Evaluating a predator-prey interaction in the field: the interaction between beetle larvae (predator) and tadpoles (prey)

The larval amphibian community of temporary pond ecosystems has served as a model for studies in community ecology, with a majority of this work being conducted in mesocosms. Recent research has suggested that mesocosms may overestimate ecological effects; therefore, experimental studies conducted u...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of zoology (1987) 2006-05, Vol.269 (1), p.1-5
Main Authors: Rubbo, M. J., Mirza, R. S., Belden, L. K., Falkenbach, J. J., Storrs, S. I., Kiesecker, J. M.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
chemical cue
dytiscid
Ecosystems
field experiment
Frogs
Insects
Predation
wood frog
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The larval amphibian community of temporary pond ecosystems has served as a model for studies in community ecology, with a majority of this work being conducted in mesocosms. Recent research has suggested that mesocosms may overestimate ecological effects; therefore, experimental studies conducted under field conditions are required to gauge the results of mesocosm studies. To assess a species interaction under more natural conditions, we conducted a series of field experiments examining the predator–prey interaction between beetle larvae (Dytiscus sp.; predator) and larval wood frogs Rana sylvatica (prey) in central Pennsylvania, USA. Quantitative sampling of woodland ponds indicated that beetle larvae of the genus Dytiscus were the most common predator of tadpoles. In a field enclosure experiment, dytiscids were effective predators of tadpoles in the pond environment. Moreover, tadpoles avoided areas in a pond containing caged dytiscids, demonstrating that tadpoles recognize the chemical stimuli of predators in complex environments. The results of this study are consistent with data from prior laboratory and mesocosm studies and suggest that these venues can produce reliable interpretations of predator–prey dynamics in this community.
ISSN:0952-8369
1469-7998
DOI:10.1111/j.1469-7998.2006.00080.x