Loading…

Test duration for feed and water intake in beef cattle using an Insentec system

To understand the effect water has on beef performance and drought adaptability, individual animal water intakes need to be collected. The Beef Improvement Federation has established guidelines for feed intake test duration, but no such guidelines exist for water intake. To establish a preliminary t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of animal science 2016-09, Vol.94, p.141-141
Main Authors: Ahlberg, C M, Krehbiel, C R, Richards, C J, Place, S E, Desilva, U, VanOverbeke, D L, Mateescu, R, Reed, J A, Allwardt, K, Taylor, A, Rolf, M
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 141
container_issue
container_start_page 141
container_title Journal of animal science
container_volume 94
creator Ahlberg, C M
Krehbiel, C R
Richards, C J
Place, S E
Desilva, U
VanOverbeke, D L
Mateescu, R
Reed, J A
Allwardt, K
Taylor, A
Rolf, M
description To understand the effect water has on beef performance and drought adaptability, individual animal water intakes need to be collected. The Beef Improvement Federation has established guidelines for feed intake test duration, but no such guidelines exist for water intake. To establish a preliminary test duration for water intake, individual daily feed intake (FI) and water intake (WI) records were collected for a total of 70 d on 236 crossbred steers using an Insentec system at the Oklahoma State University Willard Sparks Beef Research Unit. Steers were fed in two groups from May to August in 2014 and 2015 and were individually weighed every 14 d. Within each group, steers were blocked by weight (low and high) at the beginning of the study and randomly assigned to one of four pens containing approximately 30 steers per pen. Each pen provided 186.5 m2 of shade and included an Insentec system containing six feed bunks and 1 water bunk. Steers were fed a constant diet throughout the study. Intake records were filtered for reasonableness using parameters for feed and water bunk starting weight, ending weight, and duration. Records collected on weigh dates and days where equipment malfunctioned were filtered to maintain data quality. Average intakes for each animal were computed for increasingly large test durations (7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 42, 49, 56, or 63 d) to determine the optimum test duration for feed and water intake in this dataset. Phenotypic correlations for each shortened test duration as compared to averages for the full 70 d test were calculated using the correlation procedure in SAS. Minimum test duration was determined when both the Pearson and Spearmen correlations were above 0.90 for each trait. Our results indicated that minimum test duration for both water and feed intake is 28 d. While no values exist for WI tests, the test duration for FI is slightly shorter than other studies within the literature, which may be due to homogeneity in the study population, bunk competition, reduced variation due to missing data points or small sample size. While this calculation should be augmented with additional data as it becomes available, the data would suggest that WI records can be collected within the same time frame as FI records, so cattle can be tested simultaneously for feed and water intake without extending test duration to collect the additional phenotype.
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2038227986</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2038227986</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_20382279863</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjbsKwjAUQIMoWB__cMG5kAep6SyKTi7dJbY30loTzQPx783gBzid4Rw4E1IwyWUpWCWmpKCUs1IpxudkEcJAKeOylgU5NxgidMnr2DsLxnkwiB1o28FbR_TQ26jvmAFXRAOtjnFESKG3t1zByQa0EVsInxDxsSIzo8eA6x-XZHPYN7tj-fTulfLrMrjkbVYXToXifFurSvxXfQHd0D90</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2038227986</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Test duration for feed and water intake in beef cattle using an Insentec system</title><source>Oxford University Press:Jisc Collections:OUP Read and Publish 2024-2025 (2024 collection) (Reading list)</source><creator>Ahlberg, C M ; Krehbiel, C R ; Richards, C J ; Place, S E ; Desilva, U ; VanOverbeke, D L ; Mateescu, R ; Reed, J A ; Allwardt, K ; Taylor, A ; Rolf, M</creator><creatorcontrib>Ahlberg, C M ; Krehbiel, C R ; Richards, C J ; Place, S E ; Desilva, U ; VanOverbeke, D L ; Mateescu, R ; Reed, J A ; Allwardt, K ; Taylor, A ; Rolf, M</creatorcontrib><description>To understand the effect water has on beef performance and drought adaptability, individual animal water intakes need to be collected. The Beef Improvement Federation has established guidelines for feed intake test duration, but no such guidelines exist for water intake. To establish a preliminary test duration for water intake, individual daily feed intake (FI) and water intake (WI) records were collected for a total of 70 d on 236 crossbred steers using an Insentec system at the Oklahoma State University Willard Sparks Beef Research Unit. Steers were fed in two groups from May to August in 2014 and 2015 and were individually weighed every 14 d. Within each group, steers were blocked by weight (low and high) at the beginning of the study and randomly assigned to one of four pens containing approximately 30 steers per pen. Each pen provided 186.5 m2 of shade and included an Insentec system containing six feed bunks and 1 water bunk. Steers were fed a constant diet throughout the study. Intake records were filtered for reasonableness using parameters for feed and water bunk starting weight, ending weight, and duration. Records collected on weigh dates and days where equipment malfunctioned were filtered to maintain data quality. Average intakes for each animal were computed for increasingly large test durations (7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 42, 49, 56, or 63 d) to determine the optimum test duration for feed and water intake in this dataset. Phenotypic correlations for each shortened test duration as compared to averages for the full 70 d test were calculated using the correlation procedure in SAS. Minimum test duration was determined when both the Pearson and Spearmen correlations were above 0.90 for each trait. Our results indicated that minimum test duration for both water and feed intake is 28 d. While no values exist for WI tests, the test duration for FI is slightly shorter than other studies within the literature, which may be due to homogeneity in the study population, bunk competition, reduced variation due to missing data points or small sample size. While this calculation should be augmented with additional data as it becomes available, the data would suggest that WI records can be collected within the same time frame as FI records, so cattle can be tested simultaneously for feed and water intake without extending test duration to collect the additional phenotype.