Loading…

Validation of Glucometer Technology for Measurement of Glycaemia during Glucose Tolerance Tests and Endotoxin Challenge in Pigs

Glucometers are portable, require small sample volumes, and yield rapid estimates of glycaemia. However, differences in packed cell volume of whole blood between species potentially confound estimates of glucose concentration compared to clinical biochemical analyzers (BA). Our objective was to dete...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of animal science 2018-03, Vol.96, p.82-82
Main Authors: Nunnelley, W Z, Maxwell, H S, Bayne, J E, Brandebourg, T D
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 82
container_issue
container_start_page 82
container_title Journal of animal science
container_volume 96
creator Nunnelley, W Z
Maxwell, H S
Bayne, J E
Brandebourg, T D
description Glucometers are portable, require small sample volumes, and yield rapid estimates of glycaemia. However, differences in packed cell volume of whole blood between species potentially confound estimates of glucose concentration compared to clinical biochemical analyzers (BA). Our objective was to determine the correlation between glucometer estimates of glucose concentration in serum, plasma, and whole blood compared to biochemical analyzer values and then to use the optimal sample handling procedure to track changes during physiological challenges to euglycaemia. Blood samples were collected via jugular venipuncture from 152 Yorkshire barrows and gilts between 8 to 12 weeks of age. Glucose concentration was measured in whole blood, serum, plasma, and fluorinated plasma. Values were compared by Pearson correlation and Bland-Altman analysis. Glucometer estimates of glycaemia in whole blood were highly variable and poorly correlated with BA values (r2=0.34). Correlations of serum and plasma glucometer values with BA values were significantly stronger (serum, r2=0.57; plasma, r2=0.64). Glucometer values obtained in fluorinated plasma correlated the strongest with BA values (r2=0.89). Bland-Altman analysis likewise revealed that glucometer estimates of glycaemia in fluorinated plasma were most similar to those obtained by BA. Mean differences in glucose concentrations determined by BA and glucometer in whole blood, serum, plasma, and fluorinated plasma were 43.5, 33.5, 12.4, and 4.5 mg/ dl, respectively. These results indicate that glucometer technology can reliably reproduce biochemical analyzer estimates of glycaemia when measured in fluorinated plasma. Next this protocol was used in market weight pigs to monitor glycaemia under physiological challenges, represented by glucose tolerance tests (GTT) to mimic postprandial conditions and endotoxin challenges to mimic acute infection. For GTT, pigs (n =4) were fasted for 12 hours, and then 0.3 g/ kg BW glucose was infused. Venous blood was collected at regular intervals for 3 hours post-infusion. Circulating glucose concentration increased 5-fold by 30 minutes after infusion and returned to baseline by 120 minutes. Values obtained by glucometer and BA were not different (P > 0.77). Intramuscular injection of 50 µg/kg BW endotoxin induced a febrile response as rectal temperatures increased 3 degrees Celsius by 1 hour after injection, concomitant with a 43% decrease in glucose concentration. Glucose values obtained
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2046690155</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2046690155</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_20466901553</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjE9Lw0AUxBexYKz9Dg88B3Y3bmjPpepF8BC8lkfykm7ZvKf7B-zJr26gfgBPM8P8Zm5UZZx1dWPa5lZVWltTb7fG3qn7lM5aG-t2rlI_Hxj8gNkLg4zwEkovM2WK0FF_YgkyXWCUCG-EqUSaifMVvPRIs0cYSvQ8XZeJoJNAEblfHKWcAHmAAw-S5dsz7E8YAvFEsIR3P6UHtRoxJNr86Vo9Ph-6_Wv9GeWrLA_Hs5TIS3W0-qltd9o41_yP-gUrA1Gq</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2046690155</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Validation of Glucometer Technology for Measurement of Glycaemia during Glucose Tolerance Tests and Endotoxin Challenge in Pigs</title><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Nunnelley, W Z ; Maxwell, H S ; Bayne, J E ; Brandebourg, T D</creator><creatorcontrib>Nunnelley, W Z ; Maxwell, H S ; Bayne, J E ; Brandebourg, T D</creatorcontrib><description>Glucometers are portable, require small sample volumes, and yield rapid estimates of glycaemia. However, differences in packed cell volume of whole blood between species potentially confound