Loading…

Do the returns to community colleges differ between academic and vocational programs?

This paper provides new evidence about the payoffs to community colleges' terminal training programs as distinct from their traditional transfer function. Using NLSY data, we offer three main findings. First, four-year college graduates who started at a community college are not at a substantia...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Journal of human resources 2003, Vol.38 (1), p.134-155
Main Authors: Gill, Andrew M, Leigh, Duane E
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-75ff6c329597b48461c6216f8872c77d28b8645213582240545708b95ab491073
cites
container_end_page 155
container_issue 1
container_start_page 134
container_title The Journal of human resources
container_volume 38
creator Gill, Andrew M
Leigh, Duane E
description This paper provides new evidence about the payoffs to community colleges' terminal training programs as distinct from their traditional transfer function. Using NLSY data, we offer three main findings. First, four-year college graduates who started at a community college are not at a substantial earnings disadvantage relative to those who started at a four-year college. Second, community college students in terminal training programs enjoy a positive payoff comparable to that received by four-year college starters who do not graduate. Finally, we find evidence of positive self-selection for community college students who choose the terminal training track.
doi_str_mv 10.2307/1558759
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_202686501</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ660440</ericid><jstor_id>1558759</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>1558759</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-75ff6c329597b48461c6216f8872c77d28b8645213582240545708b95ab491073</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1LAzEQxYMoWKt4Fw9BBE-rk2y-9iRS6xcFLxa8LdlsVrd0NzVJlf73RrbozdPM8H7Mm3kIHRO4pDnIK8K5krzYQSPCmcoUANtFIwBKMyLE6z46CGEBaSY5G6H5rcPx3WJv49r3AUeHjeu6dd_GTeqWS_tmA67bprEeVzZ-WdtjbXRtu9Zg3df40xkdW9frJV559-Z1F64P0V6jl8EebesYze-mL5OHbPZ8_zi5mWUmVyRmkjeNMDkteCErppggRlAiGqUkNVLWVFVKMJ4u5YpSBpxxCaoquK5YQUDmY3Q27E3OH2sbYrlw6Y1kWVKgQgkOJEEXA2S8C8Hbplz5ttN-UxIofyIrt5El8nQgrW_NLzV9EgIYgySfD_IiROf_2XIyYHW7-vMSSipO82_byHiO</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>202686501</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Do the returns to community colleges differ between academic and vocational programs?</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>ERIC</source><source>BSC - Ebsco (Business Source Ultimate)</source><source>JSTOR</source><creator>Gill, Andrew M ; Leigh, Duane E</creator><creatorcontrib>Gill, Andrew M ; Leigh, Duane E</creatorcontrib><description>This paper provides new evidence about the payoffs to community colleges' terminal training programs as distinct from their traditional transfer function. Using NLSY data, we offer three main findings. First, four-year college graduates who started at a community college are not at a substantial earnings disadvantage relative to those who started at a four-year college. Second, community college students in terminal training programs enjoy a positive payoff comparable to that received by four-year college starters who do not graduate. Finally, we find evidence of positive self-selection for community college students who choose the terminal training track.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-166X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1548-8004</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2307/1558759</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JHREA9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Madison: University of Wisconsin Press</publisher><subject>20. Jahrhundert ; Academic degrees ; Academic Education ; Bachelors Degrees ; Berufsbildende Schule ; Bildungsertrag ; Coefficients ; College Graduates ; College students ; College transfer students ; Community Colleges ; Earnings ; Graduate schools ; High school graduates ; Hochschule ; Human resources ; Labor markets ; Mathematical models ; National Longitudinal Survey of Youth ; Return on Investment ; Salary Wage Differentials ; Studies ; Terminal Education ; Transfer Students ; Two Year Colleges ; USA ; Vocational Education ; Wage differential</subject><ispartof>The Journal of human resources, 2003, Vol.38 (1), p.134-155</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2002 The Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System</rights><rights>Copyright University of Wisconsin Press Winter 2003</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-75ff6c329597b48461c6216f8872c77d28b8645213582240545708b95ab491073</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/1558759$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/1558759$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4009,27902,27903,27904,33202,58217,58450</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://www.fachportal-paedagogik.de/fis_bildung/suche/fis_set.html?FId=687852$$DAccess content in the German Education Portal$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ660440$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gill, Andrew M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leigh, Duane E</creatorcontrib><title>Do the returns to community colleges differ between academic and vocational programs?</title><title>The Journal of human resources</title><description>This paper provides new evidence about the payoffs to community colleges' terminal training programs as distinct from their traditional transfer function. Using NLSY data, we offer three main findings. First, four-year college graduates who started at a community college are not at a substantial earnings disadvantage relative to those who started at a four-year college. Second, community college students in terminal training programs enjoy a positive payoff comparable to that received by four-year college starters who do not graduate. Finally, we find evidence of positive self-selection for community college students who choose the terminal training track.