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8812</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-3163</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Champaign: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Adaptability ; Beef ; Beef cattle ; Bovidae ; Breeding of animals ; Cattle ; Cattle industry ; Correlation ; Data points ; Drought ; Genotype &amp; phenotype ; Guidelines ; Homogeneity ; Mathematical analysis ; Missing data ; Phenotypes ; Population studies ; Water ; Water intake ; Water intakes ; Water purification</subject><ispartof>Journal of animal science, 2016-09, Vol.94, p.141-141</ispartof><rights>Copyright Oxford University Press, UK Sep 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ahlberg, C M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krehbiel, C R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richards, C J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Place, S E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Desilva, U</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VanOverbeke, D L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mateescu, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reed, J A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allwardt, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taylor, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rolf, M</creatorcontrib><title>Test duration for feed and water intake in beef cattle using an Insentec system</title><title>Journal of animal science</title><description>To understand the effect water has on beef performance and drought adaptability, individual animal water intakes need to be collected. The Beef Improvement Federation has established guidelines for feed intake test duration, but no such guidelines exist for water intake. To establish a preliminary test duration for water intake, individual daily feed intake (FI) and water intake (WI) records were collected for a total of 70 d on 236 crossbred steers using an Insentec system at the Oklahoma State University Willard Sparks Beef Research Unit. Steers were fed in two groups from May to August in 2014 and 2015 and were individually weighed every 14 d. Within each group, steers were blocked by weight (low and high) at the beginning of the study and randomly assigned to one of four pens containing approximately 30 steers per pen. Each pen provided 186.5 m2 of shade and included an Insentec system containing six feed bunks and 1 water bunk. Steers were fed a constant diet throughout the study. Intake records were filtered for reasonableness using parameters for feed and water bunk starting weight, ending weight, and duration. Records collected on weigh dates and days where equipment malfunctioned were filtered to maintain data quality. Average intakes for each animal were computed for increasingly large test durations (7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 42, 49, 56, or 63 d) to determine the optimum test duration for feed and water intake in this dataset. Phenotypic correlations for each shortened test duration as compared to averages for the full 70 d test were calculated using the correlation procedure in SAS. Minimum test duration was determined when both the Pearson and Spearmen correlations were above 0.90 for each trait. Our results indicated that minimum test duration for both water and feed intake is 28 d. While no values exist for WI tests, the test duration for FI is slightly shorter than other studies within the literature, which may be due to homogeneity in the study population, bunk competition, reduced variation due to missing data points or small sample size. While this calculation should be augmented with additional data as it becomes available, the data would suggest that WI records can be collected within the same time frame as FI records, so cattle can be tested simultaneously for feed and water intake without extending test duration to collect the additional phenotype.</description><subject>Adaptability</subject><subject>Beef</subject><subject>Beef cattle</subject><subject>Bovidae</subject><subject>Breeding of animals</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>Cattle industry</subject><subject>Correlation</subject><subject>Data points</subject><subject>Drought</subject><subject>Genotype &amp; phenotype</subject><subject>Guidelines</subject><subject>Homogeneity</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>Missing data</subject><subject>Phenotypes</subject><subject>Population studies</subject><subject>Water</subject><subject>Water intake</subject><subject>Water intakes</subject><subject>Water purification</subject><issn>0021-8812</issn><issn>1525-3163</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNjbsKwjAUQIMoWB__cMG5kAep6SyKTi7dJbY30loTzQPx783gBzid4Rw4E1IwyWUpWCWmpKCUs1IpxudkEcJAKeOylgU5NxgidMnr2DsLxnkwiB1o28FbR_TQ26jvmAFXRAOtjnFESKG3t1zByQa0EVsInxDxsSIzo8eA6x-XZHPYN7tj-fTulfLrMrjkbVYXToXifFurSvxXfQHd0D90</recordid><startdate>20160901</startdate><enddate>20160901</enddate><creator>Ahlberg, C M</creator><creator>Krehbiel, C R</creator><creator>Richards, C J</creator><creator>Place, S E</creator><creator>Desilva, U</creator><creator>VanOverbeke, D L</creator><creator>Mateescu, R</creator><creator>Reed, J A</creator><creator>Allwardt, K</creator><creator>Taylor, A</creator><creator>Rolf, M</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>U9A</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160901</creationdate><title>Test