Loading…
Kinematic-Sensitivity Indices for Dimensionally Nonhomogeneous Jacobian Matrices
Numerous performance indices have been proposed to compare robot architectures based on their kinematic properties. However, none of these indices seems to draw a consensus among the robotics community. The most notorious indices, which are manipulability and dexterity, still entail some drawbacks,...
Saved in:
Published in: | IEEE transactions on robotics 2010-02, Vol.26 (1), p.166-173 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-b17d8280e291e2f18d35f64c6fe9362d83c02c932e9f65d6b1fcc310198581c73 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-b17d8280e291e2f18d35f64c6fe9362d83c02c932e9f65d6b1fcc310198581c73 |
container_end_page | 173 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 166 |
container_title | IEEE transactions on robotics |
container_volume | 26 |
creator | Cardou, P. Bouchard, S. Gosselin, C. |
description | Numerous performance indices have been proposed to compare robot architectures based on their kinematic properties. However, none of these indices seems to draw a consensus among the robotics community. The most notorious indices, which are manipulability and dexterity, still entail some drawbacks, which are mainly due to the impossibility to define a single invariant metric for the special Euclidean group. The natural consequence is to use two distinct metrics, i.e., one for rotations and one for point displacements, as has already been proposed by other researchers. This is the approach used in this paper, where we define the maximum rotation sensitivity and the maximum point-displacement sensitivity. These two indices provide tight upper bounds to the end-effector rotation and point-displacement sensitivity under a unit-magnitude array of actuated-joint displacements. Therefore, their meaning is thought to be clear and definite to the designer of a robotic manipulator. Furthermore, methods for the computation of the proposed indices are devised, some of their properties are established and interpreted in the context of robotic manipulator design, and an example is provided. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1109/TRO.2009.2037252 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_201567713</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>5378571</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>743680131</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-b17d8280e291e2f18d35f64c6fe9362d83c02c932e9f65d6b1fcc310198581c73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkctLJDEQxhtR8LHeF7w0guyp3ao8upOjqKvjc9kdzyGTTjTS3dGkR5j_3owzePDipaqgfl89-IriJ8IxIsjf03_3xwRA5kAbwslGsYOSYQWsFpu55pxUFKTYLnZTegYgTALdKf5e-8H2evSm-m-H5Ef_5sdFORlab2wqXYjlme-XnTDorluUd2F4Cn14tIMN81ReaRNmXg_lrR7jUvKj2HK6S3Z_nfeKhz_n09PL6ub-YnJ6clMZRnGsZti0ggiwRKIlDkVLuauZqZ2VtCatoAaIkZRY6Wre1jN0xlAElIILNA3dK36t5r7E8Dq3aVS9T8Z2nf44TImGAwpk35MNo7UApJjJwy_kc5jH_HdSBJDXTYM0Q7CCTAwpRevUS_S9jguFoJZWqGyFWlqh1lZkydF6rk5Gdy7qwfj0qSOEEUoJy9zBivPW2s82p43gefM7KqSQtg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>201567713</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Kinematic-Sensitivity Indices for Dimensionally Nonhomogeneous Jacobian Matrices</title><source>IEEE Xplore (Online service)</source><creator>Cardou, P. ; Bouchard, S. ; Gosselin, C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Cardou, P. ; Bouchard, S. ; Gosselin, C.</creatorcontrib><description>Numerous performance indices have been proposed to compare robot architectures based on their kinematic properties. However, none of these indices seems to draw a consensus among the robotics community. The most notorious indices, which are manipulability and dexterity, still entail some drawbacks, which are mainly due to the impossibility to define a single invariant metric for the special Euclidean group. The natural consequence is to use two distinct metrics, i.e., one for rotations and one for point displacements, as has already been proposed by other researchers. This is the approach used in this paper, where we define the maximum rotation sensitivity and the maximum point-displacement sensitivity. These two indices provide tight upper bounds to the end-effector rotation and point-displacement sensitivity under a unit-magnitude array of actuated-joint displacements. Therefore, their meaning is thought to be clear and definite to the designer of a robotic manipulator. Furthermore, methods for the computation of the proposed indices are devised, some of their properties are established and interpreted in the context of robotic manipulator design, and an example is provided.