Insights into the black box of child care supply: Predictors of provider participation in the Massachusetts child care subsidy system

• Published in: Children and youth services review 2017-08, Vol.79, p.148-159
• Main Authors: Giapponi Schneider, Kate, Erickson Warfield, Marji, Joshi, Pamela, Ha, Yoonsook, Hodgkin, Dominic
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Access; Center-based child care; Child care; Child care access; Child care subsidies; Child development; Children; Day care centers; Families & family life; Family child care; Females; Law; Low income groups; Market value; Medical personnel; Nonprofit; Participation; Prices; Private sector; Quality; Quality of care; Recruitment; Regression analysis; Subsidies; Tactics; Women
• ISSN: 0190-7409; 1873-7765
• DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2017.06.014

The United States child care subsidy system relies on the voluntary participation of private providers in the market in order for low-income families to access otherwise unaffordable care. However, with few states able to pay child care providers subsidy payment rates at market value (National Women's Law Center, 2015) and increasing pressure for providers to improve their quality of care (Child Care and Development Fund [CCDF] Program, 2016), there is concern at the federal level regarding the supply of providers willing to participate in the subsidy system (CCDF Program, 2016; Schumacher, 2015). Using administrative data from Massachusetts, this study examines the factors associated with provider participation in the child care subsidy system. Findings from logistic regression analyses indicate that lower administrative capacity, higher private pay prices (in comparison to the subsidy payment rate), and higher local market household income may limit or reduce opportunities for participation in the subsidy system. Results also suggest that for-profit providers are not avoiding participating in the subsidy system, but may find participation challenging if subsidy payment rates are too low (compared to private pay prices). Additionally, although the total pool of accredited providers is small, accredited providers have greater odds of participation compared to non-accredited providers, indicating that families may have some access to quality care. These findings suggest that states should focus on identifying 1) ways to ease administrative impediments to entry into the subsidy system, 2) effective provider recruitment tactics, and 3) monetary/non-monetary incentive structures that can build a large and diverse supply of high quality subsidized care. •Factors associated with provider participation in the subsidy system are examined.•Higher administrative capacity facilitates subsidy system participation.•Higher private pay prices act as barriers to subsidy system participation.•Local market forces are significant determinants of subsidy participation.•For-profit providers have greater odds of participating compared to non-profits.