duration for feed and water intake in beef cattle using an Insentec system</title><author>Ahlberg, C M ; Krehbiel, C R ; Richards, C J ; Place, S E ; Desilva, U ; VanOverbeke, D L ; Mateescu, R ; Reed, J A ; Allwardt, K ; Taylor, A ; Rolf, M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_20382279863</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Adaptability</topic><topic>Beef</topic><topic>Beef cattle</topic><topic>Bovidae</topic><topic>Breeding of animals</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>Cattle industry</topic><topic>Correlation</topic><topic>Data points</topic><topic>Drought</topic><topic>Genotype &amp; phenotype</topic><topic>Guidelines</topic><topic>Homogeneity</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>Missing data</topic><topic>Phenotypes</topic><topic>Population studies</topic><topic>Water</topic><topic>Water intake</topic><topic>Water intakes</topic><topic>Water purification</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ahlberg, C M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krehbiel, C R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richards, C J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Place, S E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Desilva, U</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VanOverbeke, D L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mateescu, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reed, J A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allwardt, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taylor, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rolf, M</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Career &amp; Technical Education Database</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ahlberg, C M</au><au>Krehbiel, C R</au><au>Richards, C J</au><au>Place, S E</au><au>Desilva, U</au><au>VanOverbeke, D L</au><au>Mateescu, R</au><au>Reed, J A</au><au>Allwardt, K</au><au>Taylor, A</au><au>Rolf, M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Test duration for feed and water intake in beef cattle using an Insentec system</atitle><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle><date>2016-09-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>94</volume><spage>141</spage><epage>141</epage><pages>141-141</pages><issn>0021-8812</issn><eissn>1525-3163</eissn><abstract>To understand the effect water has on beef performance and drought adaptability, individual animal water intakes need to be collected. The Beef Improvement Federation has established guidelines for feed intake test duration, but no such guidelines exist for water intake. To establish a preliminary test duration for water intake, individual daily feed intake (FI) and water intake (WI) records were collected for a total of 70 d on 236 crossbred steers using an Insentec system at the Oklahoma State University Willard Sparks Beef Research Unit. Steers were fed in two groups from May to August in 2014 and 2015 and were individually weighed every 14 d. Within each group, steers were blocked by weight (low and high) at the beginning of the study and randomly assigned to one of four pens containing approximately 30 steers per pen. Each pen provided 186.5 m2 of shade and included an Insentec system containing six feed bunks and 1 water bunk. Steers were fed a constant diet throughout the study. Intake records were filtered for reasonableness using parameters for feed and water bunk starting weight, ending weight, and duration. Records collected on weigh dates and days where equipment malfunctioned were filtered to maintain data quality. Average intakes for each animal were computed for increasingly large test durations (7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 42, 49, 56, or 63 d) to determine the optimum test duration for feed and water intake in this dataset. Phenotypic correlations for each shortened test duration as compared to averages for the full 70 d test were calculated using the correlation procedure in SAS. Minimum test duration was determined when both the Pearson and Spearmen correlations were above 0.90 for each trait. Our results indicated that minimum test duration for both water and feed intake is 28 d. While no values exist for WI tests, the test duration for FI is slightly shorter than other studies within the literature, which may be due to homogeneity in the study population, bunk competition, reduced variation due to missing data points or small sample size. While this calculation should be augmented with additional data as it becomes available, the data would suggest that WI records can be collected within the same time frame as FI records, so cattle can be tested simultaneously for feed and water intake without extending test duration to collect the additional phenotype.</abstract><cop>Champaign</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-8812
ispartof Journal of animal science, 2016-09, Vol.94, p.141-141
issn 0021-8812
1525-3163
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2038227986
source Oxford University Press:Jisc Collections:OUP Read and Publish 2024-2025 (2024 collection) (Reading list)
subjects Adaptability
Beef
Beef cattle
Bovidae
Breeding of animals
Cattle
Cattle industry
Correlation
Data points
Drought
Genotype & phenotype
Guidelines
Homogeneity
Mathematical analysis
Missing data
Phenotypes
Population studies
Water
Water intake
Water intakes
Water purification
title Test duration for feed and water intake in beef cattle using an Insentec system
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T09%3A59%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Test%20duration%20for%20feed%20and%20water%20intake%20in%20beef%20cattle%20using%20an%20Insentec%20system&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20animal%20science&rft.au=Ahlberg,%20C%20M&rft.date=2016-09-01&rft.volume=94&rft.spage=141&rft.epage=141&rft.pages=141-141&rft.issn=0021-8812&rft.eissn=1525-3163&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2038227986%3C/proquest%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_20382279863%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2038227986&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true