Loading…
Biface Reduction and the Measurement of Dalton Curation: A Southeastern United States Case Study
Stone tools were reduced during use, with implications both for classification and curation rates. Ballenger's “expended utility” (EU) is a continuous reduction measure devised for Dalton bifaces, described by its mean but also its distribution among specimens. We validate EU as a reduction mea...
Saved in:
Published in: | American antiquity 2007-01, Vol.72 (1), p.153-175 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c600t-ad295b77a57fcef3f3afe81c91931b3819d39efc872beba4f71262faad19faa63 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c600t-ad295b77a57fcef3f3afe81c91931b3819d39efc872beba4f71262faad19faa63 |
container_end_page | 175 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 153 |
container_title | American antiquity |
container_volume | 72 |
creator | Shott, Michael J. Ballenger, Jesse A. M. |
description | Stone tools were reduced during use, with implications both for classification and curation rates. Ballenger's “expended utility” (EU) is a continuous reduction measure devised for Dalton bifaces, described by its mean but also its distribution among specimens. We validate EU as a reduction measure by reference to experimental and contextual controls. We compare EU between the “special context” Dalton assemblages Sloan and Hawkins in Arkansas and Ballenger's eastern Oklahoma “occupation context” ones. Then we fit EU distributions to mathematical functions to model the curation process. Results show that Oklahoma bifaces were better curated than Arkansas ones. Fitting distributions to the Gompertz-Makeham model efficiently describes distributions' shape and scale, which are as important to know as central tendency. Curation is not a categorical state but a continuous variable whose complex variation implicates complex causes. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2307/40035302 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_203263072</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_2307_40035302</cupid><galeid>A161023972</galeid><jstor_id>40035302</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A161023972</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c600t-ad295b77a57fcef3f3afe81c91931b3819d39efc872beba4f71262faad19faa63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0v9rEzEUAPBDFKxT8E8IgqDCzXy5r_7WndoVqgPrfj7f5V5qyjWZSQ7cf2-2dhtlRUogCckneSHvJclrRk-5oOXHjFKRC8qfJBMueJ7mtMieJhNKKU9LwYrnyQvv15QyQUU1SX6daQUSyQ_sRxm0NQRMT8JvJN8Q_OhwgyYQq8hnGELcbUYHN-wTmZKlHSMEH9AZcml0wJ4sAwT0pAGPcT721y-TZwoGj69240ly-fXLz-Y8XVzM5s10kcqC0pBCz-u8K0vISyVRCSVAYcVkzWrBOlGxuhc1KlmVvMMOMlUyXnAF0LM69oU4Sd5s771y9s-IPrRrOzoTQ7acCl7Ev-ERpVu0ggFbbZQNDuQKDToYrEGl4_KUFYxyUd_60wM-th43Wh488H7vQDQB_4YVjN638-X34-35_Hh7NjvaVrPFvk0PWWmHAVfYxgw1F_v-3dZLZ713qNorpzfgrltG25v6a-_qL9K3u4SAlzAoB0Zq_-CrmPcsow9u7YN1_7vvwy40bDqn-_i8-ww_wv8AWGvrwQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>203263072</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Biface Reduction and the Measurement of Dalton Curation: A Southeastern United States Case Study</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>International Bibliography of Art (IBA)</source><creator>Shott, Michael J. ; Ballenger, Jesse A. M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Shott, Michael J. ; Ballenger, Jesse A. M.</creatorcontrib><description>Stone tools were reduced during use, with implications both for classification and curation rates. Ballenger's “expended utility” (EU) is a continuous reduction measure devised for Dalton bifaces, described by its mean but also its distribution among specimens. We validate EU as a reduction measure by reference to experimental and contextual controls. We compare EU between the “special context” Dalton assemblages Sloan and Hawkins in Arkansas and Ballenger's eastern Oklahoma “occupation context” ones. Then we fit EU distributions to mathematical functions to model the curation process. Results show that Oklahoma bifaces were better curated than Arkansas ones. Fitting distributions to the Gompertz-Makeham model efficiently describes distributions' shape and scale, which are as important to know as central tendency. Curation is not a categorical state but a continuous variable whose complex variation implicates complex causes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-7316</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2325-5064</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2307/40035302</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AANTAM</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, US: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Age ; Analysis ; Archaeological sites ; Archaeology ; Case studies ; Comparative analysis ; Context ; Data curation ; Excavation and methods ; Historic artifacts ; Historic preservation ; History of technology ; Interpretation, statistical and computer analysis ; Laboratory