Loading…
Archaeological Cultures and Cultural Affiliation: Hopi and Zuni Perspectives in the American Southwest
Archaeologists and Native Americans apply different concepts to classify ancient groups of people who lived in the past. This is a topic of current interest because many archaeologists in the United States are now having to determine the cultural affiliation of the materials they study to comply wit...
Saved in:
Published in: | American antiquity 1997-10, Vol.62 (4), p.600-608 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c610t-6a991b2e5a23e48c47000bce85c8c7ad3c4bf3e04198fb66950c2d0a0527c6163 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c610t-6a991b2e5a23e48c47000bce85c8c7ad3c4bf3e04198fb66950c2d0a0527c6163 |
container_end_page | 608 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 600 |
container_title | American antiquity |
container_volume | 62 |
creator | Dongoske, Kurt E. Yeatts, Michael Anyon, Roger Ferguson, T. J. |
description | Archaeologists and Native Americans apply different concepts to classify ancient groups of people who lived in the past. This is a topic of current interest because many archaeologists in the United States are now having to determine the cultural affiliation of the materials they study to comply with the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act. The Hopi and Zuni tribes in the American Southwest are used as case examples to examine how and why archaeological and tribal views of cultural affiliation are divergent. We suggest anthropological perspectives of culture need to be reintegrated into archaeological theory in collaboration with Native Americans in order to interpret the past in a manner that is both useful and interesting to the multiple audiences interested in our work. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2307/281880 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_203262088</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_2307_281880</cupid><galeid>A20574339</galeid><jstor_id>281880</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A20574339</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c610t-6a991b2e5a23e48c47000bce85c8c7ad3c4bf3e04198fb66950c2d0a0527c6163</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0luLEzEUAOBBFKyr_oZBRfZhR0-SuWR8G4u2heIKqy--hEzmTJsyTbpJxtV_b7TFpdCFkoeQ5MvJ5ZwkeUngHWVQvaeccA6PkglltMgKKPPHyQQAaFYxUj5Nnnm_ASAMGJ8kfePUWqId7EorOaTTcQijQ59K0x0Gcbbpez1oGbQ1H9K53el_yz9Go9Ov6PwOVdA_4yZt0rDGtNmii9FMemPHsL5DH54nT3o5eHxx6C-S758_fZvOs-X1bDFtlpkqCYSslHVNWoqFpAxzrvIq3rtVyAvFVSU7pvK2Zwg5qXnflmVdgKIdSChoFSOU7CJ5tY-7c_Z2jAeLjR2diUcKCoyWFDiP6PVDiORVTimJMqqrvVrJAYU2vQ1OqhUajD9iDcYfQdFQKKqcsTry7ASPrcOtVqf85ZGPJOCvsJKj92Jx8-VsOl-cTT_OzqV8tjyiV6eossOAKxQxg9PrI_52z5Wz3jvsxc7prXS_BQHxt0TFvkQjfHNIhPSx-HonjdL-v6Z5UVeU3edr44N1Dwc7vEfJbet0Fy92n9Zj-gfGa_ZE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1474221326</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Archaeological Cultures and Cultural Affiliation: Hopi and Zuni Perspectives in the American Southwest</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection【Remote access available】</source><source>International Bibliography of Art (IBA)</source><creator>Dongoske, Kurt E. ; Yeatts, Michael ; Anyon, Roger ; Ferguson, T. J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Dongoske, Kurt E. ; Yeatts, Michael ; Anyon, Roger ; Ferguson, T. J.</creatorcontrib><description>Archaeologists and Native Americans apply different concepts to classify ancient groups of people who lived in the past. This is a topic of current interest because many archaeologists in the United States are now having to determine the cultural affiliation of the materials they study to comply with the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act. The Hopi and Zuni tribes in the American Southwest are used as case examples to examine how and why archaeological and tribal views of cultural affiliation are divergent. We suggest anthropological perspectives of culture need to be reintegrated into archaeological theory in collaboration with Native Americans in order to interpret the past in a manner that is both useful and interesting to the multiple audiences interested in our work.