Loading…

Anti-system Contentions and Authoritarian Response in China: Evolution and Mechanisms

This paper proposes a new framework to analyze social contentions in China from the perspectives of contention motives and mobilization channels, explains why traditional forms of contention do not undermine the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) rule, and identifies anti-system contention as a distinc...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Asian and African studies (Leiden) 2018-05, Vol.53 (3), p.401-419
Main Authors: He, Jingkai, Su, Zhenhua
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-393245d01e11faa417fddd2acc9e1712f676893312c22ceaedc5f1ec4d8de5a13
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-393245d01e11faa417fddd2acc9e1712f676893312c22ceaedc5f1ec4d8de5a13
container_end_page 419
container_issue 3
container_start_page 401
container_title Journal of Asian and African studies (Leiden)
container_volume 53
creator He, Jingkai
Su, Zhenhua
description This paper proposes a new framework to analyze social contentions in China from the perspectives of contention motives and mobilization channels, explains why traditional forms of contention do not undermine the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) rule, and identifies anti-system contention as a distinctive form of contention that poses the greatest challenge to the CCP’s rule. Through analysis of political opportunity structures and mobilization mechanisms that allowed anti-system contentions to rise, this paper argues that since such contentions mainly consist of value-oriented social actors mobilized via informal channels, it would require the Chinese regime to adapt to a more targeted and coordinated model of repression to address the new challenges. The paper further provides empirical case studies to show the effectiveness of the regime’s adaptive repression and shows that anti-system contentions in China face their own hurdle to develop into more prominent contentions.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0021909616687598
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2036665999</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A545261447</galeid><sage_id>10.1177_0021909616687598</sage_id><sourcerecordid>A545261447</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-393245d01e11faa417fddd2acc9e1712f676893312c22ceaedc5f1ec4d8de5a13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kN1LwzAUxYMoOKfvPhZ8ruYmTdL4Nsr8gMlA3HMI6e3W0aUzaUX_e1snCoJPl8P5ce69h5BLoNcASt1QykBTLUHKXAmdH5EJqEykTPD8mExGOx39U3IW45YOmnM5IauZ7-o0fsQOd0nR-g4H3fqYWF8ms77btKHubKitT54x7gcHk9onxab29jaZv7VNP_Jf-BO6jfV13MVzclLZJuLF95yS1d38pXhIF8v7x2K2SB3PVJdyzVkmSgoIUFmbgarKsmTWOY2ggFVSyVxzDswx5tBi6UQF6LIyL1FY4FNydcjdh_a1x9iZbdsHP6w0jHIppdBaD1R6oNa2QVN7N7753rm2aXCNZrioWJqZyASTkGVq4OmBd6GNMWBl9qHe2fBhgJqxbPO37N8V0Q6JP0f8y38Co29-IA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2036665999</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Anti-system Contentions and Authoritarian Response in China: Evolution and Mechanisms</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Sage Journals Online</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>He, Jingkai ; Su, Zhenhua</creator><creatorcontrib>He, Jingkai ; Su, Zhenhua</creatorcontrib><description>This paper proposes a new framework to analyze social contentions in China from the perspectives of contention motives and mobilization channels, explains why traditional forms of contention do not undermine the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) rule, and identifies anti-system contention as a distinctive form of contention that poses the greatest challenge to the CCP’s rule. Through analysis of political opportunity structures and mobilization mechanisms that allowed anti-system contentions to rise, this paper argues that since such contentions mainly consist of value-oriented social actors mobilized via informal channels, it would require the Chinese regime to adapt to a more targeted and coordinated model of repression to address the new challenges. The paper further provides empirical case studies to show the effectiveness of the regime’s adaptive repression and shows that anti-system contentions in China face their own hurdle to develop into more prominent contentions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9096</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1745-2538</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0021909616687598</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Authoritarianism ; Case studies ; Communism ; Evolution ; Industrial mobilization ; Mobilization ; Opportunity structures ; Political aspects ; Politics ; Social aspects ; Social movements</subject><ispartof>Journal of Asian and African studies (Leiden), 2018-05, Vol.53 (3), p.401-419</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-393245d01e11faa417fddd2acc9e1712f676893312c22ceaedc5f1ec4d8de5a13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-393245d01e11faa417fddd2acc9e1712f676893312c22ceaedc5f1ec4d8de5a13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,33223,33774,79364</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>He, Jingkai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Su, Zhenhua</creatorcontrib><title>Anti-system Contentions and Authoritarian Response in China: Evolution and Mechanisms</title><title>Journal of Asian and African studies (Leiden)</title><addtitle>Journal of Asian and African Studies</addtitle><description>This paper proposes a new framework to analyze social contentions in China from the perspectives of contention motives and mobilization channels, explains why traditional forms of contention do not undermine the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) rule, and identifies anti-system contention as a distinctive form of contention that poses the greatest challenge to the CCP’s rule. Through analysis of political opportunity structures and mobilization mechanisms that allowed anti-system contentions to rise, this paper argues that since such contentions mainly consist of value-oriented social actors mobilized via informal channels, it would require the Chinese regime to adapt to a more targeted and coordinated model of repression to address the new challenges. The paper further provides empirical case studies to show the effectiveness of the regime’s adaptive repression and shows that anti-system contentions in China face their own hurdle to develop into more prominent contentions.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Authoritarianism</subject><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Communism</subject><subject>Evolution</subject><subject>Industrial mobilization</subject><subject>Mobilization</subject><subject>Opportunity structures</subject><subject>Political aspects</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Social aspects</subject><subject>Social movements</subject><issn>0021-9096</issn><issn>1745-2538</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kN1LwzAUxYMoOKfvPhZ8ruYmTdL4Nsr8gMlA3HMI6e3W0aUzaUX_e1snCoJPl8P5ce69h5BLoNcASt1QykBTLUHKXAmdH5EJqEykTPD8mExGOx39U3IW45YOmnM5IauZ7-o0fsQOd0nR-g4H3fqYWF8ms77btKHubKitT54x7gcHk9onxab29jaZv7VNP_Jf-BO6jfV13MVzclLZJuLF95yS1d38pXhIF8v7x2K2SB3PVJdyzVkmSgoIUFmbgarKsmTWOY2ggFVSyVxzDswx5tBi6UQF6LIyL1FY4FNydcjdh_a1x9iZbdsHP6w0jHIppdBaD1R6oNa2QVN7N7753rm2aXCNZrioWJqZyASTkGVq4OmBd6GNMWBl9qHe2fBhgJqxbPO37N8V0Q6JP0f8y38Co29-IA</recordid><startdate>201805</startdate><enddate>201805</enddate><creator>He, Jingkai</creator><creator>Su, Zhenhua</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd. (UK)</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201805</creationdate><title>Anti-system Contentions and Authoritarian Response in China: Evolution and Mechanisms</title><author>He, Jingkai ; Su, Zhenhua</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-393245d01e11faa417fddd2acc9e1712f676893312c22ceaedc5f1ec4d8de5a13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Authoritarianism</topic><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Communism</topic><topic>Evolution</topic><topic>Industrial mobilization</topic><topic>Mobilization</topic><topic>Opportunity structures</topic><topic>Political aspects</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Social aspects</topic><topic>Social movements</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>He, Jingkai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Su, Zhenhua</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Journal of Asian and African studies (Leiden)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>He, Jingkai</au><au>Su, Zhenhua</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Anti-system Contentions and Authoritarian Response in China: Evolution and Mechanisms</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Asian and African studies (Leiden)</jtitle><addtitle>Journal of Asian and African Studies</addtitle><date>2018-05</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>53</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>401</spage><epage>419</epage><pages>401-419</pages><issn>0021-9096</issn><eissn>1745-2538</eissn><abstract>This paper proposes a new framework to analyze social contentions in China from the perspectives of contention motives and mobilization channels, explains why traditional forms of contention do not undermine the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) rule, and identifies anti-system contention as a distinctive form of contention that poses the greatest challenge to the CCP’s rule. Through analysis of political opportunity structures and mobilization mechanisms that allowed anti-system contentions to rise, this paper argues that since such contentions mainly consist of value-oriented social actors mobilized via informal channels, it would require the Chinese regime to adapt to a more targeted and coordinated model of repression to address the new challenges. The paper further provides empirical case studies to show the effectiveness of the regime’s adaptive repression and shows that anti-system contentions in China face their own hurdle to develop into more prominent contentions.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0021909616687598</doi><tpages>19</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-9096
ispartof Journal of Asian and African studies (Leiden), 2018-05, Vol.53 (3), p.401-419
issn 0021-9096
1745-2538
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2036665999
source International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Sage Journals Online; Sociological Abstracts
subjects Analysis
Authoritarianism
Case studies
Communism
Evolution
Industrial mobilization
Mobilization
Opportunity structures
Political aspects
Politics
Social aspects
Social movements
title Anti-system Contentions and Authoritarian Response in China: Evolution and Mechanisms
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T03%3A55%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Anti-system%20Contentions%20and%20Authoritarian%20Response%20in%20China:%20Evolution%20and%20Mechanisms&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Asian%20and%20African%20studies%20(Leiden)&rft.au=He,%20Jingkai&rft.date=2018-05&rft.volume=53&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=401&rft.epage=419&rft.pages=401-419&rft.issn=0021-9096&rft.eissn=1745-2538&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0021909616687598&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA545261447%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-393245d01e11faa417fddd2acc9e1712f676893312c22ceaedc5f1ec4d8de5a13%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2036665999&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A545261447&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0021909616687598&rfr_iscdi=true