Loading…
Practice makes proficient: teaching undergraduate students to understand published research
Scientific knowledge, including the critical evaluation and comprehension of empirical articles, is a key skill valued by most undergraduate institutions for students within the sciences. Students often find it difficult to not only summarize empirical journal articles, but moreover to successfully...
Saved in:
Published in: | Instructional science 2018-12, Vol.46 (6), p.921-946 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-16f89b80cfc928c3f307bc27b70b6afd1dabd4a6de0186290fe5d4afe8d9684b3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-16f89b80cfc928c3f307bc27b70b6afd1dabd4a6de0186290fe5d4afe8d9684b3 |
container_end_page | 946 |
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 921 |
container_title | Instructional science |
container_volume | 46 |
creator | Kershaw, Trina C. Lippman, Jordan P. Fugate, Jennifer M. B. |
description | Scientific knowledge, including the critical evaluation and comprehension of empirical articles, is a key skill valued by most undergraduate institutions for students within the sciences. Students often find it difficult to not only summarize empirical journal articles, but moreover to successfully grasp the quality and rigor of investigation behind the source. In this paper, we use instructional scaffolds (reading worksheets, RWs, with tutorials) to aid students in being able to comprehend, and ultimately transfer, the skills necessary in critically evaluating primary sources of research. We assess students learning of these skills on a multiple-choice assessment of Journal Article Comprehension (JAC). Students in experimental classes, who received instructional scaffolds, improved on the JAC post-test compared with students in control classes. This result shows that students are acquiring fundamental research skills such as understanding the components of research articles. We also showed that improvement on the JAC post-test for the experimental class extended to a written summary test. This result suggests that students in the experimental group are developing discipline-specific science process skills that allow them to apply JAC skills to a near-transfer task of writing a summary. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11251-018-9456-2 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2039617266</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1197624</ericid><jstor_id>45213864</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>45213864</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-16f89b80cfc928c3f307bc27b70b6afd1dabd4a6de0186290fe5d4afe8d9684b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEFP3DAQha0KJBboD-BQKRLqMe2Mk9gON4S2tNVK7aGcerAce7ybZTdZbOfAv69XQZQTJ8v63ps38xi7QviCAPJrROQNloCqbOtGlPwDW2AjqxLbhp-wBQCHsuZSnrHzGLcAgLWCBfv7OxibekvF3jxSLA5h9L3taUg3RSJjN_2wLqbBUVgH4yaTqIhpcpnHIo0zickMrjhM3a6PG3JFoEgm2M0lO_VmF-njy3vBHr4t_9x9L1e_7n_c3a5KWwmVShRetZ0C623Lla18BbKzXHYSOmG8Q2c6VxvhKF8neAuemvz3pFwrVN1VF-x6npuXf5ooJr0dpzDkSM2hagVKLkRW4ayyYYwxkNeH0O9NeNYI-tihnjvUOUUfO9Q8ez7NHgq9fdUvfyK2UvA6cz7zmNmwpvA_-b2hn2fTNqYxvN2C58t13XCslKirf83giz0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2039617266</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Practice makes proficient: teaching undergraduate students to understand published research</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>Springer Nature</source><source>ERIC</source><source>Education Collection</source><creator>Kershaw, Trina C. ; Lippman, Jordan P. ; Fugate, Jennifer M. B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kershaw, Trina C. ; Lippman, Jordan P. ; Fugate, Jennifer M. B.</creatorcontrib><description>Scientific knowledge, including the critical evaluation and comprehension of empirical articles, is a key skill valued by most undergraduate institutions for students within the sciences. Students often find it difficult to not only summarize empirical journal articles, but moreover to successfully grasp the quality and rigor of investigation behind the source. In this paper, we use instructional scaffolds (reading worksheets, RWs, with tutorials) to aid students in being able to comprehend, and ultimately transfer, the skills necessary in critically evaluating primary sources of research. We assess students learning of these skills on a multiple-choice assessment of Journal Article Comprehension (JAC). Students in experimental classes, who received instructional scaffolds, improved on the JAC post-test compared with students in control classes. This result shows that students are acquiring fundamental research skills such as understanding the components of research articles. We also showed that improvement on the JAC post-test for the experimental class extended to a written summary test. This result suggests that students in the experimental group are developing discipline-specific science process skills that allow them to apply JAC skills to a near-transfer task of writing a summary.