Loading…

The Effect of Gender on Attributions for Women’s Anxiety and Doubt in a Science Narrative

Although the effect of biases and stereotype threat on women in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) fields is well documented, less is known about how men and women attribute an undergraduate woman’s anxieties in a STEM class. We examined how undergraduate men and women perceive a woma...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Psychology of women quarterly 2018-06, Vol.42 (2), p.178-191
Main Authors: Freedman, Gili, Green, Melanie C., Flanagan, Mary, Fitzgerald, Kaitlin, Kaufman, Geoff
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-36cdf2e1e7dd782a009e9cc93d141636aabaca0320c3f43d256323d6ae1cc1dc3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-36cdf2e1e7dd782a009e9cc93d141636aabaca0320c3f43d256323d6ae1cc1dc3
container_end_page 191
container_issue 2
container_start_page 178
container_title Psychology of women quarterly
container_volume 42
creator Freedman, Gili
Green, Melanie C.
Flanagan, Mary
Fitzgerald, Kaitlin
Kaufman, Geoff
description Although the effect of biases and stereotype threat on women in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) fields is well documented, less is known about how men and women attribute an undergraduate woman’s anxieties in a STEM class. We examined how undergraduate men and women perceive a woman facing emotional struggles in a physics class (Study 1, N = 309; Study 2, N = 271) and having her contributions ignored in an environmental science class (Study 3, N = 344) in three studies and an internal meta-analysis. Across the studies and meta-analysis, we found gender differences in reactions to the stories. Men were less likely than women to attribute the student’s anxiety to bias-related factors, such as awareness of stereotypes or instructor treatment, and more likely than women to attribute the anxiety to the student’s lack of preparation. Women were more likely to view the narratives as reflecting real-life experiences of women in STEM. The results indicate a lack of awareness, on the part of undergraduate men, of the difficulties faced by women in STEM classes. Based on the current findings, educators and researchers should consider the role that gender plays in how women’s emotional responses in STEM contexts are interpreted. Additional online materials for this article are available on PWQ’s website at http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/suppl/10.1177/0361684318754528
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0361684318754528
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2041237138</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0361684318754528</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2041237138</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-36cdf2e1e7dd782a009e9cc93d141636aabaca0320c3f43d256323d6ae1cc1dc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEFLAzEUhIMoWKt3jwHPq3nJbnb3WKpWoejBigcPS5q86Bab1CQr9ubf8O_5S9xSQRB8lznMN_NgCDkGdgpQlmdMSJBVLqAqi7zg1Q4ZQF5CJnPGd8lgY2cbf58cxLhg_eV1NSCPs2ekF9aiTtRbOkFnMFDv6Cil0M671HoXqfWBPvgluq-Pz0hH7r3FtKbKGXruu3miraOK3ukWnUZ6o0JQqX3DQ7Jn1UvEox8dkvvLi9n4KpveTq7Ho2mmRQEpE1IbyxGwNKasuGKsxlrrWhjIQQqp1FxpxQRnWthcGF5IwYWRCkFrMFoMycm2dxX8a4cxNQvfBde_bDjLgYsSRNVTbEvp4GMMaJtVaJcqrBtgzWbC5u-EfSTbRqJ6wt_Sf_lvOLRwwQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2041237138</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Effect of Gender on Attributions for Women’s Anxiety and Doubt in a Science Narrative</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>SAGE</source><creator>Freedman, Gili ; Green, Melanie C. ; Flanagan, Mary ; Fitzgerald, Kaitlin ; Kaufman, Geoff</creator><creatorcontrib>Freedman, Gili ; Green, Melanie C. ; Flanagan, Mary ; Fitzgerald, Kaitlin ; Kaufman, Geoff</creatorcontrib><description>Although the effect of biases and stereotype threat on women in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) fields is well documented, less is known about how men and women attribute an undergraduate woman’s anxieties in a STEM class. We examined how undergraduate men and women perceive a woman facing emotional struggles in a physics class (Study 1, N = 309; Study 2, N = 271) and having her contributions ignored in an environmental science class (Study 3, N = 344) in three studies and an internal meta-analysis. Across the studies and meta-analysis, we found gender differences in reactions to the stories. Men were less likely than women to attribute the student’s anxiety to bias-related factors, such as awareness of stereotypes or instructor treatment, and more likely than women to attribute the anxiety to the student’s lack of preparation. Women were more likely to view the narratives as reflecting real-life experiences of women in STEM. The results indicate a lack of awareness, on the part of