Loading…
Encapsulation challenges, the substantial issue in solid lipid nanoparticles characterization
Solid lipid nanoparticles (SLNs), as alternative colloidal carriers, have been used for the sustained release of lipophilic drugs with poor water solubility. One of the most important parameters in the characterization of SLNs is entrapment efficiency (EE). Despite the importance of this factor in e...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of cellular biochemistry 2018-06, Vol.119 (6), p.4251-4264 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Solid lipid nanoparticles (SLNs), as alternative colloidal carriers, have been used for the sustained release of lipophilic drugs with poor water solubility. One of the most important parameters in the characterization of SLNs is entrapment efficiency (EE). Despite the importance of this factor in estimating the drug loading capacity, EE does not always represent the exact percentage of the entrapped drug. Several variables such as the stirring speed and duration, and concentration of surfactant, emulsifier, and drug play important roles in determining the final EE. In addition, EE is mainly affected by the type and concentration of the lipid. There are two major methods for the measurement of EE are in which the encapsulated drug in SLNs is either directly measured (direct method) or the amount of unencapsulated drug in the supernatant is measured (indirect method). Accuracy of drug analysis is the main challenge for EE calculation, and is either performed in the separated aqueous medium or the particles. In this review, we aimed to introduce the available methods for EE determination in SLNs and discuss the advantages and shortcomings of each method.
In this review, we aimed to introduce the available methods for EE determination in SLNs and discuss the advantages and shortcomings of each method. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0730-2312 1097-4644 |
DOI: | 10.1002/jcb.26617 |