Loading…
Quality Evaluation Tests for Tensile Strength of Reactive Powder Concrete
AbstractThis study presents a comparison between different testing procedures to determine the tensile strength of reactive powder concrete (RPC). The tensile strength test methods include a direct tensile test and two indirect tensile tests, the splitting test and the double punch test (DPT). In th...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of materials in civil engineering 2018-05, Vol.30 (5) |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a374t-ea6979bef0e8ef5d5f98a966afd177a0b64ee08b66c28ee0ca779493b278dac93 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a374t-ea6979bef0e8ef5d5f98a966afd177a0b64ee08b66c28ee0ca779493b278dac93 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Journal of materials in civil engineering |
container_volume | 30 |
creator | Goaiz, Hussam A Yu, Tao Hadi, Muhammad N. S |
description | AbstractThis study presents a comparison between different testing procedures to determine the tensile strength of reactive powder concrete (RPC). The tensile strength test methods include a direct tensile test and two indirect tensile tests, the splitting test and the double punch test (DPT). In this study, the RPC was designed to obtain a nominal compressive strength of 100 MPa at the age of 28 days. Macro steel fibers were used to reinforce the RPC by volumetric percentages of 0, 1, 2, and 3%. Mechanical properties of RPC were obtained at 28 days such as compressive, tensile, and flexural strengths; compressive stress-strain relationship; and tensile stress-strain behavior. By comparing the experimental results of the two indirect tensile tests with the uniaxial direct tensile test (DTT), it was shown that the DPT presents more accurate results of the RPC tensile strength than the splitting test. The experimental results were verified with the existing model to predict the tensile strength of the RPC. In addition, considering the low cost and the ease of conducting the DPT, this test can be used as an alternative to the DTT to obtain the tensile strength of the RPC. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002257 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2011520795</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2011520795</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a374t-ea6979bef0e8ef5d5f98a966afd177a0b64ee08b66c28ee0ca779493b278dac93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1OwzAQhC0EEqXwDhZc4JBiJ7Edc0NRgUqt-Gk4W06yhlQhKbZT1LcnUQucOO1oNTO7-hA6p2RCCafXl7fLdHq1yCZUxlHAWBRNCCFhyMQBGv3uDtGIJFIGlHF6jE6cW_WmiMRkhGbPna4rv8XTja477au2wRk477Bpba8aV9WAl95C8-bfcWvwC-jCVxvAT-1XCRanbVNY8HCKjoyuHZzt5xi93k2z9CGYP97P0tt5oCMR-wA0l0LmYAgkYFjJjEy05FybkgqhSc5jAJLknBdh0qtCCyFjGeWhSEpdyGiMLna9a9t-dv2ratV2tulPqpBQykIiJOtdNztXYVvnLBi1ttWHtltFiRrQKTWgU4tMDZjUgEnt0fVhvgtrV8Bf_U_y_-A3pk1zQA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2011520795</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Quality Evaluation Tests for Tensile Strength of Reactive Powder Concrete</title><source>American Society Of Civil Engineers ASCE Journals</source><creator>Goaiz, Hussam A ; Yu, Tao ; Hadi, Muhammad N. S</creator><creatorcontrib>Goaiz, Hussam A ; Yu, Tao ; Hadi, Muhammad N. S</creatorcontrib><description>AbstractThis study presents a comparison between different testing procedures to determine the tensile strength of reactive powder concrete (RPC). The tensile strength test methods include a direct tensile test and two indirect tensile tests, the splitting test and the double punch test (DPT). In this study, the RPC was designed to obtain a nominal compressive strength of 100 MPa at the age of 28 days. Macro steel fibers were used to reinforce the RPC by volumetric percentages of 0, 1, 2, and 3%. Mechanical properties of RPC were obtained at 28 days such as compressive, tensile, and flexural strengths; compressive stress-strain relationship; and tensile stress-strain behavior. By comparing the experimental results of the two indirect tensile tests with the uniaxial direct tensile test (DTT), it was shown that the DPT presents more accurate results of the RPC tensile strength than the splitting test. The experimental results were verified with the existing model to predict the tensile strength of the RPC. In addition, considering the low cost and the ease of conducting the DPT, this test can be used as an alternative to the DTT to obtain the tensile strength of the RPC.