estimates of glucose concentration compared to clinical biochemical analyzers (BA). Our objective was to determine the correlation between glucometer estimates of glucose concentration in serum, plasma, and whole blood compared to biochemical analyzer values and then to use the optimal sample handling procedure to track changes during physiological challenges to euglycaemia. Blood samples were collected via jugular venipuncture from 152 Yorkshire barrows and gilts between 8 to 12 weeks of age. Glucose concentration was measured in whole blood, serum, plasma, and fluorinated plasma. Values were compared by Pearson correlation and Bland-Altman analysis. Glucometer estimates of glycaemia in whole blood were highly variable and poorly correlated with BA values (r2=0.34). Correlations of serum and plasma glucometer values with BA values were significantly stronger (serum, r2=0.57; plasma, r2=0.64). Glucometer values obtained in fluorinated plasma correlated the strongest with BA values (r2=0.89). Bland-Altman analysis likewise revealed that glucometer estimates of glycaemia in fluorinated plasma were most similar to those obtained by BA. Mean differences in glucose concentrations determined by BA and glucometer in whole blood, serum, plasma, and fluorinated plasma were 43.5, 33.5, 12.4, and 4.5 mg/ dl, respectively. These results indicate that glucometer technology can reliably reproduce biochemical analyzer estimates of glycaemia when measured in fluorinated plasma. Next this protocol was used in market weight pigs to monitor glycaemia under physiological challenges, represented by glucose tolerance tests (GTT) to mimic postprandial conditions and endotoxin challenges to mimic acute infection. For GTT, pigs (n =4) were fasted for 12 hours, and then 0.3 g/ kg BW glucose was infused. Venous blood was collected at regular intervals for 3 hours post-infusion. Circulating glucose concentration increased 5-fold by 30 minutes after infusion and returned to baseline by 120 minutes. Values obtained by glucometer and BA were not different (P &gt; 0.77). Intramuscular injection of 50 µg/kg BW endotoxin induced a febrile response as rectal temperatures increased 3 degrees Celsius by 1 hour after injection, concomitant with a 43% decrease in glucose concentration. Glucose values obtained by glucometer and BA were not different in blood sampled during the 8 hours post-injection of endotoxin (P &gt; 0.89). These results indicate that glucometers can reliably estimate glycaemia in fluorinated plasma under a wide range of physiological conditions in the pig.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8812</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-3163</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Champaign: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Analyzers ; Biochemistry ; Blood ; Blood circulation ; Blood glucose ; Cell size ; Correlation analysis ; Estimates ; Fluorination ; Glucose ; Glucose tolerance ; Hogs ; Injection ; Measuring instruments ; Physiology ; Plasma ; Rectum ; Technology</subject><ispartof>Journal of animal science, 2018-03, Vol.96, p.82-82</ispartof><rights>Copyright Oxford University Press, UK Mar 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nunnelley, W Z</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maxwell, H S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bayne, J E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brandebourg, T D</creatorcontrib><title>Validation of Glucometer Technology for Measurement of Glycaemia during Glucose Tolerance Tests and Endotoxin Challenge in Pigs</title><title>Journal of animal science</title><description>Glucometers are portable, require small sample volumes, and yield rapid estimates of glycaemia. However, differences in packed cell volume of whole blood between species potentially confound estimates of glucose concentration compared to clinical biochemical analyzers (BA). Our objective was to determine the correlation between glucometer estimates of glucose concentration in serum, plasma, and whole blood compared to biochemical analyzer values and then to use the optimal sample handling procedure to track changes during physiological challenges to euglycaemia. Blood samples were collected via jugular venipuncture from 152 Yorkshire barrows and gilts between 8 to 12 weeks of age. Glucose concentration was measured in whole blood, serum, plasma, and fluorinated plasma. Values were compared by Pearson correlation and Bland-Altman analysis. Glucometer