The Effects of Consumer vs. Staff Administration on the Measurement of Consumer Satisfaction with Psychiatric Rehabilitation

The nearly uniform positive results of consumer satisfaction surveys call into question their utility as a viable outcome measure for psychiatric rehabilitation. Participants consistently exhibit this positive response tendency regardless of the quality of service being rated. A particular concern i...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Psychiatric rehabilitation journal 1998, Vol.21 (4), p.365-370
Main Authors: Gill, Kenneth J, Pratt, Carlos W, Librera, Lue Ann
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Client Satisfaction
Female
Human
Male
Patient satisfaction
Psychiatric Patients
Psychiatry
Psychological tests
Rehabilitation
Response Bias
Test Administration
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The nearly uniform positive results of consumer satisfaction surveys call into question their utility as a viable outcome measure for psychiatric rehabilitation. Participants consistently exhibit this positive response tendency regardless of the quality of service being rated. A particular concern is that staff administration of these measures may bias results in a positive direction. Using two different satisfaction instruments, members of seven psychiatric rehabilitation day programs were randomly assigned to either staff administration or administration by fellow consumers. It was predicted that consumer-administered questionnaires would have lower scores. The results showed that consumer administration did not uniformly result in lower ratings. Instead, a statistically significant interaction of administrator (staff vs. consumers) by program was found. The findings suggested that the personnel who administer these surveys do affect satisfaction scores, but these effects systematically vary from program to program.
ISSN:1095-158X
1559-3126
DOI:10.1037/h0095287