Loading…
Elections, Policy and the Media: Tasmania's Forests and the 2004 Federal Election
Much of the academic literature holds the media responsible for the proliferation of the game frame as a way of reporting on elections. This paper challenges that view through an examination of media coverage of forest policy in the 2004 federal election. The study of articles published in three maj...
Saved in:
Published in: | Australian journal of political science 2006-12, Vol.41 (4), p.569-584 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c498t-2d7dd43076aabdf1fa0d49dfde85e5c9197cd72e9907a83e8fb67b286da991743 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c498t-2d7dd43076aabdf1fa0d49dfde85e5c9197cd72e9907a83e8fb67b286da991743 |
container_end_page | 584 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 569 |
container_title | Australian journal of political science |
container_volume | 41 |
creator | Hollander, Robyn |
description | Much of the academic literature holds the media responsible for the proliferation of the game frame as a way of reporting on elections. This paper challenges that view through an examination of media coverage of forest policy in the 2004 federal election. The study of articles published in three major broadsheets finds that the majority of stories were set within the game frame, which depicts elections as sporting contests, and that far fewer articles focused on the issue. The lack of interest in policy is characteristic of election reporting but, in this case, can be attributed to the way in which the major parties managed their campaigns. Not only did they drive the game frame but, as policy makers, they also determined the frame within which the limited media consideration of policy substance was set. The article concludes that political actors must take at least some responsibility for the domination of the game frame in election reporting. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/10361140600959783 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_rmit_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_204411856</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><informt_id>10.3316/ielapa.200702145</informt_id><sourcerecordid>1244293821</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c498t-2d7dd43076aabdf1fa0d49dfde85e5c9197cd72e9907a83e8fb67b286da991743</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc9rFDEUxwdRsFb_AG-DB7049WXyayJeSum2hYotVPAW3k6SNiU7WZMsdv_7Zh3rwSI9JfA-38_Ly2uatwQOCAzwiQAVhDAQAIorOdBnzR6hgnZA4cfzeq_1rgLiZfMq51sA0jMl9prL42DH4uOUP7YXMfhx2-Jk2nJj26_WePzcXmFe4eTxQ24XMdlc8l-iB2DtwhqbMLQPotfNC4ch2zd_zv3m--L46ui0O_92cnZ0eN6NTA2l6400hlGQAnFpHHEIhinjjB245aMiSo5G9lYpkDhQO7ilkMt-EAaVIpLR_eb97F2n-HNT36VXPo82BJxs3GRdf4FzzsSTIBVCScZVBd_9A97GTZrqELoHxggZ-M5GZmhMMedknV4nv8K01QT0bhX60SpqZjFn0soXjWt0Rd-Uss7aYEHtJxd_V2K61ib6nYlSIrS3ocK1OUjoCeNVJGfRHMFfMQWjC25DTC7hNPr8uL0ud6UmvzyZpP-f4B5mQbdC</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>204411856</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Elections, Policy and the Media: Tasmania's Forests and the 2004 Federal Election</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Taylor and Francis Social Sciences and Humanities Collection</source><creator>Hollander, Robyn</creator><creatorcontrib>Hollander, Robyn</creatorcontrib><description>Much of the academic literature holds the media responsible for the proliferation of the game frame as a way of reporting on elections. This paper challenges that view through an examination of media coverage of forest policy in the 2004 federal election. The study of articles published in three major broadsheets finds that the majority of stories were set within the game frame, which depicts elections as sporting contests, and that far fewer articles focused on the issue. The lack of interest in policy is characteristic of election reporting but, in this case, can be attributed to the way in which the major parties managed their campaigns. Not only did they drive the game frame but, as policy makers, they also determined the frame within which the limited media consideration of policy substance was set. The article concludes that political actors must take at least some responsibility for the domination of the game frame in election reporting.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1036-1146</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1363-030X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/10361140600959783</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Abingdon: Routledge</publisher><subject>Australia ; Campaign strategies ; Discourse ; Dominance ; Elections ; Elections as sporting contests ; Elections: Australia ; Environmental policy ; Forest policy ; Forests ; Game frame ; Game theory ; Journalism ; Mass media ; Mass Media Effects ; Media ; Media coverage ; Media coverage ; News Coverage ; Policy analysis ; Political Parties ; Political theory ; Press ; Responsibility ; Sports ; Surveys ; Tasmania ; Tasmania: Industries and resources</subject><ispartof>Australian journal of political science, 2006-12, Vol.41 (4), p.569-584</ispartof><rights>Copyright Australasian Political Studies Association 2006</rights><rights>Copyright Taylor & Francis Ltd. Dec 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c498t-2d7dd43076aabdf1fa0d49dfde85e5c9197cd72e9907a83e8fb67b286da991743</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c498t-2d7dd43076aabdf1fa0d49dfde85e5c9197cd72e9907a83e8fb67b286da991743</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,33223,33224</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hollander, Robyn</creatorcontrib><title>Elections, Policy and the Media: Tasmania's Forests and the 2004 Federal Election</title><title>Australian journal of political science</title><description>Much of the academic literature holds the media responsible for the proliferation of the game frame as a way of reporting on elections. This paper challenges that view through an examination of media coverage of forest policy in the 2004 federal election. The study of articles published in three major broadsheets finds that the majority of stories were set within the game frame, which depicts elections as sporting contests, and that far fewer articles focused on the issue. The lack of interest in policy is characteristic of election reporting but, in this case, can be attributed to the way in which the major parties managed their campaigns. Not only did they drive the game frame but, as policy makers, they also determined the frame within which the limited media consideration of policy substance was set. The article concludes that political actors must take at least some responsibility for the domination of the game frame in election reporting.