estimates of glycaemia in whole blood were highly variable and poorly correlated with BA values (r2=0.34). Correlations of serum and plasma glucometer values with BA values were significantly stronger (serum, r2=0.57; plasma, r2=0.64). Glucometer values obtained in fluorinated plasma correlated the strongest with BA values (r2=0.89). Bland-Altman analysis likewise revealed that glucometer estimates of glycaemia in fluorinated plasma were most similar to those obtained by BA. Mean differences in glucose concentrations determined by BA and glucometer in whole blood, serum, plasma, and fluorinated plasma were 43.5, 33.5, 12.4, and 4.5 mg/ dl, respectively. These results indicate that glucometer technology can reliably reproduce biochemical analyzer estimates of glycaemia when measured in fluorinated plasma. Next this protocol was used in market weight pigs to monitor glycaemia under physiological challenges, represented by glucose tolerance tests (GTT) to mimic postprandial conditions and endotoxin challenges to mimic acute infection. For GTT, pigs (n =4) were fasted for 12 hours, and then 0.3 g/ kg BW glucose was infused. Venous blood was collected at regular intervals for 3 hours post-infusion. Circulating glucose concentration increased 5-fold by 30 minutes after infusion and returned to baseline by 120 minutes. Values obtained by glucometer and BA were not different (P &gt; 0.77). Intramuscular injection of 50 µg/kg BW endotoxin induced a febrile response as rectal temperatures increased 3 degrees Celsius by 1 hour after injection, concomitant with a 43% decrease in glucose concentration. Glucose values obtained by glucometer and BA were not different in blood sampled during the 8 hours post-injection of endotoxin (P &gt; 0.89). These results indicate that glucometers can reliably estimate glycaemia in fluorinated plasma under a wide range of physiological conditions in the pig.</description><subject>Analyzers</subject><subject>Biochemistry</subject><subject>Blood</subject><subject>Blood circulation</subject><subject>Blood glucose</subject><subject>Cell size</subject><subject>Correlation analysis</subject><subject>Estimates</subject><subject>Fluorination</subject><subject>Glucose</subject><subject>Glucose tolerance</subject><subject>Hogs</subject><subject>Injection</subject><subject>Measuring instruments</subject><subject>Physiology</subject><subject>Plasma</subject><subject>Rectum</subject><subject>Technology</subject><issn>0021-8812</issn><issn>1525-3163</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNjE9Lw0AUxBexYKz9Dg88B3Y3bmjPpepF8BC8lkfykm7ZvKf7B-zJr26gfgBPM8P8Zm5UZZx1dWPa5lZVWltTb7fG3qn7lM5aG-t2rlI_Hxj8gNkLg4zwEkovM2WK0FF_YgkyXWCUCG-EqUSaifMVvPRIs0cYSvQ8XZeJoJNAEblfHKWcAHmAAw-S5dsz7E8YAvFEsIR3P6UHtRoxJNr86Vo9Ph-6_Wv9GeWrLA_Hs5TIS3W0-qltd9o41_yP-gUrA1Gq</recordid><startdate>20180301</startdate><enddate>20180301</enddate><creator>Nunnelley, W Z</creator><creator>Maxwell, H S</creator><creator>Bayne, J E</creator><creator>Brandebourg, T D</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>U9A</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180301</creationdate><title>Validation of Glucometer Technology for Measurement of Glycaemia during Glucose Tolerance Tests and Endotoxin Challenge in Pigs</title><author>Nunnelley, W Z ; Maxwell, H S ; Bayne, J E ; Brandebourg, T D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_20466901553</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Analyzers</topic><topic>Biochemistry</topic><topic>Blood</topic><topic>Blood circulation</topic><topic>Blood glucose</topic><topic>Cell size</topic><topic>Correlation analysis</topic><topic>Estimates</topic><topic>Fluorination</topic><topic>Glucose</topic><topic>Glucose tolerance</topic><topic>Hogs</topic><topic>Injection</topic><topic>Measuring instruments</topic><topic>Physiology</topic><topic>Plasma</topic><topic>Rectum</topic><topic>Technology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nunnelley, W Z</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maxwell, H S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bayne, J E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brandebourg, T D</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Career &amp; Technical Education Database</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest_Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nunnelley, W Z</au><au>Maxwell, H S</au><au>Bayne, J E</au><au>Brandebourg, T D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Validation