Loading…

Activity as Object-Related: Resolving the Dichotomy of Individual and Collective Planes of Activity

This article suggests that the principle of object-relatedness, introduced by Vygotsky and expanded by A. N. Leontiev, can be used to conceptualize human subjectivity within a profoundly social view of human development. This is achieved by reformulating the premises of cultural-historical activity...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Mind, culture and activity culture and activity, 2005-02, Vol.12 (1), p.70-88
Main Author: Stetsenko, Anna
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c264t-14f30cb95eab9bc3c4b43dd00d2266e2a3a8a252c39664a85969ebf5c392639a3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c264t-14f30cb95eab9bc3c4b43dd00d2266e2a3a8a252c39664a85969ebf5c392639a3
container_end_page 88
container_issue 1
container_start_page 70
container_title Mind, culture and activity
container_volume 12
creator Stetsenko, Anna
description This article suggests that the principle of object-relatedness, introduced by Vygotsky and expanded by A. N. Leontiev, can be used to conceptualize human subjectivity within a profoundly social view of human development. This is achieved by reformulating the premises of cultural-historical activity theory to include the notion that material production, intersubjective exchanges, and human subjectivity form a unified three-fold dialectical system. Focusing on the constant manifold transitions among components of this system as its modus vivendi reveals (a) individual and collective processes as being interrelated and co-evolving levels of activity, and (b) the practical relevance of human subjectivity alongside the human relevance of material practices. Such an expanded view posits human subjectivity on a continuum of regulatory mechanisms of social practice, to which both individual and social processes belong. It is further conceptualized as a form of practical transformative pursuits in the world, and as a lawful and necessary moment of human life endowed with the capacity to generate new activity cycles. The co-evolution of collective motives and personal goals, as well as the practical relevance of theoretical constructions, are used as illustrations.
doi_str_mv 10.1207/s15327884mca1201_6
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_203652421</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ834000</ericid><sourcerecordid>886789731</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c264t-14f30cb95eab9bc3c4b43dd00d2266e2a3a8a252c39664a85969ebf5c392639a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UE1LAzEQXUTBWv0D4iF4X80m2XQjeCi1flGoFD2H2WzWbkk3NUkr--_NUvUiOJeZefPeG3hJcp7hq4zg0bXPckpGRcHWCiKQSX6QDHos7cHDOOMRSwWm4jg58X6FYwmCB4kaq9DsmtAh8GherrQK6UIbCLq6QQvtrdk17TsKS43uGrW0wa47ZGv01FZRVm3BIGgrNLHG6N5JoxcDrfY958f6NDmqwXh99t2Hydv99HXymM7mD0-T8SxVhLOQZqymWJUi11CKUlHFSkarCuOKEM41AQoFkJwoKjhnUOSCC13WedwJpwLoMLnc-26c_dhqH-TKbl0bX0qCKc8JI1kkkT1JOeu907XcuGYNrpMZln2W8m-WUXSxF2nXqF_B9LmgLAYZz7f7c9PW1q3h0zpTyQCdsa520KrGS_qP_RcWdIWf</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>203652421</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Activity as Object-Related: Resolving the Dichotomy of Individual and Collective Planes of Activity</title><source>ERIC</source><source>Taylor and Francis Social Sciences and Humanities Collection</source><creator>Stetsenko, Anna</creator><creatorcontrib>Stetsenko, Anna</creatorcontrib><description>This article suggests that the principle of object-relatedness, introduced by Vygotsky and expanded by A. N. Leontiev, can be used to conceptualize human subjectivity within a profoundly social view of human development. This is achieved by reformulating the premises of cultural-historical activity theory to include the notion that material production, intersubjective exchanges, and human subjectivity form a unified three-fold dialectical system. Focusing on the constant manifold transitions among components of this system as its modus vivendi reveals (a) individual and collective processes as being interrelated and co-evolving levels of activity, and (b) the practical relevance of human subjectivity alongside the human relevance of material practices. Such an expanded view posits human subjectivity on a continuum of regulatory mechanisms of social practice, to which both individual and social processes belong. It is further conceptualized as a form of practical transformative pursuits in the world, and as a lawful and necessary moment of human life endowed with the capacity to generate new activity cycles. The co-evolution of collective motives and personal goals, as well as the practical relevance of theoretical constructions, are used as illustrations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1074-9039</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-7884</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1207/s15327884mca1201_6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Philadelphia: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc</publisher><subject>Activities ; Adjustment (to Environment) ; Cognitive Structures ; Cooperation ; Culture ; Developmental Psychology ; Educational Principles ; History ; Individual Development ; Learning Theories ; Productivity ; Social Environment ; Social psychology ; Sociocultural Patterns</subject><ispartof>Mind, culture and activity, 2005-02, Vol.12 (1), p.70-88</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor &amp; Francis Group, LLC 2005</rights><rights>Copyright (C) 2005, Regents of the University of California on behalf of the Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c264t-14f30cb95eab9bc3c4b43dd00d2266e2a3a8a252c39664a85969ebf5c392639a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c264t-14f30cb95eab9bc3c4b43dd00d2266e2a3a8a252c39664a85969ebf5c392639a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ834000$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stetsenko, Anna</creatorcontrib><title>Activity as Object-Related: Resolving the Dichotomy of Individual and Collective Planes of Activity</title><title>Mind, culture and activity</title><description>This article suggests that the principle of object-relatedness, introduced by Vygotsky and expanded by A. N. Leontiev, can be used to conceptualize human subjectivity within a profoundly social view of human development. This is achieved by reformulating the premises of cultural-historical activity theory to include the notion that material production, intersubjective exchanges, and human subjectivity form a unified three-fold dialectical system. Focusing on the constant manifold transitions among components of this system as its modus vivendi reveals (a) individual and collective processes as being interrelated and co-evolving levels of activity, and (b) the practical relevance of human subjectivity alongside the human relevance of material practices. Such an expanded view posits human subjectivity on a continuum of regulatory mechanisms of social practice, to which both individual and social processes belong. It is further conceptualized as a form of practical transformative pursuits in the world, and as a lawful and necessary moment of human life endowed with the capacity to generate new activity cycles. The co-evolution of collective motives and personal goals, as well as the practical relevance of theoretical constructions, are used as illustrations.