Loading…

Single-step genomic prediction accuracies for lactation and reproduction traits in Yorkshire sows

Most economically important traits associated with lactation and reproduction in pigs are either less heritable, sex-limited, expressed later in life, or difficult to measure on a routine basis. Genomic predictions using single-step BLUP (SSBLUP) methodologies, which utilizes information on phenotyp...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of animal science 2016-10, Vol.94, p.185-186
Main Authors: Thekkoot, D M, Kemp, R A, Boddicker, N J, Plastow, G
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 186
container_issue
container_start_page 185
container_title Journal of animal science
container_volume 94
creator Thekkoot, D M
Kemp, R A
Boddicker, N J
Plastow, G
description Most economically important traits associated with lactation and reproduction in pigs are either less heritable, sex-limited, expressed later in life, or difficult to measure on a routine basis. Genomic predictions using single-step BLUP (SSBLUP) methodologies, which utilizes information on phenotypes, pedigree and markers from genotyped and non-genotyped animals simultaneously, is an alternative to phenotype and pedigree based (BLUP) methods. The objective of this study was to estimate and compare prediction accuracies for lactation and reproduction traits using SSBLUP and BLUP methods. Data from 2481 litters from 1431 Yorkshire sows farrowed between August 2011 and August 2015 were used in this study. Of these 1161 sows were genotyped using Illumina's Porcine SNP60 Bead Chip. The sows were weighed and scanned for back fat and loin depth before farrowing and at weaning. Piglets were weighed at birth, weaning and death. Feed consumption of each sow during lactation was measured using the Gestal feed recording system. Reproductive traits studied were total number born, number born dead, number alive at 24 h and number weaned. Lactation traits analyzed were average daily feed intake of sow during lactation, sow body weight, back fat and loin depth at farrowing, body weight, back fat and loin depth loss during lactation, and litter weight gain from birth to weaning. The training data included sows born before April 1, 2013, and validation data included sows (n = 242) born on or after April first 2013. BLUP breeding values for animals in the validation data were computed using all information from the test data plus pedigree information for animals in the validation data. Both SSBLUP and BLUP evaluations were computed using MiX99 software. Accuracies for animals in the validation data were estimated as the correlation between their estimated breeding values and phenotypes, corrected for fixed effects, divided by the square root of heritability of the trait. For all traits studied, prediction accuracies using SSBLUP were higher (0.23 to 0.84) than those from BLUP (0.18 to 0.72). On average the SSBLUP accuracies were 39% and 33% higher, respectively for reproductive and lactation traits. The results indicate that the SSBLUP methodology produces more accurate estimated breeding values for lactation and reproduction traits in pigs.
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2046735093</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2046735093</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_20467350933</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNi7sKAjEQAIMoeD7-YcH6IA_joxbFXhsrCbk9jZ7JuZvD31fQD7CaYmZ6olBW29KohemLQkqtytVK6aEYMd-kVNqubSHcIcRLgyVnbOGCMT2Ch5awCj6HFMF535HzARnqRNA4n91XxAoIW0pV9y0zuZAZQoRTojtfAyFwevFEDGrXME5_HIvZbnvc7MvP--yQ8_mWOoofddZyvlgaK9fG_Fe9AdyTR4w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2046735093</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Single-step genomic prediction accuracies for lactation and reproduction traits in Yorkshire sows</title><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><creator>Thekkoot, D M ; Kemp, R A ; Boddicker, N J ; Plastow, G</creator><creatorcontrib>Thekkoot, D M ; Kemp, R A ; Boddicker, N J ; Plastow, G</creatorcontrib><description>Most economically important traits associated with lactation and reproduction in pigs are either less heritable, sex-limited, expressed later in life, or difficult to measure on a routine basis. Genomic predictions using single-step BLUP (SSBLUP) methodologies, which utilizes information on phenotypes, pedigree and markers from genotyped and non-genotyped animals simultaneously, is an alternative to phenotype and pedigree based (BLUP) methods. The objective of this study was to estimate and compare prediction accuracies for lactation and reproduction traits using SSBLUP and BLUP methods. Data from 2481 litters from 1431 Yorkshire sows farrowed between August 2011 and August 2015 were used in this study. Of these 1161 sows were genotyped using Illumina's Porcine SNP60 Bead Chip. The sows were weighed and scanned for back fat and loin depth before farrowing and at weaning. Piglets were weighed at birth, weaning and death. Feed consumption of each sow during lactation was measured using the Gestal feed recording system. Reproductive traits studied were total number born, number born dead, number alive at 24 h and number weaned. Lactation traits analyzed were average daily feed intake of sow during lactation, sow body weight, back fat and loin depth at farrowing, body weight, back fat and loin depth loss during lactation, and litter weight gain from birth to weaning. The training data included sows born before April 1, 2013, and validation data included sows (n = 242) born on or after April first 2013. BLUP breeding values for animals in the validation data were computed using all information from the test data plus pedigree information for animals in the validation data. Both SSBLUP and BLUP evaluations were computed using MiX99 software. Accuracies for animals in the validation data were estimated as the correlation between their estimated breeding values and phenotypes, corrected for fixed effects, divided by the square root of heritability of the trait. For all traits studied, prediction accuracies using SSBLUP were higher (0.23 to 0.84) than those from BLUP (0.18 to 0.72). On average the SSBLUP accuracies were 39% and 33% higher, respectively for reproductive and lactation traits. The results indicate that the SSBLUP methodology produces more accurate estimated breeding values for lactation and reproduction traits in pigs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8812</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-3163</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Champaign: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Animal reproduction ; Animal sciences ; Animals ; Birth ; Body weight ; Breeding ; Computation ; Correlation analysis ; Genotype &amp; phenotype ; Heritability ; Hogs ; Information processing ; Lactation ; Pedigree ; Phenotypes ; Reproduction ; Reproduction (biology) ; Suidae ; Swine ; Weaning</subject><ispartof>Journal of animal science, 2016-10, Vol.94, p.185-186</ispartof><rights>Copyright Oxford University Press, UK Oct 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Thekkoot, D M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kemp, R A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boddicker, N J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Plastow, G</creatorcontrib><title>Single-step genomic prediction accuracies for lactation and reproduction traits in Yorkshire sows</title><title>Journal of animal science</title><description>Most economically important traits associated with lactation and reproduction in pigs are either less heritable, sex-limited, expressed later in life, or difficult to measure on a routine basis. Genomic predictions using single-step BLUP (SSBLUP) methodologies, which utilizes information on phenotypes, pedigree and markers from genotyped and non-genotyped animals simultaneously, is an alternative to phenotype and pedigree based (BLUP) methods. The objective of this study was to estimate and compare prediction accuracies for lactation and reproduction traits using SSBLUP and BLUP methods. Data from 2481 litters from 1431 Yorkshire sows farrowed between August 2011 and August 2015 were used in this study. Of these 1161 sows were genotyped using Illumina's Porcine SNP60 Bead Chip. The sows were weighed and scanned for back fat and loin depth before farrowing and at weaning. Piglets were weighed at birth, weaning and death. Feed consumption of each sow during lactation was measured using the Gestal feed recording system. Reproductive traits studied were total number born, number born dead, number alive at 24 h and number weaned. Lactation traits analyzed were average daily feed intake of sow during lactation, sow body weight, back fat and loin depth at farrowing, body weight, back fat and loin depth loss during lactation, and litter weight gain from birth to weaning. The training data included sows born before April 1, 2013, and validation data included sows (n = 242) born on or after April first 2013. BLUP breeding values for animals in the validation data were computed using all information from the test data plus pedigree information for animals in the validation data. Both SSBLUP and BLUP evaluations were computed using MiX99 software. Accuracies for animals in the validation data were estimated as the correlation between their estimated breeding values and phenotypes, corrected for fixed effects, divided by the square root of heritability of the trait. For all traits studied, prediction accuracies using SSBLUP were higher (0.23 to 0.84) than those from BLUP (0.18 to 0.72). On average the SSBLUP accuracies were 39% and 33% higher, respectively for reproductive and lactation traits. The results indicate that the SSBLUP methodology produces more accurate estimated breeding values for lactation and reproduction traits in pigs.</description><subject>Animal reproduction</subject><subject>Animal sciences</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Birth</subject><subject>Body weight</subject><subject>Breeding</subject><subject>Computation</subject><subject>Correlation analysis</subject><subject>Genotype &amp; phenotype</subject><subject>Heritability</subject><subject>Hogs</subject><subject>Information processing</subject><subject>Lactation</subject><subject>Pedigree</subject><subject>Phenotypes</subject><subject>Reproduction</subject><subject>Reproduction (biology)</subject><subject>Suidae</subject><subject>Swine</subject><subject>Weaning</subject><issn>0021-8812</issn><issn>1525-3163</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNi7sKAjEQAIMoeD7-YcH6IA_joxbFXhsrCbk9jZ7JuZvD31fQD7CaYmZ6olBW29KohemLQkqtytVK6aEYMd-kVNqubSHcIcRLgyVnbOGCMT2Ch5awCj6HFMF535HzARnqRNA4n91XxAoIW0pV9y0zuZAZQoRTojtfAyFwevFEDGrXME5_HIvZbnvc7MvP--yQ8_mWOoofddZyvlgaK9fG_Fe9AdyTR4w</recordid><startdate>20161001</startdate><enddate>20161001</enddate><creator>Thekkoot, D M</creator><creator>Kemp, R A</creator><creator>Boddicker, N J</creator><creator>Plastow, G</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>U9A</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20161001</creationdate><title>Single-step