of Glucometer Technology for Measurement of Glycaemia during Glucose Tolerance Tests and Endotoxin Challenge in Pigs</atitle><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle><date>2018-03-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>96</volume><spage>82</spage><epage>82</epage><pages>82-82</pages><issn>0021-8812</issn><eissn>1525-3163</eissn><abstract>Glucometers are portable, require small sample volumes, and yield rapid estimates of glycaemia. However, differences in packed cell volume of whole blood between species potentially confound estimates of glucose concentration compared to clinical biochemical analyzers (BA). Our objective was to determine the correlation between glucometer estimates of glucose concentration in serum, plasma, and whole blood compared to biochemical analyzer values and then to use the optimal sample handling procedure to track changes during physiological challenges to euglycaemia. Blood samples were collected via jugular venipuncture from 152 Yorkshire barrows and gilts between 8 to 12 weeks of age. Glucose concentration was measured in whole blood, serum, plasma, and fluorinated plasma. Values were compared by Pearson correlation and Bland-Altman analysis. Glucometer estimates of glycaemia in whole blood were highly variable and poorly correlated with BA values (r2=0.34). Correlations of serum and plasma glucometer values with BA values were significantly stronger (serum, r2=0.57; plasma, r2=0.64). Glucometer values obtained in fluorinated plasma correlated the strongest with BA values (r2=0.89). Bland-Altman analysis likewise revealed that glucometer estimates of glycaemia in fluorinated plasma were most similar to those obtained by BA. Mean differences in glucose concentrations determined by BA and glucometer in whole blood, serum, plasma, and fluorinated plasma were 43.5, 33.5, 12.4, and 4.5 mg/ dl, respectively. These results indicate that glucometer technology can reliably reproduce biochemical analyzer estimates of glycaemia when measured in fluorinated plasma. Next this protocol was used in market weight pigs to monitor glycaemia under physiological challenges, represented by glucose tolerance tests (GTT) to mimic postprandial conditions and endotoxin challenges to mimic acute infection. For GTT, pigs (n =4) were fasted for 12 hours, and then 0.3 g/ kg BW glucose was infused. Venous blood was collected at regular intervals for 3 hours post-infusion. Circulating glucose concentration increased 5-fold by 30 minutes after infusion and returned to baseline by 120 minutes. Values obtained by glucometer and BA were not different (P &gt; 0.77). Intramuscular injection of 50 µg/kg BW endotoxin induced a febrile response as rectal temperatures increased 3 degrees Celsius by 1 hour after injection, concomitant with a 43% decrease in glucose concentration. Glucose values obtained by glucometer and BA were not different in blood sampled during the 8 hours post-injection of endotoxin (P &gt; 0.89). These results indicate that glucometers can reliably estimate glycaemia in fluorinated plasma under a wide range of physiological conditions in the pig.</abstract><cop>Champaign</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-8812
ispartof Journal of animal science, 2018-03, Vol.96, p.82-82
issn 0021-8812
1525-3163
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2046690155
source Oxford Journals Online; PubMed Central
subjects Analyzers
Biochemistry
Blood
Blood circulation
Blood glucose
Cell size
Correlation analysis
Estimates
Fluorination
Glucose
Glucose tolerance
Hogs
Injection
Measuring instruments
Physiology
Plasma
Rectum
Technology
title Validation of Glucometer Technology for Measurement of Glycaemia during Glucose Tolerance Tests and Endotoxin Challenge in Pigs
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T11%3A01%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Validation%20of%20Glucometer%20Technology%20for%20Measurement%20of%20Glycaemia%20during%20Glucose%20Tolerance%20Tests%20and%20Endotoxin%20Challenge%20in%20Pigs&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20animal%20science&rft.au=Nunnelley,%20W%20Z&rft.date=2018-03-01&rft.volume=96&rft.spage=82&rft.epage=82&rft.pages=82-82&rft.issn=0021-8812&rft.eissn=1525-3163&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2046690155%3C/proquest%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_20466901553%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2046690155&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true