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1552-3098</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1941-0468</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/TRO.2009.2037252</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ITREAE</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: IEEE</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Actuators ; Applied sciences ; Arrays ; Computer science; control theory; systems ; condition number ; Control theory. Systems ; dexterity ; Differential equations ; Displacement control ; End effectors ; Exact sciences and technology ; Jacobian matrices ; Jacobian matrix ; kinematic sensitivity ; Kinematics ; manipulability ; Manipulators ; Mathematical models ; Matrix ; matrix norm ; parallel robot ; Parallel robots ; Robot kinematics ; Robot sensing systems ; Robotics ; Robots ; serial robot ; Upper bound</subject><ispartof>IEEE transactions on robotics, 2010-02, Vol.26 (1), p.166-173</ispartof><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) Feb 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-b17d8280e291e2f18d35f64c6fe9362d83c02c932e9f65d6b1fcc310198581c73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-b17d8280e291e2f18d35f64c6fe9362d83c02c932e9f65d6b1fcc310198581c73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/5378571$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,54796</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=22423324$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cardou, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bouchard, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gosselin, C.</creatorcontrib><title>Kinematic-Sensitivity Indices for Dimensionally Nonhomogeneous Jacobian Matrices</title><title>IEEE transactions on robotics</title><addtitle>TRO</addtitle><description>Numerous performance indices have been proposed to compare robot architectures based on their kinematic properties. However, none of these indices seems to draw a consensus among the robotics community. The most notorious indices, which are manipulability and dexterity, still entail some drawbacks, which are mainly due to the impossibility to define a single invariant metric for the special Euclidean group. The natural consequence is to use two distinct metrics, i.e., one for rotations and one for point displacements, as has already been proposed by other researchers. This is the approach used in this paper, where we define the maximum rotation sensitivity and the maximum point-displacement sensitivity. These two indices provide tight upper bounds to the end-effector rotation and point-displacement sensitivity under a unit-magnitude array of actuated-joint displacements. Therefore, their meaning is thought to be clear and definite to the designer of a robotic manipulator. Furthermore, methods for the computation of the proposed indices are devised, some of their properties are established and interpreted in the context of robotic manipulator design, and an example is provided.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Actuators</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Arrays</subject><subject>Computer science; control theory; systems</subject><subject>condition number</subject><subject>Control theory. Systems</subject><subject>dexterity</subject><subject>Differential equations</subject><subject>Displacement control</subject><subject>End effectors</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Jacobian matrices</subject><subject>Jacobian matrix</subject><subject>kinematic sensitivity</subject><subject>Kinematics</subject><subject>manipulability</subject><subject>Manipulators</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Matrix</subject><subject>matrix norm</subject><subject>parallel robot</subject><subject>Parallel robots</subject><subject>Robot kinematics</subject><subject>Robot sensing systems</subject><subject>Robotics</subject><subject>Robots</subject><subject>serial robot</subject><subject>Upper bound</subject><issn>1552-3098</issn><issn>1941-0468</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkctLJDEQxhtR8LHeF7w0guyp3ao8upOjqKvjc9kdzyGTTjTS3dGkR5j_3owzePDipaqgfl89-IriJ8IxIsjf03_3xwRA5kAbwslGsYOSYQWsFpu55pxUFKTYLnZTegYgTALdKf5e-8H2evSm-m-H5Ef_5sdFORlab2wqXYjlme-XnTDorluUd2F4Cn14tIMN81ReaRNmXg_lrR7jUvKj2HK6S3Z_nfeKhz_n09PL6ub-YnJ6clMZRnGsZti0ggiwRKIlDkVLuauZqZ2VtCatoAaIkZRY6Wre1jN0xlAElIILNA3dK36t5r7E8Dq3aVS9T8Z2nf44TImGAwpk35MNo7UApJjJwy_kc5jH_HdSBJDXTYM0Q7CCTAwpRevUS_S9jguFoJZWqGyFWlqh1lZkydF6rk5Gdy7qwfj0qSOEEUoJy9zBivPW2s82p43gefM7KqSQtg</recordid><startdate>20100201</startdate><enddate>20100201</enddate><creator>Cardou, P.</creator><creator>Bouchard, S.</creator><creator>Gosselin, C.