Improving Judicial Administration Through Implementation of an Automated Sentencing Guidelines System

To ensure public trust and confidence, courts must routinely examine the management of their operations and continuously explore improvement opportunities. Although technology can be a catalyst for improving judicial administration, without the requisite planning, organizational capital (e.g., peopl...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Criminal justice policy review 2018-06, Vol.29 (5), p.489-504
Main Authors: Fox, Danielle P., Yamagata, Hisashi, Najaka, Stacy S., Soulé, David A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Automation
Courts
Criminal law
Criminal sentences
Implementation
Planning
Trust
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:To ensure public trust and confidence, courts must routinely examine the management of their operations and continuously explore improvement opportunities. Although technology can be a catalyst for improving judicial administration, without the requisite planning, organizational capital (e.g., people, process, and system alignment), and evaluation it is unlikely that such initiatives will be sustained let alone succeed. In 2012, a local circuit court in Maryland implemented the Maryland Automated Guidelines System (MAGS) developed by the Maryland State Commission on Criminal Sentencing Policy to electronically initiate, complete, and submit sentencing guidelines worksheets. This study discusses the evaluation of MAGS implementation, highlighting the value of technology and monitoring as a means to enhance judicial administration.
ISSN:0887-4034
1552-3586
DOI:10.1177/0887403416628603