A Bayesian paired comparison approach for relative accident probability assessment with covariate information

• Published in: European journal of operational research 2006-02, Vol.169 (1), p.157-177
• Main Authors: Szwed, P., Dorp, J. Rene van, Merrick, J.R.W., Mazzuchi, T.A., Singh, A.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Accidents; Applied probability; Applied sciences; Bayesian analysis; Exact sciences and technology; Expert judgment; Experts; Ferries; Operational research. Management science; Probability; Risk analysis; Risk assessment; Studies
• ISSN: 0377-2217; 1872-6860
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2004.04.047

One of the challenges managers face when trying to understand complex, technological systems (in their efforts to mitigate system risks) is the quantification of accident probability, particularly in the case of rare events. Once this risk information has been quantified, managers and decision makers can use it to develop appropriate policies, design projects, and/or allocate resources that will mitigate risk. However, rare event risk information inherently suffers from a sparseness of accident data. Therefore, expert judgment is often elicited to develop frequency data for these high-consequence rare events. When applied appropriately, expert judgment can serve as an important (and, at times, the only) source of risk information. This paper presents a Bayesian methodology for assessing relative accident probabilities and their uncertainty using paired comparison to elicit expert judgments. The approach is illustrated using expert judgment data elicited for a risk study of the largest passenger ferry system in the US.