Audit cultures: Neoliberal governmentality, socialist legacy, or technologies of governing?

ABSTRACT In this article, I analyze the social processes of performance audits in a variety of cases in China, other postsocialist nations, and a U.S. workplace with Chinese immigrant employees. Although the processes share many commonalities, the ideological evaluations of them by the people involv...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:American ethnologist 2008-05, Vol.35 (2), p.275-289
Main Author: KIPNIS, ANDREW B.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Comparative analysis
Culture
Ethnology
Management audits
Neoliberalism
Rose, Nikolas
Socialism
Sources and methods
Specific concepts
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:ABSTRACT In this article, I analyze the social processes of performance audits in a variety of cases in China, other postsocialist nations, and a U.S. workplace with Chinese immigrant employees. Although the processes share many commonalities, the ideological evaluations of them by the people involved are often diametrically opposed to those by anthropological analysts. For example, the Chinese workers often describe the performance audits as “socialist,” whereas the anthropological analysts tend to see them as a form of “neoliberal” governmentality. I use these contradictory evaluations to develop a critique of Nikolas Rose's conceptualization of “neoliberal governmentality,” especially when it is used as an explanation for contemporary processes of governing. Building on the comparative analysis of the performance audit cases, I conclude with a call for a classic anthropological approach to the study of audit cultures. [governmentality, audit cultures, China, socialism, neoliberalism]
ISSN:0094-0496
1548-1425
DOI:10.1111/j.1548-1425.2008.00034.x