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-7316</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2325-5064</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2307/281880</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AANTAM</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, US: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Archaeological paradigms ; Archaeological sites ; Archaeology ; Case studies ; Civilization ; Clans ; Culture ; Culture historical archaeology ; Generalities ; Historical archaeology ; History ; Hopis ; Material culture ; Native Americans ; Native North Americans ; Oral history ; Oral tradition ; Organisation and history of research ; Penutian languages ; Prehistory and protohistory ; Social archaeology ; Uto-Aztecan languages ; Zunis</subject><ispartof>American antiquity, 1997-10, Vol.62 (4), p.600-608</ispartof><rights>Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 1997</rights><rights>Copyright 1997 The Society for American Archaeology</rights><rights>1998 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 1997 Cambridge University Press</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 1997 Cambridge University Press</rights><rights>Copyright Society for American Archaeology Oct 1997</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c610t-6a991b2e5a23e48c47000bce85c8c7ad3c4bf3e04198fb66950c2d0a0527c6163</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c610t-6a991b2e5a23e48c47000bce85c8c7ad3c4bf3e04198fb66950c2d0a0527c6163</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/281880$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/281880$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,33461,58238,58471</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=2459723$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dongoske, Kurt E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yeatts, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anyon, Roger</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferguson, T. J.</creatorcontrib><title>Archaeological Cultures and Cultural Affiliation: Hopi and Zuni Perspectives in the American Southwest</title><title>American antiquity</title><addtitle>Am. antiq</addtitle><description>Archaeologists and Native Americans apply different concepts to classify ancient groups of people who lived in the past. This is a topic of current interest because many archaeologists in the United States are now having to determine the cultural affiliation of the materials they study to comply with the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act. The Hopi and Zuni tribes in the American Southwest are used as case examples to examine how and why archaeological and tribal views of cultural affiliation are divergent. We suggest anthropological perspectives of culture need to be reintegrated into archaeological theory in collaboration with Native Americans in order to interpret the past in a manner that is both useful and interesting to the multiple audiences interested in our work.</description><subject>Archaeological paradigms</subject><subject>Archaeological sites</subject><subject>Archaeology</subject><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Civilization</subject><subject>Clans</subject><subject>Culture</subject><subject>Culture historical archaeology</subject><subject>Generalities</subject><subject>Historical archaeology</subject><subject>History</subject><subject>Hopis</subject><subject>Material culture</subject><subject>Native Americans</subject><subject>Native North Americans</subject><subject>Oral history</subject><subject>Oral tradition</subject><subject>Organisation and history of research</subject><subject>Penutian languages</subject><subject>Prehistory and protohistory</subject><subject>Social archaeology</subject><subject>Uto-Aztecan languages</subject><subject>Zunis</subject><issn>0002-7316</issn><issn>2325-5064</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8XN</sourceid><recordid>eNqN0luLEzEUAOBBFKyr_oZBRfZhR0-SuWR8G4u2heIKqy--hEzmTJsyTbpJxtV_b7TFpdCFkoeQ5MvJ5ZwkeUngHWVQvaeccA6PkglltMgKKPPHyQQAaFYxUj5Nnnm_ASAMGJ8kfePUWqId7EorOaTTcQijQ59K0x0Gcbbpez1oGbQ1H9K53el_yz9Go9Ov6PwOVdA_4yZt0rDGtNmii9FMemPHsL5DH54nT3o5eHxx6C-S758_fZvOs-X1bDFtlpkqCYSslHVNWoqFpAxzrvIq3rtVyAvFVSU7pvK2Zwg5qXnflmVdgKIdSChoFSOU7CJ5tY-7c_Z2jAeLjR2diUcKCoyWFDiP6PVDiORVTimJMqqrvVrJAYU2vQ1OqhUajD9iDcYfQdFQKKqcsTry7ASPrcOtVqf85ZGPJOCvsJKj92Jx8-VsOl-cTT_OzqV8tjyiV6eossOAKxQxg9PrI_52z5Wz3jvsxc7prXS_BQHxt0TFvkQjfHNIhPSx-HonjdL-v6Z5UVeU3edr44N1Dwc7vEfJbet0Fy92n9Zj-gfGa_ZE</recordid><startdate>19971001</startdate><enddate>19971001</enddate><creator>Dongoske, Kurt E.</creator><creator>Yeatts, Michael</creator><creator>Anyon, Roger</creator><creator>Ferguson, T. J.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><general>Society for American Archaeology</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8GL</scope><scope>IBG</scope><scope>IHI</scope><scope>ISN</scope><scope>FIXVA</scope><scope>FKUCP</scope><scope>HZAIM</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>8XN</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19971001</creationdate><title>Archaeological Cultures and Cultural Affiliation: Hopi and Zuni Perspectives in the American Southwest</title><author>Dongoske, Kurt E. ; Yeatts, Michael ; Anyon, Roger ; Ferguson, T. J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c610t-6a991b2e5a23e48c47000bce85c8c7ad3c4bf3e04198fb66950c2d0a0527c6163</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>Archaeological