methods ; Lithic industry ; Mathematical models ; Measurement ; Measurement techniques ; Methodology and general studies ; Occupations ; Paleoanthropology ; Practice ; Prehistory and protohistory ; Projectiles ; Scrapers ; Stone implements ; Stone tools ; Typology, technology and attribute analysis ; Use life ; Validation studies</subject><ispartof>American antiquity, 2007-01, Vol.72 (1), p.153-175</ispartof><rights>Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 2007</rights><rights>Copyright 2007 Society for American Archaeology</rights><rights>2008 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2007 Cambridge University Press</rights><rights>Copyright Society for American Archaeology Jan 2007</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c600t-ad295b77a57fcef3f3afe81c91931b3819d39efc872beba4f71262faad19faa63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c600t-ad295b77a57fcef3f3afe81c91931b3819d39efc872beba4f71262faad19faa63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/40035302$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/40035302$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,4012,27910,27911,27912,33448,58225,58458</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=18600440$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shott, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ballenger, Jesse A. M.</creatorcontrib><title>Biface Reduction and the Measurement of Dalton Curation: A Southeastern United States Case Study</title><title>American antiquity</title><addtitle>Am. antiq</addtitle><description>Stone tools were reduced during use, with implications both for classification and curation rates. Ballenger's “expended utility” (EU) is a continuous reduction measure devised for Dalton bifaces, described by its mean but also its distribution among specimens. We validate EU as a reduction measure by reference to experimental and contextual controls. We compare EU between the “special context” Dalton assemblages Sloan and Hawkins in Arkansas and Ballenger's eastern Oklahoma “occupation context” ones. Then we fit EU distributions to mathematical functions to model the curation process. Results show that Oklahoma bifaces were better curated than Arkansas ones. Fitting distributions to the Gompertz-Makeham model efficiently describes distributions' shape and scale, which are as important to know as central tendency. Curation is not a categorical state but a continuous variable whose complex variation implicates complex causes.</description><subject>Age</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Archaeological sites</subject><subject>Archaeology</subject><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Context</subject><subject>Data curation</subject><subject>Excavation and methods</subject><subject>Historic artifacts</subject><subject>Historic preservation</subject><subject>History of technology</subject><subject>Interpretation, statistical and computer analysis</subject><subject>Laboratory methods</subject><subject>Lithic industry</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Measurement</subject><subject>Measurement techniques</subject><subject>Methodology and general studies</subject><subject>Occupations</subject><subject>Paleoanthropology</subject><subject>Practice</subject><subject>Prehistory and protohistory</subject><subject>Projectiles</subject><subject>Scrapers</subject><subject>Stone implements</subject><subject>Stone tools</subject><subject>Typology, technology and attribute analysis</subject><subject>Use life</subject><subject>Validation studies</subject><issn>0002-7316</issn><issn>2325-5064</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8XN</sourceid><recordid>eNqN0v9rEzEUAPBDFKxT8E8IgqDCzXy5r_7WndoVqgPrfj7f5V5qyjWZSQ7cf2-2dhtlRUogCckneSHvJclrRk-5oOXHjFKRC8qfJBMueJ7mtMieJhNKKU9LwYrnyQvv15QyQUU1SX6daQUSyQ_sRxm0NQRMT8JvJN8Q_OhwgyYQq8hnGELcbUYHN-wTmZKlHSMEH9AZcml0wJ4sAwT0pAGPcT721y-TZwoGj69240ly-fXLz-Y8XVzM5s10kcqC0pBCz-u8K0vISyVRCSVAYcVkzWrBOlGxuhc1KlmVvMMOMlUyXnAF0LM69oU4Sd5s771y9s-IPrRrOzoTQ7acCl7Ev-ERpVu0ggFbbZQNDuQKDToYrEGl4_KUFYxyUd_60wM-th43Wh488H7vQDQB_4YVjN638-X34-35_Hh7NjvaVrPFvk0PWWmHAVfYxgw1F_v-3dZLZ713qNorpzfgrltG25v6a-_qL9K3u4SAlzAoB0Zq_-CrmPcsow9u7YN1_7vvwy40bDqn-_i8-ww_wv8AWGvrwQ</recordid><startdate>200701</startdate><enddate>200701</enddate><creator>Shott, Michael J.</creator><creator>Ballenger, Jesse A. M.