undergraduate men, of the difficulties faced by women in STEM classes. Based on the current findings, educators and researchers should consider the role that gender plays in how women’s emotional responses in STEM contexts are interpreted. Additional online materials for this article are available on PWQ’s website at http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/suppl/10.1177/0361684318754528</description><identifier>ISSN: 0361-6843</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-6402</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0361684318754528</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Anxiety ; Attributes ; Attribution ; Bias ; Emotional responses ; Feminism ; Feminist psychology ; Gender differences ; Gender stereotypes ; Life experiences ; Narratives ; Physics ; Psychology ; Science and technology ; STEM education ; Systematic review ; Technology ; Women ; Womens studies</subject><ispartof>Psychology of women quarterly, 2018-06, Vol.42 (2), p.178-191</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-36cdf2e1e7dd782a009e9cc93d141636aabaca0320c3f43d256323d6ae1cc1dc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-36cdf2e1e7dd782a009e9cc93d141636aabaca0320c3f43d256323d6ae1cc1dc3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7006-9674</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924,30998,33222,79135</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Freedman, Gili</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Green, Melanie C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flanagan, Mary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fitzgerald, Kaitlin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaufman, Geoff</creatorcontrib><title>The Effect of Gender on Attributions for Women’s Anxiety and Doubt in a Science Narrative</title><title>Psychology of women quarterly</title><description>Although the effect of biases and stereotype threat on women in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) fields is well documented, less is known about how men and women attribute an undergraduate woman’s anxieties in a STEM class. We examined how undergraduate men and women perceive a woman facing emotional struggles in a physics class (Study 1, N = 309; Study 2, N = 271) and having her contributions ignored in an environmental science class (Study 3, N = 344) in three studies and an internal meta-analysis. Across the studies and meta-analysis, we found gender differences in reactions to the stories. Men were less likely than women to attribute the student’s anxiety to bias-related factors, such as awareness of stereotypes or instructor treatment, and more likely than women to attribute the anxiety to the student’s lack of preparation. Women were more likely to view the narratives as reflecting real-life experiences of women in STEM. The results indicate a lack of awareness, on the part of undergraduate men, of the difficulties faced by women in STEM classes. Based on the current findings, educators and researchers should consider the role that gender plays in how women’s emotional responses in STEM contexts are interpreted. Additional online materials for this article are available on PWQ’s website at http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/suppl/10.1177/0361684318754528</description><subject>Anxiety</subject><subject>Attributes</subject><subject>Attribution</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Emotional responses</subject><subject>Feminism</subject><subject>Feminist psychology</subject><subject>Gender differences</subject><subject>Gender stereotypes</subject><subject>Life experiences</subject><subject>Narratives</subject><subject>Physics</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Science and technology</subject><subject>STEM education</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Technology</subject><subject>Women</subject><subject>Womens studies</subject><issn>0361-6843</issn><issn>1471-6402</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kEFLAzEUhIMoWKt3jwHPq3nJbnb3WKpWoejBigcPS5q86Bab1CQr9ubf8O_5S9xSQRB8lznMN_NgCDkGdgpQlmdMSJBVLqAqi7zg1Q4ZQF5CJnPGd8lgY2cbf58cxLhg_eV1NSCPs2ekF9aiTtRbOkFnMFDv6Cil0M671HoXqfWBPvgluq-Pz0hH7r3FtKbKGXruu3miraOK3ukWnUZ6o0JQqX3DQ7Jn1UvEox8dkvvLi9n4KpveTq7Ho2mmRQEpE1IbyxGwNKasuGKsxlrrWhjIQQqp1FxpxQRnWthcGF5IwYWRCkFrMFoMycm2dxX8a4cxNQvfBde_bDjLgYsSRNVTbEvp4GMMaJtVaJcqrBtgzWbC5u-EfSTbRqJ6wt_Sf_lvOLRwwQ</recordid><startdate>201806</startdate><enddate>201806</enddate><creator>Freedman, Gili</creator><creator>Green, Melanie C.