A preliminary study on the optimal configuration and operating range of a “microgrid scale” air liquefaction plant for Liquid Air Energy Storage

• Published in: Energy conversion and management 2017-07, Vol.143, p.275-285
• Main Authors: Borri, E., Tafone, A., Romagnoli, A., Comodi, G.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Air; Compression; Configuration management; Configurations; Cryogenics; Distributed generation; Electric power distribution; Energy conservation; Energy distribution; Energy storage; LAES; Liquefaction; Liquefaction cycle; Liquid air; Liquid Air Energy Storage; Low temperature physics; Parametric analysis; Scaling; Small-scale LAES; Storage systems
• ISSN: 0196-8904; 1879-2227
• DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2017.03.079

•A liquefaction cycle for a microgrid scale Liquid Air Energy Storage is proposed.•Different liquefaction cycles are compared by means of parametric analysis.•The optimal configuration proposed is a Kapitza cycle with two stage compression.•The specific consumption of the optimal configuration is around 700kWh/t.•Specific consumption reduces to 532kWh/t if a pressurized phase separator is used. Liquid Air Energy Storage systems represent a sustainable solution to store energy. Although a lot of interest is dedicated to large scale systems (up to 300tons per day), a small-scale Liquid Air Energy Storage can be used as energy storage as part of a microgrid and/or an energy distribution network. However, when scaling down the size of the system, the round trip efficiency decreases due to the low performance of the liquefaction process. In this paper a preliminary study on the optimal configuration for a microgrid scale liquefaction cycle (10tons per 12h) for a Liquid Air Energy Storage application is proposed in order to minimize the specific consumption. The Linde, Claude and Kapitza cycles are modelled and compared by means of a parametric analysis carried out with the software Aspen HYSYS. The results show that the two stages compression Kapitza cycle operating at 40bar represents an optimal solution in terms of performance and cycle configuration resulting in a specific consumption of about 700kWh/t. The analysis also shows that the implementation of a pressurized phase separator leads to a reduction of the specific consumption as high as 21% (≈550kWh/t).