</description><subject>20. Jahrhundert</subject><subject>Academic degrees</subject><subject>Academic Education</subject><subject>Bachelors Degrees</subject><subject>Berufsbildende Schule</subject><subject>Bildungsertrag</subject><subject>Coefficients</subject><subject>College Graduates</subject><subject>College students</subject><subject>College transfer students</subject><subject>Community Colleges</subject><subject>Earnings</subject><subject>Graduate schools</subject><subject>High school graduates</subject><subject>Hochschule</subject><subject>Human resources</subject><subject>Labor markets</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>National Longitudinal Survey of Youth</subject><subject>Return on Investment</subject><subject>Salary Wage Differentials</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Terminal Education</subject><subject>Transfer Students</subject><subject>Two Year Colleges</subject><subject>USA</subject><subject>Vocational Education</subject><subject>Wage differential</subject><issn>0022-166X</issn><issn>1548-8004</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7SW</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM1LAzEQxYMoWKt4Fw9BBE-rk2y-9iRS6xcFLxa8LdlsVrd0NzVJlf73RrbozdPM8H7Mm3kIHRO4pDnIK8K5krzYQSPCmcoUANtFIwBKMyLE6z46CGEBaSY5G6H5rcPx3WJv49r3AUeHjeu6dd_GTeqWS_tmA67bprEeVzZ-WdtjbXRtu9Zg3df40xkdW9frJV559-Z1F64P0V6jl8EebesYze-mL5OHbPZ8_zi5mWUmVyRmkjeNMDkteCErppggRlAiGqUkNVLWVFVKMJ4u5YpSBpxxCaoquK5YQUDmY3Q27E3OH2sbYrlw6Y1kWVKgQgkOJEEXA2S8C8Hbplz5ttN-UxIofyIrt5El8nQgrW_NLzV9EgIYgySfD_IiROf_2XIyYHW7-vMSSipO82_byHiO</recordid><startdate>2003</startdate><enddate>2003</enddate><creator>Gill, Andrew M</creator><creator>Leigh, Duane E</creator><general>University of Wisconsin Press</general><scope>9S6</scope><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K9.</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2003</creationdate><title>Do the returns to community colleges differ between academic and vocational programs?</title><author>Gill, Andrew M ; Leigh, Duane E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-75ff6c329597b48461c6216f8872c77d28b8645213582240545708b95ab491073</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>20. Jahrhundert</topic><topic>Academic degrees</topic><topic>Academic Education</topic><topic>Bachelors Degrees</topic><topic>Berufsbildende Schule</topic><topic>Bildungsertrag</topic><topic>Coefficients</topic><topic>College Graduates</topic><topic>College students</topic><topic>College transfer students</topic><topic>Community Colleges</topic><topic>Earnings</topic><topic>Graduate schools</topic><topic>High school graduates</topic><topic>Hochschule</topic><topic>Human resources</topic><topic>Labor markets</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>National Longitudinal Survey of Youth</topic><topic>Return on Investment</topic><topic>Salary Wage Differentials</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Terminal Education</topic><topic>Transfer Students</topic><topic>Two Year Colleges</topic><topic>USA</topic><topic>Vocational Education</topic><topic>Wage differential</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gill, Andrew M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leigh, Duane E</creatorcontrib><collection>FIS Bildung Literaturdatenbank</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><jtitle>The Journal of human resources</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gill, Andrew M</au><au>Leigh, Duane E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ660440</ericid><atitle>Do the returns to community colleges differ between academic and vocational programs?</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of human resources</jtitle><date>2003</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>134</spage><epage>155</epage><pages>134-155</pages><issn>0022-166X</issn><eissn>1548-8004</eissn><coden>JHREA9</coden><abstract>This paper provides new evidence about the payoffs to community colleges' terminal training programs as distinct from their traditional transfer function. Using NLSY data, we offer three main findings. First, four-year college graduates who started at a community college are not at a substantial earnings disadvantage relative to those who started at a four-year college. Second, community college students in terminal training programs enjoy a positive payoff comparable to that received by four-year college starters who do not graduate. Finally, we find evidence of positive self-selection for community college students who choose the terminal training track.</abstract><cop>Madison</cop><pub>University of Wisconsin Press</pub><doi>10.2307/1558759</doi><tpages>22</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-166X
ispartof The Journal of human resources, 2003, Vol.38 (1), p.134-155
issn 0022-166X
1548-8004
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_202686501
source International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); ERIC; BSC - Ebsco (Business Source Ultimate); JSTOR
subjects 20. Jahrhundert
Academic degrees
Academic Education
Bachelors Degrees
Berufsbildende Schule
Bildungsertrag
Coefficients
College Graduates
College students
College transfer students
Community Colleges
Earnings
Graduate schools
High school graduates
Hochschule
Human resources
Labor markets
Mathematical models
National Longitudinal Survey of Youth
Return on Investment
Salary Wage Differentials
Studies
Terminal Education
Transfer Students
Two Year Colleges
USA
Vocational Education
Wage differential
title Do the returns to community colleges differ between academic and vocational programs?
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T13%3A43%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Do%20the%20returns%20to%20community%20colleges%20differ%20between%20academic%20and%20vocational%20programs?&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20human%20resources&rft.au=Gill,%20Andrew%20M&rft.date=2003&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=134&rft.epage=155&rft.pages=134-155&rft.issn=0022-166X&rft.eissn=1548-8004&rft.coden=JHREA9&rft_id=info:doi/10.2307/1558759&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E1558759%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-75ff6c329597b48461c6216f8872c77d28b8645213582240545708b95ab491073%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=202686501&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ660440&rft_jstor_id=1558759&rfr_iscdi=true