genomic prediction accuracies for lactation and reproduction traits in Yorkshire sows</title><author>Thekkoot, D M ; Kemp, R A ; Boddicker, N J ; Plastow, G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_20467350933</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Animal reproduction</topic><topic>Animal sciences</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Birth</topic><topic>Body weight</topic><topic>Breeding</topic><topic>Computation</topic><topic>Correlation analysis</topic><topic>Genotype &amp; phenotype</topic><topic>Heritability</topic><topic>Hogs</topic><topic>Information processing</topic><topic>Lactation</topic><topic>Pedigree</topic><topic>Phenotypes</topic><topic>Reproduction</topic><topic>Reproduction (biology)</topic><topic>Suidae</topic><topic>Swine</topic><topic>Weaning</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Thekkoot, D M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kemp, R A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boddicker, N J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Plastow, G</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Career &amp; Technical Education Database</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Complete (ProQuest Database)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library (ProQuest Database)</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Thekkoot, D M</au><au>Kemp, R A</au><au>Boddicker, N J</au><au>Plastow, G</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Single-step genomic prediction accuracies for lactation and reproduction traits in Yorkshire sows</atitle><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle><date>2016-10-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>94</volume><spage>185</spage><epage>186</epage><pages>185-186</pages><issn>0021-8812</issn><eissn>1525-3163</eissn><abstract>Most economically important traits associated with lactation and reproduction in pigs are either less heritable, sex-limited, expressed later in life, or difficult to measure on a routine basis. Genomic predictions using single-step BLUP (SSBLUP) methodologies, which utilizes information on phenotypes, pedigree and markers from genotyped and non-genotyped animals simultaneously, is an alternative to phenotype and pedigree based (BLUP) methods. The objective of this study was to estimate and compare prediction accuracies for lactation and reproduction traits using SSBLUP and BLUP methods. Data from 2481 litters from 1431 Yorkshire sows farrowed between August 2011 and August 2015 were used in this study. Of these 1161 sows were genotyped using Illumina's Porcine SNP60 Bead Chip. The sows were weighed and scanned for back fat and loin depth before farrowing and at weaning. Piglets were weighed at birth, weaning and death. Feed consumption of each sow during lactation was measured using the Gestal feed recording system. Reproductive traits studied were total number born, number born dead, number alive at 24 h and number weaned. Lactation traits analyzed were average daily feed intake of sow during lactation, sow body weight, back fat and loin depth at farrowing, body weight, back fat and loin depth loss during lactation, and litter weight gain from birth to weaning. The training data included sows born before April 1, 2013, and validation data included sows (n = 242) born on or after April first 2013. BLUP breeding values for animals in the validation data were computed using all information from the test data plus pedigree information for animals in the validation data. Both SSBLUP and BLUP evaluations were computed using MiX99 software. Accuracies for animals in the validation data were estimated as the correlation between their estimated breeding values and phenotypes, corrected for fixed effects, divided by the square root of heritability of the trait. For all traits studied, prediction accuracies using SSBLUP were higher (0.23 to 0.84) than those from BLUP (0.18 to 0.72). On average the SSBLUP accuracies were 39% and 33% higher, respectively for reproductive and lactation traits. The results indicate that the SSBLUP methodology produces more accurate estimated breeding values for lactation and reproduction traits in pigs.</abstract><cop>Champaign</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-8812
ispartof Journal of animal science, 2016-10, Vol.94, p.185-186
issn 0021-8812
1525-3163
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2046735093
source Oxford Journals Online
subjects Animal reproduction
Animal sciences
Animals
Birth
Body weight
Breeding
Computation
Correlation analysis
Genotype & phenotype
Heritability
Hogs
Information processing
Lactation
Pedigree
Phenotypes
Reproduction
Reproduction (biology)
Suidae
Swine
Weaning
title Single-step genomic prediction accuracies for lactation and reproduction traits in Yorkshire sows
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T08%3A26%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Single-step%20genomic%20prediction%20accuracies%20for%20lactation%20and%20reproduction%20traits%20in%20Yorkshire%20sows&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20animal%20science&rft.au=Thekkoot,%20D%20M&rft.date=2016-10-01&rft.volume=94&rft.spage=185&rft.epage=186&rft.pages=185-186&rft.issn=0021-8812&rft.eissn=1525-3163&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2046735093%3C/proquest%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_20467350933%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2046735093&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true