</description><subject>Activities</subject><subject>Adjustment (to Environment)</subject><subject>Cognitive Structures</subject><subject>Cooperation</subject><subject>Culture</subject><subject>Developmental Psychology</subject><subject>Educational Principles</subject><subject>History</subject><subject>Individual Development</subject><subject>Learning Theories</subject><subject>Productivity</subject><subject>Social Environment</subject><subject>Social psychology</subject><subject>Sociocultural Patterns</subject><issn>1074-9039</issn><issn>1532-7884</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7SW</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UE1LAzEQXUTBWv0D4iF4X80m2XQjeCi1flGoFD2H2WzWbkk3NUkr--_NUvUiOJeZefPeG3hJcp7hq4zg0bXPckpGRcHWCiKQSX6QDHos7cHDOOMRSwWm4jg58X6FYwmCB4kaq9DsmtAh8GherrQK6UIbCLq6QQvtrdk17TsKS43uGrW0wa47ZGv01FZRVm3BIGgrNLHG6N5JoxcDrfY958f6NDmqwXh99t2Hydv99HXymM7mD0-T8SxVhLOQZqymWJUi11CKUlHFSkarCuOKEM41AQoFkJwoKjhnUOSCC13WedwJpwLoMLnc-26c_dhqH-TKbl0bX0qCKc8JI1kkkT1JOeu907XcuGYNrpMZln2W8m-WUXSxF2nXqF_B9LmgLAYZz7f7c9PW1q3h0zpTyQCdsa520KrGS_qP_RcWdIWf</recordid><startdate>20050201</startdate><enddate>20050201</enddate><creator>Stetsenko, Anna</creator><general>Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc</general><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050201</creationdate><title>Activity as Object-Related: Resolving the Dichotomy of Individual and Collective Planes of Activity</title><author>Stetsenko, Anna</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c264t-14f30cb95eab9bc3c4b43dd00d2266e2a3a8a252c39664a85969ebf5c392639a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Activities</topic><topic>Adjustment (to Environment)</topic><topic>Cognitive Structures</topic><topic>Cooperation</topic><topic>Culture</topic><topic>Developmental Psychology</topic><topic>Educational Principles</topic><topic>History</topic><topic>Individual Development</topic><topic>Learning Theories</topic><topic>Productivity</topic><topic>Social Environment</topic><topic>Social psychology</topic><topic>Sociocultural Patterns</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stetsenko, Anna</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><jtitle>Mind, culture and activity</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stetsenko, Anna</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ834000</ericid><atitle>Activity as Object-Related: Resolving the Dichotomy of Individual and Collective Planes of Activity</atitle><jtitle>Mind, culture and activity</jtitle><date>2005-02-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>70</spage><epage>88</epage><pages>70-88</pages><issn>1074-9039</issn><eissn>1532-7884</eissn><abstract>This article suggests that the principle of object-relatedness, introduced by Vygotsky and expanded by A. N. Leontiev, can be used to conceptualize human subjectivity within a profoundly social view of human development. This is achieved by reformulating the premises of cultural-historical activity theory to include the notion that material production, intersubjective exchanges, and human subjectivity form a unified three-fold dialectical system. Focusing on the constant manifold transitions among components of this system as its modus vivendi reveals (a) individual and collective processes as being interrelated and co-evolving levels of activity, and (b) the practical relevance of human subjectivity alongside the human relevance of material practices. Such an expanded view posits human subjectivity on a continuum of regulatory mechanisms of social practice, to which both individual and social processes belong. It is further conceptualized as a form of practical transformative pursuits in the world, and as a lawful and necessary moment of human life endowed with the capacity to generate new activity cycles. The co-evolution of collective motives and personal goals, as well as the practical relevance of theoretical constructions, are used as illustrations.</abstract><cop>Philadelphia</cop><pub>Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc</pub><doi>10.1207/s15327884mca1201_6</doi><tpages>19</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1074-9039
ispartof Mind, culture and activity, 2005-02, Vol.12 (1), p.70-88
issn 1074-9039
1532-7884
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_203652421
source ERIC; Taylor and Francis Social Sciences and Humanities Collection
subjects Activities
Adjustment (to Environment)
Cognitive Structures
Cooperation
Culture
Developmental Psychology
Educational Principles
History
Individual Development
Learning Theories
Productivity
Social Environment
Social psychology
Sociocultural Patterns
title Activity as Object-Related: Resolving the Dichotomy of Individual and Collective Planes of Activity
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T13%3A14%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Activity%20as%20Object-Related:%20Resolving%20the%20Dichotomy%20of%20Individual%20and%20Collective%20Planes%20of%20Activity&rft.jtitle=Mind,%20culture%20and%20activity&rft.au=Stetsenko,%20Anna&rft.date=2005-02-01&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=70&rft.epage=88&rft.pages=70-88&rft.issn=1074-9039&rft.eissn=1532-7884&rft_id=info:doi/10.1207/s15327884mca1201_6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E886789731%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c264t-14f30cb95eab9bc3c4b43dd00d2266e2a3a8a252c39664a85969ebf5c392639a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=203652421&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ834000&rfr_iscdi=true