Loading…
Effect of feeding different flaxseed-based products on the rumen microbial community of dairy cows evaluated by high-throughput DNA sequencing
Four ruminally-cannulated lactating Holstein cows (mean and SD, 116.5 ± 17.5 DIM; 712.7 ± 92.3 kg BW) were used in a 4 x 4 Latin square with 28-d experimental periods to evaluate the effect of feeding flaxseed-based products on the rumen microbial population. Treatments (DM basis) were: 1) CONT, a c...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of animal science 2016-10, Vol.94, p.796-796 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 796 |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 796 |
container_title | Journal of animal science |
container_volume | 94 |
creator | Castillo-Lopez, E Moats, J Aluthge, N D Ramirez Ramirez, H A McAllister, T A Anderson, C L Christensen, D A Mutsvangwa, T Lee-Rangel, H Penner, G B Fernando, S C |
description | Four ruminally-cannulated lactating Holstein cows (mean and SD, 116.5 ± 17.5 DIM; 712.7 ± 92.3 kg BW) were used in a 4 x 4 Latin square with 28-d experimental periods to evaluate the effect of feeding flaxseed-based products on the rumen microbial population. Treatments (DM basis) were: 1) CONT, a control diet containing 51.9% of a barley-based concentrate, 20.0% alfalfa hay, and 28.2% barley silage; 2) FLAX, inclusion of 11.4% of a non-extruded flaxseed-based product which contained 55% flaxseed, 37% field peas, and 6.8% dehydrated alfalfa; 3) EF, inclusion of 11.4% of an extruded flaxseed-based product which contained 55% flaxseed, 37% field peas, and 6.8% dehydrated alfalfa; and 4) EFT, inclusion of 11.4% of an extruded flaxseed-based product which contained 55% flaxseed, 37% high-tannin faba beans (Vicia faba), and 6.8% dehydrated alfalfa. The flaxseed-based products used in FLAX, EF, and EFT were included (3 kg/d) by partially replacing 3 kg/d of the barley-based concentrate. At the end of each period, samples of ruminal contents were collected and DNA was extracted from samples. The V3 hypervariable region of the 16S rRNA bacterial gene was amplified and sequenced. Sequenced reads were subjected to phylogenetic classification using the pipelines UPARSE and QIIME. Data for the abundance of bacterial taxa were analyzed using the MIXED procedure of SAS. Major bacterial phyla were not affected (P = 0.34) by diet and included Bacteroidetes (48.8 ± 3.66%), Firmicutes (46.0 ± 3.92%), and Proteobacteria (1.3 ± 0.30%). Major bacterial families were similar (P = 0.71) across diets and were represented by Prevotellaceae (20.2 ± 2.82%) and Veillonellaceae (16.3 ± 6.19%). In addition, major genera remained unaffected (P ≥ 0.38) and included Prevotella (19.3 ± 2.47%) and Succiniclasticum (14.5 ± 6.12%). However, compared to CONT, there were shifts in some bacterial families and genera for EF and EFT. The biohydrogenating bacteria, Clostridium, decreased (P < 0.01) resulting in 0.4, 0.1, 0.1, and 0.2 ± 0.05% for CONT, FLAX, EF, and EFT, respectively. Flaxseed extrusion and high-tannin faba beans did not affect predominant bacterial taxa; however, there were shifts in less abundant taxa including a decrease in the biohydrogenating genus Clostridium. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2527/jam2016-1635 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2046734730</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2046734730</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_20467347303</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjTtOxDAYhC0EEuHRcYBfojbYzjpZSgSLtqKiXznJ79hRYi9-ALkEZ8ZIHIBqNN-MZgi54exOSNHeT2oRjDeUN7U8IRWXQtK6mFNSMSY43W65OCcXMU6McSEfZEW-d1pjn8Br0IiDdSMMtqCALoGe1VcslHYq4gDH4IfcpwjeQTIIIS_oYLF98J1VM_R-WbKzaf1dG5QNa0GfEfBDzVmlstCtYOxoaDLB59Ecc4Ln10eI-J7R9eX8ipxpNUe8_tNLcvuye3va0_JdOjEdJp-DK9FBsE3T1pu2ZvX_Wj_QmVxP</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2046734730</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effect of feeding different flaxseed-based products on the rumen microbial community of dairy cows evaluated by high-throughput DNA sequencing</title><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><creator>Castillo-Lopez, E ; Moats, J ; Aluthge, N D ; Ramirez Ramirez, H A ; McAllister, T A ; Anderson, C L ; Christensen, D A ; Mutsvangwa, T ; Lee-Rangel, H ; Penner, G B ; Fernando, S C</creator><creatorcontrib>Castillo-Lopez, E ; Moats, J ; Aluthge, N D ; Ramirez Ramirez, H A ; McAllister, T A ; Anderson, C L ; Christensen, D A ; Mutsvangwa, T ; Lee-Rangel, H ; Penner, G B ; Fernando, S C</creatorcontrib><description>Four ruminally-cannulated lactating Holstein cows (mean and SD, 116.5 ± 17.5 DIM; 712.7 ± 92.3 kg BW) were used in a 4 x 4 Latin square with 28-d experimental periods to evaluate the effect of feeding flaxseed-based products on the rumen microbial population. Treatments (DM basis) were: 1) CONT, a control diet containing 51.9% of a barley-based concentrate, 20.0% alfalfa hay, and 28.2% barley silage; 2) FLAX, inclusion of 11.4% of a non-extruded flaxseed-based product which contained 55% flaxseed, 37% field peas, and 6.8% dehydrated alfalfa; 3) EF, inclusion of 11.4% of an extruded flaxseed-based product which contained 55% flaxseed, 37% field peas, and 6.8% dehydrated alfalfa; and 4) EFT, inclusion of 11.4% of an extruded flaxseed-based product which contained 55% flaxseed, 37% high-tannin faba beans (Vicia faba), and 6.8% dehydrated alfalfa. The flaxseed-based products used in FLAX, EF, and EFT were included (3 kg/d) by partially replacing 3 kg/d of the barley-based concentrate. At the end of each period, samples of ruminal contents were collected and DNA was extracted from samples. The V3 hypervariable region of the 16S rRNA bacterial gene was amplified and sequenced. Sequenced reads were subjected to phylogenetic classification using the pipelines UPARSE and QIIME. Data for the abundance of bacterial taxa were analyzed using the MIXED procedure of SAS. Major bacterial phyla were not affected (P = 0.34) by diet and included Bacteroidetes (48.8 ± 3.66%), Firmicutes (46.0 ± 3.92%), and Proteobacteria (1.3 ± 0.30%). Major bacterial families were similar (P = 0.71) across diets and were represented by Prevotellaceae (20.2 ± 2.82%) and Veillonellaceae (16.3 ± 6.19%). In addition, major genera remained unaffected (P ≥ 0.38) and included Prevotella (19.3 ± 2.47%) and Succiniclasticum (14.5 ± 6.12%). However, compared to CONT, there were shifts in some bacterial families and genera for EF and EFT. The biohydrogenating bacteria, Clostridium, decreased (P < 0.01) resulting in 0.4, 0.1, 0.1, and 0.2 ± 0.05% for CONT, FLAX, EF, and EFT, respectively. Flaxseed extrusion and high-tannin faba beans did not affect predominant bacterial taxa; however, there were shifts in less abundant taxa including a decrease in the biohydrogenating genus Clostridium.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8812</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-3163</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2527/jam2016-1635</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Champaign: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Alfalfa ; Bacteria ; Barley ; Beans ; Broad beans ; Cattle ; Clostridium ; Dairy cattle ; Dehydration ; Deoxyribonucleic acid ; Diet ; DNA ; DNA sequencing ; Extrusion ; Feeding ; Flax ; Genera ; Microorganisms ; Peas ; Phylogenetics ; Phylogeny ; rRNA 16S ; Rumen ; Tannins ; Taxa ; Vegetables ; Vicia faba</subject><ispartof>Journal of animal science, 2016-10, Vol.94, p.796-796</ispartof><rights>Copyright Oxford University Press, UK Oct 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,27911,27912</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Castillo-Lopez, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moats, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aluthge, N D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramirez Ramirez, H A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McAllister, T A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, C L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christensen, D A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mutsvangwa, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee-Rangel, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Penner, G B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernando, S C</creatorcontrib><title>Effect of feeding different flaxseed-based products on the rumen microbial community of dairy cows evaluated by high-throughput DNA sequencing</title><title>Journal of animal science</title><description>Four ruminally-cannulated lactating Holstein cows (mean and SD, 116.5 ± 17.5 DIM; 712.7 ± 92.3 kg BW) were used in a 4 x 4 Latin square with 28-d experimental periods to evaluate the effect of feeding flaxseed-based products on the rumen microbial population. Treatments (DM basis) were: 1) CONT, a control diet containing 51.9% of a barley-based concentrate, 20.0% alfalfa hay, and 28.2% barley silage; 2) FLAX, inclusion of 11.4% of a non-extruded flaxseed-based product which contained 55% flaxseed, 37% field peas, and 6.8% dehydrated alfalfa; 3) EF, inclusion of 11.4% of an extruded flaxseed-based product which contained 55% flaxseed, 37% field peas, and 6.8% dehydrated alfalfa; and 4) EFT, inclusion of 11.4% of an extruded flaxseed-based product which contained 55% flaxseed, 37% high-tannin faba beans (Vicia faba), and 6.8% dehydrated alfalfa. The flaxseed-based products used in FLAX, EF, and EFT were included (3 kg/d) by partially replacing 3 kg/d of the barley-based concentrate. At the end of each period, samples of ruminal contents were collected and DNA was extracted from samples. The V3 hypervariable region of the 16S rRNA bacterial gene was amplified and sequenced. Sequenced reads were subjected to phylogenetic classification using the pipelines UPARSE and QIIME. Data for the abundance of bacterial taxa were analyzed using the MIXED procedure of SAS. Major bacterial phyla were not affected (P = 0.34) by diet and included Bacteroidetes (48.8 ± 3.66%), Firmicutes (46.0 ± 3.92%), and Proteobacteria (1.3 ± 0.30%). Major bacterial families were similar (P = 0.71) across diets and were represented by Prevotellaceae (20.2 ± 2.82%) and Veillonellaceae (16.3 ± 6.19%). In addition, major genera remained unaffected (P ≥ 0.38) and included Prevotella (19.3 ± 2.47%) and Succiniclasticum (14.5 ± 6.12%). However, compared to CONT, there were shifts in some bacterial families and genera for EF and EFT. The biohydrogenating bacteria, Clostridium, decreased (P < 0.01) resulting in 0.4, 0.1, 0.1, and 0.2 ± 0.05% for CONT, FLAX, EF, and EFT, respectively. Flaxseed extrusion and high-tannin faba beans did not affect predominant bacterial taxa; however, there were shifts in less abundant taxa including a decrease in the biohydrogenating genus Clostridium.</description><subject>Alfalfa</subject><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Barley</subject><subject>Beans</subject><subject>Broad beans</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>Clostridium</subject><subject>Dairy cattle</subject><subject>Dehydration</subject><subject>Deoxyribonucleic acid</subject><subject>Diet</subject><subject>DNA</subject><subject>DNA sequencing</subject><subject>Extrusion</subject><subject>Feeding</subject><subject>Flax</subject><subject>Genera</subject><subject>Microorganisms</subject><subject>Peas</subject><subject>Phylogenetics</subject><subject>Phylogeny</subject><subject>rRNA 16S</subject><subject>Rumen</subject><subject>Tannins</subject><subject>Taxa</subject><subject>Vegetables</subject><subject>Vicia faba</subject><issn>0021-8812</issn><issn>1525-3163</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNjTtOxDAYhC0EEuHRcYBfojbYzjpZSgSLtqKiXznJ79hRYi9-ALkEZ8ZIHIBqNN-MZgi54exOSNHeT2oRjDeUN7U8IRWXQtK6mFNSMSY43W65OCcXMU6McSEfZEW-d1pjn8Br0IiDdSMMtqCALoGe1VcslHYq4gDH4IfcpwjeQTIIIS_oYLF98J1VM_R-WbKzaf1dG5QNa0GfEfBDzVmlstCtYOxoaDLB59Ecc4Ln10eI-J7R9eX8ipxpNUe8_tNLcvuye3va0_JdOjEdJp-DK9FBsE3T1pu2ZvX_Wj_QmVxP</recordid><startdate>20161001</startdate><enddate>20161001</enddate><creator>Castillo-Lopez, E</creator><creator>Moats, J</creator><creator>Aluthge, N D</creator><creator>Ramirez Ramirez, H A</creator><creator>McAllister, T A</creator><creator>Anderson, C L</creator><creator>Christensen, D A</creator><creator>Mutsvangwa, T</creator><creator>Lee-Rangel, H</creator><creator>Penner, G B</creator><creator>Fernando, S C</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>U9A</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20161001</creationdate><title>Effect of feeding different flaxseed-based products on the rumen microbial community of dairy cows evaluated by high-throughput DNA sequencing</title><author>Castillo-Lopez, E ; Moats, J ; Aluthge, N D ; Ramirez Ramirez, H A ; McAllister, T A ; Anderson, C L ; Christensen, D A ; Mutsvangwa, T ; Lee-Rangel, H ; Penner, G B ; Fernando, S C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_20467347303</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Alfalfa</topic><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Barley</topic><topic>Beans</topic><topic>Broad beans</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>Clostridium</topic><topic>Dairy cattle</topic><topic>Dehydration</topic><topic>Deoxyribonucleic acid</topic><topic>Diet</topic><topic>DNA</topic><topic>DNA sequencing</topic><topic>Extrusion</topic><topic>Feeding</topic><topic>Flax</topic><topic>Genera</topic><topic>Microorganisms</topic><topic>Peas</topic><topic>Phylogenetics</topic><topic>Phylogeny</topic><topic>rRNA 16S</topic><topic>Rumen</topic><topic>Tannins</topic><topic>Taxa</topic><topic>Vegetables</topic><topic>Vicia faba</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Castillo-Lopez, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moats, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aluthge, N D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramirez Ramirez, H A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McAllister, T A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, C L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christensen, D A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mutsvangwa, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee-Rangel, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Penner, G