Loading…
Forest Canopy Height Estimation Using Multiplatform Remote Sensing Dataset
Recently, numerous studies have attempted to determine forest height using remote sensing techniques that not only have the benefits of fast data acquisition, processing, and analysis but are also cost-effective. However, if there was insufficient data to apply the latest remote sensing techniques,...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of sensors 2018-01, Vol.2018 (2018), p.1-9 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c493t-eb76c6d4372c69fb7818a7db71e6943f733a75aa02a902872a1d3b6c73ea7a783 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c493t-eb76c6d4372c69fb7818a7db71e6943f733a75aa02a902872a1d3b6c73ea7a783 |
container_end_page | 9 |
container_issue | 2018 |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | Journal of sensors |
container_volume | 2018 |
creator | Lee, Won-Jin Lee, Chang-Wook |
description | Recently, numerous studies have attempted to determine forest height using remote sensing techniques that not only have the benefits of fast data acquisition, processing, and analysis but are also cost-effective. However, if there was insufficient data to apply the latest remote sensing techniques, we need to consider many kinds of datasets as possible. In this study, we tried to determine forest height using discrete-return LiDAR data, SRTM, satellite L-band SAR data, and Optical data. We experimented with the differences between LiDAR DSM and DTM, as well as SRTM DSM and LiDAR DTM. In addition, we applied an SBAS algorithm and linear regression to the dataset. From the quantitative evaluation, the RMSE and R2 of the LiDAR-derived forest height (3.22 m and 0.43, resp.) and the SRTM-derived forest height (2.90 m and 0.50, resp.) were both reasonably good, especially when we consider data acquisition time differences and measurement errors in mountainous areas. Moreover, we slightly improved the RMSE and R2 from 2.90 m and 0.50, respectively, to 2.75 m and 0.54, respectively, by correcting the SRTM using the SBAS algorithm. Furthermore, we merged the datasets using linear regression and obtained improved forest heights with RMSE and R2 values of 2.68 m and 0.56, respectively. To generate a forest height map, we used NDVI from Optical imagery and masked heights below 2 m from each sensor. Thus, we excluded urban areas, “bare earth surfaces,” and mountain streams from each sensor’s imagery. Finally, we generated a forest height map by overlapping the datasets. The results of this study indicate that each sensor has the potential for not only determining forest height but also extracting complementary forest area information. Furthermore, this study demonstrates the potential for improvement using the SBAS algorithm and linear regression. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1155/2018/1593129 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2028885325</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2028885325</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c493t-eb76c6d4372c69fb7818a7db71e6943f733a75aa02a902872a1d3b6c73ea7a783</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0M9LwzAUB_AgCs7pzbMUPGpdfiw_epS5OUUR1IG38NqmW8fW1CRD9t-b2aFHT3mQz0ve-yJ0TvANIZwPKCZqQHjGCM0OUI8IJVNJhTr8rfnHMTrxfomxYJKxHnqcWGd8SEbQ2HabTE09X4Rk7EO9hlDbJpn5upknz5tVqNsVhMq6dfJq1jaY5M00P5d3EMCbcIqOKlh5c7Y_-2g2Gb-PpunTy_3D6PYpLYYZC6nJpShEOWSSFiKrcqmIAlnmkhiRDVkVxwLJATCFDFMlKZCS5aKQzIAEqVgfXXbvts5-buLwemk3rolfahoblOKM8qiuO1U4670zlW5d3MltNcF6l5bepaX3aUV-1fFF3ZTwVf-nLzptojEV_GmKseSYfQNQcXLb</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2028885325</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Forest Canopy Height Estimation Using Multiplatform Remote Sensing Dataset</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Lee, Won-Jin ; Lee, Chang-Wook</creator><contributor>Lupan, Oleg ; Oleg Lupan</contributor><creatorcontrib>Lee, Won-Jin ; Lee, Chang-Wook ; Lupan, Oleg ; Oleg Lupan</creatorcontrib><description>Recently, numerous studies have attempted to determine forest height using remote sensing techniques that not only have the benefits of fast data acquisition, processing, and analysis but are also cost-effective. However, if there was insufficient data to apply the latest remote sensing techniques, we need to consider many kinds of datasets as possible. In this study, we tried to determine forest height using discrete-return LiDAR data, SRTM, satellite L-band SAR data, and Optical data. We experimented with the differences between LiDAR DSM and DTM, as well as SRTM DSM and LiDAR DTM. In addition, we applied an SBAS algorithm and linear regression to the dataset. From the quantitative evaluation, the RMSE and R2 of the LiDAR-derived forest height (3.22 m and 0.43, resp.) and the SRTM-derived forest height (2.90 m and 0.50, resp.) were both reasonably good, especially when we consider data acquisition time differences and measurement errors in mountainous areas. Moreover, we slightly improved the RMSE and R2 from 2.90 m and 0.50, respectively, to 2.75 m and 0.54, respectively, by correcting the SRTM using the SBAS algorithm. Furthermore, we merged the datasets using linear regression and obtained improved forest heights with RMSE and R2 values of 2.68 m and 0.56, respectively. To generate a forest height map, we used NDVI from Optical imagery and masked heights below 2 m from each sensor. Thus, we excluded urban areas, “bare earth surfaces,” and mountain streams from each sensor’s imagery. Finally, we generated a forest height map by overlapping the datasets. The results of this study indicate that each sensor has the potential for not only determining forest height but also extracting complementary forest area information. Furthermore, this study demonstrates the potential for improvement using the SBAS algorithm and linear regression.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1687-725X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1687-7268</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1155/2018/1593129</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cairo, Egypt: Hindawi Publishing Corporation</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Cost analysis ; Datasets ; Detection ; Earth science ; Forests ; Imagery ; Lasers ; Lidar ; Mountain streams ; Mountainous areas ; Quantitative analysis ; Regression analysis ; Remote sensing ; Sensors ; Studies ; Topography ; Trees ; Urban areas ; Vegetation</subject><ispartof>Journal of sensors, 2018-01, Vol.2018 (2018), p.1-9</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2018 Won-Jin Lee and Chang-Wook Lee.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 Won-Jin Lee and Chang-Wook Lee.; This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c493t-eb76c6d4372c69fb7818a7db71e6943f733a75aa02a902872a1d3b6c73ea7a783</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c493t-eb76c6d4372c69fb7818a7db71e6943f733a75aa02a902872a1d3b6c73ea7a783</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7235-3225 ; 0000-0001-5541-2617</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2028885325/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2028885325?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,25753,27924,27925,37012,44590,75126</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Lupan, Oleg</contributor><contributor>Oleg Lupan</contributor><creatorcontrib>Lee, Won-Jin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Chang-Wook</creatorcontrib><title>Forest Canopy Height Estimation Using Multiplatform Remote Sensing Dataset</title><title>Journal of sensors</title><description>Recently, numerous studies have attempted to determine forest height using remote sensing techniques that not only have the benefits of fast data acquisition, processing, and analysis but are also cost-effective. However, if there was insufficient data to apply the latest remote sensing techniques, we need to consider many kinds of datasets as possible. In this study, we tried to determine forest height using discrete-return LiDAR data, SRTM, satellite L-band SAR data, and Optical data. We experimented with the differences between LiDAR DSM and DTM, as well as SRTM DSM and LiDAR DTM. In addition, we applied an SBAS algorithm and linear regression to the dataset. From the quantitative evaluation, the RMSE and R2 of the LiDAR-derived forest height (3.22 m and 0.43, resp.) and the SRTM-derived forest height (2.90 m and 0.50, resp.) were both reasonably good, especially when we consider data acquisition time differences and measurement errors in mountainous areas. Moreover, we slightly improved the RMSE and R2 from 2.90 m and 0.50, respectively, to 2.75 m and 0.54, respectively, by correcting the SRTM using the SBAS algorithm. Furthermore, we merged the datasets using linear regression and obtained improved forest heights with RMSE and R2 values of 2.68 m and 0.56, respectively. To generate a forest height map, we used NDVI from Optical imagery and masked heights below 2 m from each sensor. Thus, we excluded urban areas, “bare earth surfaces,” and mountain streams from each sensor’s imagery. Finally, we generated a forest height map by overlapping the datasets. The results of this study indicate that each sensor has the potential for not only determining forest height but also extracting complementary forest area information. Furthermore, this study demonstrates the potential for improvement using the SBAS algorithm and linear regression.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Cost analysis</subject><subject>Datasets</subject><subject>Detection</subject><subject>Earth science</subject><subject>Forests</subject><subject>Imagery</subject><subject>Lasers</subject><subject>Lidar</subject><subject>Mountain streams</subject><subject>Mountainous areas</subject><subject>Quantitative analysis</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Remote sensing</subject><subject>Sensors</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Topography</subject><subject>Trees</subject><subject>Urban areas</subject><subject>Vegetation</subject><issn>1687-725X</issn><issn>1687-7268</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0M9LwzAUB_AgCs7pzbMUPGpdfiw_epS5OUUR1IG38NqmW8fW1CRD9t-b2aFHT3mQz0ve-yJ0TvANIZwPKCZqQHjGCM0OUI8IJVNJhTr8rfnHMTrxfomxYJKxHnqcWGd8SEbQ2HabTE09X4Rk7EO9hlDbJpn5upknz5tVqNsVhMq6dfJq1jaY5M00P5d3EMCbcIqOKlh5c7Y_-2g2Gb-PpunTy_3D6PYpLYYZC6nJpShEOWSSFiKrcqmIAlnmkhiRDVkVxwLJATCFDFMlKZCS5aKQzIAEqVgfXXbvts5-buLwemk3rolfahoblOKM8qiuO1U4670zlW5d3MltNcF6l5bepaX3aUV-1fFF3ZTwVf-nLzptojEV_GmKseSYfQNQcXLb</recordid><startdate>20180101</startdate><enddate>20180101</enddate><creator>Lee, Won-Jin</creator><creator>Lee, Chang-Wook</creator><general>Hindawi Publishing Corporation</general><general>Hindawi</general><general>Hindawi Limited</general><scope>ADJCN</scope><scope>AHFXO</scope><scope>RHU</scope><scope>RHW</scope><scope>RHX</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AL</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CWDGH</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>M0N</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7235-3225</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5541-2617</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180101</creationdate><title>Forest Canopy Height Estimation Using Multiplatform Remote Sensing Dataset</title><author>Lee, Won-Jin ; Lee, Chang-Wook</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c493t-eb76c6d4372c69fb7818a7db71e6943f733a75aa02a902872a1d3b6c73ea7a783</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Cost analysis</topic><topic>Datasets</topic><topic>Detection</topic><topic>Earth science</topic><topic>Forests</topic><topic>Imagery</topic><topic>Lasers</topic><topic>Lidar</topic><topic>Mountain streams</topic><topic>Mountainous areas</topic><topic>Quantitative analysis</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Remote sensing</topic><topic>Sensors</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Topography</topic><topic>Trees</topic><topic>Urban areas</topic><topic>Vegetation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lee, Won-Jin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Chang-Wook</creatorcontrib><collection>الدوريات العلمية والإحصائية - e-Marefa Academic and Statistical Periodicals</collection><collection>معرفة - المحتوى العربي الأكاديمي المتكامل - e-Marefa Academic Complete</collection><collection>Hindawi Publishing Complete</collection><collection>Hindawi Publishing Subscription Journals</collection><collection>Hindawi Publishing Open Access Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Computing Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Middle East & Africa Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computing Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Journal of sensors</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lee, Won-Jin</au><au>Lee, Chang-Wook</au><au>Lupan, Oleg</au><au>Oleg Lupan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Forest Canopy Height Estimation Using Multiplatform Remote Sensing Dataset</atitle><jtitle>Journal of sensors</jtitle><date>2018-01-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>2018</volume><issue>2018</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>9</epage><pages>1-9</pages><issn>1687-725X</issn><eissn>1687-7268</eissn><abstract>Recently, numerous studies have attempted to determine forest height using remote sensing techniques that not only have the benefits of fast data acquisition, processing, and analysis but are also cost-effective. However, if there was insufficient data to apply the latest remote sensing techniques, we need to consider many kinds of datasets as possible. In this study, we tried to determine forest height using discrete-return LiDAR data, SRTM, satellite L-band SAR data, and Optical data. We experimented with the differences between LiDAR DSM and DTM, as well as SRTM DSM and LiDAR DTM. In addition, we applied an SBAS algorithm and linear regression to the dataset. From the quantitative evaluation, the RMSE and R2 of the LiDAR-derived forest height (3.22 m and 0.43, resp.) and the SRTM-derived forest height (2.90 m and 0.50, resp.) were both reasonably good, especially when we consider data acquisition time differences and measurement errors in mountainous areas. Moreover, we slightly improved the RMSE and R2 from 2.90 m and 0.50, respectively, to 2.75 m and 0.54, respectively, by correcting the SRTM using the SBAS algorithm. Furthermore, we merged the datasets using linear regression and obtained improved forest heights with RMSE and R2 values of 2.68 m and 0.56, respectively. To generate a forest height map, we used NDVI from Optical imagery and masked heights below 2 m from each sensor. Thus, we excluded urban areas, “bare earth surfaces,” and mountain streams from each sensor’s imagery. Finally, we generated a forest height map by overlapping the datasets. The results of this study indicate that each sensor has the potential for not only determining forest height but also extracting complementary forest area information. Furthermore, this study demonstrates the potential for improvement using the SBAS algorithm and linear regression.</abstract><cop>Cairo, Egypt</cop><pub>Hindawi Publishing Corporation</pub><doi>10.1155/2018/1593129</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7235-3225</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5541-2617</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1687-725X |
ispartof | Journal of sensors, 2018-01, Vol.2018 (2018), p.1-9 |
issn | 1687-725X 1687-7268 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2028885325 |
source | Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles; Publicly Available Content Database |
subjects | Algorithms Cost analysis Datasets Detection Earth science Forests Imagery Lasers Lidar Mountain streams Mountainous areas Quantitative analysis Regression analysis Remote sensing Sensors Studies Topography Trees Urban areas Vegetation |
title | Forest Canopy Height Estimation Using Multiplatform Remote Sensing Dataset |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T11%3A07%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Forest%20Canopy%20Height%20Estimation%20Using%20Multiplatform%20Remote%20Sensing%20Dataset&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20sensors&rft.au=Lee,%20Won-Jin&rft.date=2018-01-01&rft.volume=2018&rft.issue=2018&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=9&rft.pages=1-9&rft.issn=1687-725X&rft.eissn=1687-7268&rft_id=info:doi/10.1155/2018/1593129&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2028885325%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c493t-eb76c6d4372c69fb7818a7db71e6943f733a75aa02a902872a1d3b6c73ea7a783%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2028885325&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |