Loading…
The Adoption of the Bow and Arrow in Eastern North America: A View from Central Arkansas
North American archaeologists have long been interested in distinguishing between dart and arrow points in order to establish when bow-and-arrow technology was adopted in the Eastern Woodlands. A quantitative analysis of point form and qualitative reconstructions of bifacial reduction trajectories f...
Saved in:
Published in: | American antiquity 1999-04, Vol.64 (2), p.243-263 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c614t-1d36d7731bbabd5fd826b72bae9eaaedbc405bb007244fd34acbd72d0e83c3133 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c614t-1d36d7731bbabd5fd826b72bae9eaaedbc405bb007244fd34acbd72d0e83c3133 |
container_end_page | 263 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 243 |
container_title | American antiquity |
container_volume | 64 |
creator | Nassaney, Michael S. Pyle, Kendra |
description | North American archaeologists have long been interested in distinguishing between dart and arrow points in order to establish when bow-and-arrow technology was adopted in the Eastern Woodlands. A quantitative analysis of point form and qualitative reconstructions of bifacial reduction trajectories from Plum Bayou culture sites in central Arkansas indicate that arrow points were abruptly adopted and became widespread about A.D. 600. Moreover, arrow points are metrically discrete entities that were not developed through gradual modification of dart points in this region as appears to be the case elsewhere. Comparisons with patterns observed in other regions of the East show significant variation in the timing, rate, and direction of the adoption of the bow and arrow, as well as the role of this technological change in Native American economies and sociopolitics. These observations suggest that the bow and arrow were: (1) introduced significantly earlier than some researchers have posited; (2) independently invented by some groups and diffused to others; and (3) relinquished and later readopted in some areas of the Eastern Woodlands in response to changing social, historical, and environmental conditions. Our data also call into question simple unilinear or diffusionary models that claim to explain the development and spread of this technological innovation. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2307/2694277 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_203267264</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_2307_2694277</cupid><galeid>A54895664</galeid><jstor_id>2694277</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A54895664</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c614t-1d36d7731bbabd5fd826b72bae9eaaedbc405bb007244fd34acbd72d0e83c3133</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0ltv0zAUAOAIgUQZiL9gARIgLeDYjp3wllWjq1RtDwzEW-TLSZeS2J3tavDvMbRiKiqo8oMv-nyOrXOy7HmB3xGKxXvCa0aEeJBNCCVlXmLOHmYTjDHJBS344-xJCCuMC4ppNcm-Xt8Aaoxbx95Z5DoU0_7M3SFpDWq8T6veonMZIniLLp2PN6gZwfdafkAN-tLDHeq8G9EUbPRySHe-SRtkeJo96uQQ4NluPsk-fzy_nl7ki6vZfNoscs0LFvPCUG5EephSUpmyMxXhShAloQYpwSjNcKkUxoIw1hnKpFZGEIOhopoWlJ5kL7Zx197dbiDEduU23qaULcGUcEE4S-jlv1DBBCNFXYk6qdOtWsoB2t52Lv1IL8FC-piz0PXpuClZVZf8d9D8AE_DwNjrQ_7Nnk8kwve4lJsQ2vmny6PpxfxoejY7llazxR49PUS1GwZYQpsqOL3a46-3XHsXgoeuXft-lP5HW-D2V1e2u65M8tWuEjJoOXReWt2HP5zg1LS8vGerEJ3_T7S3u7xyVL436Wn3hf3L_gQPxPHo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1474219879</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Adoption of the Bow and Arrow in Eastern North America: A View from Central Arkansas</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>International Bibliography of Art (IBA)</source><creator>Nassaney, Michael S. ; Pyle, Kendra</creator><creatorcontrib>Nassaney, Michael S. ; Pyle, Kendra</creatorcontrib><description>North American archaeologists have long been interested in distinguishing between dart and arrow points in order to establish when bow-and-arrow technology was adopted in the Eastern Woodlands. A quantitative analysis of point form and qualitative reconstructions of bifacial reduction trajectories from Plum Bayou culture sites in central Arkansas indicate that arrow points were abruptly adopted and became widespread about A.D. 600. Moreover, arrow points are metrically discrete entities that were not developed through gradual modification of dart points in this region as appears to be the case elsewhere. Comparisons with patterns observed in other regions of the East show significant variation in the timing, rate, and direction of the adoption of the bow and arrow, as well as the role of this technological change in Native American economies and sociopolitics. These observations suggest that the bow and arrow were: (1) introduced significantly earlier than some researchers have posited; (2) independently invented by some groups and diffused to others; and (3) relinquished and later readopted in some areas of the Eastern Woodlands in response to changing social, historical, and environmental conditions. Our data also call into question simple unilinear or diffusionary models that claim to explain the development and spread of this technological innovation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-7316</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2325-5064</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2307/2694277</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AANTAM</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, US: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>America and Arctic regions ; Anthropology ; Antiquities ; Archaeological surveys ; Archaeology ; Archery ; Archery equipment ; Arrowheads ; Arrows ; Atlatls ; Bayous ; Bow and arrow ; History ; History of technology ; Native American antiquities ; Native Americans ; North America ; Paleoanthropology ; Preceramic cultures ; Prehistory and protohistory ; Projectile points ; Projectile points (Archaeology) ; Projectiles ; Quantitative analysis ; Stone tools ; Woodlands</subject><ispartof>American antiquity, 1999-04, Vol.64 (2), p.243-263</ispartof><rights>Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 1999</rights><rights>Copyright 1999 Society for American Archaeology</rights><rights>1999 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 1999 Cambridge University Press</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 1999 Cambridge University Press</rights><rights>Copyright Society for American Archaeology Apr 1999</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c614t-1d36d7731bbabd5fd826b72bae9eaaedbc405bb007244fd34acbd72d0e83c3133</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c614t-1d36d7731bbabd5fd826b72bae9eaaedbc405bb007244fd34acbd72d0e83c3133</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/2694277$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/2694277$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,33461,58238,58471</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=2023265$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nassaney, Michael S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pyle, Kendra</creatorcontrib><title>The Adoption of the Bow and Arrow in Eastern North America: A View from Central Arkansas</title><title>American antiquity</title><addtitle>Am. antiq</addtitle><description>North American archaeologists have long been interested in distinguishing between dart and arrow points in order to establish when bow-and-arrow technology was adopted in the Eastern Woodlands. A quantitative analysis of point form and qualitative reconstructions of bifacial reduction trajectories from Plum Bayou culture sites in central Arkansas indicate that arrow points were abruptly adopted and became widespread about A.D. 600. Moreover, arrow points are metrically discrete entities that were not developed through gradual modification of dart points in this region as appears to be the case elsewhere. Comparisons with patterns observed in other regions of the East show significant variation in the timing, rate, and direction of the adoption of the bow and arrow, as well as the role of this technological change in Native American economies and sociopolitics. These observations suggest that the bow and arrow were: (1) introduced significantly earlier than some researchers have posited; (2) independently invented by some groups and diffused to others; and (3) relinquished and later readopted in some areas of the Eastern Woodlands in response to changing social, historical, and environmental conditions. Our data also call into question simple unilinear or diffusionary models that claim to explain the development and spread of this technological innovation.</description><subject>America and Arctic regions</subject><subject>Anthropology</subject><subject>Antiquities</subject><subject>Archaeological surveys</subject><subject>Archaeology</subject><subject>Archery</subject><subject>Archery equipment</subject><subject>Arrowheads</subject><subject>Arrows</subject><subject>Atlatls</subject><subject>Bayous</subject><subject>Bow and arrow</subject><subject>History</subject><subject>History of technology</subject><subject>Native American antiquities</subject><subject>Native Americans</subject><subject>North America</subject><subject>Paleoanthropology</subject><subject>Preceramic cultures</subject><subject>Prehistory and protohistory</subject><subject>Projectile points</subject><subject>Projectile points (Archaeology)</subject><subject>Projectiles</subject><subject>Quantitative analysis</subject><subject>Stone tools</subject><subject>Woodlands</subject><issn>0002-7316</issn><issn>2325-5064</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8XN</sourceid><recordid>eNqN0ltv0zAUAOAIgUQZiL9gARIgLeDYjp3wllWjq1RtDwzEW-TLSZeS2J3tavDvMbRiKiqo8oMv-nyOrXOy7HmB3xGKxXvCa0aEeJBNCCVlXmLOHmYTjDHJBS344-xJCCuMC4ppNcm-Xt8Aaoxbx95Z5DoU0_7M3SFpDWq8T6veonMZIniLLp2PN6gZwfdafkAN-tLDHeq8G9EUbPRySHe-SRtkeJo96uQQ4NluPsk-fzy_nl7ki6vZfNoscs0LFvPCUG5EephSUpmyMxXhShAloQYpwSjNcKkUxoIw1hnKpFZGEIOhopoWlJ5kL7Zx197dbiDEduU23qaULcGUcEE4S-jlv1DBBCNFXYk6qdOtWsoB2t52Lv1IL8FC-piz0PXpuClZVZf8d9D8AE_DwNjrQ_7Nnk8kwve4lJsQ2vmny6PpxfxoejY7llazxR49PUS1GwZYQpsqOL3a46-3XHsXgoeuXft-lP5HW-D2V1e2u65M8tWuEjJoOXReWt2HP5zg1LS8vGerEJ3_T7S3u7xyVL436Wn3hf3L_gQPxPHo</recordid><startdate>19990401</startdate><enddate>19990401</enddate><creator>Nassaney, Michael S.</creator><creator>Pyle, Kendra</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><general>Society for American Archaeology</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8GL</scope><scope>IBG</scope><scope>IHI</scope><scope>ISN</scope><scope>FIXVA</scope><scope>FKUCP</scope><scope>HZAIM</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>8XN</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19990401</creationdate><title>The Adoption of the Bow and Arrow in Eastern North America: A View from Central Arkansas</title><author>Nassaney, Michael S. ; Pyle, Kendra</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c614t-1d36d7731bbabd5fd826b72bae9eaaedbc405bb007244fd34acbd72d0e83c3133</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>America and Arctic regions</topic><topic>Anthropology</topic><topic>Antiquities</topic><topic>Archaeological surveys</topic><topic>Archaeology</topic><topic>Archery</topic><topic>Archery equipment</topic><topic>Arrowheads</topic><topic>Arrows</topic><topic>Atlatls</topic><topic>Bayous</topic><topic>Bow and arrow</topic><topic>History</topic><topic>History of technology</topic><topic>Native American antiquities</topic><topic>Native Americans</topic><topic>North America</topic><topic>Paleoanthropology</topic><topic>Preceramic cultures</topic><topic>Prehistory and protohistory</topic><topic>Projectile points</topic><topic>Projectile points (Archaeology)</topic><topic>Projectiles</topic><topic>Quantitative analysis</topic><topic>Stone tools</topic><topic>Woodlands</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nassaney, Michael S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pyle, Kendra</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: High School</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Biography</collection><collection>Gale In Context: U.S. History</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Canada</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 03</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 04</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 26</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>International Bibliography of Art (IBA)</collection><jtitle>American antiquity</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nassaney, Michael S.</au><au>Pyle, Kendra</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Adoption of the Bow and Arrow in Eastern North America: A View from Central Arkansas</atitle><jtitle>American antiquity</jtitle><addtitle>Am. antiq</addtitle><date>1999-04-01</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>64</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>243</spage><epage>263</epage><pages>243-263</pages><issn>0002-7316</issn><eissn>2325-5064</eissn><coden>AANTAM</coden><abstract>North American archaeologists have long been interested in distinguishing between dart and arrow points in order to establish when bow-and-arrow technology was adopted in the Eastern Woodlands. A quantitative analysis of point form and qualitative reconstructions of bifacial reduction trajectories from Plum Bayou culture sites in central Arkansas indicate that arrow points were abruptly adopted and became widespread about A.D. 600. Moreover, arrow points are metrically discrete entities that were not developed through gradual modification of dart points in this region as appears to be the case elsewhere. Comparisons with patterns observed in other regions of the East show significant variation in the timing, rate, and direction of the adoption of the bow and arrow, as well as the role of this technological change in Native American economies and sociopolitics. These observations suggest that the bow and arrow were: (1) introduced significantly earlier than some researchers have posited; (2) independently invented by some groups and diffused to others; and (3) relinquished and later readopted in some areas of the Eastern Woodlands in response to changing social, historical, and environmental conditions. Our data also call into question simple unilinear or diffusionary models that claim to explain the development and spread of this technological innovation.</abstract><cop>New York, US</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.2307/2694277</doi><tpages>22</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0002-7316 |
ispartof | American antiquity, 1999-04, Vol.64 (2), p.243-263 |
issn | 0002-7316 2325-5064 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_203267264 |
source | JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; International Bibliography of Art (IBA) |
subjects | America and Arctic regions Anthropology Antiquities Archaeological surveys Archaeology Archery Archery equipment Arrowheads Arrows Atlatls Bayous Bow and arrow History History of technology Native American antiquities Native Americans North America Paleoanthropology Preceramic cultures Prehistory and protohistory Projectile points Projectile points (Archaeology) Projectiles Quantitative analysis Stone tools Woodlands |
title | The Adoption of the Bow and Arrow in Eastern North America: A View from Central Arkansas |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T03%3A18%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Adoption%20of%20the%20Bow%20and%20Arrow%20in%20Eastern%20North%20America:%20A%20View%20from%20Central%20Arkansas&rft.jtitle=American%20antiquity&rft.au=Nassaney,%20Michael%20S.&rft.date=1999-04-01&rft.volume=64&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=243&rft.epage=263&rft.pages=243-263&rft.issn=0002-7316&rft.eissn=2325-5064&rft.coden=AANTAM&rft_id=info:doi/10.2307/2694277&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA54895664%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c614t-1d36d7731bbabd5fd826b72bae9eaaedbc405bb007244fd34acbd72d0e83c3133%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1474219879&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A54895664&rft_cupid=10_2307_2694277&rft_jstor_id=2694277&rfr_iscdi=true |