B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernando, S C</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Career & Technical Education Database</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health and Medical</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Castillo-Lopez, E</au><au>Moats, J</au><au>Aluthge, N D</au><au>Ramirez Ramirez, H A</au><au>McAllister, T A</au><au>Anderson, C L</au><au>Christensen, D A</au><au>Mutsvangwa, T</au><au>Lee-Rangel, H</au><au>Penner, G B</au><au>Fernando, S C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effect of feeding different flaxseed-based products on the rumen microbial community of dairy cows evaluated by high-throughput DNA sequencing</atitle><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle><date>2016-10-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>94</volume><spage>796</spage><epage>796</epage><pages>796-796</pages><issn>0021-8812</issn><eissn>1525-3163</eissn><abstract>Four ruminally-cannulated lactating Holstein cows (mean and SD, 116.5 ± 17.5 DIM; 712.7 ± 92.3 kg BW) were used in a 4 x 4 Latin square with 28-d experimental periods to evaluate the effect of feeding flaxseed-based products on the rumen microbial population. Treatments (DM basis) were: 1) CONT, a control diet containing 51.9% of a barley-based concentrate, 20.0% alfalfa hay, and 28.2% barley silage; 2) FLAX, inclusion of 11.4% of a non-extruded flaxseed-based product which contained 55% flaxseed, 37% field peas, and 6.8% dehydrated alfalfa; 3) EF, inclusion of 11.4% of an extruded flaxseed-based product which contained 55% flaxseed, 37% field peas, and 6.8% dehydrated alfalfa; and 4) EFT, inclusion of 11.4% of an extruded flaxseed-based product which contained 55% flaxseed, 37% high-tannin faba beans (Vicia faba), and 6.8% dehydrated alfalfa. The flaxseed-based products used in FLAX, EF, and EFT were included (3 kg/d) by partially replacing 3 kg/d of the barley-based concentrate. At the end of each period, samples of ruminal contents were collected and DNA was extracted from samples. The V3 hypervariable region of the 16S rRNA bacterial gene was amplified and sequenced. Sequenced reads were subjected to phylogenetic classification using the pipelines UPARSE and QIIME. Data for the abundance of bacterial taxa were analyzed using the MIXED procedure of SAS. Major bacterial phyla were not affected (P = 0.34) by diet and included Bacteroidetes (48.8 ± 3.66%), Firmicutes (46.0 ± 3.92%), and Proteobacteria (1.3 ± 0.30%). Major bacterial families were similar (P = 0.71) across diets and were represented by Prevotellaceae (20.2 ± 2.82%) and Veillonellaceae (16.3 ± 6.19%). In addition, major genera remained unaffected (P ≥ 0.38) and included Prevotella (19.3 ± 2.47%) and Succiniclasticum (14.5 ± 6.12%). However, compared to CONT, there were shifts in some bacterial families and genera for EF and EFT. The biohydrogenating bacteria, Clostridium, decreased (P < 0.01) resulting in 0.4, 0.1, 0.1, and 0.2 ± 0.05% for CONT, FLAX, EF, and EFT, respectively. Flaxseed extrusion and high-tannin faba beans did not affect predominant bacterial taxa; however, there were shifts in less abundant taxa including a decrease in the biohydrogenating genus Clostridium.</abstract><cop>Champaign</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.2527/jam2016-1635</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0021-8812 |
ispartof | Journal of animal science, 2016-10, Vol.94, p.796-796 |
issn | 0021-8812 1525-3163 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2046734730 |
source | Oxford Journals Online |
subjects | Alfalfa Bacteria Barley Beans Broad beans Cattle Clostridium Dairy cattle Dehydration Deoxyribonucleic acid Diet DNA DNA sequencing Extrusion Feeding Flax Genera Microorganisms Peas Phylogenetics Phylogeny rRNA 16S Rumen Tannins Taxa Vegetables Vicia faba |
title | Effect of feeding different flaxseed-based products on the rumen microbial community of dairy cows evaluated by high-throughput DNA sequencing |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T00%3A38%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect%20of%20feeding%20different%20flaxseed-based%20products%20on%20the%20rumen%20microbial%20community%20of%20dairy%20cows%20evaluated%20by%20high-throughput%20DNA%20sequencing&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20animal%20science&rft.au=Castillo-Lopez,%20E&rft.date=2016-10-01&rft.volume=94&rft.spage=796&rft.epage=796&rft.pages=796-796&rft.issn=0021-8812&rft.eissn=1525-3163&rft_id=info:doi/10.2527/jam2016-1635&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2046734730%3C/proquest%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_20467347303%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2046734730&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |