Loading…
Viruses affecting tomato crops in Serbia
In a two-year survey (2011–2012), 3220 samples were collected and analyzed in order to determine the presence and distribution of viruses in tomato crops at 56 localities of 18 districts in Serbia. Out of 12 viruses tested, Cucumber mosaic virus (CMV), Potato virus Y (PVY), Alfalfa mosaic virus (AMV...
Saved in:
Published in: | European journal of plant pathology 2018-09, Vol.152 (1), p.225-235 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-71e6502518cf26a82e3bd8a4693d53a1355cccd68d31f844e0278c7dbab7293f3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-71e6502518cf26a82e3bd8a4693d53a1355cccd68d31f844e0278c7dbab7293f3 |
container_end_page | 235 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 225 |
container_title | European journal of plant pathology |
container_volume | 152 |
creator | Nikolić, Dušan Vučurović, Ana Stanković, Ivana Radović, Nikola Zečević, Katarina Bulajić, Aleksandra Krstić, Branka |
description | In a two-year survey (2011–2012), 3220 samples were collected and analyzed in order to determine the presence and distribution of viruses in tomato crops at 56 localities of 18 districts in Serbia. Out of 12 viruses tested,
Cucumber mosaic virus
(CMV),
Potato virus Y
(PVY),
Alfalfa mosaic virus
(AMV),
Tomato spotted wilt virus
(TSWV),
Tomato mosaic virus
(ToMV) and
Tobacco mosaic virus
(TMV) were detected in 42.1, 40, 11, 8.6, 2.3 and 1.3% of the total tested samples, respectively. The results revealed that CMV was prevalent in 2011 and PVY in 2012. CMV and PVY, apart from being predominant, were also the most widespread viruses. In general, single infections were the most frequent type of infection. Additionally, the most common mixed infections were double infections and the most prevalent combination was CMV and PVY. In 2011, the incidence of diseases and the percentage of all infection types were significantly higher than in 2012. Furthermore, in 2011, regardless of total single infections being prevalent compared to mixed infections, two prevailing viruses were commonly detected in mixed infections. The additional molecular testing of ELISA-negative samples using virus specific primers did not reveal the presence of
Pepino mosaic virus
(PepMV),
Tomato yellow leaf curl virus
(TYLC),
Tomato infections chlorosis virus
(TICV) and
Tomato chlorosis virus
(ToCV). |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10658-018-1467-y |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2015634517</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2015634517</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-71e6502518cf26a82e3bd8a4693d53a1355cccd68d31f844e0278c7dbab7293f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtLxDAUhYMoWEd_gLuCGzfR3KR5LWXQURhw4WMb0jQZOjhtTdpF_70ZKrhydTfnO_fwIXQN5A4IkfcJiOAKE1AYKiHxfIIK4JJhVQl9igqiqcagJDtHFyntSWa0pgW6_WzjlHwqbQjejW23K8f-YMe-dLEfUtl25ZuPdWsv0VmwX8lf_d4V-nh6fF8_4-3r5mX9sMWOgRixBC84oRyUC1RYRT2rG2XzCNZwZoFx7pxrhGoYBFVVnlCpnGxqW0uqWWArdLP0DrH_nnwazb6fYpdfGkqAC1ZxkDkFSyqvTCn6YIbYHmycDRBzFGIWISYLMUchZs4MXZiUs93Ox7_m_6EfYEFiGQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2015634517</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Viruses affecting tomato crops in Serbia</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Nikolić, Dušan ; Vučurović, Ana ; Stanković, Ivana ; Radović, Nikola ; Zečević, Katarina ; Bulajić, Aleksandra ; Krstić, Branka</creator><creatorcontrib>Nikolić, Dušan ; Vučurović, Ana ; Stanković, Ivana ; Radović, Nikola ; Zečević, Katarina ; Bulajić, Aleksandra ; Krstić, Branka</creatorcontrib><description>In a two-year survey (2011–2012), 3220 samples were collected and analyzed in order to determine the presence and distribution of viruses in tomato crops at 56 localities of 18 districts in Serbia. Out of 12 viruses tested,
Cucumber mosaic virus
(CMV),
Potato virus Y
(PVY),
Alfalfa mosaic virus
(AMV),
Tomato spotted wilt virus
(TSWV),
Tomato mosaic virus
(ToMV) and
Tobacco mosaic virus
(TMV) were detected in 42.1, 40, 11, 8.6, 2.3 and 1.3% of the total tested samples, respectively. The results revealed that CMV was prevalent in 2011 and PVY in 2012. CMV and PVY, apart from being predominant, were also the most widespread viruses. In general, single infections were the most frequent type of infection. Additionally, the most common mixed infections were double infections and the most prevalent combination was CMV and PVY. In 2011, the incidence of diseases and the percentage of all infection types were significantly higher than in 2012. Furthermore, in 2011, regardless of total single infections being prevalent compared to mixed infections, two prevailing viruses were commonly detected in mixed infections. The additional molecular testing of ELISA-negative samples using virus specific primers did not reveal the presence of