</creator><general>IEEE</general><general>Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers</general><general>The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)</general><scope>97E</scope><scope>RIA</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>F28</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100201</creationdate><title>Kinematic-Sensitivity Indices for Dimensionally Nonhomogeneous Jacobian Matrices</title><author>Cardou, P. ; Bouchard, S. ; Gosselin, C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-b17d8280e291e2f18d35f64c6fe9362d83c02c932e9f65d6b1fcc310198581c73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Actuators</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Arrays</topic><topic>Computer science; control theory; systems</topic><topic>condition number</topic><topic>Control theory. Systems</topic><topic>dexterity</topic><topic>Differential equations</topic><topic>Displacement control</topic><topic>End effectors</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Jacobian matrices</topic><topic>Jacobian matrix</topic><topic>kinematic sensitivity</topic><topic>Kinematics</topic><topic>manipulability</topic><topic>Manipulators</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Matrix</topic><topic>matrix norm</topic><topic>parallel robot</topic><topic>Parallel robots</topic><topic>Robot kinematics</topic><topic>Robot sensing systems</topic><topic>Robotics</topic><topic>Robots</topic><topic>serial robot</topic><topic>Upper bound</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cardou, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bouchard, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gosselin, C.</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 2005-present</collection><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 1998-Present</collection><collection>IEEE/IET Electronic Library</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><jtitle>IEEE transactions on robotics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cardou, P.</au><au>Bouchard, S.</au><au>Gosselin, C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Kinematic-Sensitivity Indices for Dimensionally Nonhomogeneous Jacobian Matrices</atitle><jtitle>IEEE transactions on robotics</jtitle><stitle>TRO</stitle><date>2010-02-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>166</spage><epage>173</epage><pages>166-173</pages><issn>1552-3098</issn><eissn>1941-0468</eissn><coden>ITREAE</coden><abstract>Numerous performance indices have been proposed to compare robot architectures based on their kinematic properties. However, none of these indices seems to draw a consensus among the robotics community. The most notorious indices, which are manipulability and dexterity, still entail some drawbacks, which are mainly due to the impossibility to define a single invariant metric for the special Euclidean group. The natural consequence is to use two distinct metrics, i.e., one for rotations and one for point displacements, as has already been proposed by other researchers. This is the approach used in this paper, where we define the maximum rotation sensitivity and the maximum point-displacement sensitivity. These two indices provide tight upper bounds to the end-effector rotation and point-displacement sensitivity under a unit-magnitude array of actuated-joint displacements. Therefore, their meaning is thought to be clear and definite to the designer of a robotic manipulator. Furthermore, methods for the computation of the proposed indices are devised, some of their properties are established and interpreted in the context of robotic manipulator design, and an example is provided.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/TRO.2009.2037252</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1552-3098 |
ispartof | IEEE transactions on robotics, 2010-02, Vol.26 (1), p.166-173 |
issn | 1552-3098 1941-0468 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_201567713 |
source | IEEE Xplore (Online service) |
subjects | Accuracy Actuators Applied sciences Arrays Computer science control theory systems condition number Control theory. Systems dexterity Differential equations Displacement control End effectors Exact sciences and technology Jacobian matrices Jacobian matrix kinematic sensitivity Kinematics manipulability Manipulators Mathematical models Matrix matrix norm parallel robot Parallel robots Robot kinematics Robot sensing systems Robotics Robots serial robot Upper bound |
title | Kinematic-Sensitivity Indices for Dimensionally Nonhomogeneous Jacobian Matrices |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T20%3A28%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Kinematic-Sensitivity%20Indices%20for%20Dimensionally%20Nonhomogeneous%20Jacobian%20Matrices&rft.jtitle=IEEE%20transactions%20on%20robotics&rft.au=Cardou,%20P.&rft.date=2010-02-01&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=166&rft.epage=173&rft.pages=166-173&rft.issn=1552-3098&rft.eissn=1941-0468&rft.coden=ITREAE&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/TRO.2009.2037252&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E743680131%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-b17d8280e291e2f18d35f64c6fe9362d83c02c932e9f65d6b1fcc310198581c73%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=201567713&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=5378571&rfr_iscdi=true |