powder Concrete

AbstractThis study presents a comparison between different testing procedures to determine the tensile strength of reactive powder concrete (RPC). The tensile strength test methods include a direct tensile test and two indirect tensile tests, the splitting test and the double punch test (DPT). In th...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of materials in civil engineering 2018-05, Vol.30 (5)
Main Authors: Goaiz, Hussam A, Yu, Tao, Hadi, Muhammad N. S
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a374t-ea6979bef0e8ef5d5f98a966afd177a0b64ee08b66c28ee0ca779493b278dac93
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a374t-ea6979bef0e8ef5d5f98a966afd177a0b64ee08b66c28ee0ca779493b278dac93
container_end_page
container_issue 5
container_start_page
container_title Journal of materials in civil engineering
container_volume 30
creator Goaiz, Hussam A
Yu, Tao
Hadi, Muhammad N. S
description AbstractThis study presents a comparison between different testing procedures to determine the tensile strength of reactive powder concrete (RPC). The tensile strength test methods include a direct tensile test and two indirect tensile tests, the splitting test and the double punch test (DPT). In this study, the RPC was designed to obtain a nominal compressive strength of 100 MPa at the age of 28 days. Macro steel fibers were used to reinforce the RPC by volumetric percentages of 0, 1, 2, and 3%. Mechanical properties of RPC were obtained at 28 days such as compressive, tensile, and flexural strengths; compressive stress-strain relationship; and tensile stress-strain behavior. By comparing the experimental results of the two indirect tensile tests with the uniaxial direct tensile test (DTT), it was shown that the DPT presents more accurate results of the RPC tensile strength than the splitting test. The experimental results were verified with the existing model to predict the tensile strength of the RPC. In addition, considering the low cost and the ease of conducting the DPT, this test can be used as an alternative to the DTT to obtain the tensile strength of the RPC.
doi_str_mv 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002257
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2011520795</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2011520795</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a374t-ea6979bef0e8ef5d5f98a966afd177a0b64ee08b66c28ee0ca779493b278dac93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1OwzAQhC0EEqXwDhZc4JBiJ7Edc0NRgUqt-Gk4W06yhlQhKbZT1LcnUQucOO1oNTO7-hA6p2RCCafXl7fLdHq1yCZUxlHAWBRNCCFhyMQBGv3uDtGIJFIGlHF6jE6cW_WmiMRkhGbPna4rv8XTja477au2wRk477Bpba8aV9WAl95C8-bfcWvwC-jCVxvAT-1XCRanbVNY8HCKjoyuHZzt5xi93k2z9CGYP97P0tt5oCMR-wA0l0LmYAgkYFjJjEy05FybkgqhSc5jAJLknBdh0qtCCyFjGeWhSEpdyGiMLna9a9t-dv2ratV2tulPqpBQykIiJOtdNztXYVvnLBi1ttWHtltFiRrQKTWgU4tMDZjUgEnt0fVhvgtrV8Bf_U_y_-A3pk1zQA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2011520795</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Quality Evaluation Tests for Tensile Strength of Reactive Powder Concrete</title><source>American Society Of Civil Engineers ASCE Journals</source><creator>Goaiz, Hussam A ; Yu, Tao ; Hadi, Muhammad N. S</creator><creatorcontrib>Goaiz, Hussam A ; Yu, Tao ; Hadi, Muhammad N. S</creatorcontrib><description>AbstractThis study presents a comparison between different testing procedures to determine the tensile strength of reactive powder concrete (RPC). The tensile strength test methods include a direct tensile test and two indirect tensile tests, the splitting test and the double punch test (DPT). In this study, the RPC was designed to obtain a nominal compressive strength of 100 MPa at the age of 28 days. Macro steel fibers were used to reinforce the RPC by volumetric percentages of 0, 1, 2, and 3%. Mechanical properties of RPC were obtained at 28 days such as compressive, tensile, and flexural strengths; compressive stress-strain relationship; and tensile stress-strain behavior. By comparing the experimental results of the two indirect tensile tests with the uniaxial direct tensile test (DTT), it was shown that the DPT presents more accurate results of the RPC tensile strength than the splitting test. The experimental results were verified with the existing model to predict the tensile strength of the RPC. In addition, considering the low cost and the ease of conducting the DPT, this test can be used as an alternative to the DTT to obtain the tensile strength of the RPC.