paradigms</topic><topic>Archaeological sites</topic><topic>Archaeology</topic><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Civilization</topic><topic>Clans</topic><topic>Culture</topic><topic>Culture historical archaeology</topic><topic>Generalities</topic><topic>Historical archaeology</topic><topic>History</topic><topic>Hopis</topic><topic>Material culture</topic><topic>Native Americans</topic><topic>Native North Americans</topic><topic>Oral history</topic><topic>Oral tradition</topic><topic>Organisation and history of research</topic><topic>Penutian languages</topic><topic>Prehistory and protohistory</topic><topic>Social archaeology</topic><topic>Uto-Aztecan languages</topic><topic>Zunis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dongoske, Kurt E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yeatts, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anyon, Roger</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferguson, T. J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: High School</collection><collection>Biography Resource Center</collection><collection>Gale In Context: U.S. History</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Canada</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 03</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 04</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 26</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>International Bibliography of Art (IBA)</collection><jtitle>American antiquity</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dongoske, Kurt E.</au><au>Yeatts, Michael</au><au>Anyon, Roger</au><au>Ferguson, T. J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Archaeological Cultures and Cultural Affiliation: Hopi and Zuni Perspectives in the American Southwest</atitle><jtitle>American antiquity</jtitle><addtitle>Am. antiq</addtitle><date>1997-10-01</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>62</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>600</spage><epage>608</epage><pages>600-608</pages><issn>0002-7316</issn><eissn>2325-5064</eissn><coden>AANTAM</coden><abstract>Archaeologists and Native Americans apply different concepts to classify ancient groups of people who lived in the past. This is a topic of current interest because many archaeologists in the United States are now having to determine the cultural affiliation of the materials they study to comply with the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act. The Hopi and Zuni tribes in the American Southwest are used as case examples to examine how and why archaeological and tribal views of cultural affiliation are divergent. We suggest anthropological perspectives of culture need to be reintegrated into archaeological theory in collaboration with Native Americans in order to interpret the past in a manner that is both useful and interesting to the multiple audiences interested in our work.</abstract><cop>New York, US</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.2307/281880</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0002-7316 |
ispartof | American antiquity, 1997-10, Vol.62 (4), p.600-608 |
issn | 0002-7316 2325-5064 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_203262088 |
source | JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection【Remote access available】; International Bibliography of Art (IBA) |
subjects | Archaeological paradigms Archaeological sites Archaeology Case studies Civilization Clans Culture Culture historical archaeology Generalities Historical archaeology History Hopis Material culture Native Americans Native North Americans Oral history Oral tradition Organisation and history of research Penutian languages Prehistory and protohistory Social archaeology Uto-Aztecan languages Zunis |
title | Archaeological Cultures and Cultural Affiliation: Hopi and Zuni Perspectives in the American Southwest |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T06%3A45%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Archaeological%20Cultures%20and%20Cultural%20Affiliation:%20Hopi%20and%20Zuni%20Perspectives%20in%20the%20American%20Southwest&rft.jtitle=American%20antiquity&rft.au=Dongoske,%20Kurt%20E.&rft.date=1997-10-01&rft.volume=62&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=600&rft.epage=608&rft.pages=600-608&rft.issn=0002-7316&rft.eissn=2325-5064&rft.coden=AANTAM&rft_id=info:doi/10.2307/281880&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA20574339%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c610t-6a991b2e5a23e48c47000bce85c8c7ad3c4bf3e04198fb66950c2d0a0527c6163%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1474221326&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A20574339&rft_cupid=10_2307_281880&rft_jstor_id=281880&rfr_iscdi=true |