</description><subject>Australia</subject><subject>Campaign strategies</subject><subject>Discourse</subject><subject>Dominance</subject><subject>Elections</subject><subject>Elections as sporting contests</subject><subject>Elections: Australia</subject><subject>Environmental policy</subject><subject>Forest policy</subject><subject>Forests</subject><subject>Game frame</subject><subject>Game theory</subject><subject>Journalism</subject><subject>Mass media</subject><subject>Mass Media Effects</subject><subject>Media</subject><subject>Media coverage</subject><subject>Media coverage</subject><subject>News Coverage</subject><subject>Policy analysis</subject><subject>Political Parties</subject><subject>Political theory</subject><subject>Press</subject><subject>Responsibility</subject><subject>Sports</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><subject>Tasmania</subject><subject>Tasmania: Industries and resources</subject><issn>1036-1146</issn><issn>1363-030X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc9rFDEUxwdRsFb_AG-DB7049WXyayJeSum2hYotVPAW3k6SNiU7WZMsdv_7Zh3rwSI9JfA-38_Ly2uatwQOCAzwiQAVhDAQAIorOdBnzR6hgnZA4cfzeq_1rgLiZfMq51sA0jMl9prL42DH4uOUP7YXMfhx2-Jk2nJj26_WePzcXmFe4eTxQ24XMdlc8l-iB2DtwhqbMLQPotfNC4ch2zd_zv3m--L46ui0O_92cnZ0eN6NTA2l6400hlGQAnFpHHEIhinjjB245aMiSo5G9lYpkDhQO7ilkMt-EAaVIpLR_eb97F2n-HNT36VXPo82BJxs3GRdf4FzzsSTIBVCScZVBd_9A97GTZrqELoHxggZ-M5GZmhMMedknV4nv8K01QT0bhX60SpqZjFn0soXjWt0Rd-Uss7aYEHtJxd_V2K61ib6nYlSIrS3ocK1OUjoCeNVJGfRHMFfMQWjC25DTC7hNPr8uL0ud6UmvzyZpP-f4B5mQbdC</recordid><startdate>20061201</startdate><enddate>20061201</enddate><creator>Hollander, Robyn</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20061201</creationdate><title>Elections, Policy and the Media: Tasmania's Forests and the 2004 Federal Election</title><author>Hollander, Robyn</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c498t-2d7dd43076aabdf1fa0d49dfde85e5c9197cd72e9907a83e8fb67b286da991743</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Australia</topic><topic>Campaign strategies</topic><topic>Discourse</topic><topic>Dominance</topic><topic>Elections</topic><topic>Elections as sporting contests</topic><topic>Elections: Australia</topic><topic>Environmental policy</topic><topic>Forest policy</topic><topic>Forests</topic><topic>Game frame</topic><topic>Game theory</topic><topic>Journalism</topic><topic>Mass media</topic><topic>Mass Media Effects</topic><topic>Media</topic><topic>Media coverage</topic><topic>Media coverage</topic><topic>News Coverage</topic><topic>Policy analysis</topic><topic>Political Parties</topic><topic>Political theory</topic><topic>Press</topic><topic>Responsibility</topic><topic>Sports</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><topic>Tasmania</topic><topic>Tasmania: Industries and resources</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hollander, Robyn</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Australian journal of political science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hollander, Robyn</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Elections, Policy and the Media: Tasmania's Forests and the 2004 Federal Election</atitle><jtitle>Australian journal of political science</jtitle><date>2006-12-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>569</spage><epage>584</epage><pages>569-584</pages><issn>1036-1146</issn><eissn>1363-030X</eissn><abstract>Much of the academic literature holds the media responsible for the proliferation of the game frame as a way of reporting on elections. This paper challenges that view through an examination of media coverage of forest policy in the 2004 federal election. The study of articles published in three major broadsheets finds that the majority of stories were set within the game frame, which depicts elections as sporting contests, and that far fewer articles focused on the issue. The lack of interest in policy is characteristic of election reporting but, in this case, can be attributed to the way in which the major parties managed their campaigns. Not only did they drive the game frame but, as policy makers, they also determined the frame within which the limited media consideration of policy substance was set. The article concludes that political actors must take at least some responsibility for the domination of the game frame in election reporting.</abstract><cop>Abingdon</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/10361140600959783</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1036-1146 |
ispartof | Australian journal of political science, 2006-12, Vol.41 (4), p.569-584 |
issn | 1036-1146 1363-030X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_204411856 |
source | International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Taylor and Francis Social Sciences and Humanities Collection |
subjects | Australia Campaign strategies Discourse Dominance Elections Elections as sporting contests Elections: Australia Environmental policy Forest policy Forests Game frame Game theory Journalism Mass media Mass Media Effects Media Media coverage Media coverage News Coverage Policy analysis Political Parties Political theory Press Responsibility Sports Surveys Tasmania Tasmania: Industries and resources |
title | Elections, Policy and the Media: Tasmania's Forests and the 2004 Federal Election |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T03%3A17%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_rmit_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Elections,%20Policy%20and%20the%20Media:%20Tasmania's%20Forests%20and%20the%202004%20Federal%20Election&rft.jtitle=Australian%20journal%20of%20political%20science&rft.au=Hollander,%20Robyn&rft.date=2006-12-01&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=569&rft.epage=584&rft.pages=569-584&rft.issn=1036-1146&rft.eissn=1363-030X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/10361140600959783&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_rmit_%3E1244293821%3C/proquest_rmit_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c498t-2d7dd43076aabdf1fa0d49dfde85e5c9197cd72e9907a83e8fb67b286da991743%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=204411856&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_informt_id=10.3316/ielapa.200702145&rfr_iscdi=true |