Pepino mosaic virus
(PepMV),
Tomato yellow leaf curl virus
(TYLC),
Tomato infections chlorosis virus
(TICV) and
Tomato chlorosis virus
(ToCV).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0929-1873</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-8469</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10658-018-1467-y</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Agriculture ; Alfalfa ; Anti-virus software ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Chlorosis ; Crops ; Ecology ; Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay ; Infections ; Life Sciences ; Plant diseases ; Plant Pathology ; Plant Sciences ; Plant virus diseases ; Potatoes ; Primers ; Tobacco ; Tomatoes ; Viruses ; Wilt ; Yellow leaf</subject><ispartof>European journal of plant pathology, 2018-09, Vol.152 (1), p.225-235</ispartof><rights>Koninklijke Nederlandse Planteziektenkundige Vereniging 2018</rights><rights>European Journal of Plant Pathology is a copyright of Springer, (2018). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-71e6502518cf26a82e3bd8a4693d53a1355cccd68d31f844e0278c7dbab7293f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-71e6502518cf26a82e3bd8a4693d53a1355cccd68d31f844e0278c7dbab7293f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nikolić, Dušan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vučurović, Ana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stanković, Ivana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Radović, Nikola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zečević, Katarina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bulajić, Aleksandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krstić, Branka</creatorcontrib><title>Viruses affecting tomato crops in Serbia</title><title>European journal of plant pathology</title><addtitle>Eur J Plant Pathol</addtitle><description>In a two-year survey (2011–2012), 3220 samples were collected and analyzed in order to determine the presence and distribution of viruses in tomato crops at 56 localities of 18 districts in Serbia. Out of 12 viruses tested,
Cucumber mosaic virus
(CMV),
Potato virus Y
(PVY),
Alfalfa mosaic virus
(AMV),
Tomato spotted wilt virus
(TSWV),
Tomato mosaic virus
(ToMV) and
Tobacco mosaic virus
(TMV) were detected in 42.1, 40, 11, 8.6, 2.3 and 1.3% of the total tested samples, respectively. The results revealed that CMV was prevalent in 2011 and PVY in 2012. CMV and PVY, apart from being predominant, were also the most widespread viruses. In general, single infections were the most frequent type of infection. Additionally, the most common mixed infections were double infections and the most prevalent combination was CMV and PVY. In 2011, the incidence of diseases and the percentage of all infection types were significantly higher than in 2012. Furthermore, in 2011, regardless of total single infections being prevalent compared to mixed infections, two prevailing viruses were commonly detected in mixed infections. The additional molecular testing of ELISA-negative samples using virus specific primers did not reveal the presence of
Pepino mosaic virus
(PepMV),
Tomato yellow leaf curl virus
(TYLC),
Tomato infections chlorosis virus
(TICV) and
Tomato chlorosis virus
(ToCV).</description><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Alfalfa</subject><subject>Anti-virus software</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Chlorosis</subject><subject>Crops</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay</subject><subject>Infections</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Plant diseases</subject><subject>Plant Pathology</subject><subject>Plant Sciences</subject><subject>Plant virus diseases</subject><subject>Potatoes</subject><subject>Primers</subject><subject>Tobacco</subject><subject>Tomatoes</subject><subject>Viruses</subject><subject>Wilt</subject><subject>Yellow leaf</subject><issn>0929-1873</issn><issn>1573-8469</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kEtLxDAUhYMoWEd_gLuCGzfR3KR5LWXQURhw4WMb0jQZOjhtTdpF_70ZKrhydTfnO_fwIXQN5A4IkfcJiOAKE1AYKiHxfIIK4JJhVQl9igqiqcagJDtHFyntSWa0pgW6_WzjlHwqbQjejW23K8f-YMe-dLEfUtl25ZuPdWsv0VmwX8lf_d4V-nh6fF8_4-3r5mX9sMWOgRixBC84oRyUC1RYRT2rG2XzCNZwZoFx7pxrhGoYBFVVnlCpnGxqW0uqWWArdLP0DrH_nnwazb6fYpdfGkqAC1ZxkDkFSyqvTCn6YIbYHmycDRBzFGIWISYLMUchZs4MXZiUs93Ox7_m_6EfYEFiGQ</recordid><startdate>20180901</startdate><enddate>20180901</enddate><creator>Nikolić, Dušan</creator><creator>Vučurović, Ana</creator><creator>Stanković, Ivana</creator><creator>Radović, Nikola</creator><creator>Zečević, Katarina</creator><creator>Bulajić, Aleksandra</creator><creator>Krstić, Branka</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180901</creationdate><title>Viruses affecting tomato crops in Serbia</title><author>Nikolić, Dušan ; Vučurović, Ana ; Stanković, Ivana ; Radović, Nikola ; Zečević, Katarina ; Bulajić, Aleksandra ; Krstić, Branka</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-71e6502518cf26a82e3bd8a4693d53a1355cccd68d31f844e0278c7dbab7293f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Alfalfa</topic><topic>Anti-virus software</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Chlorosis</topic><topic>Crops</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay</topic><topic>Infections</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Plant diseases</topic><topic>Plant Pathology</topic><topic>Plant Sciences</topic><topic>Plant virus diseases</topic><topic>Potatoes</topic><topic>Primers</topic><topic>Tobacco</topic><topic>Tomatoes</topic><topic>Viruses</topic><topic>Wilt</topic><topic>Yellow leaf</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nikolić, Dušan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vučurović, Ana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stanković, Ivana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Radović, Nikola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zečević, Katarina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bulajić, Aleksandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krstić, Branka</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><jtitle>European journal of plant pathology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nikolić, Dušan</au><au>Vučurović, Ana</au><au>Stanković, Ivana</au><au>Radović, Nikola</au><au>Zečević, Katarina</au><au>Bulajić, Aleksandra</au><au>Krstić, Branka</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Viruses affecting tomato crops in Serbia</atitle><jtitle>European journal of plant pathology</jtitle><stitle>Eur J Plant Pathol</stitle><date>2018-09-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>152</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>225</spage><epage>235</epage><pages>225-235</pages><issn>0929-1873</issn><eissn>1573-8469</eissn><abstract>In a two-year survey (2011–2012), 3220 samples were collected and analyzed in order to determine the presence and distribution of viruses in tomato crops at 56 localities of 18 districts in Serbia. Out of 12 viruses tested,
Cucumber mosaic virus
(CMV),
Potato virus Y
(PVY),
Alfalfa mosaic virus
(AMV),
Tomato spotted wilt virus
(TSWV),
Tomato mosaic virus
(ToMV) and
Tobacco mosaic virus
(TMV) were detected in 42.1, 40, 11, 8.6, 2.3 and 1.3% of the total tested samples, respectively. The results revealed that CMV was prevalent in 2011 and PVY in 2012. CMV and PVY, apart from being predominant, were also the most widespread viruses. In general, single infections were the most frequent type of infection. Additionally, the most common mixed infections were double infections and the most prevalent combination was CMV and PVY. In 2011, the incidence of diseases and the percentage of all infection types were significantly higher than in 2012. Furthermore, in 2011, regardless of total single infections being prevalent compared to mixed infections, two prevailing viruses were commonly detected in mixed infections. The additional molecular testing of ELISA-negative samples using virus specific primers did not reveal the presence of
Pepino mosaic virus
(PepMV),
Tomato yellow leaf curl virus
(TYLC),
Tomato infections chlorosis virus
(TICV) and
Tomato chlorosis virus
(ToCV).</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s10658-018-1467-y</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0929-1873 |
ispartof | European journal of plant pathology, 2018-09, Vol.152 (1), p.225-235 |
issn | 0929-1873 1573-8469 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2015634517 |
source | Springer Nature |
subjects | Agriculture Alfalfa Anti-virus software Biomedical and Life Sciences Chlorosis Crops Ecology Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay Infections Life Sciences Plant diseases Plant Pathology Plant Sciences Plant virus diseases Potatoes Primers Tobacco Tomatoes Viruses Wilt Yellow leaf |
title | Viruses affecting tomato crops in Serbia |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T15%3A38%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Viruses%20affecting%20tomato%20crops%20in%20Serbia&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20plant%20pathology&rft.au=Nikoli%C4%87,%20Du%C5%A1an&rft.date=2018-09-01&rft.volume=152&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=225&rft.epage=235&rft.pages=225-235&rft.issn=0929-1873&rft.eissn=1573-8469&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10658-018-1467-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2015634517%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-71e6502518cf26a82e3bd8a4693d53a1355cccd68d31f844e0278c7dbab7293f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2015634517&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |