Loading…

The Adoption of the Bow and Arrow in Eastern North America: A View from Central Arkansas

North American archaeologists have long been interested in distinguishing between dart and arrow points in order to establish when bow-and-arrow technology was adopted in the Eastern Woodlands. A quantitative analysis of point form and qualitative reconstructions of bifacial reduction trajectories f...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:American antiquity 1999-04, Vol.64 (2), p.243-263
Main Authors: Nassaney, Michael S., Pyle, Kendra
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c614t-1d36d7731bbabd5fd826b72bae9eaaedbc405bb007244fd34acbd72d0e83c3133
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c614t-1d36d7731bbabd5fd826b72bae9eaaedbc405bb007244fd34acbd72d0e83c3133
container_end_page 263
container_issue 2
container_start_page 243
container_title American antiquity
container_volume 64
creator Nassaney, Michael S.
Pyle, Kendra
description North American archaeologists have long been interested in distinguishing between dart and arrow points in order to establish when bow-and-arrow technology was adopted in the Eastern Woodlands. A quantitative analysis of point form and qualitative reconstructions of bifacial reduction trajectories from Plum Bayou culture sites in central Arkansas indicate that arrow points were abruptly adopted and became widespread about A.D. 600. Moreover, arrow points are metrically discrete entities that were not developed through gradual modification of dart points in this region as appears to be the case elsewhere. Comparisons with patterns observed in other regions of the East show significant variation in the timing, rate, and direction of the adoption of the bow and arrow, as well as the role of this technological change in Native American economies and sociopolitics. These observations suggest that the bow and arrow were: (1) introduced significantly earlier than some researchers have posited; (2) independently invented by some groups and diffused to others; and (3) relinquished and later readopted in some areas of the Eastern Woodlands in response to changing social, historical, and environmental conditions. Our data also call into question simple unilinear or diffusionary models that claim to explain the development and spread of this technological innovation.
doi_str_mv 10.2307/2694277
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_203267264</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_2307_2694277</cupid><galeid>A54895664</galeid><jstor_id>2694277</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A54895664</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c614t-1d36d7731bbabd5fd826b72bae9eaaedbc405bb007244fd34acbd72d0e83c3133</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0ltv0zAUAOAIgUQZiL9gARIgLeDYjp3wllWjq1RtDwzEW-TLSZeS2J3tavDvMbRiKiqo8oMv-nyOrXOy7HmB3xGKxXvCa0aEeJBNCCVlXmLOHmYTjDHJBS344-xJCCuMC4ppNcm-Xt8Aaoxbx95Z5DoU0_7M3SFpDWq8T6veonMZIniLLp2PN6gZwfdafkAN-tLDHeq8G9EUbPRySHe-SRtkeJo96uQQ4NluPsk-fzy_nl7ki6vZfNoscs0LFvPCUG5EephSUpmyMxXhShAloQYpwSjNcKkUxoIw1hnKpFZGEIOhopoWlJ5kL7Zx197dbiDEduU23qaULcGUcEE4S-jlv1DBBCNFXYk6qdOtWsoB2t52Lv1IL8FC-piz0PXpuClZVZf8d9D8AE_DwNjrQ_7Nnk8kwve4lJsQ2vmny6PpxfxoejY7llazxR49PUS1GwZYQpsqOL3a46-3XHsXgoeuXft-lP5HW-D2V1e2u65M8tWuEjJoOXReWt2HP5zg1LS8vGerEJ3_T7S3u7xyVL436Wn3hf3L_gQPxPHo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1474219879</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Adoption of the Bow and Arrow in Eastern North America: A View from Central Arkansas</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>International Bibliography of Art (IBA)</source><creator>Nassaney, Michael S. ; Pyle, Kendra</creator><creatorcontrib>Nassaney, Michael S. ; Pyle, Kendra</creatorcontrib><description>North American archaeologists have long been interested in distinguishing between dart and arrow points in order to establish when bow-and-arrow technology was adopted in the Eastern Woodlands. A quantitative analysis of point form and qualitative reconstructions of bifacial reduction trajectories from Plum Bayou culture sites in central Arkansas indicate that arrow points were abruptly adopted and became widespread about A.D. 600. Moreover, arrow points are metrically discrete entities that were not developed through gradual modification of dart points in this region as appears to be the case elsewhere. Comparisons with patterns observed in other regions of the East show significant variation in the timing, rate, and direction of the adoption of the bow and arrow, as well as the role of this technological change in Native American economies and sociopolitics. These observations suggest that the bow and arrow were: (1) introduced significantly earlier than some researchers have posited; (2) independently invented by some groups and diffused to others; and (3) relinquished and later readopted in some areas of the Eastern Woodlands in response to changing social, historical, and environmental conditions. Our data also call into question simple unilinear or diffusionary models that claim to explain the development and spread of this technological innovation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-7316</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2325-5064</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2307/2694277</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AANTAM</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, US: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>America