Loading…

Practice makes proficient: teaching undergraduate students to understand published research

Scientific knowledge, including the critical evaluation and comprehension of empirical articles, is a key skill valued by most undergraduate institutions for students within the sciences. Students often find it difficult to not only summarize empirical journal articles, but moreover to successfully...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Instructional science 2018-12, Vol.46 (6), p.921-946
Main Authors: Kershaw, Trina C., Lippman, Jordan P., Fugate, Jennifer M. B.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-16f89b80cfc928c3f307bc27b70b6afd1dabd4a6de0186290fe5d4afe8d9684b3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-16f89b80cfc928c3f307bc27b70b6afd1dabd4a6de0186290fe5d4afe8d9684b3
container_end_page 946
container_issue 6
container_start_page 921
container_title Instructional science
container_volume 46
creator Kershaw, Trina C.
Lippman, Jordan P.
Fugate, Jennifer M. B.
description Scientific knowledge, including the critical evaluation and comprehension of empirical articles, is a key skill valued by most undergraduate institutions for students within the sciences. Students often find it difficult to not only summarize empirical journal articles, but moreover to successfully grasp the quality and rigor of investigation behind the source. In this paper, we use instructional scaffolds (reading worksheets, RWs, with tutorials) to aid students in being able to comprehend, and ultimately transfer, the skills necessary in critically evaluating primary sources of research. We assess students learning of these skills on a multiple-choice assessment of Journal Article Comprehension (JAC). Students in experimental classes, who received instructional scaffolds, improved on the JAC post-test compared with students in control classes. This result shows that students are acquiring fundamental research skills such as understanding the components of research articles. We also showed that improvement on the JAC post-test for the experimental class extended to a written summary test. This result suggests that students in the experimental group are developing discipline-specific science process skills that allow them to apply JAC skills to a near-transfer task of writing a summary.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11251-018-9456-2
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2039617266</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1197624</ericid><jstor_id>45213864</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>45213864</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-16f89b80cfc928c3f307bc27b70b6afd1dabd4a6de0186290fe5d4afe8d9684b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEFP3DAQha0KJBboD-BQKRLqMe2Mk9gON4S2tNVK7aGcerAce7ybZTdZbOfAv69XQZQTJ8v63ps38xi7QviCAPJrROQNloCqbOtGlPwDW2AjqxLbhp-wBQCHsuZSnrHzGLcAgLWCBfv7OxibekvF3jxSLA5h9L3taUg3RSJjN_2wLqbBUVgH4yaTqIhpcpnHIo0zickMrjhM3a6PG3JFoEgm2M0lO_VmF-njy3vBHr4t_9x9L1e_7n_c3a5KWwmVShRetZ0C623Lla18BbKzXHYSOmG8Q2c6VxvhKF8neAuemvz3pFwrVN1VF-x6npuXf5ooJr0dpzDkSM2hagVKLkRW4ayyYYwxkNeH0O9NeNYI-tihnjvUOUUfO9Q8ez7NHgq9fdUvfyK2UvA6cz7zmNmwpvA_-b2hn2fTNqYxvN2C58t13XCslKirf83giz0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2039617266</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Practice makes proficient: teaching undergraduate students to understand published research</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>Springer Nature</source><source>ERIC</source><source>Education Collection</source><creator>Kershaw, Trina C. ; Lippman, Jordan P. ; Fugate, Jennifer M. B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kershaw, Trina C. ; Lippman, Jordan P. ; Fugate, Jennifer M. B.</creatorcontrib><description>Scientific knowledge, including the critical evaluation and comprehension of empirical articles, is a key skill valued by most undergraduate institutions for students within the sciences. Students often find it difficult to not only summarize empirical journal articles, but moreover to successfully grasp the quality and rigor of investigation behind the source. In this paper, we use instructional scaffolds (reading worksheets, RWs, with tutorials) to aid students in being able to comprehend, and ultimately transfer, the skills necessary in critically evaluating primary sources of research. We assess students learning of these skills on a multiple-choice assessment of Journal Article Comprehension (JAC). Students in experimental classes, who received instructional scaffolds, improved on the JAC post-test compared with students in control classes. This result shows that students are acquiring fundamental research skills such as understanding the components of research articles. We also showed that improvement on the JAC post-test for the experimental class extended to a written summary test. This result suggests that students in the experimental group are developing discipline-specific science process skills that allow them to apply JAC skills to a near-transfer task of writing a summary.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0020-4277</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-1952</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11251-018-9456-2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer</publisher><subject>Academic disciplines ; Classes ; Comprehension ; Education ; Educational Psychology ; Educational Research ; Experimental Groups ; Higher education ; Learning ; Learning and Instruction ; Original Research ; Pedagogic Psychology ; Pedagogy ; Pretests Posttests ; Process Education ; Research Methodology ; Research Skills ; Scaffolding (Teaching Technique) ; Scholarly publishing ; Science education ; Science Process Skills ; Teaching ; Teaching Methods ; Tutorials ; Undergraduate Students ; University students</subject><ispartof>Instructional science, 2018-12, Vol.46 (6), p.921-946</ispartof><rights>Springer Nature B.V. 2018</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018</rights><rights>Instructional Science is a copyright of Springer, (2018). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-16f89b80cfc928c3f307bc27b70b6afd1dabd4a6de0186290fe5d4afe8d9684b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-16f89b80cfc928c3f307bc27b70b6afd1dabd4a6de0186290fe5d4afe8d9684b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2039617266/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2039617266?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,12847,21378,21394,27924,27925,33223,33611,33877,43733,43880,58238,58471,74221,74397</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1197624$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kershaw, Trina C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lippman, Jordan P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fugate, Jennifer M. B.</creatorcontrib><title>Practice makes proficient: teaching undergraduate students to understand published research</title><title>Instructional science</title><addtitle>Instr Sci</addtitle><description>Scientific knowledge, including the critical evaluation and comprehension of empirical articles, is a key skill valued by most undergraduate institutions for students within the sciences. Students often find it difficult to not only summarize empirical journal articles, but moreover to successfully grasp the quality and rigor of investigation behind the source. In this paper, we use instructional scaffolds (reading worksheets, RWs, with tutorials) to aid students in being able to comprehend, and ultimately transfer, the skills necessary in critically evaluating primary sources of research. We assess students learning of these skills on a multiple-choice assessment of Journal Article Comprehension (JAC). Students in experimental classes, who received instructional scaffolds, improved on the JAC post-test compared with students in control classes. This result shows that students are acquiring fundamental research skills such as understanding the components of research articles. We also showed that improvement on the JAC post-test for the experimental class extended to a written summary test. This result suggests that students in the experimental group are developing discipline-specific science process skills that allow them to apply JAC skills to a near-transfer task of writing a summary.</description><subject>Academic disciplines</subject><subject>Classes</subject><subject>Comprehension</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Educational Psychology</subject><subject>Educational Research</subject><subject>Experimental Groups</subject><subject>Higher education</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Learning and Instruction</subject><subject>Original Research</subject><subject>Pedagogic Psychology</subject><subject>Pedagogy</subject><subject>Pretests Posttests</subject><subject>Process Education</subject><subject>Research Methodology</subject><subject>Research Skills</subject><subject>Scaffolding (Teaching Technique)</subject><subject>Scholarly publishing</subject><subject>Science education</subject><subject>Science Process Skills</subject><subject>Teaching</subject><subject>Teaching Methods</subject><subject>Tutorials</subject><subject>Undergraduate Students</subject><subject>University students</subject><issn>0020-4277</issn><issn>1573-1952</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7SW</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>CJNVE</sourceid><sourceid>M0P</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEFP3DAQha0KJBboD-BQKRLqMe2Mk9gON4S2tNVK7aGcerAce7ybZTdZbOfAv69XQZQTJ8v63ps38xi7QviCAPJrROQNloCqbOtGlPwDW2AjqxLbhp-wBQCHsuZSnrHzGLcAgLWCBfv7OxibekvF3jxSLA5h9L3taUg3RSJjN_2wLqbBUVgH4yaTqIhpcpnHIo0zickMrjhM3a6PG3JFoEgm2M0lO_VmF-njy3vBHr4t_9x9L1e_7n_c3a5KWwmVShRetZ0C623Lla18BbKzXHYSOmG8Q2c6VxvhKF8neAuemvz3pFwrVN1VF-x6npuXf5ooJr0dpzDkSM2hagVKLkRW4ayyYYwxkNeH0O9NeNYI-tihnjvUOUUfO9Q8ez7NHgq9fdUvfyK2UvA6cz7zmNmwpvA_-b2hn2fTNqYxvN2C58t13XCslKirf83giz0</recordid><startdate>20181201</startdate><enddate>20181201</enddate><creator>Kershaw, Trina C.</creator><creator>Lippman, Jordan P.</creator><creator>Fugate, Jennifer M. B.</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>8A4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20181201</creationdate><title>Practice makes proficient: teaching undergraduate students to understand published research</title><author>Kershaw, Trina C. ; Lippman, Jordan P. ; Fugate, Jennifer M. B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-16f89b80cfc928c3f307bc27b70b6afd1dabd4a6de0186290fe5d4afe8d9684b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Academic disciplines</topic><topic>Classes</topic><topic>Comprehension</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Educational Psychology</topic><topic>Educational Research</topic><topic>Experimental Groups</topic><topic>Higher education</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Learning and Instruction</topic><topic>Original Research</topic><topic>Pedagogic Psychology</topic><topic>Pedagogy</topic><topic>Pretests Posttests</topic><topic>Process Education</topic><topic>Research Methodology</topic><topic>Research Skills</topic><topic>Scaffolding (Teaching Technique)</topic><topic>Scholarly publishing</topic><topic>Science education</topic><topic>Science Process Skills</topic><topic>Teaching</topic><topic>Teaching Methods</topic><topic>Tutorials</topic><topic>Undergraduate Students</topic><topic>University students</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kershaw, Trina C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lippman, Jordan P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fugate, Jennifer M. B.</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Periodicals</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Instructional science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kershaw, Trina C.</au><au>Lippman, Jordan P.</au><au>Fugate, Jennifer M. B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1197624</ericid><atitle>Practice makes proficient: teaching undergraduate students to understand published research</atitle><jtitle>Instructional science</jtitle><stitle>Instr Sci</stitle><date>2018-12-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>921</spage><epage>946</epage><pages>921-946</pages><issn>0020-4277</issn><eissn>1573-1952</eissn><abstract>Scientific knowledge, including the critical evaluation and comprehension of empirical articles, is a key skill valued by most undergraduate institutions for students within the sciences. Students often find it difficult to not only summarize empirical journal articles, but moreover to successfully grasp the quality and rigor of investigation behind the source. In this paper, we use instructional scaffolds (reading worksheets, RWs, with tutorials) to aid students in being able to comprehend, and ultimately transfer, the skills necessary in critically evaluating primary sources of research. We assess students learning of these skills on a multiple-choice assessment of Journal Article Comprehension (JAC). Students in experimental classes, who received instructional scaffolds, improved on the JAC post-test compared with students in control classes. This result shows that students are acquiring fundamental research skills such as understanding the components of research articles. We also showed that improvement on the JAC post-test for the experimental class extended to a written summary test. This result suggests that students in the experimental group are developing discipline-specific science process skills that allow them to apply JAC skills to a near-transfer task of writing a summary.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer</pub><doi>10.1007/s11251-018-9456-2</doi><tpages>26</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0020-4277
ispartof Instructional science, 2018-12, Vol.46 (6), p.921-946
issn 0020-4277
1573-1952
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2039617266
source International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; Social Science Premium Collection; Springer Nature; ERIC; Education Collection
subjects Academic disciplines
Classes
Comprehension
Education
Educational Psychology
Educational Research
Experimental Groups
Higher education
Learning
Learning and Instruction
Original Research
Pedagogic Psychology
Pedagogy
Pretests Posttests
Process Education
Research Methodology
Research Skills
Scaffolding (Teaching Technique)
Scholarly publishing
Science education
Science Process Skills
Teaching
Teaching Methods
Tutorials
Undergraduate Students
University students
title Practice makes proficient: teaching undergraduate students to understand published research
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T01%3A23%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Practice%20makes%20proficient:%20teaching%20undergraduate%20students%20to%20understand%20published%20research&rft.jtitle=Instructional%20science&rft.au=Kershaw,%20Trina%20C.&rft.date=2018-12-01&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=921&rft.epage=946&rft.pages=921-946&rft.issn=0020-4277&rft.eissn=1573-1952&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11251-018-9456-2&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E45213864%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-16f89b80cfc928c3f307bc27b70b6afd1dabd4a6de0186290fe5d4afe8d9684b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2039617266&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1197624&rft_jstor_id=45213864&rfr_iscdi=true