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0899-1561</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-5533</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002257</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: American Society of Civil Engineers</publisher><subject>Building materials ; Civil engineering ; Compressive properties ; Compressive strength ; Mechanical properties ; Quality assessment ; Splitting ; Steel fibers ; Strain ; Stress-strain relationships ; Technical Papers ; Tensile strength ; Tensile stress ; Tensile tests ; Test procedures ; Ultra high performance concrete</subject><ispartof>Journal of materials in civil engineering, 2018-05, Vol.30 (5)</ispartof><rights>2018 American Society of Civil Engineers</rights><rights>Copyright American Society of Civil Engineers May 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a374t-ea6979bef0e8ef5d5f98a966afd177a0b64ee08b66c28ee0ca779493b278dac93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a374t-ea6979bef0e8ef5d5f98a966afd177a0b64ee08b66c28ee0ca779493b278dac93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttp://ascelibrary.org/doi/pdf/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002257$$EPDF$$P50$$Gasce$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://ascelibrary.org/doi/abs/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002257$$EHTML$$P50$$Gasce$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3252,10068,27924,27925,76191,76199</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Goaiz, Hussam A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Tao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hadi, Muhammad N. S</creatorcontrib><title>Quality Evaluation Tests for Tensile Strength of Reactive Powder Concrete</title><title>Journal of materials in civil engineering</title><description>AbstractThis study presents a comparison between different testing procedures to determine the tensile strength of reactive powder concrete (RPC). The tensile strength test methods include a direct tensile test and two indirect tensile tests, the splitting test and the double punch test (DPT). In this study, the RPC was designed to obtain a nominal compressive strength of 100 MPa at the age of 28 days. Macro steel fibers were used to reinforce the RPC by volumetric percentages of 0, 1, 2, and 3%. Mechanical properties of RPC were obtained at 28 days such as compressive, tensile, and flexural strengths; compressive stress-strain relationship; and tensile stress-strain behavior. By comparing the experimental results of the two indirect tensile tests with the uniaxial direct tensile test (DTT), it was shown that the DPT presents more accurate results of the RPC tensile strength than the splitting test. The experimental results were verified with the existing model to predict the tensile strength of the RPC. In addition, considering the low cost and the ease of conducting the DPT, this test can be used as an alternative to the DTT to obtain the tensile strength of the RPC.</description><subject>Building materials</subject><subject>Civil engineering</subject><subject>Compressive properties</subject><subject>Compressive strength</subject><subject>Mechanical properties</subject><subject>Quality assessment</subject><subject>Splitting</subject><subject>Steel fibers</subject><subject>Strain</subject><subject>Stress-strain relationships</subject><subject>Technical Papers</subject><subject>Tensile strength</subject><subject>Tensile stress</subject><subject>Tensile tests</subject><subject>Test procedures</subject><subject>Ultra high performance concrete</subject><issn>0899-1561</issn><issn>1943-5533</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kM1OwzAQhC0EEqXwDhZc4JBiJ7Edc0NRgUqt-Gk4W06yhlQhKbZT1LcnUQucOO1oNTO7-hA6p2RCCafXl7fLdHq1yCZUxlHAWBRNCCFhyMQBGv3uDtGIJFIGlHF6jE6cW_WmiMRkhGbPna4rv8XTja477au2wRk477Bpba8aV9WAl95C8-bfcWvwC-jCVxvAT-1XCRanbVNY8HCKjoyuHZzt5xi93k2z9CGYP97P0tt5oCMR-wA0l0LmYAgkYFjJjEy05FybkgqhSc5jAJLknBdh0qtCCyFjGeWhSEpdyGiMLna9a9t-dv2ratV2tulPqpBQykIiJOtdNztXYVvnLBi1ttWHtltFiRrQKTWgU4tMDZjUgEnt0fVhvgtrV8Bf_U_y_-A3pk1zQA</recordid><startdate>20180501</startdate><enddate>20180501</enddate><creator>Goaiz, Hussam A</creator><creator>Yu, Tao</creator><creator>Hadi, Muhammad N. S</creator><general>American Society of Civil