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><general>Society for American Archaeology</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8GL</scope><scope>IBG</scope><scope>IHI</scope><scope>ISN</scope><scope>8XN</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200701</creationdate><title>Biface Reduction and the Measurement of Dalton Curation: A Southeastern United States Case Study</title><author>Shott, Michael J. ; Ballenger, Jesse A. M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c600t-ad295b77a57fcef3f3afe81c91931b3819d39efc872beba4f71262faad19faa63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Age</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Archaeological sites</topic><topic>Archaeology</topic><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Context</topic><topic>Data curation</topic><topic>Excavation and methods</topic><topic>Historic artifacts</topic><topic>Historic preservation</topic><topic>History of technology</topic><topic>Interpretation, statistical and computer analysis</topic><topic>Laboratory methods</topic><topic>Lithic industry</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Measurement</topic><topic>Measurement techniques</topic><topic>Methodology and general studies</topic><topic>Occupations</topic><topic>Paleoanthropology</topic><topic>Practice</topic><topic>Prehistory and protohistory</topic><topic>Projectiles</topic><topic>Scrapers</topic><topic>Stone implements</topic><topic>Stone tools</topic><topic>Typology, technology and attribute analysis</topic><topic>Use life</topic><topic>Validation studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shott, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ballenger, Jesse A. M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: High School</collection><collection>Gale in Context : Biography</collection><collection>History Resource Center U.S.</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Canada</collection><collection>International Bibliography of Art (IBA)</collection><jtitle>American antiquity</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shott, Michael J.</au><au>Ballenger, Jesse A. M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Biface Reduction and the Measurement of Dalton Curation: A Southeastern United States Case Study</atitle><jtitle>American antiquity</jtitle><addtitle>Am. antiq</addtitle><date>2007-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>72</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>153</spage><epage>175</epage><pages>153-175</pages><issn>0002-7316</issn><eissn>2325-5064</eissn><coden>AANTAM</coden><abstract>Stone tools were reduced during use, with implications both for classification and curation rates. Ballenger's “expended utility” (EU) is a continuous reduction measure devised for Dalton bifaces, described by its mean but also its distribution among specimens. We validate EU as a reduction measure by reference to experimental and contextual controls. We compare EU between the “special context” Dalton assemblages Sloan and Hawkins in Arkansas and Ballenger's eastern Oklahoma “occupation context” ones. Then we fit EU distributions to mathematical functions to model the curation process. Results show that Oklahoma bifaces were better curated than Arkansas ones. Fitting distributions to the Gompertz-Makeham model efficiently describes distributions' shape and scale, which are as important to know as central tendency. Curation is not a categorical state but a continuous variable whose complex variation implicates complex causes.</abstract><cop>New York, US</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.2307/40035302</doi><tpages>23</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0002-7316 |
ispartof | American antiquity, 2007-01, Vol.72 (1), p.153-175 |
issn | 0002-7316 2325-5064 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_203263072 |
source | JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; International Bibliography of Art (IBA) |
subjects | Age Analysis Archaeological sites Archaeology Case studies Comparative analysis Context Data curation Excavation and methods Historic artifacts Historic preservation History of technology Interpretation, statistical and computer analysis Laboratory methods Lithic industry Mathematical models Measurement Measurement techniques Methodology and general studies Occupations Paleoanthropology Practice Prehistory and protohistory Projectiles Scrapers Stone implements Stone tools Typology, technology and attribute analysis Use life Validation studies |
title | Biface Reduction and the Measurement of Dalton Curation: A Southeastern United States Case Study |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T09%3A41%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Biface%20Reduction%20and%20the%20Measurement%20of%20Dalton%20Curation:%20A%20Southeastern%20United%20States%20Case%20Study&rft.jtitle=American%20antiquity&rft.au=Shott,%20Michael%20J.&rft.date=2007-01&rft.volume=72&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=153&rft.epage=175&rft.pages=153-175&rft.issn=0002-7316&rft.eissn=2325-5064&rft.coden=AANTAM&rft_id=info:doi/10.2307/40035302&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA161023972%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c600t-ad295b77a57fcef3f3afe81c91931b3819d39efc872beba4f71262faad19faa63%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=203263072&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A161023972&rft_cupid=10_2307_40035302&rft_jstor_id=40035302&rfr_iscdi=true |