Monocausal Attributions Along Cross-Sections of Psychosis Development and Links with Psychopathology and Data Gathering Style

Several attributional biases have been discussed as putative causal factors in psychosis formation and maintenance. The monocausality bias in particular describes the excessive tendency to disregard multifactorial explanations and to instead attribute events to a single cause. To elucidate the role...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Cognitive therapy and research 2018-10, Vol.42 (5), p.699-710
Main Authors: Nowak, U., Eisenacher, S., Braun, H., Rausch, F., Muszinski, S., Thiem, J., Becker, A., Englisch, S., Kirsch, P., Meyer-Lindenberg, A., Zink, M.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Bias
Clinical Psychology
Cognitive Psychology
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Mental disorders
Original Article
Psychopathology
Psychosis
Quality of Life Research
Schizophrenia
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Several attributional biases have been discussed as putative causal factors in psychosis formation and maintenance. The monocausality bias in particular describes the excessive tendency to disregard multifactorial explanations and to instead attribute events to a single cause. To elucidate the role of monocausality in psychosis development, this study compared patients with an at-risk mental state of psychosis (ARMS, n  = 49), first-episode patients (FEP, n  = 35), chronic schizophrenia patients (SZ, n  = 32) and healthy controls (HC, n  = 39) on the Internal Personal and Situational Attributions Questionnaire—Revised. FEP patients made significantly more monocausal attributions than HC to the external-personal locus for positive events. Moreover, monocausality was linked with psychotic as well as depressive symptoms and tentatively also with a hasty data gathering style. Future studies should explore associations with other metacognitive deficits and the potential to prevent or correct the monocausality bias through psychological interventions.
ISSN:0147-5916
1573-2819
DOI:10.1007/s10608-018-9907-8