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0020-4277</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-1952</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11251-018-9456-2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer</publisher><subject>Academic disciplines ; Classes ; Comprehension ; Education ; Educational Psychology ; Educational Research ; Experimental Groups ; Higher education ; Learning ; Learning and Instruction ; Original Research ; Pedagogic Psychology ; Pedagogy ; Pretests Posttests ; Process Education ; Research Methodology ; Research Skills ; Scaffolding (Teaching Technique) ; Scholarly publishing ; Science education ; Science Process Skills ; Teaching ; Teaching Methods ; Tutorials ; Undergraduate Students ; University students</subject><ispartof>Instructional science, 2018-12, Vol.46 (6), p.921-946</ispartof><rights>Springer Nature B.V. 2018</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018</rights><rights>Instructional Science is a copyright of Springer, (2018). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-16f89b80cfc928c3f307bc27b70b6afd1dabd4a6de0186290fe5d4afe8d9684b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-16f89b80cfc928c3f307bc27b70b6afd1dabd4a6de0186290fe5d4afe8d9684b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2039617266/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2039617266?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,12847,21378,21394,27924,27925,33223,33611,33877,43733,43880,58238,58471,74221,74397</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1197624$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kershaw, Trina C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lippman, Jordan P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fugate, Jennifer M. B.</creatorcontrib><title>Practice makes proficient: teaching undergraduate students to understand published research</title><title>Instructional science</title><addtitle>Instr Sci</addtitle><description>Scientific knowledge, including the critical evaluation and comprehension of empirical articles, is a key skill valued by most undergraduate institutions for students within the sciences. Students often find it difficult to not only summarize empirical journal articles, but moreover to successfully grasp the quality and rigor of investigation behind the source. In this paper, we use instructional scaffolds (reading worksheets, RWs, with tutorials) to aid students in being able to comprehend, and ultimately transfer, the skills necessary in critically evaluating primary sources of research. We assess students learning of these skills on a multiple-choice assessment of Journal Article Comprehension (JAC). Students in experimental classes, who received instructional scaffolds, improved on the JAC post-test compared with students in control classes. This result shows that students are acquiring fundamental research skills such as understanding the components of research articles. We also showed that improvement on the JAC post-test for the experimental class extended to a written summary test. This result suggests that students in the experimental group are developing discipline-specific science process skills that allow them to apply JAC skills to a near-transfer task of writing a summary.</description><subject>Academic disciplines</subject><subject>Classes</subject><subject>Comprehension</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Educational Psychology</subject><subject>Educational Research</subject><subject>Experimental Groups</subject><subject>Higher education</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Learning and Instruction</subject><subject>Original Research</subject><subject>Pedagogic Psychology</subject><subject>Pedagogy</subject><subject>Pretests Posttests</subject><subject>Process Education</subject><subject>Research Methodology</subject><subject>Research Skills</subject><subject>Scaffolding (Teaching Technique)</subject><subject>Scholarly publishing</subject><subject>Science education</subject><subject>Science Process Skills</subject><subject>Teaching</subject><subject>Teaching Methods</subject><subject>Tutorials</subject><subject>Undergraduate Students</subject><subject>University students</subject><issn>0020-4277</issn><issn>1573-1952</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7SW</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>CJNVE</sourceid><sourceid>M0P</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEFP3DAQha0KJBboD-BQKRLqMe2Mk9gON4S2tNVK7aGcerAce7ybZTdZbOfAv69XQZQTJ8v63ps38xi7QviCAPJrROQNloCqbOtGlPwDW2AjqxLbhp-wBQCHsuZSnrHzGLcAgLWCBfv7OxibekvF3jxSLA5h9L3taUg3RSJjN_2wLqbBUVgH4yaTqIhpcpnHIo0zickMrjhM3a6PG3JFoEgm2M0lO_VmF-njy3vBHr4t_9x9L1e_7n_c3a5KWwmVShRetZ0C623Lla18BbKzXHYSOmG8Q2c6VxvhKF8neAuemvz3pFwrVN1VF-x6npuXf5ooJr0dpzDkSM2hagVKLkRW4ayyYYwxkNeH0O9NeNYI-tihnjvUOUUfO9Q8ez7NHgq9fdUvfyK2UvA6cz7zmNmwpvA_-b2hn2fTNqYxvN2C58t13XCslKirf83giz0</recordid><startdate>20181201</startdate><enddate>20181201</enddate><creator>Kershaw, Trina C.</creator><creator>Lippman, Jordan P.</creator><creator>Fugate, Jennifer M. B.</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>8A4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20181201</creationdate><title>Practice makes proficient: teaching undergraduate students to understand published research</title><author>Kershaw, Trina C. ; Lippman, Jordan P. ; Fugate, Jennifer M. B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-16f89b80cfc928c3f307bc27b70b6afd1dabd4a6de0186290fe5d4afe8d9684b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Academic disciplines</topic><topic>Classes</topic><topic>Comprehension</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Educational Psychology</topic><topic>Educational Research</topic><topic>Experimental Groups</topic><topic>Higher education</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Learning and Instruction</topic><topic>Original Research</topic><topic>Pedagogic Psychology</topic><topic>Pedagogy</topic><topic>Pretests Posttests</topic><topic>Process Education</topic><topic>Research Methodology</topic><topic>Research Skills</topic><topic>Scaffolding (Teaching Technique)</topic><topic>Scholarly publishing</topic><topic>Science education</topic><topic>Science Process Skills</topic><topic>Teaching</topic><topic>Teaching Methods</topic><topic>Tutorials</topic><topic>Undergraduate Students</topic><topic>University students</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kershaw, Trina C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lippman, Jordan P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fugate, Jennifer M. B.</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Periodicals</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Instructional science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kershaw, Trina C.</au><au>Lippman, Jordan P.</au><au>Fugate, Jennifer M. B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1197624</ericid><atitle>Practice makes proficient: teaching undergraduate students to understand published research</atitle><jtitle>Instructional science</jtitle><stitle>Instr Sci</stitle><date>2018-12-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>921</spage><epage>946</epage><pages>921-946</pages><issn>0020-4277</issn><eissn>1573-1952</eissn><abstract>Scientific knowledge, including the critical evaluation and comprehension of empirical articles, is a key skill valued by most undergraduate institutions for students within the sciences. Students often find it difficult to not only summarize empirical journal articles, but moreover to successfully grasp the quality and rigor of investigation behind the source. In this paper, we use instructional scaffolds (reading worksheets, RWs, with tutorials) to aid students in being able to comprehend, and ultimately transfer, the skills necessary in critically evaluating primary sources of research. We assess students learning of these skills on a multiple-choice assessment of Journal Article Comprehension (JAC). Students in experimental classes, who received instructional scaffolds, improved on the JAC post-test compared with students in control classes. This result shows that students are acquiring fundamental research skills such as understanding the components of research articles. We also showed that improvement on the JAC post-test for the experimental class extended to a written summary test. This result suggests that students in the experimental group are developing discipline-specific science process skills that allow them to apply JAC skills to a near-transfer task of writing a summary.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer</pub><doi>10.1007/s11251-018-9456-2</doi><tpages>26</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0020-4277 |
ispartof | Instructional science, 2018-12, Vol.46 (6), p.921-946 |
issn | 0020-4277 1573-1952 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2039617266 |
source | International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; Social Science Premium Collection; Springer Nature; ERIC; Education Collection |
subjects | Academic disciplines Classes Comprehension Education Educational Psychology Educational Research Experimental Groups Higher education Learning Learning and Instruction Original Research Pedagogic Psychology Pedagogy Pretests Posttests Process Education Research Methodology Research Skills Scaffolding (Teaching Technique) Scholarly publishing Science education Science Process Skills Teaching Teaching Methods Tutorials Undergraduate Students University students |
title | Practice makes proficient: teaching undergraduate students to understand published research |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T01%3A23%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Practice%20makes%20proficient:%20teaching%20undergraduate%20students%20to%20understand%20published%20research&rft.jtitle=Instructional%20science&rft.au=Kershaw,%20Trina%20C.&rft.date=2018-12-01&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=921&rft.epage=946&rft.pages=921-946&rft.issn=0020-4277&rft.eissn=1573-1952&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11251-018-9456-2&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E45213864%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-16f89b80cfc928c3f307bc27b70b6afd1dabd4a6de0186290fe5d4afe8d9684b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2039617266&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1197624&rft_jstor_id=45213864&rfr_iscdi=true |