Loading…

Viruses affecting tomato crops in Serbia

In a two-year survey (2011–2012), 3220 samples were collected and analyzed in order to determine the presence and distribution of viruses in tomato crops at 56 localities of 18 districts in Serbia. Out of 12 viruses tested, Cucumber mosaic virus (CMV), Potato virus Y (PVY), Alfalfa mosaic virus (AMV...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:European journal of plant pathology 2018-09, Vol.152 (1), p.225-235
Main Authors: Nikolić, Dušan, Vučurović, Ana, Stanković, Ivana, Radović, Nikola, Zečević, Katarina, Bulajić, Aleksandra, Krstić, Branka
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-71e6502518cf26a82e3bd8a4693d53a1355cccd68d31f844e0278c7dbab7293f3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-71e6502518cf26a82e3bd8a4693d53a1355cccd68d31f844e0278c7dbab7293f3
container_end_page 235
container_issue 1
container_start_page 225
container_title European journal of plant pathology
container_volume 152
creator Nikolić, Dušan
Vučurović, Ana
Stanković, Ivana
Radović, Nikola
Zečević, Katarina
Bulajić, Aleksandra
Krstić, Branka
description In a two-year survey (2011–2012), 3220 samples were collected and analyzed in order to determine the presence and distribution of viruses in tomato crops at 56 localities of 18 districts in Serbia. Out of 12 viruses tested, Cucumber mosaic virus (CMV), Potato virus Y (PVY), Alfalfa mosaic virus (AMV), Tomato spotted wilt virus (TSWV), Tomato mosaic virus (ToMV) and Tobacco mosaic virus (TMV) were detected in 42.1, 40, 11, 8.6, 2.3 and 1.3% of the total tested samples, respectively. The results revealed that CMV was prevalent in 2011 and PVY in 2012. CMV and PVY, apart from being predominant, were also the most widespread viruses. In general, single infections were the most frequent type of infection. Additionally, the most common mixed infections were double infections and the most prevalent combination was CMV and PVY. In 2011, the incidence of diseases and the percentage of all infection types were significantly higher than in 2012. Furthermore, in 2011, regardless of total single infections being prevalent compared to mixed infections, two prevailing viruses were commonly detected in mixed infections. The additional molecular testing of ELISA-negative samples using virus specific primers did not reveal the presence of Pepino mosaic virus (PepMV), Tomato yellow leaf curl virus (TYLC), Tomato infections chlorosis virus (TICV) and Tomato chlorosis virus (ToCV).
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10658-018-1467-y
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2015634517</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2015634517</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-71e6502518cf26a82e3bd8a4693d53a1355cccd68d31f844e0278c7dbab7293f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtLxDAUhYMoWEd_gLuCGzfR3KR5LWXQURhw4WMb0jQZOjhtTdpF_70ZKrhydTfnO_fwIXQN5A4IkfcJiOAKE1AYKiHxfIIK4JJhVQl9igqiqcagJDtHFyntSWa0pgW6_WzjlHwqbQjejW23K8f-YMe-dLEfUtl25ZuPdWsv0VmwX8lf_d4V-nh6fF8_4-3r5mX9sMWOgRixBC84oRyUC1RYRT2rG2XzCNZwZoFx7pxrhGoYBFVVnlCpnGxqW0uqWWArdLP0DrH_nnwazb6fYpdfGkqAC1ZxkDkFSyqvTCn6YIbYHmycDRBzFGIWISYLMUchZs4MXZiUs93Ox7_m_6EfYEFiGQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2015634517</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Viruses affecting tomato crops in Serbia</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Nikolić, Dušan ; Vučurović, Ana ; Stanković, Ivana ; Radović, Nikola ; Zečević, Katarina ; Bulajić, Aleksandra ; Krstić, Branka</creator><creatorcontrib>Nikolić, Dušan ; Vučurović, Ana ; Stanković, Ivana ; Radović, Nikola ; Zečević, Katarina ; Bulajić, Aleksandra ; Krstić, Branka</creatorcontrib><description>In a two-year survey (2011–2012), 3220 samples were collected and analyzed in order to determine the presence and distribution of viruses in tomato crops at 56 localities of 18 districts in Serbia. Out of 12 viruses tested, Cucumber mosaic virus (CMV), Potato virus Y (PVY), Alfalfa mosaic virus (AMV), Tomato spotted wilt virus (TSWV), Tomato mosaic virus (ToMV) and Tobacco mosaic virus (TMV) were detected in 42.1, 40, 11, 8.6, 2.3 and 1.3% of the total tested samples, respectively. The results revealed that CMV was prevalent in 2011 and PVY in 2012. CMV and PVY, apart from being predominant, were also the most widespread viruses. In general, single infections were the most frequent type of infection. Additionally, the most common mixed infections were double infections and the most prevalent combination was CMV and PVY. In 2011, the incidence of diseases and the percentage of all infection types were significantly higher than in 2012. Furthermore, in 2011, regardless of total single infections being prevalent compared to mixed infections, two prevailing viruses were commonly detected in mixed infections. The additional molecular testing of ELISA-negative samples using virus specific primers did not reveal the presence of Pepino mosaic virus (PepMV), Tomato yellow leaf curl virus (TYLC), Tomato infections chlorosis virus (TICV) and Tomato chlorosis virus (ToCV).