Engineers</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180501</creationdate><title>Quality Evaluation Tests for Tensile Strength of Reactive Powder Concrete</title><author>Goaiz, Hussam A ; Yu, Tao ; Hadi, Muhammad N. S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a374t-ea6979bef0e8ef5d5f98a966afd177a0b64ee08b66c28ee0ca779493b278dac93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Building materials</topic><topic>Civil engineering</topic><topic>Compressive properties</topic><topic>Compressive strength</topic><topic>Mechanical properties</topic><topic>Quality assessment</topic><topic>Splitting</topic><topic>Steel fibers</topic><topic>Strain</topic><topic>Stress-strain relationships</topic><topic>Technical Papers</topic><topic>Tensile strength</topic><topic>Tensile stress</topic><topic>Tensile tests</topic><topic>Test procedures</topic><topic>Ultra high performance concrete</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Goaiz, Hussam A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Tao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hadi, Muhammad N. S</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of materials in civil engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Goaiz, Hussam A</au><au>Yu, Tao</au><au>Hadi, Muhammad N. S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Quality Evaluation Tests for Tensile Strength of Reactive Powder Concrete</atitle><jtitle>Journal of materials in civil engineering</jtitle><date>2018-05-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>5</issue><issn>0899-1561</issn><eissn>1943-5533</eissn><abstract>AbstractThis study presents a comparison between different testing procedures to determine the tensile strength of reactive powder concrete (RPC). The tensile strength test methods include a direct tensile test and two indirect tensile tests, the splitting test and the double punch test (DPT). In this study, the RPC was designed to obtain a nominal compressive strength of 100 MPa at the age of 28 days. Macro steel fibers were used to reinforce the RPC by volumetric percentages of 0, 1, 2, and 3%. Mechanical properties of RPC were obtained at 28 days such as compressive, tensile, and flexural strengths; compressive stress-strain relationship; and tensile stress-strain behavior. By comparing the experimental results of the two indirect tensile tests with the uniaxial direct tensile test (DTT), it was shown that the DPT presents more accurate results of the RPC tensile strength than the splitting test. The experimental results were verified with the existing model to predict the tensile strength of the RPC. In addition, considering the low cost and the ease of conducting the DPT, this test can be used as an alternative to the DTT to obtain the tensile strength of the RPC.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>American Society of Civil Engineers</pub><doi>10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002257</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0899-1561 |
ispartof | Journal of materials in civil engineering, 2018-05, Vol.30 (5) |
issn | 0899-1561 1943-5533 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2011520795 |
source | American Society Of Civil Engineers ASCE Journals |
subjects | Building materials Civil engineering Compressive properties Compressive strength Mechanical properties Quality assessment Splitting Steel fibers Strain Stress-strain relationships Technical Papers Tensile strength Tensile stress Tensile tests Test procedures Ultra high performance concrete |
title | Quality Evaluation Tests for Tensile Strength of Reactive Powder Concrete |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T21%3A32%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Quality%20Evaluation%20Tests%20for%20Tensile%20Strength%20of%20Reactive%20Powder%20Concrete&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20materials%20in%20civil%20engineering&rft.au=Goaiz,%20Hussam%20A&rft.date=2018-05-01&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=5&rft.issn=0899-1561&rft.eissn=1943-5533&rft_id=info:doi/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002257&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2011520795%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a374t-ea6979bef0e8ef5d5f98a966afd177a0b64ee08b66c28ee0ca779493b278dac93%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2011520795&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |