Loading…

The physiological consequences of ingesting a toxic plant (Diplotaxis tenuifolia) and medicinal supplements influence subsequent foraging decisions by sheep

There is a large group of highly nutritious plants that are commonly avoided by grazing livestock due to the presence of toxic plant secondary compounds. Our hypothesis was that aversion toward toxic plants is learned and that their negative postingestive effects could be attenuated by specific nutr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of animal science 2016-10, Vol.94, p.318-318
Main Authors: Catanese, F H, Villalba, J J, Distel, R A
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 318
container_issue
container_start_page 318
container_title Journal of animal science
container_volume 94
creator Catanese, F H
Villalba, J J
Distel, R A
description There is a large group of highly nutritious plants that are commonly avoided by grazing livestock due to the presence of toxic plant secondary compounds. Our hypothesis was that aversion toward toxic plants is learned and that their negative postingestive effects could be attenuated by specific nutrients. Therefore, we determined the impact of supplements on physiological parameters and feeding behavior in Merino sheep consuming Diplotaxis tenuifolia ("Wild rocket"), a plant with high concentration of glucosinolates (37.2 ± 3.6 µmol/g). Thirty-six sheep were randomly assigned to four feeding treatments in a split-plot design with lambs (n = 9) nested within treatment: Wild rocket (DT), Wild rocket and a protein (160 g/d) supplement (DT+P), Wild rocket and a protein supplement containing iodine (10 mg/d) and copper (40 mg/d) (DT+P+M), or alfalfa pellets (CTRL) in amounts that paired the ingestion of Wild rocket in DT. Toward the end of a 35-d exposure period, sheep in DT showed the lowest intake of Wild rocket (P = 0.04) as well as reduced concentrations of plasma thyroid hormones (T3 and T4; P < 0.001 and P = 0.05, respectively) and the enzyme alanine aminotransferase (P = 0.02) and a trend toward reduced hemoglobin concentration (P = 0.07) relative to sheep in DT+P and DT+P+M, which, in turn, showed concentrations of hormones and hepatic enzymes similar to those recorded in CTRL. Total serum protein and albumin levels were greater (P = 0.03 and P = 0.04, respectively) in supplemented than in unsupplemented sheep fed Wild rocket, which could have elicited a protective effect on glucosinolate ingestion. Foraging behavior was evaluated in an experimental arena where animals could select among randomly distributed buckets containing a fixed amount of Wild rocket or variable amounts of barley grain. Regardless of barley grain availability, sheep in DT showed lower intake and lower time spent eating Wild rocket than sheep in DT+P or in DT+P+M (19.0 vs. 48.5 and 43.2 ± 6.0 g [P = 0.007] and 26.8 vs. 54.4 and 48.9 ± 4.78 s [P = 0.005], respectively). Sheep in CTRL showed intake levels of Wild rocket and behavioral responses similar to those observed in supplemented sheep. In conclusion, nutritional supplements have the potential to attenuate the negative postingestive effects of glucosinolates in Wild rocket and enhance the utilization of the plant at pasture. A negative feeding experience with Wild rocket is needed for animals to display the typical pattern of a
doi_str_mv 10.2527/jam2016-0666
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2046732495</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2046732495</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_20467324953</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjktOwzAQhi0EEuGx4wAjsYFFwHZqt10DFQfovnKdSeLIsU3Hkdq7cFjM4wBsZqTR_3_fMHYn-JNUcvk8mklyoWuutT5jlVBS1Y3QzTmrOJeiXq2EvGRXRCPnQqq1qtjndkBIw4lc9LF31niwMRB-zBgsEsQOXOiRcplgIMejs5C8CRkeXl3yMZujI8gYZtdF78wjmNDChK2zLhQazSl5nDBkKqTO_3DLdf_ryNDFg-m_6S1aV94IBPsT0ICYbthFZzzh7d--Zvebt-3Le50OsZQp78Y4H4qFdpIv9LKRi7Vq_pf6AixBYrY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2046732495</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The physiological consequences of ingesting a toxic plant (Diplotaxis tenuifolia) and medicinal supplements influence subsequent foraging decisions by sheep</title><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><creator>Catanese, F H ; Villalba, J J ; Distel, R A</creator><creatorcontrib>Catanese, F H ; Villalba, J J ; Distel, R A</creatorcontrib><description>There is a large group of highly nutritious plants that are commonly avoided by grazing livestock due to the presence of toxic plant secondary compounds. Our hypothesis was that aversion toward toxic plants is learned and that their negative postingestive effects could be attenuated by specific nutrients. Therefore, we determined the impact of supplements on physiological parameters and feeding behavior in Merino sheep consuming Diplotaxis tenuifolia ("Wild rocket"), a plant with high concentration of glucosinolates (37.2 ± 3.6 µmol/g). Thirty-six sheep were randomly assigned to four feeding treatments in a split-plot design with lambs (n = 9) nested within treatment: Wild rocket (DT), Wild rocket and a protein (160 g/d) supplement (DT+P), Wild rocket and a protein supplement containing iodine (10 mg/d) and copper (40 mg/d) (DT+P+M), or alfalfa pellets (CTRL) in amounts that paired the ingestion of Wild rocket in DT. Toward the end of a 35-d exposure period, sheep in DT showed the lowest intake of Wild rocket (P = 0.04) as well as reduced concentrations of plasma thyroid hormones (T3 and T4; P &lt; 0.001 and P = 0.05, respectively) and the enzyme alanine aminotransferase (P = 0.02) and a trend toward reduced hemoglobin concentration (P = 0.07) relative to sheep in DT+P and DT+P+M, which, in turn, showed concentrations of hormones and hepatic enzymes similar to those recorded in CTRL. Total serum protein and albumin levels were greater (P = 0.03 and P = 0.04, respectively) in supplemented than in unsupplemented sheep fed Wild rocket, which could have elicited a protective effect on glucosinolate ingestion. Foraging behavior was evaluated in an experimental arena where animals could select among randomly distributed buckets containing a fixed amount of Wild rocket or variable amounts of barley grain. Regardless of barley grain availability, sheep in DT showed lower intake and lower time spent eating Wild rocket than sheep in DT+P or in DT+P+M (19.0 vs. 48.5 and 43.2 ± 6.0 g [P = 0.007] and 26.8 vs. 54.4 and 48.9 ± 4.78 s [P = 0.005], respectively). Sheep in CTRL showed intake levels of Wild rocket and behavioral responses similar to those observed in supplemented sheep. In conclusion, nutritional supplements have the potential to attenuate the negative postingestive effects of glucosinolates in Wild rocket and enhance the utilization of the plant at pasture. A negative feeding experience with Wild rocket is needed for animals to display the typical pattern of aversion commonly observed in grazing conditions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8812</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-3163</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2527/jam2016-0666</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Champaign: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Alanine ; Alanine transaminase ; Alfalfa ; Animal behavior ; Animals ; Aversion ; Barley ; Buckets ; Diplotaxis tenuifolia ; Feeding ; Feeding behavior ; Flowers &amp; plants ; Foraging behavior ; Glucosinolates ; Grain ; Grazing ; Hemoglobin ; Hormones ; Ingestion ; Iodine ; Livestock ; Medicinal plants ; Nutrient solutions ; Nutrients ; Ovis aries ; Pasture ; Physiology ; Proteins ; Sheep ; Thyroid ; Thyroid gland ; Thyroid hormones ; Thyroxine ; Toxicity ; Triiodothyronine</subject><ispartof>Journal of animal science, 2016-10, Vol.94, p.318-318</ispartof><rights>Copyright Oxford University Press, UK Oct 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Catanese, F H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Villalba, J J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Distel, R A</creatorcontrib><title>The physiological consequences of ingesting a toxic plant (Diplotaxis tenuifolia) and medicinal supplements influence subsequent foraging decisions by sheep</title><title>Journal of animal science</title><description>There is a large group of highly nutritious plants that are commonly avoided by grazing livestock due to the presence of toxic plant secondary compounds. Our hypothesis was that aversion toward toxic plants is learned and that their negative postingestive effects could be attenuated by specific nutrients. Therefore, we determined the impact of supplements on physiological parameters and feeding behavior in Merino sheep consuming Diplotaxis tenuifolia ("Wild rocket"), a plant with high concentration of glucosinolates (37.2 ± 3.6 µmol/g). Thirty-six sheep were randomly assigned to four feeding treatments in a split-plot design with lambs (n = 9) nested within treatment: Wild rocket (DT), Wild rocket and a protein (160 g/d) supplement (DT+P), Wild rocket and a protein supplement containing iodine (10 mg/d) and copper (40 mg/d) (DT+P+M), or alfalfa pellets (CTRL) in amounts that paired the ingestion of Wild rocket in DT. Toward the end of a 35-d exposure period, sheep in DT showed the lowest intake of Wild rocket (P = 0.04) as well as reduced concentrations of plasma thyroid hormones (T3 and T4; P &lt; 0.001 and P = 0.05, respectively) and the enzyme alanine aminotransferase (P = 0.02) and a trend toward reduced hemoglobin concentration (P = 0.07) relative to sheep in DT+P and DT+P+M, which, in turn, showed concentrations of hormones and hepatic enzymes similar to those recorded in CTRL. Total serum protein and albumin levels were greater (P = 0.03 and P = 0.04, respectively) in supplemented than in unsupplemented sheep fed Wild rocket, which could have elicited a protective effect on glucosinolate ingestion. Foraging behavior was evaluated in an experimental arena where animals could select among randomly distributed buckets containing a fixed amount of Wild rocket or variable amounts of barley grain. Regardless of barley grain availability, sheep in DT showed lower intake and lower time spent eating Wild rocket than sheep in DT+P or in DT+P+M (19.0 vs. 48.5 and 43.2 ± 6.0 g [P = 0.007] and 26.8 vs. 54.4 and 48.9 ± 4.78 s [P = 0.005], respectively). Sheep in CTRL showed intake levels of Wild rocket and behavioral responses similar to those observed in supplemented sheep. In conclusion, nutritional supplements have the potential to attenuate the negative postingestive effects of glucosinolates in Wild rocket and enhance the utilization of the plant at pasture. A negative feeding experience with Wild rocket is needed for animals to display the typical pattern of aversion commonly observed in grazing conditions.</description><subject>Alanine</subject><subject>Alanine transaminase</subject><subject>Alfalfa</subject><subject>Animal behavior</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Aversion</subject><subject>Barley</subject><subject>Buckets</subject><subject>Diplotaxis tenuifolia</subject><subject>Feeding</subject><subject>Feeding behavior</subject><subject>Flowers &amp; plants</subject><subject>Foraging behavior</subject><subject>Glucosinolates</subject><subject>Grain</subject><subject>Grazing</subject><subject>Hemoglobin</subject><subject>Hormones</subject><subject>Ingestion</subject><subject>Iodine</subject><subject>Livestock</subject><subject>Medicinal plants</subject><subject>Nutrient solutions</subject><subject>Nutrients</subject><subject>Ovis aries</subject><subject>Pasture</subject><subject>Physiology</subject><subject>Proteins</subject><subject>Sheep</subject><subject>Thyroid</subject><subject>Thyroid gland</subject><subject>Thyroid hormones</subject><subject>Thyroxine</subject><subject>Toxicity</subject><subject>Triiodothyronine</subject><issn>0021-8812</issn><issn>1525-3163</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNjktOwzAQhi0EEuGx4wAjsYFFwHZqt10DFQfovnKdSeLIsU3Hkdq7cFjM4wBsZqTR_3_fMHYn-JNUcvk8mklyoWuutT5jlVBS1Y3QzTmrOJeiXq2EvGRXRCPnQqq1qtjndkBIw4lc9LF31niwMRB-zBgsEsQOXOiRcplgIMejs5C8CRkeXl3yMZujI8gYZtdF78wjmNDChK2zLhQazSl5nDBkKqTO_3DLdf_ryNDFg-m_6S1aV94IBPsT0ICYbthFZzzh7d--Zvebt-3Le50OsZQp78Y4H4qFdpIv9LKRi7Vq_pf6AixBYrY</recordid><startdate>20161001</startdate><enddate>20161001</enddate><creator>Catanese, F H</creator><creator>Villalba, J J</creator><creator>Distel, R A</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>U9A</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20161001</creationdate><title>The physiological consequences of ingesting a toxic plant (Diplotaxis tenuifolia) and medicinal supplements influence subsequent foraging decisions by sheep</title><author>Catanese, F H ; Villalba, J J ; Distel, R A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_20467324953</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Alanine</topic><topic>Alanine transaminase</topic><topic>Alfalfa</topic><topic>Animal behavior</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Aversion</topic><topic>Barley</topic><topic>Buckets</topic><topic>Diplotaxis tenuifolia</topic><topic>Feeding</topic><topic>Feeding behavior</topic><topic>Flowers &amp; plants</topic><topic>Foraging behavior</topic><topic>Glucosinolates</topic><topic>Grain</topic><topic>Grazing</topic><topic>Hemoglobin</topic><topic>Hormones</topic><topic>Ingestion</topic><topic>Iodine</topic><topic>Livestock</topic><topic>Medicinal plants</topic><topic>Nutrient solutions</topic><topic>Nutrients</topic><topic>Ovis aries</topic><topic>Pasture</topic><topic>Physiology</topic><topic>Proteins</topic><topic>Sheep</topic><topic>Thyroid</topic><topic>Thyroid gland</topic><topic>Thyroid hormones</topic><topic>Thyroxine</topic><topic>Toxicity</topic><topic>Triiodothyronine</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Catanese, F H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Villalba, J J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Distel, R A</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Career &amp; Technical Education Database</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Catanese, F H</au><au>Villalba, J J</au><au>Distel, R A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The physiological consequences of ingesting a toxic plant (Diplotaxis tenuifolia) and medicinal supplements influence subsequent foraging decisions by sheep</atitle><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle><date>2016-10-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>94</volume><spage>318</spage><epage>318</epage><pages>318-318</pages><issn>0021-8812</issn><eissn>1525-3163</eissn><abstract>There is a large group of highly nutritious plants that are commonly avoided by grazing livestock due to the presence of toxic plant secondary compounds. Our hypothesis was that aversion toward toxic plants is learned and that their negative postingestive effects could be attenuated by specific nutrients. Therefore, we determined the impact of supplements on physiological parameters and feeding behavior in Merino sheep consuming Diplotaxis tenuifolia ("Wild rocket"), a plant with high concentration of glucosinolates (37.2 ± 3.6 µmol/g). Thirty-six sheep were randomly assigned to four feeding treatments in a split-plot design with lambs (n = 9) nested within treatment: Wild rocket (DT), Wild rocket and a protein (160 g/d) supplement (DT+P), Wild rocket and a protein supplement containing iodine (10 mg/d) and copper (40 mg/d) (DT+P+M), or alfalfa pellets (CTRL) in amounts that paired the ingestion of Wild rocket in DT. Toward the end of a 35-d exposure period, sheep in DT showed the lowest intake of Wild rocket (P = 0.04) as well as reduced concentrations of plasma thyroid hormones (T3 and T4; P &lt; 0.001 and P = 0.05, respectively) and the enzyme alanine aminotransferase (P = 0.02) and a trend toward reduced hemoglobin concentration (P = 0.07) relative to sheep in DT+P and DT+P+M, which, in turn, showed concentrations of hormones and hepatic enzymes similar to those recorded in CTRL. Total serum protein and albumin levels were greater (P = 0.03 and P = 0.04, respectively) in supplemented than in unsupplemented sheep fed Wild rocket, which could have elicited a protective effect on glucosinolate ingestion. Foraging behavior was evaluated in an experimental arena where animals could select among randomly distributed buckets containing a fixed amount of Wild rocket or variable amounts of barley grain. Regardless of barley grain availability, sheep in DT showed lower intake and lower time spent eating Wild rocket than sheep in DT+P or in DT+P+M (19.0 vs. 48.5 and 43.2 ± 6.0 g [P = 0.007] and 26.8 vs. 54.4 and 48.9 ± 4.78 s [P = 0.005], respectively). Sheep in CTRL showed intake levels of Wild rocket and behavioral responses similar to those observed in supplemented sheep. In conclusion, nutritional supplements have the potential to attenuate the negative postingestive effects of glucosinolates in Wild rocket and enhance the utilization of the plant at pasture. A negative feeding experience with Wild rocket is needed for animals to display the typical pattern of aversion commonly observed in grazing conditions.</abstract><cop>Champaign</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.2527/jam2016-0666</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-8812
ispartof Journal of animal science, 2016-10, Vol.94, p.318-318
issn 0021-8812
1525-3163
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2046732495
source Oxford Journals Online
subjects Alanine
Alanine transaminase
Alfalfa
Animal behavior
Animals
Aversion
Barley
Buckets
Diplotaxis tenuifolia
Feeding
Feeding behavior
Flowers & plants
Foraging behavior
Glucosinolates
Grain
Grazing
Hemoglobin
Hormones
Ingestion
Iodine
Livestock
Medicinal plants
Nutrient solutions
Nutrients
Ovis aries
Pasture
Physiology
Proteins
Sheep
Thyroid
Thyroid gland
Thyroid hormones
Thyroxine
Toxicity
Triiodothyronine
title The physiological consequences of ingesting a toxic plant (Diplotaxis tenuifolia) and medicinal supplements influence subsequent foraging decisions by sheep
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T20%3A30%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20physiological%20consequences%20of%20ingesting%20a%20toxic%20plant%20(Diplotaxis%20tenuifolia)%20and%20medicinal%20supplements%20influence%20subsequent%20foraging%20decisions%20by%20sheep&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20animal%20science&rft.au=Catanese,%20F%20H&rft.date=2016-10-01&rft.volume=94&rft.spage=318&rft.epage=318&rft.pages=318-318&rft.issn=0021-8812&rft.eissn=1525-3163&rft_id=info:doi/10.2527/jam2016-0666&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2046732495%3C/proquest%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_20467324953%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2046732495&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true