</creator><creator>Flanagan, Mary</creator><creator>Fitzgerald, Kaitlin</creator><creator>Kaufman, Geoff</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7006-9674</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201806</creationdate><title>The Effect of Gender on Attributions for Women’s Anxiety and Doubt in a Science Narrative</title><author>Freedman, Gili ; Green, Melanie C. ; Flanagan, Mary ; Fitzgerald, Kaitlin ; Kaufman, Geoff</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-36cdf2e1e7dd782a009e9cc93d141636aabaca0320c3f43d256323d6ae1cc1dc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Anxiety</topic><topic>Attributes</topic><topic>Attribution</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Emotional responses</topic><topic>Feminism</topic><topic>Feminist psychology</topic><topic>Gender differences</topic><topic>Gender stereotypes</topic><topic>Life experiences</topic><topic>Narratives</topic><topic>Physics</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Science and technology</topic><topic>STEM education</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Technology</topic><topic>Women</topic><topic>Womens studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Freedman, Gili</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Green, Melanie C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flanagan, Mary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fitzgerald, Kaitlin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaufman, Geoff</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><jtitle>Psychology of women quarterly</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Freedman, Gili</au><au>Green, Melanie C.</au><au>Flanagan, Mary</au><au>Fitzgerald, Kaitlin</au><au>Kaufman, Geoff</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Effect of Gender on Attributions for Women’s Anxiety and Doubt in a Science Narrative</atitle><jtitle>Psychology of women quarterly</jtitle><date>2018-06</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>178</spage><epage>191</epage><pages>178-191</pages><issn>0361-6843</issn><eissn>1471-6402</eissn><abstract>Although the effect of biases and stereotype threat on women in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) fields is well documented, less is known about how men and women attribute an undergraduate woman’s anxieties in a STEM class. We examined how undergraduate men and women perceive a woman facing emotional struggles in a physics class (Study 1, N = 309; Study 2, N = 271) and having her contributions ignored in an environmental science class (Study 3, N = 344) in three studies and an internal meta-analysis. Across the studies and meta-analysis, we found gender differences in reactions to the stories. Men were less likely than women to attribute the student’s anxiety to bias-related factors, such as awareness of stereotypes or instructor treatment, and more likely than women to attribute the anxiety to the student’s lack of preparation. Women were more likely to view the narratives as reflecting real-life experiences of women in STEM. The results indicate a lack of awareness, on the part of undergraduate men, of the difficulties faced by women in STEM classes. Based on the current findings, educators and researchers should consider the role that gender plays in how women’s emotional responses in STEM contexts are interpreted. Additional online materials for this article are available on PWQ’s website at http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/suppl/10.1177/0361684318754528</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0361684318754528</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7006-9674</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0361-6843
ispartof Psychology of women quarterly, 2018-06, Vol.42 (2), p.178-191
issn 0361-6843
1471-6402
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2041237138
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); SAGE
subjects Anxiety
Attributes
Attribution
Bias
Emotional responses
Feminism
Feminist psychology
Gender differences
Gender stereotypes
Life experiences
Narratives
Physics
Psychology
Science and technology
STEM education
Systematic review
Technology
Women
Womens studies
title The Effect of Gender on Attributions for Women’s Anxiety and Doubt in a Science Narrative
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T07%3A23%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Effect%20of%20Gender%20on%20Attributions%20for%20Women%E2%80%99s%20Anxiety%20and%20Doubt%20in%20a%20Science%20Narrative&rft.jtitle=Psychology%20of%20women%20quarterly&rft.au=Freedman,%20Gili&rft.date=2018-06&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=178&rft.epage=191&rft.pages=178-191&rft.issn=0361-6843&rft.eissn=1471-6402&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0361684318754528&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2041237138%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-36cdf2e1e7dd782a009e9cc93d141636aabaca0320c3f43d256323d6ae1cc1dc3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2041237138&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0361684318754528&rfr_iscdi=true