Contamination by Meat Juice When Shopping for Packages of Raw Poultry

Raw poultry products often are contaminated with Salmonella and Campylobacter, and these bacteria can be transmitted through meat juice on the packages. An observational study was conducted to assess consumer exposure to meat juice during shopping and to quantify the transmission of meat juice from...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of food protection 2018-05, Vol.81 (5), p.835-841
Main Authors: Chen, Fur-Chi, Godwin, Sandria, Chambers, Delores, Chambers, 4th, Edgar, Cates, Sheryl, Stone, Richard, Donelan, Amy
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Animals
Campylobacter
Checkout
Consumer behavior
Consumers
E coli
Escherichia coli
Food
Food contamination
Food contamination & poisoning
Food Contamination - analysis
Food irradiation
Food Packaging - methods
Food safety
Grocery stores
Hands
Immunoassay
Juices
Meat
Microorganisms
Observational studies
Packages
Packaging
Pathogens
Plastics
Poultry
Risk factors
Salmonella
Shopping
Studies
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Raw poultry products often are contaminated with Salmonella and Campylobacter, and these bacteria can be transmitted through meat juice on the packages. An observational study was conducted to assess consumer exposure to meat juice during shopping and to quantify the transmission of meat juice from poultry packages to hands and other surfaces. Ninety-six participants completed the shopping study; 402 swabs were collected and analyzed for the presence of meat juice by an immunoassay. Overall, meat juice was detected on 61% of poultry package surfaces, 34% of shoppers' hands, 41% of grocery bags, 60% of kitchen surfaces, and 51% of food item surfaces. When meat juice was detected on the purchased poultry packages, the chance of the meat juice being on the shopper's hands, grocery bags, food items, and kitchen surfaces was significantly higher ( P < 0.005) compared with packages on which meat juice was not present. Shoppers who had poultry wrapped separately during checkout had a significantly lower ( P < 0.05) chance of meat juice on the food items. However, using plastic bags and wrapping poultry separately did not significantly reduce the likelihood of meat juice on kitchen surfaces at home due to consumers' practices of repackaging before storage. Results suggested that the transfer of meat juice through direct contact with the poultry packages is a major concern during shopping and should be prevented.
ISSN:0362-028X
1944-9097
DOI:10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-17-467