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0929-1873</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-8469</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10658-018-1467-y</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Agriculture ; Alfalfa ; Anti-virus software ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Chlorosis ; Crops ; Ecology ; Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay ; Infections ; Life Sciences ; Plant diseases ; Plant Pathology ; Plant Sciences ; Plant virus diseases ; Potatoes ; Primers ; Tobacco ; Tomatoes ; Viruses ; Wilt ; Yellow leaf</subject><ispartof>European journal of plant pathology, 2018-09, Vol.152 (1), p.225-235</ispartof><rights>Koninklijke Nederlandse Planteziektenkundige Vereniging 2018</rights><rights>European Journal of Plant Pathology is a copyright of Springer, (2018). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-71e6502518cf26a82e3bd8a4693d53a1355cccd68d31f844e0278c7dbab7293f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-71e6502518cf26a82e3bd8a4693d53a1355cccd68d31f844e0278c7dbab7293f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nikolić, Dušan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vučurović, Ana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stanković, Ivana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Radović, Nikola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zečević, Katarina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bulajić, Aleksandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krstić, Branka</creatorcontrib><title>Viruses affecting tomato crops in Serbia</title><title>European journal of plant pathology</title><addtitle>Eur J Plant Pathol</addtitle><description>In a two-year survey (2011–2012), 3220 samples were collected and analyzed in order to determine the presence and distribution of viruses in tomato crops at 56 localities of 18 districts in Serbia. Out of 12 viruses tested, Cucumber mosaic virus (CMV), Potato virus Y (PVY), Alfalfa mosaic virus (AMV), Tomato spotted wilt virus (TSWV), Tomato mosaic virus (ToMV) and Tobacco mosaic virus (TMV) were detected in 42.1, 40, 11, 8.6, 2.3 and 1.3% of the total tested samples, respectively. The results revealed that CMV was prevalent in 2011 and PVY in 2012. CMV and PVY, apart from being predominant, were also the most widespread viruses. In general, single infections were the most frequent type of infection. Additionally, the most common mixed infections were double infections and the most prevalent combination was CMV and PVY. In 2011, the incidence of diseases and the percentage of all infection types were significantly higher than in 2012. Furthermore, in 2011, regardless of total single infections being prevalent compared to mixed infections, two prevailing viruses were commonly detected in mixed infections. The additional molecular testing of ELISA-negative samples using virus specific primers did not reveal the presence of Pepino mosaic virus (PepMV), Tomato yellow leaf curl virus (TYLC), Tomato infections chlorosis virus (TICV) and Tomato chlorosis virus (ToCV).</description><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Alfalfa</subject><subject>Anti-virus software</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Chlorosis</subject><subject>Crops</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay</subject><subject>Infections</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Plant diseases</subject><subject>Plant Pathology</subject><subject>Plant Sciences</subject><subject>Plant virus diseases</subject><subject>Potatoes</subject><subject>Primers</subject><subject>Tobacco</subject><subject>Tomatoes</subject><subject>Viruses</subject><subject>Wilt</subject><subject>Yellow leaf</subject><issn>0929-1873</issn><issn>1573-8469</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kEtLxDAUhYMoWEd_gLuCGzfR3KR5LWXQURhw4WMb0jQZOjhtTdpF_70ZKrhydTfnO_fwIXQN5A4IkfcJiOAKE1AYKiHxfIIK4JJhVQl9igqiqcagJDtHFyntSWa0pgW6_WzjlHwqbQjejW23K8f-YMe-dLEfUtl25ZuPdWsv0VmwX8lf_d4V-nh6fF8_4-3r5mX9sMWOgRixBC84oRyUC1RYRT2rG2XzCNZwZoFx7pxrhGoYBFVVnlCpnGxqW0uqWWArdLP0DrH_nnwazb6fYpdfGkqAC1ZxkDkFSyqvTCn6YIbYHmycDRBzFGIWISYLMUchZs4MXZiUs93Ox7_m_6EfYEFiGQ</recordid><startdate>20180901</startdate><enddate>20180901</enddate><creator>Nikolić, Dušan</creator><creator>Vučurović, Ana</creator><creator>Stanković, Ivana</creator><creator>Radović, Nikola</creator><creator>Zečević, Katarina</creator><creator>Bulajić, Aleksandra</creator><creator>Krstić, Branka</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180901</creationdate><title>Viruses affecting tomato crops in Serbia</title><author>Nikolić, Dušan ; Vučurović, Ana ; Stanković, Ivana ; Radović, Nikola ; Zečević, Katarina ; Bulajić, Aleksandra ; Krstić, Branka</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-71e6502518cf26a82e3bd8a4693d53a1355cccd68d31f844e0278c7dbab7293f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Alfalfa</topic><topic>Anti-virus software</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Chlorosis</topic><topic>Crops</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay</topic><topic>Infections</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Plant diseases</topic><topic>Plant Pathology</topic><topic>Plant Sciences</topic><topic>Plant virus diseases</topic><topic>Potatoes</topic><topic>Primers</topic><topic>Tobacco</topic><topic>Tomatoes</topic><topic>Viruses</topic><topic>Wilt</topic><topic>Yellow leaf</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nikolić, Dušan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vučurović, Ana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stanković, Ivana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Radović, Nikola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zečević, Katarina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bulajić, Aleksandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krstić, Branka</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><jtitle>European journal of plant pathology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nikolić, Dušan</au><au>Vučurović, Ana</au><au>Stanković, Ivana</au><au>Radović, Nikola</au><au>Zečević, Katarina</au><au>Bulajić, Aleksandra</au><au>Krstić, Branka</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Viruses affecting tomato crops in Serbia</atitle><jtitle>European journal of plant pathology</jtitle><stitle>Eur J Plant Pathol</stitle><date>2018-09-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>152</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>225</spage><epage>235</epage><pages>225-235</pages><issn>0929-1873</issn><eissn>1573-8469</eissn><abstract>In a two-year survey (2011–2012), 3220 samples were collected and analyzed in order to determine the presence and distribution of viruses in tomato crops at 56 localities of 18 districts in Serbia. Out of 12 viruses tested, Cucumber mosaic virus (CMV), Potato virus Y (PVY), Alfalfa mosaic virus (AMV), Tomato spotted wilt virus (TSWV), Tomato mosaic virus (ToMV) and Tobacco mosaic virus (TMV) were detected in 42.1, 40, 11, 8.6, 2.3 and 1.3% of the total tested samples, respectively. The results revealed that CMV was prevalent in 2011 and PVY in 2012. CMV and PVY, apart from being predominant, were also the most widespread viruses. In general, single infections were the most frequent type of infection. Additionally, the most common mixed infections were double infections and the most prevalent combination was CMV and PVY. In 2011, the incidence of diseases and the percentage of all infection types were significantly higher than in 2012. Furthermore, in 2011, regardless of total single infections being prevalent compared to mixed infections, two prevailing viruses were commonly detected in mixed infections. The additional molecular testing of ELISA-negative samples using virus specific primers did not reveal the presence of Pepino mosaic virus (PepMV), Tomato yellow leaf curl virus (TYLC), Tomato infections chlorosis virus (TICV) and Tomato chlorosis virus (ToCV).</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s10658-018-1467-y</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0929-1873
ispartof European journal of plant pathology, 2018-09, Vol.152 (1), p.225-235
issn 0929-1873
1573-8469
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2015634517
source Springer Nature
subjects Agriculture
Alfalfa
Anti-virus software
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Chlorosis
Crops
Ecology
Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay
Infections
Life Sciences
Plant diseases
Plant Pathology
Plant Sciences
Plant virus diseases
Potatoes
Primers
Tobacco
Tomatoes
Viruses
Wilt
Yellow leaf
title Viruses affecting tomato crops in Serbia
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T15%3A38%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Viruses%20affecting%20tomato%20crops%20in%20Serbia&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20plant%20pathology&rft.au=Nikoli%C4%87,%20Du%C5%A1an&rft.date=2018-09-01&rft.volume=152&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=225&rft.epage=235&rft.pages=225-235&rft.issn=0929-1873&rft.eissn=1573-8469&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10658-018-1467-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2015634517%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-71e6502518cf26a82e3bd8a4693d53a1355cccd68d31f844e0278c7dbab7293f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2015634517&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true