Loading…
Disruptive innovation, labor markets, and Big Valley STEM School: network analysis in STEM education
A defining characteristic of contemporary trends in global education policy is the promotion of STEM learning in the primary, secondary, and tertiary sectors of education as a means to generate innovation and prosperity in the economy. Intertwined with common sensical assumptions about future labor...
Saved in:
Published in: | Cultural studies of science education 2018-03, Vol.13 (1), p.267-298 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-6612b1041823454e73e1650db994018f0ed95f6e9dc3945832a23607faf88c3e3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-6612b1041823454e73e1650db994018f0ed95f6e9dc3945832a23607faf88c3e3 |
container_end_page | 298 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 267 |
container_title | Cultural studies of science education |
container_volume | 13 |
creator | Ellison, Scott Allen, Ben |
description | A defining characteristic of contemporary trends in global education policy is the promotion of STEM learning in the primary, secondary, and tertiary sectors of education as a means to generate innovation and prosperity in the economy. Intertwined with common sensical assumptions about future labor markets and the transformative potential of technology in education, STEM has become a hegemonic discourse informing policy formation and educational practice. In Gramscian terms, the struggle over STEM as a discursive practice, between proponents of instrumental learning of marketable economic skills and those of education towards humanistic goals, reveals insights about the ideological characteristics of the push for STEM learning. This article explores the power dynamics behind the push for STEM learning as an ideological discourse propagated by global networks of elite policy actors and enacted by non-elite policy actors at the school level. The findings point toward a disjuncture between the discourse of elite policy actors in the US, the realities of STEM labor markets, and the actualization of this policy discourse into classroom practice. The implications of this study indicate that analyses of vertical power relations in network governance in STEM education should attend to the semiotics, materiality, and mutability of networked spaces. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11422-016-9786-9 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2015712844</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1173391</ericid><sourcerecordid>2015712844</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-6612b1041823454e73e1650db994018f0ed95f6e9dc3945832a23607faf88c3e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kF9PwyAUxYnRxDn9AD6YkPi6KhdoS33TOf9lxodNXwlr6WSrZUI7s28vs2Y--QIk53fOvRyEToFcACHppQfglEYEkihLRTj2UA9EChHEQPZ3b0IP0ZH3C0LihAD0UHFrvGtXjVlrbOrarlVjbD3AlZpZhz-UW-rGD7CqC3xj5vhNVZXe4Ml09Iwn-bu11RWudfNl3TIwqtp440NOB-iizX_ijtFBqSqvT37vPnq9G02HD9H45f5xeD2OcsZEEyUJ0BkQDoIyHnOdMg1JTIpZlnECoiS6yOIy0VmRs4zHglFFWULSUpVC5EyzPjrvclfOfrbaN3JhWxfW8pISiFOggvNAQUflznrvdClXzoSfbiQQuS1TdmXKUKbclimz4DnrPNqZfMePngBSxjIIOu10H7R6rt3f5P9DvwHW1H7r</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2015712844</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Disruptive innovation, labor markets, and Big Valley STEM School: network analysis in STEM education</title><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>Springer Nature</source><source>ERIC</source><source>Education Collection</source><creator>Ellison, Scott ; Allen, Ben</creator><creatorcontrib>Ellison, Scott ; Allen, Ben</creatorcontrib><description>A defining characteristic of contemporary trends in global education policy is the promotion of STEM learning in the primary, secondary, and tertiary sectors of education as a means to generate innovation and prosperity in the economy. Intertwined with common sensical assumptions about future labor markets and the transformative potential of technology in education, STEM has become a hegemonic discourse informing policy formation and educational practice. In Gramscian terms, the struggle over STEM as a discursive practice, between proponents of instrumental learning of marketable economic skills and those of education towards humanistic goals, reveals insights about the ideological characteristics of the push for STEM learning. This article explores the power dynamics behind the push for STEM learning as an ideological discourse propagated by global networks of elite policy actors and enacted by non-elite policy actors at the school level. The findings point toward a disjuncture between the discourse of elite policy actors in the US, the realities of STEM labor markets, and the actualization of this policy discourse into classroom practice. The implications of this study indicate that analyses of vertical power relations in network governance in STEM education should attend to the semiotics, materiality, and mutability of networked spaces.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1871-1502</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1871-1510</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11422-016-9786-9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Economic Development ; Economics ; Education ; Education policy ; Educational Policy ; Educational Practices ; Governance ; Innovation ; Innovations ; Labor ; Labor Market ; Learning ; Markets ; Mathematics education ; Network analysis ; Original Paper ; Power Structure ; Science Education ; Semiotics ; Sociology of Education ; STEM Education ; Technical education ; Technology education ; Technology Uses in Education ; Transformative Learning</subject><ispartof>Cultural studies of science education, 2018-03, Vol.13 (1), p.267-298</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016</rights><rights>Cultural Studies of Science Education is a copyright of Springer, (2016). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-6612b1041823454e73e1650db994018f0ed95f6e9dc3945832a23607faf88c3e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-6612b1041823454e73e1650db994018f0ed95f6e9dc3945832a23607faf88c3e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3885-5525</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2015712844/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2015712844?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21357,21373,27901,27902,33588,33854,43709,43856,73964,74140</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1173391$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ellison, Scott</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allen, Ben</creatorcontrib><title>Disruptive innovation, labor markets, and Big Valley STEM School: network analysis in STEM education</title><title>Cultural studies of science education</title><addtitle>Cult Stud of Sci Educ</addtitle><description>A defining characteristic of contemporary trends in global education policy is the promotion of STEM learning in the primary, secondary, and tertiary sectors of education as a means to generate innovation and prosperity in the economy. Intertwined with common sensical assumptions about future labor markets and the transformative potential of technology in education, STEM has become a hegemonic discourse informing policy formation and educational practice. In Gramscian terms, the struggle over STEM as a discursive practice, between proponents of instrumental learning of marketable economic skills and those of education towards humanistic goals, reveals insights about the ideological characteristics of the push for STEM learning. This article explores the power dynamics behind the push for STEM learning as an ideological discourse propagated by global networks of elite policy actors and enacted by non-elite policy actors at the school level. The findings point toward a disjuncture between the discourse of elite policy actors in the US, the realities of STEM labor markets, and the actualization of this policy discourse into classroom practice. The implications of this study indicate that analyses of vertical power relations in network governance in STEM education should attend to the semiotics, materiality, and mutability of networked spaces.</description><subject>Economic Development</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Education policy</subject><subject>Educational Policy</subject><subject>Educational Practices</subject><subject>Governance</subject><subject>Innovation</subject><subject>Innovations</subject><subject>Labor</subject><subject>Labor Market</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Markets</subject><subject>Mathematics education</subject><subject>Network analysis</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Power Structure</subject><subject>Science Education</subject><subject>Semiotics</subject><subject>Sociology of Education</subject><subject>STEM Education</subject><subject>Technical education</subject><subject>Technology education</subject><subject>Technology Uses in Education</subject><subject>Transformative Learning</subject><issn>1871-1502</issn><issn>1871-1510</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7SW</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>CJNVE</sourceid><sourceid>M0P</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kF9PwyAUxYnRxDn9AD6YkPi6KhdoS33TOf9lxodNXwlr6WSrZUI7s28vs2Y--QIk53fOvRyEToFcACHppQfglEYEkihLRTj2UA9EChHEQPZ3b0IP0ZH3C0LihAD0UHFrvGtXjVlrbOrarlVjbD3AlZpZhz-UW-rGD7CqC3xj5vhNVZXe4Ml09Iwn-bu11RWudfNl3TIwqtp440NOB-iizX_ijtFBqSqvT37vPnq9G02HD9H45f5xeD2OcsZEEyUJ0BkQDoIyHnOdMg1JTIpZlnECoiS6yOIy0VmRs4zHglFFWULSUpVC5EyzPjrvclfOfrbaN3JhWxfW8pISiFOggvNAQUflznrvdClXzoSfbiQQuS1TdmXKUKbclimz4DnrPNqZfMePngBSxjIIOu10H7R6rt3f5P9DvwHW1H7r</recordid><startdate>20180301</startdate><enddate>20180301</enddate><creator>Ellison, Scott</creator><creator>Allen, Ben</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3885-5525</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180301</creationdate><title>Disruptive innovation, labor markets, and Big Valley STEM School: network analysis in STEM education</title><author>Ellison, Scott ; Allen, Ben</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-6612b1041823454e73e1650db994018f0ed95f6e9dc3945832a23607faf88c3e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Economic Development</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Education policy</topic><topic>Educational Policy</topic><topic>Educational Practices</topic><topic>Governance</topic><topic>Innovation</topic><topic>Innovations</topic><topic>Labor</topic><topic>Labor Market</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Markets</topic><topic>Mathematics education</topic><topic>Network analysis</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Power Structure</topic><topic>Science Education</topic><topic>Semiotics</topic><topic>Sociology of Education</topic><topic>STEM Education</topic><topic>Technical education</topic><topic>Technology education</topic><topic>Technology Uses in Education</topic><topic>Transformative Learning</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ellison, Scott</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allen, Ben</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Education Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>ProQuest advanced technologies & aerospace journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Cultural studies of science education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ellison, Scott</au><au>Allen, Ben</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1173391</ericid><atitle>Disruptive innovation, labor markets, and Big Valley STEM School: network analysis in STEM education</atitle><jtitle>Cultural studies of science education</jtitle><stitle>Cult Stud of Sci Educ</stitle><date>2018-03-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>267</spage><epage>298</epage><pages>267-298</pages><issn>1871-1502</issn><eissn>1871-1510</eissn><abstract>A defining characteristic of contemporary trends in global education policy is the promotion of STEM learning in the primary, secondary, and tertiary sectors of education as a means to generate innovation and prosperity in the economy. Intertwined with common sensical assumptions about future labor markets and the transformative potential of technology in education, STEM has become a hegemonic discourse informing policy formation and educational practice. In Gramscian terms, the struggle over STEM as a discursive practice, between proponents of instrumental learning of marketable economic skills and those of education towards humanistic goals, reveals insights about the ideological characteristics of the push for STEM learning. This article explores the power dynamics behind the push for STEM learning as an ideological discourse propagated by global networks of elite policy actors and enacted by non-elite policy actors at the school level. The findings point toward a disjuncture between the discourse of elite policy actors in the US, the realities of STEM labor markets, and the actualization of this policy discourse into classroom practice. The implications of this study indicate that analyses of vertical power relations in network governance in STEM education should attend to the semiotics, materiality, and mutability of networked spaces.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s11422-016-9786-9</doi><tpages>32</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3885-5525</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1871-1502 |
ispartof | Cultural studies of science education, 2018-03, Vol.13 (1), p.267-298 |
issn | 1871-1502 1871-1510 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2015712844 |
source | Social Science Premium Collection; Springer Nature; ERIC; Education Collection |
subjects | Economic Development Economics Education Education policy Educational Policy Educational Practices Governance Innovation Innovations Labor Labor Market Learning Markets Mathematics education Network analysis Original Paper Power Structure Science Education Semiotics Sociology of Education STEM Education Technical education Technology education Technology Uses in Education Transformative Learning |
title | Disruptive innovation, labor markets, and Big Valley STEM School: network analysis in STEM education |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T00%3A01%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Disruptive%20innovation,%20labor%20markets,%20and%20Big%20Valley%20STEM%20School:%20network%20analysis%20in%20STEM%20education&rft.jtitle=Cultural%20studies%20of%20science%20education&rft.au=Ellison,%20Scott&rft.date=2018-03-01&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=267&rft.epage=298&rft.pages=267-298&rft.issn=1871-1502&rft.eissn=1871-1510&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11422-016-9786-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2015712844%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-6612b1041823454e73e1650db994018f0ed95f6e9dc3945832a23607faf88c3e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2015712844&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1173391&rfr_iscdi=true |