Loading…

Biface Reduction and the Measurement of Dalton Curation: A Southeastern United States Case Study

Stone tools were reduced during use, with implications both for classification and curation rates. Ballenger's “expended utility” (EU) is a continuous reduction measure devised for Dalton bifaces, described by its mean but also its distribution among specimens. We validate EU as a reduction mea...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:American antiquity 2007-01, Vol.72 (1), p.153-175
Main Authors: Shott, Michael J., Ballenger, Jesse A. M.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c600t-ad295b77a57fcef3f3afe81c91931b3819d39efc872beba4f71262faad19faa63
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c600t-ad295b77a57fcef3f3afe81c91931b3819d39efc872beba4f71262faad19faa63
container_end_page 175
container_issue 1
container_start_page 153
container_title American antiquity
container_volume 72
creator Shott, Michael J.
Ballenger, Jesse A. M.
description Stone tools were reduced during use, with implications both for classification and curation rates. Ballenger's “expended utility” (EU) is a continuous reduction measure devised for Dalton bifaces, described by its mean but also its distribution among specimens. We validate EU as a reduction measure by reference to experimental and contextual controls. We compare EU between the “special context” Dalton assemblages Sloan and Hawkins in Arkansas and Ballenger's eastern Oklahoma “occupation context” ones. Then we fit EU distributions to mathematical functions to model the curation process. Results show that Oklahoma bifaces were better curated than Arkansas ones. Fitting distributions to the Gompertz-Makeham model efficiently describes distributions' shape and scale, which are as important to know as central tendency. Curation is not a categorical state but a continuous variable whose complex variation implicates complex causes.
doi_str_mv 10.2307/40035302
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_203263072</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_2307_40035302</cupid><galeid>A161023972</galeid><jstor_id>40035302</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A161023972</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c600t-ad295b77a57fcef3f3afe81c91931b3819d39efc872beba4f71262faad19faa63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0v9rEzEUAPBDFKxT8E8IgqDCzXy5r_7WndoVqgPrfj7f5V5qyjWZSQ7cf2-2dhtlRUogCckneSHvJclrRk-5oOXHjFKRC8qfJBMueJ7mtMieJhNKKU9LwYrnyQvv15QyQUU1SX6daQUSyQ_sRxm0NQRMT8JvJN8Q_OhwgyYQq8hnGELcbUYHN-wTmZKlHSMEH9AZcml0wJ4sAwT0pAGPcT721y-TZwoGj69240ly-fXLz-Y8XVzM5s10kcqC0pBCz-u8K0vISyVRCSVAYcVkzWrBOlGxuhc1KlmVvMMOMlUyXnAF0LM69oU4Sd5s771y9s-IPrRrOzoTQ7acCl7Ev-ERpVu0ggFbbZQNDuQKDToYrEGl4_KUFYxyUd_60wM-th43Wh488H7vQDQB_4YVjN638-X34-35_Hh7NjvaVrPFvk0PWWmHAVfYxgw1F_v-3dZLZ713qNorpzfgrltG25v6a-_qL9K3u4SAlzAoB0Zq_-CrmPcsow9u7YN1_7vvwy40bDqn-_i8-ww_wv8AWGvrwQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>203263072</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Biface Reduction and the Measurement of Dalton Curation: A Southeastern United States Case Study</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>International Bibliography of Art (IBA)</source><creator>Shott, Michael J. ; Ballenger, Jesse A. M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Shott, Michael J. ; Ballenger, Jesse A. M.</creatorcontrib><description>Stone tools were reduced during use, with implications both for classification and curation rates. Ballenger's “expended utility” (EU) is a continuous reduction measure devised for Dalton bifaces, described by its mean but also its distribution among specimens. We validate EU as a reduction measure by reference to experimental and contextual controls. We compare EU between the “special context” Dalton assemblages Sloan and Hawkins in Arkansas and Ballenger's eastern Oklahoma “occupation context” ones. Then we fit EU distributions to mathematical functions to model the curation process. Results show that Oklahoma bifaces were better curated than Arkansas ones. Fitting distributions to the Gompertz-Makeham model efficiently describes distributions' shape and scale, which are as important to know as central tendency. Curation is not a categorical state but a continuous variable whose complex variation implicates complex causes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-7316</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2325-5064</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2307/40035302</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AANTAM</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, US: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Age ; Analysis ; Archaeological sites ; Archaeology ; Case studies ; Comparative analysis ; Context ; Data curation ; Excavation and methods ; Historic artifacts ; Historic preservation ; History of technology ; Interpretation, statistical and computer analysis ; Laboratory methods ; Lithic industry ; Mathematical models ; Measurement ; Measurement techniques ; Methodology and general studies ; Occupations ; Paleoanthropology ; Practice ; Prehistory and protohistory ; Projectiles ; Scrapers ; Stone implements ; Stone tools ; Typology, technology and attribute analysis ; Use life ; Validation studies</subject><ispartof>American antiquity, 2007-01, Vol.72 (1), p.153-175</ispartof><rights>Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 2007</rights><rights>Copyright 2007 Society for American Archaeology</rights><rights>2008 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2007 Cambridge University Press</rights><rights>Copyright Society for American Archaeology Jan 2007</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c600t-ad295b77a57fcef3f3afe81c91931b3819d39efc872beba4f71262faad19faa63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c600t-ad295b77a57fcef3f3afe81c91931b3819d39efc872beba4f71262faad19faa63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/40035302$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/40035302$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,4012,27910,27911,27912,33448,58225,58458</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=18600440$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shott, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ballenger, Jesse A. M.</creatorcontrib><title>Biface Reduction and the Measurement of Dalton Curation: A Southeastern United States Case Study</title><title>American antiquity</title><addtitle>Am. antiq</addtitle><description>Stone tools were reduced during use, with implications both for classification and curation rates. Ballenger's “expended utility” (EU) is a continuous reduction measure devised for Dalton bifaces, described by its mean but also its distribution among specimens. We validate EU as a reduction measure by reference to experimental and contextual controls. We compare EU between the “special context” Dalton assemblages Sloan and Hawkins in Arkansas and Ballenger's eastern Oklahoma “occupation context” ones. Then we fit EU distributions to mathematical functions to model the curation process. Results show that Oklahoma bifaces were better curated than Arkansas ones. Fitting distributions to the Gompertz-Makeham model efficiently describes distributions' shape and scale, which are as important to know as central tendency. Curation is not a categorical state but a continuous variable whose complex variation implicates complex causes.</description><subject>Age</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Archaeological sites</subject><subject>Archaeology</subject><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Context</subject><subject>Data curation</subject><subject>Excavation and methods</subject><subject>Historic artifacts</subject><subject>Historic preservation</subject><subject>History of technology</subject><subject>Interpretation, statistical and computer analysis</subject><subject>Laboratory methods</subject><subject>Lithic industry</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Measurement</subject><subject>Measurement techniques</subject><subject>Methodology and general studies</subject><subject>Occupations</subject><subject>Paleoanthropology</subject><subject>Practice</subject><subject>Prehistory and protohistory</subject><subject>Projectiles</subject><subject>Scrapers</subject><subject>Stone implements</subject><subject>Stone tools</subject><subject>Typology, technology and attribute analysis</subject><subject>Use life</subject><subject>Validation studies</subject><issn>0002-7316</issn><issn>2325-5064</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8XN</sourceid><recordid>eNqN0v9rEzEUAPBDFKxT8E8IgqDCzXy5r_7WndoVqgPrfj7f5V5qyjWZSQ7cf2-2dhtlRUogCckneSHvJclrRk-5oOXHjFKRC8qfJBMueJ7mtMieJhNKKU9LwYrnyQvv15QyQUU1SX6daQUSyQ_sRxm0NQRMT8JvJN8Q_OhwgyYQq8hnGELcbUYHN-wTmZKlHSMEH9AZcml0wJ4sAwT0pAGPcT721y-TZwoGj69240ly-fXLz-Y8XVzM5s10kcqC0pBCz-u8K0vISyVRCSVAYcVkzWrBOlGxuhc1KlmVvMMOMlUyXnAF0LM69oU4Sd5s771y9s-IPrRrOzoTQ7acCl7Ev-ERpVu0ggFbbZQNDuQKDToYrEGl4_KUFYxyUd_60wM-th43Wh488H7vQDQB_4YVjN638-X34-35_Hh7NjvaVrPFvk0PWWmHAVfYxgw1F_v-3dZLZ713qNorpzfgrltG25v6a-_qL9K3u4SAlzAoB0Zq_-CrmPcsow9u7YN1_7vvwy40bDqn-_i8-ww_wv8AWGvrwQ</recordid><startdate>200701</startdate><enddate>200701</enddate><creator>Shott, Michael J.</creator><creator>Ballenger, Jesse A. M.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><general>Society for American Archaeology</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8GL</scope><scope>IBG</scope><scope>IHI</scope><scope>ISN</scope><scope>8XN</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200701</creationdate><title>Biface Reduction and the Measurement of Dalton Curation: A Southeastern United States Case Study</title><author>Shott, Michael J. ; Ballenger, Jesse A. M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c600t-ad295b77a57fcef3f3afe81c91931b3819d39efc872beba4f71262faad19faa63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Age</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Archaeological sites</topic><topic>Archaeology</topic><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Context</topic><topic>Data curation</topic><topic>Excavation and methods</topic><topic>Historic artifacts</topic><topic>Historic preservation</topic><topic>History of technology</topic><topic>Interpretation, statistical and computer analysis</topic><topic>Laboratory methods</topic><topic>Lithic industry</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Measurement</topic><topic>Measurement techniques</topic><topic>Methodology and general studies</topic><topic>Occupations</topic><topic>Paleoanthropology</topic><topic>Practice</topic><topic>Prehistory and protohistory</topic><topic>Projectiles</topic><topic>Scrapers</topic><topic>Stone implements</topic><topic>Stone tools</topic><topic>Typology, technology and attribute analysis</topic><topic>Use life</topic><topic>Validation studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shott, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ballenger, Jesse A. M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: High School</collection><collection>Gale in Context : Biography</collection><collection>History Resource Center U.S.</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Canada</collection><collection>International Bibliography of Art (IBA)</collection><jtitle>American antiquity</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shott, Michael J.</au><au>Ballenger, Jesse A. M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Biface Reduction and the Measurement of Dalton Curation: A Southeastern United States Case Study</atitle><jtitle>American antiquity</jtitle><addtitle>Am. antiq</addtitle><date>2007-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>72</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>153</spage><epage>175</epage><pages>153-175</pages><issn>0002-7316</issn><eissn>2325-5064</eissn><coden>AANTAM</coden><abstract>Stone tools were reduced during use, with implications both for classification and curation rates. Ballenger's “expended utility” (EU) is a continuous reduction measure devised for Dalton bifaces, described by its mean but also its distribution among specimens. We validate EU as a reduction measure by reference to experimental and contextual controls. We compare EU between the “special context” Dalton assemblages Sloan and Hawkins in Arkansas and Ballenger's eastern Oklahoma “occupation context” ones. Then we fit EU distributions to mathematical functions to model the curation process. Results show that Oklahoma bifaces were better curated than Arkansas ones. Fitting distributions to the Gompertz-Makeham model efficiently describes distributions' shape and scale, which are as important to know as central tendency. Curation is not a categorical state but a continuous variable whose complex variation implicates complex causes.</abstract><cop>New York, US</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.2307/40035302</doi><tpages>23</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-7316
ispartof American antiquity, 2007-01, Vol.72 (1), p.153-175
issn 0002-7316
2325-5064
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_203263072
source JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; International Bibliography of Art (IBA)
subjects Age
Analysis
Archaeological sites
Archaeology
Case studies
Comparative analysis
Context
Data curation
Excavation and methods
Historic artifacts
Historic preservation
History of technology
Interpretation, statistical and computer analysis
Laboratory methods
Lithic industry
Mathematical models
Measurement
Measurement techniques
Methodology and general studies
Occupations
Paleoanthropology
Practice
Prehistory and protohistory
Projectiles
Scrapers
Stone implements
Stone tools
Typology, technology and attribute analysis
Use life
Validation studies
title Biface Reduction and the Measurement of Dalton Curation: A Southeastern United States Case Study
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T09%3A41%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Biface%20Reduction%20and%20the%20Measurement%20of%20Dalton%20Curation:%20A%20Southeastern%20United%20States%20Case%20Study&rft.jtitle=American%20antiquity&rft.au=Shott,%20Michael%20J.&rft.date=2007-01&rft.volume=72&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=153&rft.epage=175&rft.pages=153-175&rft.issn=0002-7316&rft.eissn=2325-5064&rft.coden=AANTAM&rft_id=info:doi/10.2307/40035302&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA161023972%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c600t-ad295b77a57fcef3f3afe81c91931b3819d39efc872beba4f71262faad19faa63%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=203263072&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A161023972&rft_cupid=10_2307_40035302&rft_jstor_id=40035302&rfr_iscdi=true