and Arctic regions ; Anthropology ; Antiquities ; Archaeological surveys ; Archaeology ; Archery ; Archery equipment ; Arrowheads ; Arrows ; Atlatls ; Bayous ; Bow and arrow ; History ; History of technology ; Native American antiquities ; Native Americans ; North America ; Paleoanthropology ; Preceramic cultures ; Prehistory and protohistory ; Projectile points ; Projectile points (Archaeology) ; Projectiles ; Quantitative analysis ; Stone tools ; Woodlands</subject><ispartof>American antiquity, 1999-04, Vol.64 (2), p.243-263</ispartof><rights>Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 1999</rights><rights>Copyright 1999 Society for American Archaeology</rights><rights>1999 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 1999 Cambridge University Press</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 1999 Cambridge University Press</rights><rights>Copyright Society for American Archaeology Apr 1999</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c614t-1d36d7731bbabd5fd826b72bae9eaaedbc405bb007244fd34acbd72d0e83c3133</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c614t-1d36d7731bbabd5fd826b72bae9eaaedbc405bb007244fd34acbd72d0e83c3133</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/2694277$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/2694277$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,33461,58238,58471</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=2023265$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nassaney, Michael S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pyle, Kendra</creatorcontrib><title>The Adoption of the Bow and Arrow in Eastern North America: A View from Central Arkansas</title><title>American antiquity</title><addtitle>Am. antiq</addtitle><description>North American archaeologists have long been interested in distinguishing between dart and arrow points in order to establish when bow-and-arrow technology was adopted in the Eastern Woodlands. A quantitative analysis of point form and qualitative reconstructions of bifacial reduction trajectories from Plum Bayou culture sites in central Arkansas indicate that arrow points were abruptly adopted and became widespread about A.D. 600. Moreover, arrow points are metrically discrete entities that were not developed through gradual modification of dart points in this region as appears to be the case elsewhere. Comparisons with patterns observed in other regions of the East show significant variation in the timing, rate, and direction of the adoption of the bow and arrow, as well as the role of this technological change in Native American economies and sociopolitics. These observations suggest that the bow and arrow were: (1) introduced significantly earlier than some researchers have posited; (2) independently invented by some groups and diffused to others; and (3) relinquished and later readopted in some areas of the Eastern Woodlands in response to changing social, historical, and environmental conditions. Our data also call into question simple unilinear or diffusionary models that claim to explain the development and spread of this technological innovation.</description><subject>America and Arctic regions</subject><subject>Anthropology</subject><subject>Antiquities</subject><subject>Archaeological surveys</subject><subject>Archaeology</subject><subject>Archery</subject><subject>Archery equipment</subject><subject>Arrowheads</subject><subject>Arrows</subject><subject>Atlatls</subject><subject>Bayous</subject><subject>Bow and arrow</subject><subject>History</subject><subject>History of technology</subject><subject>Native American antiquities</subject><subject>Native Americans</subject><subject>North America</subject><subject>Paleoanthropology</subject><subject>Preceramic cultures</subject><subject>Prehistory and protohistory</subject><subject>Projectile points</subject><subject>Projectile points (Archaeology)</subject><subject>Projectiles</subject><subject>Quantitative analysis</subject><subject>Stone tools</subject><subject>Woodlands</subject><issn>0002-7316</issn><issn>2325-5064</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8XN</sourceid><recordid>eNqN0ltv0zAUAOAIgUQZiL9gARIgLeDYjp3wllWjq1RtDwzEW-TLSZeS2J3tavDvMbRiKiqo8oMv-nyOrXOy7HmB3xGKxXvCa0aEeJBNCCVlXmLOHmYTjDHJBS344-xJCCuMC4ppNcm-Xt8Aaoxbx95Z5DoU0_7M3SFpDWq8T6veonMZIniLLp2PN6gZwfdafkAN-tLDHeq8G9EUbPRySHe-SRtkeJo96uQQ4NluPsk-fzy_nl7ki6vZfNoscs0LFvPCUG5EephSUpmyMxXhShAloQYpwSjNcKkUxoIw1hnKpFZGEIOhopoWlJ5kL7Zx197dbiDEduU23qaULcGUcEE4S-jlv1DBBCNFXYk6qdOtWsoB2t52Lv1IL8FC-piz0PXpuClZVZf8d9D8AE_DwNjrQ_7Nnk8kwve4lJsQ2vmny6PpxfxoejY7llazxR49PUS1GwZYQpsqOL3a46-3XHsXgoeuXft-lP5HW-D2V1e2u65M8tWuEjJoOXReWt2HP5zg1LS8vGerEJ3_T7S3u7xyVL436Wn3hf3L_gQPxPHo</recordid><startdate>19990401</startdate><enddate>19990401</enddate><creator>Nassaney, Michael S.</creator><creator>Pyle, Kendra</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><general>Society for American Archaeology</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8GL</scope><scope>IBG</scope><scope>IHI</scope><scope>ISN</scope><scope>FIXVA</scope><scope>FKUCP</scope><scope>HZAIM</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>8XN</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19990401</creationdate><title>The Adoption of the Bow and Arrow in Eastern North America: A View from Central Arkansas</title><author>Nassaney, Michael S. ; Pyle, Kendra</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c614t-1d36d7731bbabd5fd826b72bae9eaaedbc405bb007244fd34acbd72d0e83c3133</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>America and Arctic regions</topic><topic>Anthropology</topic><topic>Antiquities</topic><topic>Archaeological surveys</topic><topic>Archaeology</topic><topic>Archery</topic><topic>Archery equipment</topic><topic>Arrowheads</topic><topic>Arrows</topic><topic>Atlatls</topic><topic>Bayous</topic><topic>Bow and arrow</topic><topic>History</topic><topic>History of technology</topic><topic>Native American antiquities</topic><topic>Native Americans</topic><topic>North America</topic><topic>Paleoanthropology</topic><topic>Preceramic cultures</topic><topic>Prehistory and protohistory</topic><topic>Projectile points</topic><topic>Projectile points (Archaeology)</topic><topic>Projectiles</topic><topic>Quantitative analysis</topic><topic>Stone tools</topic><topic>Woodlands</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nassaney, Michael S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pyle, Kendra</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: High School</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Biography</collection><collection>Gale In Context: U.S. History</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Canada</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 03</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 04</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 26</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>International Bibliography of Art (IBA)</collection><jtitle>American antiquity</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nassaney, Michael S.</au><au>Pyle, Kendra</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Adoption of the Bow and Arrow in Eastern North America: A View from Central Arkansas</atitle><jtitle>American antiquity</jtitle><addtitle>Am. antiq</addtitle><date>1999-04-01</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>64</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>243</spage><epage>263</epage><pages>243-263</pages><issn>0002-7316</issn><eissn>2325-5064</eissn><coden>AANTAM</coden><abstract>North American archaeologists have long been interested in distinguishing between dart and arrow points in order to establish when bow-and-arrow technology was adopted in the Eastern Woodlands. A quantitative analysis of point form and qualitative reconstructions of bifacial reduction trajectories from Plum Bayou culture sites in central Arkansas indicate that arrow points were abruptly adopted and became widespread about A.D. 600. Moreover, arrow points are metrically discrete entities that were not developed through gradual modification of dart points in this region as appears to be the case elsewhere. Comparisons with patterns observed in other regions of the East show significant variation in the timing, rate, and direction of the adoption of the bow and arrow, as well as the role of this technological change in Native American economies and sociopolitics. These observations suggest that the bow and arrow were: (1) introduced significantly earlier than some researchers have posited; (2) independently invented by some groups and diffused to others; and (3) relinquished and later readopted in some areas of the Eastern Woodlands in response to changing social, historical, and environmental conditions. Our data also call into question simple unilinear or diffusionary models that claim to explain the development and spread of this technological innovation.</abstract><cop>New York, US</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.2307/2694277</doi><tpages>22</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-7316
ispartof American antiquity, 1999-04, Vol.64 (2), p.243-263
issn 0002-7316
2325-5064
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_203267264
source JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; International Bibliography of Art (IBA)
subjects America and Arctic regions
Anthropology
Antiquities
Archaeological surveys
Archaeology
Archery
Archery equipment
Arrowheads
Arrows
Atlatls
Bayous
Bow and arrow
History
History of technology
Native American antiquities
Native Americans
North America
Paleoanthropology
Preceramic cultures
Prehistory and protohistory
Projectile points
Projectile points (Archaeology)
Projectiles
Quantitative analysis
Stone tools
Woodlands
title The Adoption of the Bow and Arrow in Eastern North America: A View from Central Arkansas
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T03%3A18%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Adoption%20of%20the%20Bow%20and%20Arrow%20in%20Eastern%20North%20America:%20A%20View%20from%20Central%20Arkansas&rft.jtitle=American%20antiquity&rft.au=Nassaney,%20Michael%20S.&rft.date=1999-04-01&rft.volume=64&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=243&rft.epage=263&rft.pages=243-263&rft.issn=0002-7316&rft.eissn=2325-5064&rft.coden=AANTAM&rft_id=info:doi/10.2307/2694277&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA54895664%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c614t-1d36d7731bbabd5fd826b72bae9eaaedbc405bb007244fd34acbd72d0e83c3133%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1474219879&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A54895664&rft_cupid=10_2307_2694277&rft_jstor_id=2694277&rfr_iscdi=true