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0899-1561</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-5533</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002257</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: American Society of Civil Engineers</publisher><subject>Building materials ; Civil engineering ; Compressive properties ; Compressive strength ; Mechanical properties ; Quality assessment ; Splitting ; Steel fibers ; Strain ; Stress-strain relationships ; Technical Papers ; Tensile strength ; Tensile stress ; Tensile tests ; Test procedures ; Ultra high performance concrete</subject><ispartof>Journal of materials in civil engineering, 2018-05, Vol.30 (5)</ispartof><rights>2018 American Society of Civil Engineers</rights><rights>Copyright American Society of Civil Engineers May 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a374t-ea6979bef0e8ef5d5f98a966afd177a0b64ee08b66c28ee0ca779493b278dac93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a374t-ea6979bef0e8ef5d5f98a966afd177a0b64ee08b66c28ee0ca779493b278dac93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttp://ascelibrary.org/doi/pdf/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002257$$EPDF$$P50$$Gasce$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://ascelibrary.org/doi/abs/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002257$$EHTML$$P50$$Gasce$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3252,10068,27924,27925,76191,76199</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Goaiz, Hussam A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Tao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hadi, Muhammad N. S</creatorcontrib><title>Quality Evaluation Tests for Tensile Strength of Reactive Powder Concrete</title><title>Journal of materials in civil engineering</title><description>AbstractThis study presents a comparison between different testing procedures to determine the tensile strength of reactive powder concrete (RPC). The tensile strength test methods include a direct tensile test and two indirect tensile tests, the splitting test and the double punch test (DPT). In this study, the RPC was designed to obtain a nominal compressive strength of 100 MPa at the age of 28 days. Macro steel fibers were used to reinforce the RPC by volumetric percentages of 0, 1, 2, and 3%. Mechanical properties of RPC were obtained at 28 days such as compressive, tensile, and flexural strengths; compressive stress-strain relationship; and tensile stress-strain behavior. By comparing the experimental results of the two indirect tensile tests with the uniaxial direct tensile test (DTT), it was shown that the DPT presents more accurate results of the RPC tensile strength than the splitting test. The experimental results were verified with the existing model to predict the tensile strength of the RPC. In addition, considering the low cost and the ease of conducting the DPT, this test can be used as an alternative to the DTT to obtain the tensile strength of the RPC.</description><subject>Building materials</subject><subject>Civil engineering</subject><subject>Compressive properties</subject><subject>Compressive strength</subject><subject>Mechanical properties</subject><subject>Quality assessment</subject><subject>Splitting</subject><subject>Steel fibers</subject><subject>Strain</subject><subject>Stress-strain relationships</subject><subject>Technical Papers</subject><subject>Tensile strength</subject><subject>Tensile stress</subject><subject>Tensile tests</subject><subject>Test procedures</subject><subject>Ultra high performance concrete</subject><issn>0899-1561</issn><issn>1943-5533</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kM1OwzAQhC0EEqXwDhZc4JBiJ7Edc0NRgUqt-Gk4W06yhlQhKbZT1LcnUQucOO1oNTO7-hA6p2RCCafXl7fLdHq1yCZUxlHAWBRNCCFhyMQBGv3uDtGIJFIGlHF6jE6cW_WmiMRkhGbPna4rv8XTja477au2wRk477Bpba8aV9WAl95C8-bfcWvwC-jCVxvAT-1XCRanbVNY8HCKjoyuHZzt5xi93k2z9CGYP97P0tt5oCMR-wA0l0LmYAgkYFjJjEy05FybkgqhSc5jAJLknBdh0qtCCyFjGeWhSEpdyGiMLna9a9t-dv2ratV2tulPqpBQykIiJOtdNztXYVvnLBi1ttWHtltFiRrQKTWgU4tMDZjUgEnt0fVhvgtrV8Bf_U_y_-A3pk1zQA</recordid><startdate>20180501</startdate><enddate>20180501</enddate><creator>Goaiz, Hussam A</creator><creator>Yu, Tao</creator><creator>Hadi, Muhammad N. S</creator><general>American Society of Civil Engineers</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180501</creationdate><title>Quality Evaluation Tests for Tensile Strength of Reactive Powder Concrete</title><author>Goaiz, Hussam A ; Yu, Tao ; Hadi, Muhammad N. S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a374t-ea6979bef0e8ef5d5f98a966afd177a0b64ee08b66c28ee0ca779493b278dac93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Building materials</topic><topic>Civil engineering</topic><topic>Compressive properties</topic><topic>Compressive strength</topic><topic>Mechanical properties</topic><topic>Quality assessment</topic><topic>Splitting</topic><topic>Steel fibers</topic><topic>Strain</topic><topic>Stress-strain relationships</topic><topic>Technical Papers</topic><topic>Tensile strength</topic><topic>Tensile stress</topic><topic>Tensile tests</topic><topic>Test procedures</topic><topic>Ultra high performance concrete</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Goaiz, Hussam A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Tao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hadi, Muhammad N. S</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of materials in civil engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Goaiz, Hussam A</au><au>Yu, Tao</au><au>Hadi, Muhammad N. S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Quality Evaluation Tests for Tensile Strength of Reactive Powder Concrete</atitle><jtitle>Journal of materials in civil engineering</jtitle><date>2018-05-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>5</issue><issn>0899-1561</issn><eissn>1943-5533</eissn><abstract>AbstractThis study presents a comparison between different testing procedures to determine the tensile strength of reactive powder concrete (RPC). The tensile strength test methods include a direct tensile test and two indirect tensile tests, the splitting test and the double punch test (DPT). In this study, the RPC was designed to obtain a nominal compressive strength of 100 MPa at the age of 28 days. Macro steel fibers were used to reinforce the RPC by volumetric percentages of 0, 1, 2, and 3%. Mechanical properties of RPC were obtained at 28 days such as compressive, tensile, and flexural strengths; compressive stress-strain relationship; and tensile stress-strain behavior. By comparing the experimental results of the two indirect tensile tests with the uniaxial direct tensile test (DTT), it was shown that the DPT presents more accurate results of the RPC tensile strength than the splitting test. The experimental results were verified with the existing model to predict the tensile strength of the RPC. In addition, considering the low cost and the ease of conducting the DPT, this test can be used as an alternative to the DTT to obtain the tensile strength of the RPC.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>American Society of Civil Engineers</pub><doi>10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002257</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0899-1561
ispartof Journal of materials in civil engineering, 2018-05, Vol.30 (5)
issn 0899-1561
1943-5533
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2011520795
source American Society Of Civil Engineers ASCE Journals
subjects Building materials
Civil engineering
Compressive properties
Compressive strength
Mechanical properties
Quality assessment
Splitting
Steel fibers
Strain
Stress-strain relationships
Technical Papers
Tensile strength
Tensile stress
Tensile tests
Test procedures
Ultra high performance concrete
title Quality Evaluation Tests for Tensile Strength of Reactive Powder Concrete
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T21%3A32%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Quality%20Evaluation%20Tests%20for%20Tensile%20Strength%20of%20Reactive%20Powder%20Concrete&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20materials%20in%20civil%20engineering&rft.au=Goaiz,%20Hussam%20A&rft.date=2018-05-01&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=5&rft.issn=0899-1561&rft.eissn=1943-5533&rft_id=info:doi/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002257&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2011520795%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a374t-ea6979bef0e8ef5d5f98a966afd177a0b64ee08b66c28ee0ca779493b278dac93%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2011520795&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true